|
| RECENTLY-COMMENTED SERMONS | More | Last Post | Total |
· Page 1 · Found: 60 user comments posted recently. |
| |
|
|
8/10/15 4:17 PM |
Wow | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
What an edifying news thread with so many mature civil responses one to another...I thought this was an adult Christian site where one could go and engage with common courtesy and civility...instead it reads like a schoolyard slugfest. |
|
|
12/18/14 3:52 AM |
Wow | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Folks: The Reason Why I Said "GOD HIMSELF, VIA THE 'DREAM', FORE-WARNED ME HOW FAR THE HELL-SPAWNED & "JE[W]SUIT"-PUSHED CORRUPTED-ALEXANDRIAN-/-EGYPTIAN-/-SATANIC~VATICAN APOSTACIZING "N.T."-GREEK-MANUSCRIPTS & 'BIBLE'-PERVERSIONS HAD REACHED EVEN TO THE VERY PASTOR & CHURCH I ATTENDED !";Is; Because, I Can Remember Back In The 1980s--While Sitting Before Br.-Dr. Pastor Wayne Van Gelderen Sr. As He Sat In The Church Office One Sunday Afternoon--Him Chuckling & Telling Me How The Church Congregation At THE MARQUETTE MANOR BAPTIST CHURCH (DOWNERS GROVE, IL, U.S.A.) Thinks That He Uses THE KING JAMES BIBLE When He Preaches; When, In Actuality & FACT He Uses THE ***J.N. "DARBY" TRANSLATION OF THE "BIBLE (WHICH IS BASED ON THE WESTCOTT-&-HORT CORRUPTED ALEXANDRIAN-/-EGYPTIAN-/-SATANIC~VATICAN-APOSTATE-"N.T."-'GREEK'-MANUSCRIPTS )" *** ! HISTORICALLY, THE J.N. DARBY-'BIBLE' TRANSLATION IS JUST ANOTHER "JE[W]SUIT"-PUSHED 'TRANSLATION' OF THE 'BIBLE': WHICH NOT ONLY CHOPS-OUT THE HISTORIC AUTHORIZED ENGLISH (KING JAMES) HOLY BIBLE'S VERSE OF ***I JOHN 5:7***; BUT, ALSO SAYS IN IT'S (DARBY'S) I TIMOTHY 3:16 "And *Confessedly*" INSTEAD OF WHAT GOD, THE HOLY GHOST-/-SPIRIT HAS SAID SINCE ST. PAUL PENNED IT AS "And Without *Controversy* " IN THE FIRST CENTURY A.D. ! ! ! |
|
|
12/18/14 1:12 AM |
Wow | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Now, You May Ask, Why In The World Would A Protestant Christian Fundamentalist Baptist Pastor--Like Br.-Dr. Wayne Van Gelderen Sr. Was--As Baptists Have Historically REJECTED Rome's, Romanist's &-Or The SATANIC~VATICAN'S Vestments, Costumes & Etc.--Would EVER Want To Preach Wearing An ANGLICAN PRIEST'S GOWN, ROBE, VESTMENT, COSTUME & ETC. ?#1-One Needs To Understand Why GOD HIMSELF Gave Me That "STONE-DUNGEON-/-SARCOFAGUS-DAGGER DREAM" Back In 1980 In The First Place. As Time & Historic FACTS Have Already Revealed To Me The REASON For The "DREAM" -&- IT'S INTERPRETATION ! As The 'REASON' For THE 'DREAM' Being A SPIRITUAL FORE-WARNING TO ME, FROM THE LORD GOD-/-CHRIST HIMSELF, As To HOW DEEP-SEATED &-OR DEEPLY ENGRAINED-/-ENGRAVED THE SATANIC~VATICAN "JE[W]SUITS" HAVE INFILTRATED, INFLUENCED &-OR AFFECTED-/-EFFECTED HISTORIC U.S. AMERICAN PROTESTANT CHRISTIAN FUNDMENTALISM-/-EVANGELICALISM: ESPECIALLY NON-DENOMINATIONAL INDEPENDENT-BAPTIST AMERICAN PROTESTANT CHRISTIAN FUNDAMENTALISM-/-EVANGELICALISM ! AND HOW GOD HIMSELF, VIA THE 'DREAM', FORE-WARNED ME HOW FAR THE HELL-SPAWNED & "JE[W]SUIT"-PUSHED CORRUPTED-ALEXANDRIAN-/-EGYPTIAN-/-SATANIC~VATICAN APOSTACIZING "N.T."-GREEK-MANUSCRIPTS & 'BIBLE'-PERVERSIONS HAD REACHED EVEN TO THE VERY PASTOR & CHURCH I ATTENDED ! |
|
|
12/17/14 10:31 PM |
Wow | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Take a good look at the archbishop's lavish pompous vestments & costume.Looks like it came straight out of an Egyptian Pharaoh's closet ! Makes the 'pope' of Rome's religious costume look quite humble--but looks can be very, very deceiving too. And, did you see his face ? -- Especially his eyes ? Wow ! He looks like a cloned-cross between Hitler's 'pope', Pius XII, and 'pope' Paul VI (The Vatican's 'pope' & Secretary Of State [1922-1954] who politically 'legitimized' Hitler & Mussolini) ! This Egyptian-Pharaoh-Vatican-Mystery Babylon Looking Prelate-/-Pastor (?) Reminds Me Of A GOD-sent Dream I Had About My Former Protestant-Christian Fundamentalist-Baptist Pastor In 1980: Pastor Br.-Dr. Wayne Van Gelderen Sr. ! In The Dream I Found Myself In A Huge Stone-Cut Dungeon-Like Underground Catacomb-Looking Room &-Or Subterranean "Chapel"; With Altar, Platform &-Or Pulpit. To The Pulpit's Left (My Right) Lay A Huge Egyptian-Looking Sarcofagus Or Tomb. And, Standing Behind The Pulpit Was My Pastor At The Time, Dr. Wayne Van Gelderen Sr.: Preaching & Dressed In An ANGLICAN PRIEST'S ROBE, GARMENT, VESTMENT &-OR COSTUME ! & Suddenly The Sarcofagus's Stone Top Opened & An Arm Came Out Holding A DAGGAR ! The Arm Was Dressed Like A SPANISH CONQUISTADOR'S ! |
|
|
1/19/14 2:49 PM |
Wow | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Now whose "infallible?" "Pope John Paul II, in an address to the bishops of the USA (Region II), during their Ad limina visit in 1988, commented on this very text of Dei Verbum no.10 to define more clearly the scope of this Magisterium: "This Magisterium is not above the divine word but serves it with a specific carisma veritatis certum (ibid., no.8), which includes the charism of infallibility, present not only in the solemn definitions of the Roman Pontiff and of Ecumenical Councils, but also in the universal ordinary Magisterium (L.G. no.25), which can truly be considered as the usual expression of the Church's infallibility" (Address, 15 October 1988, (no.4), in L'Osservatore Romano, 24 October 1988). This authoritative interpretation of the teaching of L.G. no.25 on the universal ordinary Magisterium has considerable implications for theology, moral and dogmatic, as well as for scriptural exegesis. (T.McGovern) Wow!! And Francis is worried about a bank? With all that power? |
|
|
7/24/13 3:06 PM |
wow | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Mike wrote: Just curious, where did that adversary go when he was cast out of heaven? Hmmm? Never thought about it Mike. Here is a couple of choices. 1) He became an Arminian and lives in New York? 2) 1Peter 5:8 Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour: = Sounds close to home eh! 2Cor 11:14 And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light. = In disguise too. Why? to confound and confuse the mortals. Therefore he is close to work his temptations on sinners. Job 1:7 says "And the LORD said unto Satan, Whence comest thou? Then Satan answered the LORD, and said, From going to and fro in the earth, and from walking up and down in it." = This teaches he has powers to pass from heaven to earth therefore on earth he will weave his evil web. Rev 12:8 And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven. 9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him. = This appears to place him on earth. But I'm speculating. |
|
|
5/10/13 5:52 PM |
wow | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
John Yurich USA wrote: No, I accept the entirety of the Heidelberg Catechism. I also accept Luther... 'It was early received in the Netherlands, and formally adopted at the Synod of Dort, 1618. Long and bitter controversies with Roman Catholics and Lutherans on the Catechism only endeared it the more to the Reformed. It is to this day an authoritative confession for the Reformed churches (German and Dutch). The (Dutch) Reformed Church directs all her ministers to explain the Catechism regularly before the congregations on the Sabbath day.' [URL=http://reformed.org/documents/index.html?mainframe=http://reformed.org/documents/heidelberg.html]]]The catechism here[/URL] Surprised Mr Yurich has kept his allegiance to the Reformed Faith so quiet? How many of these Reformed sermons on SA has he listened too? [URL=http://www.sermonaudio.com/search.asp?currsection=sermonstopic&keyword=the+Heidelberg+Catechism]]]SermonAudio sermons on HC[/URL] [URL=http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=320132250302]]]Righteous by faith alone[/URL] [URL=http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=112410135650]]]Luther's Bondage of the will[/URL] The above Luther Bible teaching is your own John Yurich Astonishing-wow! |
|
|
1/6/12 10:30 AM |
Wow | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Not your pope wrote: 1. The Trinity is or is not correct? 2. Jesus is or is not fully man and fully God? 3. Sola Fide is or is not correct? 4. The Bible canon is 66 or is 73 books? __________________ 1. Protestant Oneness Pentecostal leaders deny the Trinity. 2. Protestant leaders of all stripes (including many Reformed leaders) deny that Mary is the Mother of God, thus they deny that Jesus is both fully man and fully God. 3. Protestant Mennonite leaders deny Sola Fide, "The article upon which the Church stands or falls" (Luther). 4. Protestant 1611 AV translators noted in the cover page: "[All 73 books of the Bible are] appointed to be read in churches." By whose authority do you resolve these major doctrinal disagreements? Okay. When I have time later, we'll do the same exercise with the differences within Roman Catholicism. Let's see how well your church fares, even with a humanly appointed Pope. |
|
|
1/4/12 8:40 PM |
Wow | | | |
|
Thread closed Report abuse
|
Not your pope wrote: Let's start with an easy one: Paedo v. Credo Baptism. I am glad you started with an easy one The answer is Credo is right. What the Paedos do is take their own unbiblical interpretation of the redundant imagery of the OT, which was meant only vaguely to foreshadow the substance to come, and then force the NT into this matrix insisting that the Old and New Covenants are the same. But, read for instance Galatians and you will see that the contrast of the Old and New is such that the 2 are nothing alike. The old is beggerly, redundant, foreshadowed the New, was a works covenant etc. The Paedos will never understand words like "For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel", "And think not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, that God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham" etc. I came to this by comparing scripture with scripture. I came to realise that the NT presents clear light, whereas the OT was vague and misty pointing to something profoundly different to come. So in correct biblical interpretation the clear light of the NT must interpret the vagueness of the OT; the vague should never interpret the clear as the Paedos do! |
|
|
|
Jump to Page : [1] 2 3 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|