It was very easy for the scientists to know that the Voyager had left the solar system, because the Chamber of Commerce for Pluto no doubt put out a sign saying "You are now leaving the Sunny Sol solar system. You all come back soon đ "
One has to wonder if it would be acceptable for the Indian christians to turn on their persecutors in self defense. They're not the government after all, just an angry mob very possibly looking for an excuse to rob the christians and practice cruelty for it's own sake. I'd certainly be grabbing the nearest hard object and making some sort of defense. Especially if less able family and friends were involved.
I often wonder if we would have the same spiritual fortitude the Chinese church is maintaining in the midst of such persecutions. It won't surprise me if we get to answer that question with first-hand experience some day in this very naughty nation.
I don't know about the odometer on that gadget but every inch of the wings had duck feathers pasted all over 'em for extra speed and lift. I heard that they send out these probes just to be sure our planetary neighbors ain't inhabited by rednecks, hillbillies, or hicks. Of course, the probes would've never survived an encounter anyway on account of being scrapped on the spot. And who knows? Someone like our friend from Rhode Island might mistake one for a shopping cart and move in.
On a more serious note, this is interesting from a scientific perspective.
At the end of the day Jim, if one doesnât bare witness to the facts of reflecting & showing the imputed righteousness of Christ being the only saving merit one can have. Only the Blood of Christ is sufficient alone, in being greater than the stains of ones rebellion against Christ.
It doesnât matter how many friends one has, if Christ is ones greatest foe in their life. As one truly has nothing if they arenât born again from up above alone.
For all other soil is sinking sand apart from, no King but Christ Alone amen.
May God have saving regenerating mercies on your soul Jim, for tomorrow isnât owed or guaranteed too know one ever amen!
Jim Lincoln wrote: Sounds like a bunch of globalists to me â
Not quite in the way in the contemporary way that the term "globalist" is used, Jim. Actually, the Lord established a new people, a new ethnic group of sorts, not based on the color of skin, shape of eyes or features, but on the color of their heart.
So while the church universal of Jesus Christ is a global and timeliness entity, it does not stop us from being concerned with the nations in which we find ourselves. Romans 13 applies.
(TMC) âIf only leaders like Macron and Merkel would take time to read the Bible they would quickly discover that the God who made us and placed us on this planet isn't a globalist but a NATIONALIST!!â
âSounds like a bunch of globalists to meâ
Umm... No. God is not a Globalist or a Nationalist. (Nor a Republican or a Democrat for that matter) God is the Sovereign Ruler of the Entire Globe AND Individual Nations. He establishes Nations and tears them down on a Global scale. He currently uses them to advance His will, but upon His return, they will pass away. He is God of the entirety and the particulars at the same time!
The "climate change" issue is just another trick by the left to take control of the US...
They love scary questions like...
SCARE:"Co2 emissions are going destroy the earth"
ANSWERlants eat Co2. If the Co2 levels were lower than they are today, we would have a massive plant die off (just look at the interstate median, they should be mini deserts if co2 is bad).
SCARE: "The sweet little polar bears are dying off"
ANSWER: There are more polar bears alive today than in the 70s, according to LIBERAL scientist.
SCARE: "The earth is getting hotter and hotter"
ANSWER: If we were able to "cool" the world off, you can say goodbye to the large "breadbasket" areas of the world. Canada, Russia, and parts of the US would be mostly frozen. That would just cause mass famines and large population die off (off course the Libs would probably like that anyway).
The climate change stuff is absolute nonsense... âïžđ.....âïžđ
Nancy Pelosi is the one you have to start worrying about not, not Congress women from New York â
ABC Radio Online wrote: ... Taylor Griffin, a spokeswoman for Pelosi reiterated that âaddressing climate change remains a top priorityâ for Pelosi.
âShe has proposed reinstating a select committee on climate and looks forward to caucus-wide discussions with the committees of jurisdiction to determine the appropriate path forward,â Griffin stated....
--"Activists again demand New Green Deal; stage demonstration at Dem leaders' office"
[ https://tinyurl.com/ybkvk2bs ]
As the above article pointed out congresswoman-elect Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-New York, visited but did not participate in this demonstration.
I think the writers for the "New German" should use their heads more and their eyes less when thinking up stories.
Who's in control? You can say that again,Adriel considering the results of 2016 electionâđ
Hey Bro US Sorry for the delay on my end. I see what your saying. When Paul addresses the contentions, he mentions earlier on one in particular.
1 cor 2:4...my preaching was not with enticing words of man's wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power: 1 Cor 2:5 That your faith should not stand in the wisdom of men, but in the power of God.
and goes on to say
1 Cor 3:9 For we are labourers together with God
1 Cor 3:21 Therefore let no man glory in men.
1 Cor 5:7 Purge out therefore the old leaven
Purging the wisdom that taught dead works(Heb 9:14)...
1 Cor 5:8 with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth.
Simple enough right?
But Paul heard (1 Cor 6:1-6)believers were going to unbelievers(Pharisees) for answers and They didn't reason from Scriptures like Paul(Acts 17:2), they reasoned from traditions.
So when Paul cites Deut. 25:4, he is answering those who were examining him(1 Cor. 9:3) and says that is the same thing he is saying in verse 7 and in verse 10.
9:10 that he that ploweth should plow in hope; and that he that thresheth in hope should be partaker of his hope.
So I think The pharisees were muzzling the gospel Paul preached and were not (believers)partakers of the same hope Paul preached.