I did not say that murdering Servatus was right, acceptable, I said, "it was a crime worthy of death (by the law of the land)"
noticed that I said, "by the law of the land" I did not say, "By the New Testament"

"As far as David is concerned, that was a God ordained theocracy under the Old Covenant, a new Covenant is now in force that the scriptures make clear is not like the Old. It is all now of the heart, and the spirit. No, you can keep your Calvinism, I'll stick to the New Testament thank you."

You completely missed the point and I hope people can see that, both David and Calvin were saved, and both killed someone.

"Romans 8:6-8 KJV

[6] For to be carnally minded is death; but to be spiritually minded is life and peace.

[7] Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.

[8] So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God.

I think many IFB churches are indeed preaching/teaching heresy, and anti gospel things (non-lordship salvation, carnal Christian, modalism, partialism, etc.)

And unbiblical traditions (sinner's prayer, invitation, 1,2,3 pray after me, etc.) If you question the validity of Reformed Baptists, I would greatly encourage you to question IFB churches.

And as they went to tell his disciples, behold, Jesus met them, saying, All hail. And they came and held him by the feet, and worshipped him.

[10] Then said Jesus unto them, Be not afraid: go tell my brethren that they go into Galilee, and there shall they see me.

[11] Now when they were going, behold, some of the watch came into the city, and shewed unto the chief priests all the things that were done.

[12] And when they were assembled with the elders, and had taken counsel, they gave large money unto the soldiers,

[13] Saying, Say ye, His disciples came by night, and stole him away while we slept.

[14] And if this come to the governor's ears, we will persuade him, and secure you.

That may sound extreme but if we got into a time machine and went to 1776 and told George Washington, "Hey, in the future, men can self identify as women, and men can marry men and women can marry women, and they'll teach sex education to 5 year olds, and it'll be legal to kill unborn children" that would sound really extreme to him, but it's a reality.

@Jim, I've offered to debate you 5x and you've declined, many folk, such as yourself, know that if you were to attempt to defend your position in a debate you would lose. I've pointed out in the past that you set up this straw man that speaking out against abortion is a strictly political issue, when in reality it is our God given duty to defend the innocent,

furthermore you appeal to authority and you misrepresent John MacAuthur's position. Now Jim, this next concept is really complex so listen closely: Liberals don't care about the gospel, liberals proclaim homosexuality, transgenderism, killing certain humans, etc. So you have a false analogy.

How about calling out Richard Dawkins, Michael Shermer, Laurance Krauss for their remarks out Christians? How about calling out India for kicking Compassion International out of India, or call out Barak Obama for making racist remarks, or Hillary Clinton for her remarks against Americans, and we can go on and on