|
|
USER COMMENTS BY DR. PHIL |
|
|
Page 1 | Page 2 · Found: 494 user comments posted recently. |
| | | |
|
|
8/13/08 8:33 AM |
Dr. Phil | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Wayne wrote: ". . .the best that they can come up with is 'he is un-American, un-patriotic, he has a funny name, he is a muslim, he has no experience, his wife doesn't love America,' etc." This is laughable! If this is the best that they have, it sounds like enough to me (except for the "funny name" unless this goes with his being a Muslim). Neither does it sound like anything to laugh about, because if this type of individual gets to be elected to the highest office in the land, he could bring us to sorrow. |
|
|
8/8/08 8:25 AM |
Dr. Phil | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Jethro wrote: I know Evangelicals, of which I am one, are not renowned for paying attention to the original Bible languages, but it isn't rocket science to discover that the two Greek words 'arsenokoites' and 'malakos', imported into some modern English translations of the Bible as meaning 'homosexual', don't actually mean that at all. Even if they did, singling out homosexuality for special treatment is not only unfair, but misses Paul's point completely. Having done that elemetary homework, I fully understand why Rowan Williams believes the Bible doesn't forbid all same-sex relationships. Surely, he MUST be faithful to what he believes Scripture genuinely teaches, and not be swayed by what men try to tell him it teaches, even if these men are the Evangelical establishment. Jethro,You would be wise to listen to your son-in-law (Moses) and believe what Scripture genuinely teaches, and not be swayed by what men (e.g. Rowan Williams) try to tell you it teaches, even if these men are the Evangelical establishment. |
|
|
8/5/08 3:23 PM |
Dr. Phil | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
KK wrote: . .............................................. ... You're 110% Right !!! I only posted that link to show where "User Comment #36" came from ------- I don't believe Obama is affraid of himself, but I do believe he is the most unqualified, puffed up, arrogant, dangerously twisted, damnably perverse, anti-American, agenda driven individual "We" have ever seen run for the seat of the Presidency ... it says a great deal about the condition of America ... it says a great deal about the Democratic Party !!! "We The People" best wake up !!! --- How much more will "We" take ??? When I look at Obama, John Kerry, Ted Kennedy, Hillary Clinton and so many others in DC I just get visions of Hitler, Satan and Hell itself... By no means do I think McCain is the right man for the job, but in light of the alternative he will have to do --- AND "We" MUST BE EVER WATCHFUL TO SEE THAT McCain WALKS THE STRAIGHT AND NARROW !!! Have a great day !!! "IN" Christ, KK I knew that was what you were doing. I apologize if it appeared that I was responding to you. I appreciated the post. Also, you are right about McCain. |
|
|
8/5/08 10:42 AM |
Dr. Phil | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Dan Finney wrote: . . . Your Pharasaic hatred and fear is overshadowing your Christian love. Dan,Pardon me, but it appears that your "Christian love" is overshadowing your better judgment and discernment of Barak Obama. He has expressed enough of his mind to indicate where his true loyalties rest, and where he intends to take this country. He only says enough of what people want to hear to gain their confidence. It will be too late to do anything about it once he is in the White House. "MARK THEM WHICH CAUSE DIVISIONS CONTRARY TO THE DOCTRINE WHICH YOU HAVE LEARNED; AND AVOID THEM." ROMANS 16:17 Barak Obama's Black Liberation Theology is contrary to Biblical Doctrine. [URL=http://www.sermonaudio.com/new_details3.asp?ID=16824]]]The Influence of BLT On Barak Obama[/URL] |
|
|
7/27/08 5:07 PM |
Dr. Phil | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
lyn wrote: Jodie, again, what is a neutral site one could go to to verify these healings? Just because Bentley 'claims' proof is not proof. Even demonic spirits can perform signs and wonders; what message is Todd preaching with his healing? Does it line up word for word with scripture? Did you read the article, if not, why not? I must correct an earlier post of mine, this couple traveled their home in Texas to Denton, Texas, just outside of Dallas. Their son was turned away at their request for healing because he didn't 'look the part'. HOW DO YOU DEFEND THIS? Can Bentley only heal certain people who look like they can be healed? I am not questioning your salvation, I am questioning your upholding Bentley's teachings and healings, so there's no need to repeatedly remind everyone of that. I repeat my questions, what message does he preach, and if he has power to heal, how do you defend turning away a 7 year old autistic child for healing? Lyn,You are right. In the book of Revelation, the word "miracle" is used three times, and in each case it has a negative connotation regarding deception. For example, read revealtion 13 and 16 carefully. Some translations try to soften up the meaning by replacing "miracle" with the word "sign". |
|
|
7/26/08 9:54 AM |
Dr. Phil | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
John Yurich wrote: That is totally false that Catholics are loyal to the Pope. I am a Catholic and I am not loyal to the Pope. I do not pay attention to anything that the Pope says. Where do you come up with this nonsense that the Pope claims to have authority over all churches, not just the Catholic Church? I do not believe that the Pope has authority over any other church but the Catholic Church. I believe that the Pope is just the earthly leader of the Catholic Church. Your comments reveal that the Protestants here know more about RCC tenets than you do. You should study more carefully before making such statements since you are in agreement with the RCC. |
|
|
7/26/08 6:49 AM |
Dr. Phil | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Lance Eccles wrote: Of course it comes from the RCC, and of course I defend the RCC, the only authority with the right to interpret the scriptures. Others may think that they have some personal right to interpret scripture for themselves, but they contradict one another, and only sow confusion. What gives the RCC the authority to interpret the scriptures when the Apostle Paul said that "the Holy Spirit teacheth us comparing spiritual things to spiritual."? In 1 Cor. 2, he mentions nothing about "the church" being the sole authority to interpret scripture.Moreover, you forgot mention how "the RCC" contradicts the scriptures that they say they have the sole authority to interpret. For example, what contradiction do we see in the interpretation of: "There is only one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus." Yet the RCC interprets this clear teaching to mean that there is a multitude of mediators - Mary, the saints, the priests, the Pope, etc. etc. PS: You did not answer my question regarding yours and the RCC's interpretation of the doctrine of Grace. "All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction in righteousness, That the man of God may be perfect. . ."2Tim. 3:16 |
|
|
7/25/08 9:29 PM |
Dr. Phil | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Lance Eccles wrote: The lies are a way of rejecting God's grace.Or as another writer, Voltaire, said regarding the RCC: "Lie, lie, lie. Some of it will stick." Lance,The Grace of God is a gift wherein faith and repentance are granted to turn men away from rejecting the gospel to belief of the truth. (Eph. 2:1-9) Now, this logically means that men have not received grace if they persist in rejection. Therefore, your wrong view of grace indicates that you have believed the lie regarding the grace of God. Where does your training come from but the RCC that you persist in defending? Now, who is the liar? PS: Did Voltaire the liar really say this "regarding the RCC"? Sir Richard Francis Burton once said, "Indeed he knows not how to know who knows not also how to unknow". |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|