GG wrote:
Sorry Dr Phil I didn't see . . .

GG wrote:
Frankly...I'm stunned and bemused. Dr Phil asserts that many un-named Protestant Pastors are dropping like flies to the omniverous killer frenzy of Jesuit blood lust. Can it be? Is any Prot man of the clergy safe from the bloody depredation of that gang of Papal cut-throats? Will a scarlet wave of a murder be sweeping across Chrisendom like a modern day horde of Gengis Kan? Who Knows? Does SA concern itself with the truth or the injustice of accusations that could stir up recriminations and revenge? Nope! But, they will silence me for trying to shine the cold light of logic on what is a bald-faced, cold-hearted lie. Yes...this really is a Protestant sight...isn't it!

I thank Jim Lincoln for sharing with us this link. This clearly substantiates my claims about the Jesuits out of their own mouths. Therefore, after you have read this (if you care anything about learning truth) please consider a retraction for comments against me.

GG wrote:
"The 'mysterious' deaths of many protestant ministers have been at the hands of blood thirsty Jesuits. They are the licensed to kill secret agents of the Roman Church-State."
Holy Cow Dr. Phil...do you actually believe this stuff? You are supposedly an educated man? Or is this your way of providing a plausible excuse for violence against Catholics? Lets not go down this road....shall we!!!!!!! First, you must have proof otherwise this could border on murder some day!!!!! Where are the moderators? This ought to violate one of your rules...don't you think?

Neil wrote:
I dispute this point. If they were really Jesuits, then I would've expected less ignorance of published Catholic doctrine, more historical erudition, & more logical argumentation. Time & again I have cited their own Catechism etc. to them, which I shouldn't have to do towards a professional. If Jesuits are half as bright as Protestant conspiracy-theorists believe, I'd have to work a lot harder with these fellows.
No, I think they're just "good Catholics" who enjoy contending here. That's the most I can infer here.

My good friend whom I have been greatly encourage by much you have written often. I must sadly take issue with you here. Do not be decieved! Jesuits are more than "good Catholics" who enjoy contending on this site. They may be ignorant of sound doctrine, but they are masters of subversive tactics. The downfall of many Protestant churches has occured because of the infiltration of Jesuit priests into the Protestant Pulpit. The "mysterious" deaths of many protestant ministers have been at the hands of blood thirsty Jesuits. They are the licensed to kill secret agents of the Roman Church-State.

Texas may demand faith in Darwinism, but God commands repentance. This could be why Texas' judgment flows across the Rio Grande.

Lance Eccles wrote:
Al Mohler's view is very clear and objective.
He is very definitely on one side of the theological divide, and yet he can see things with the utmost clarity.
I like him.

Lance Eccles wrote:
In other words: "God isn't worth going to all this fuss for." A typical Puritan view.

bro M wrote:
Part II:
Yet this article gives the impression that reformation in doctrine coming forth from Rome would change how Christians view Rome. NEVER for there is no change for the Mother of Harlots any more than there is for the father of lies. The Scriptures are clear that Mystery Babylon will never change her ways as the call is for God's people to come out from her, NOT to reform her or to look for reformation coming forth from her walls! For Rome cannot change her true colors any more than the Ethiopian can his skin, or the leopard his spots. And any changes perceived to come forth from her is nothing more than a cleaning of the outside of the cup so as to further deceive the masses.
It is high time for evangelicals to be as bold, brilliant and incisive as Rome lest more become deceived and fall prey to her charms and seductive lies.

Michael Hranek wrote:
"this also applies to 'liberal' denominations who openly disobey the Word of God too."

Also, if the Pope really believed the admonition of holding fast to scripture, it would be the downfall of him and the RCC. He knows that he has but a short time. . . that wound of one of its heads has already happened with the Reformation. (Rev. 13:3)

If Esau could tell you the truth, he would be a good one to ask. Rom. 9:13

GG wrote:
KJV, NIV...whats the difference?. All of them are incomplete and found wanting. The Textus Receptus used part of the Latin Vulgate to fill in where Erasmus' sources were missing. Douay Rheims...now there is a real and complete (contains the Deuts) bible.

This is the Bible we are talking about here, and the Bible alone is the Word of God. What would you prefer to be your source of objective truth - "infallible church tradition"? We have seen where that has taken us - into tyranny!

Loser wrote:
Greed has driven the version craze.
The ESV is no exception, I have read it cover to cover twice, and it is poor when compared to the original. What are these men like Piper thinking?
I thank God for the day I returned to the KJV. Let us be united. Let us use the KJV in our meetings, and writings.

Neil wrote:
"Some GPS's are better than others."
Undoubtedly, but are you implying that any can warn of low clearances on a route?

Dr. Phil wrote:
"We will absolutely exclude paedophiles from the sacred ministry," he told reporters aboard the plane taking them to Washington for his first visit to the United States as pope.
"We are deeply ashamed and will do whatever is possible so that this does not happen in the future."

Fallacious Quote from the AG office:
"According to the Archdiocese's own file, 789 victims have complained of sexual abuse by members of the clergy; the acutal number of vitims is no doubt higher. The evidence to date also reveals that 250 priests and church workers stand accuse of acts of rape or sexual assault of children. This widespread assault on children has occurred for at least six decades under the administration of three successive AB's. . .

Reasons for not prosecuting:
A) The investigation of the AG office did not produce evidence of recent or ongoing sexual abuse.
B) Insufficient evidence to charge
C) No evidence that widespread abuse of children was due to institutional acceptance or a massive and pervasive failure of leadership."

by faith wrote:
by faith wrote:
Faith is nothing more than receiving a gift. It is not a work. It is a response to the call of God. God warns depraved man and gives him the free will to accept or reject His gift. Saving faith looks away from self to Christ.
One example:
Romans 4:2 For if Abraham were justified by works, he hath whereof to glory; but not before God.
3 For what saith the scripture? Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness.
Dr Phil wrote
Do the verses you quote define the faith of God as "receiving a gift" or a "response to the call of God"? No,
The real answer is yes
Gal 3
13 Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree:
14 That the blessing of Abraham might come on the Gentiles through Jesus Christ; that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith.

"We are deeply ashamed and will do whatever is possible so that this does not happen in the future."

"With whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication, and the inhabitants of the earth have been made drunk with the wines of her fornication." Revelation 17:2