|
|
USER COMMENTS BY HISTORY |
|
|
| RECENTLY-COMMENTED SERMONS | More | Last Post | Total |
· Page 1 · Found: 16 user comments posted recently. |
|
|
3/18/16 7:53 PM |
History | | Comics | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
, in Did Muhammad Exist?, Robert Spencer uncovers that material’s surprisingly shaky historical foundations. Spencer meticulously examines historical records, archaeological findings, and pioneering new scholarship to reconstruct what we can know about Muhammad, the Qur’an, and the early days of Islam. The evidence he presents challenges the most fundamental assumptions about Islam’s origins.Just as Patrick's bio sources Islam — like Judaism and Christianity –deserves to be scrutinized and appropriately examined. Spencer maintains that Islam, unlike the other massive faith systems, has never truly been given the academic attention and examination it deserves. Like Christianity, he maintains that the faith is one that “deserve[s] historical scrutiny.” “This [newest book is] something that I started to think about when I wrote the biography of Muhammad in 2006,” Spencer told The Blaze. Naturally, considering the book’s title, I asked him to divulge — Did Muhammad exist? His response was quick, condensed and to the point. Did Muhammad Exist? This Is Robert Spencers Shocking Answer “Well, no. If you mean the prophet of Islam who was purported to receive revelations from Allah that were put into the Koran. No, that guy certainly did not exist,” he boldly proclaimed. |
|
|
6/17/15 2:57 PM |
history | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
John UK wrote: Another nonconformist? How delightful. Any others out there? Don't forget John, Puritans were the original Nonconformists - You know good Biblical Calvinists. Not these save yourself salvationists like the Arminian fraternity. |
|
|
6/18/14 4:21 PM |
History | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
John UK wrote: Leave Iraq alone to sort out their own mess! They have lots of experience in doing that. And note the *British Empire* had a hand in it."Arabs have been the majority of the population in Iraq since the Sassanid Empire,[6] which pre-dates the Muslim conquest of Mesopotamia. Iraq was successfully ruled by the Sumerian, Akkadian, Babylonian, Assyrian, Median, Achaemenid, Seleucid, Parthian and Sassanian empires during the Iron Age and Classical Antiquity, before Iraq was conquered by the Muslim Rashidun Caliphate in the 7th century, and became a center of the Islamic Golden Age during the medieval Abbasid Caliphate. After a series of invasions and conquest by the Mongols and Turks, Iraq fell under Ottoman rule in the 16th century, intermittently falling under Iranian Safavid and Mamluk control. Ottoman rule ended with World War I, and Iraq came to be administered by the *British Empire* until the establishment of the Kingdom of Iraq in 1921. The Republic of Iraq was established in 1958 following a coup d'état." (Wiki) |
|
|
11/14/07 6:02 PM |
History | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Yamil; A present from a Baptist."Although no reputable Church historians have ever affirmed the belief that Baptists can trace their lineage through medieval and ancient sects ultimately to the New Testament, that point of view enjoys a large following nevertheless. It appears that scholars aware of this claim have deemed it unworthy of their attention, which may account for the persistence and popularity of Baptist successionism as a doctrine as well as an interpretation of church history. Aside from occasional articles and booklets that reject this teaching, no one has published a refutation in a systematic, documented format. The present work is an effort to supply this need so that Baptists may have a thorough analysis of successionism, together with a reliable account of their origins as a Protestant religious body." (McGoldrick, preface page iv) "It is the purpose of this book to show that, although free church groups in ancient and medieval times sometimes promoted doctrines and practices agreeable to modern Baptists, when judged by standards now acknowledged as baptistic, not one of them merits recognition as a Baptist church. Baptists arose in the seventeenth century in Holland and England. They are Protestants, heirs of the Reformers." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|