|
|
USER COMMENTS BY PAEDO-BEE |
|
|
| RECENTLY-COMMENTED SERMONS | More | Last Post | Total |
· Page 1 · Found: 3 user comments posted recently. |
|
|
11/19/06 7:24 AM |
Paedo-Bee | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Rudi from Australia Since you remarked that the "Anabaptist persecutions spoke volumes," to you, I thought I'd turn up the volume of history a little."All who were called Anabaptists were not Anabaptists. It was a general name for many classes of people, and the true Anabaptists had to suffer much for the sins of others. Many who went under this name, were Lutherans and other Pedobaptists, who had embraced certain fanatical opinions, and were denounced as Anabaptists. In reality they never embraced the Anabaptist faith at all. Fuslin very properly remarks: "There was a great difference between Anabaptists and Anabaptists. There were those among them who held strange doctrines; but this cannot be said of the whole sect. If we should attribute to every sect whatever senseless doctrines two or three fanciful fellows have taught, there is not one in the world to which we could not ascribe the most abominable errors." Beytrage Vol. II). It is certain, that many persons who were called Anabaptists were never such in reality; and it is also certain that many such practiced sprinkling." (J.T. Christian) So Pilgrim, it depends on whom you refer to, like all human history. Even parts of the historic Roman Catholic church practised immersion. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|