"a judge in Ohio affirmed the dismissal, arguing the university’s stated preference for “diversity” trumped Dixon’s constitutional rights."
Diversity over constitutional rights???
Doesn't that set a precedent to legitimise all "differences" in society regardless of the constitution?
Whereby criminal intent and activity is a "difference" of morals and lifestyle within the community which the constitution seeks to protect the people from. Does this then become a matter of "watch this space."