Jim Lincoln wrote: a] too many people buy an unreadable Bible, The [A] [V]ersion.
b] If the bought something like the NIV 1984
a] If you can read english then you can read the KING JAMES VERSION. Do they speak english in Nebraska?
b] NIV based on the roman catholic text and "interpreted" by dynamic equivalence - does not provide the word for word translation of the KING JAMES VERSION. Thus does it change the doctrines of Scripture.
1] NIV ~ Roman Catholic Greek text. 2] NIV ~ Greek interpretation of two Liberal Anglican heretics. 3] NIV ~ And after all this they add dynamic equivalence. 4] NIV ~ Is not the Word of God ~ It is the interpretation of a church called heretical who worships relics and dead people. The interpretation of Liberals. The interpretation of men who quote; "Dynamic equivalence (also known as functional equivalence) attempts to convey the thought expressed in a source text (if necessary, at the expense of literalness, original word order, the source text's grammatical voice, etc.)"