SITE NOTICE | MORE..Photo Album Improvements! The photo albums feature has been improved for all members to now include the ability to upload multiple photos via drag-and-drop with our new Media Uploader tool! .. click for more info!
Holy Spirit Directed Me to Write 'Killing Jesus,' Bill O'Reilly Says
Fox News anchor Bill O'Reilly said the Holy Spirit gave him the idea about and the title of the new book Killing Jesus, which he has co-authored with historian Martin Dugard, in the middle of one night.
"All of the ideas come to me in the middle of the night, and one night, I just woke up and it went, 'Killing Jesus,'" O'Reilly said in an interview on CBS' "60 Minutes" on Saturday.
"And I believe â because I'm a Catholic â that comes from the Holy Spirit. My inspiration comes from that. And so I wrote Killing Jesus because I think I was directed to write that," added O'Reilly in the interview with Norah O'Donnell that will air on Sunday evening.
O'Donnell asked O'Reilly if he thinks he's a chosen one. "I'm just one of many who have been given gifts," replied the anchor of "The O'Reilly Factor." "I can write. I can bloviate on TV. So I'm trying to use the gifts in a positive way. And I believe...
The fourth verse is 1 Peter 1:11. âSearching what, or what manner of time the Spirit of Christ which was in them did signify, when IT testified beforehand the sufferings of Christ, and the glory that should follow.â Versions that agree with the use of âitâ here are Alfords New Testament for English Readers 1868, Whiston's Primitive N.T. 1745, Noyes Translation 1869, the Revised Version of 1885, the American Standard Version of 1901 -"the Spirit of Christ which was in them did point unto, when IT testified beforehand", Websterâs translation 1833, the Berkeley Version 1969, Basic Bible in English 1960 - " the Spirit of Christ which was in them was pointing to, when IT gave witness to the pains which Christ would undergo", the New American Bible 1991, Douay-Rheims, the 1989 Revised English Version (Bruce Metzger), the NRSV of 1989, Modern Literal Version of the New Testament, 1999 by G. Allen Walker, the Context Group Version 2007, the Updated Bible Version 2003, the Evidence Bible (Ray Comfort) 2003, the Interlinear Hebrew-Greek Scriptures 2008 and the Revised English Version of 2010.
The third verse is Romans 8:26. âBut the Spirit ITSELF maketh intercession for us with groanings which cannot be uttered.â Again the 21st Century KJV 1994, the Emphatic Diaglott interlinear 1865, Alfordâs translation 1868, Noyes Translation 1869, the Bishopâs Bible 1568, the Geneva Bible 1599 and 1602, Daniel Mace's N.T 1729, Wesley's 1755 translation, Coverdale 1535, Whiston's Primitive N.T. 1745, Darby 1890, Websterâs 1833, Rotherham's Emphasized Bible 1902, The New Testament Translated from the Sinaitic Manuscript 1918 Henry Anderson, Goodspeed 1943, KJV 21st Century Version 1994, the Third Millenium Bible 1998, A Conservative Version 2001 and The Urim-Thummin Version 2001 all read like the KJB - "the Spirit ITSELF".
Romans 8:16. âThe Spirit ITSELF beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God.â Versions that agree with the KJB are the Bishopâs Bible 1568, Whiston's Primitive N.T. 1745, Webster's translation 1833, Alford's New Testament for English Readers 1868, Darby 1890, Rotherham's Emphasized Bible of 1902, The New Testament from the Sinaitic Manuscript 1918, Goodspeed 1943, The New American Bible 1991, the KJV 21st Century Version 1994, the Interlinear Greek N.T. by Larry Pierce 1997, the Lawrie Translation 1998, the Third Millenium bible of 1998, the NRSV of 1989, A Conservative Version 2001, the Urim-Thummin Version 2001, The Evidence Bible Ray Comfort 2002, the 21st Century Version 2002, The Faithful New Testament 2005, The Accurate New Testament 2008, The Apostolic Polyglot Bible, the Concordant Version 2006.
You have to use proper English. "IT" is neuter where the 'work' of the Holy Spirit is concerned. ie Gen 3:15, 1Jn 1:1 When dealing with the Holy Spirit/His Person (Jn14:16) masculine is used.
2 Corinthians 2:11 Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices.
I said it is your choice, I was wrong. You need to get into the Authorized Bible (KJV) and stay there and don't let anyone take it away from you. I had to study this issue because these devils tried to vandalize my faith. Praise Jesus He did help me.
These new Bibles ALL of the are Corruptions by the EMEMY. All of them, All of them BABELS. Confusion. They are keeping the Bible aways from yu again, just like they did in the dark ages!!!!!
John 1:32. âAnd John bare record, saying, I saw the Spirit descending like a dove, and IT abode upon him.â Other Bible versions that agree with the KJB in their use of âitâ are the Geneva Bible of 1599 and 1602, Bishops Bible 1568, Daniel Mace's N.T. 1729, Wesley's translation 1755, Whiston's Primitive N.T. 1745, Etheridge Translation 1849, Noyes Translation 1869, Emphatic Diaglott interlinear 1865, Darby 1870, Revised Version of 1881, American Standard Version of 1901, Rotherham's Emphasized Bible 1902, the Douay of 1950, Henry Alfordâs translation 1868, Youngâs 'literal' 1898, the 21st Century KJV of 1994, Williamâs New Testament 1937, Lamsa's translation of the Syriac 1933, Daniel Websterâs of 1833, the 20th Century New Testament, Weymouthâs translation of 1912, Goodspeedâs American translation 1943, the Amplified Bible 1987 Lockman Foundation -the 1998 Third Millenium Bible, the Revised Standard Version of 1952, the St. Joseph New American Bible 1970, the NRSV of 1989, the Worldwide English New Testament 1998, -"IT stayed on him.", Daniel Wallace's NET version (as of Nov. 7, 2012), the Mounce Reverse Interlinear N.T. 2011, the 2001 English Standard Version and the 2011 Common English Bible - "I saw the Spirit coming down from heaven like a dove, and IT rested on him."
You should be following Jesus Christ and not man. The pure WORD of GOD is "without comment." So your pride in your church kicking out the WORD of GOD and replacing it with mens ideas, should show you what kind of Church you're in. Follow men or Follow Jesus Christ. RE: The Apocrypha was not "mingled" with the 66 Books of the Sacred Scriptures. They were placed between the OT and NT. And warned these are not inspired books, and labeled it every page Apocrypha.
Jesus Himself declared the canon of the Scripture Mt 23:35.
They did not add old mother whores leaven in the Holy Bible. No mixing leaven throughout the Books.
But read your Jesuit BABEL and their words. Your choice. I suggest you study Mt 13. STUDY without mens notes. Try praying first and "ASK" the Holy Spirit to show you the prophetic truths from this parable.
The NKJV is corrupted with the USB. same as all BABELS. And they tampered with the text of the TR and used Jesuit text MIXING ALL together. CORRUPT BABEL that johnny mac prefers.
As I pointed out people who want to use the corrupted "Word" of God, known as the KJV should of course have it in electronic form, so you can have Strong's Concordance. In printed form, you can get something like the The Ryrie KJV Study Bible Hardcover Red Letter (Ryrie Study Bibles 2008). Unfortunately, he doesn't correct the Devil inspired writing of calling the Holy Spirit "it." If you want something that follows the Textus Receptus, then get a copy of New King James Version.
My church like the majority of Christian church have clean the KJV of their shelves, you could get, King James Version Debate
Crimson wrote: I may get censored since semonaudio prefers BABELS. I don't suppose you have ever studied the book of Daniel? Does GOD use the kings of the earth? Especially those whose time has come (by Gods' permissive will) and their global language established.(hint: What are the languages the Bible is translated from?) Ecc 8:4 Although it was King James an earthly King but Godly by the standards of Daniels' Gentile Kings. The King Who authorized that book was non other than the KING of Kings, THE LORD Jesus. I would not listen to a thing John Mac preaches for he denies the blood of Jesus. His study BABELS are dead mens bones. I consider him a heretic
I really don't see King James as godly by anybody's standards
I may get censored since semonaudio prefers BABELS.
I don't suppose you have ever studied the book of Daniel? Does GOD use the kings of the earth? Especially those whose time has come (by Gods' permissive will) and their global language established.(hint: What are the languages the Bible is translated from?) Ecc 8:4 Although it was King James an earthly King but Godly by the standards of Daniels' Gentile Kings. The King Who authorized that book was non other than the KING of Kings, THE LORD Jesus.
I would not listen to a thing John Mac preaches for he denies the blood of Jesus. His study BABELS are dead mens bones. I consider him a heretic
Dr. Robert A. Joyner wrote: The KJV was translated by the Church of England... They reveal their bias by refusing to translate words like âbaptismâ and âdeacon,â because if they did, it would contradict the practice of their church. The KJV originally contained the Apocrypha, 14 books and 172 chapters of uninspired writings from the Catholic Bible. Also, it contained a list of holy days, including one for the âblessed Virgin.â There was not a big variety of denominations on the KJV translation committee. There was not one Baptist. King James hated Baptists. He said he wanted to âharrow out of Englandâ all Baptists....
Crimson wrote: The ESV is from the same corrupt manuscripts of the VATICAN (divining serpent) Vaticanus. You can read the Jesuit Doughy Rheims BABEL. ALL I mean all of the new Bibles since 1881 The popes babels. (doughy on purpose because it is old mother whores leaven) 33 Â¶Another parable spake he unto them; The kingdom of heaven is like unto leaven, which a woman took, and hid in three measures of meal, till the whole was leavened.
Wonder which version is not tied to the Romish system.
Nice post, James, now if everyone was as honest with themselves, and humble when need be whether it be on this topic or others...
Anyway, I tend to think that God has preserved His word, doctrinally, across the board. I have seen some gross violations when it comes to some words, phrases, etc, but have any Bibles changed doctrinally? I don't know, I am asking...
Doug Kutilek wrote: .... Let me say it again--the sole justification for producing and publishing any Bible translation is so that those who do not understand the words in the original languages can nevertheless gain access to them through words they do understand in their own language.... And I could write at length of the KJV's fourfold reference to the Holy Spirit, Third Person of the Trinity, as "it" (John 1:32; Romans 8:16, 26; I Peter 1:11), which in my opinion comes little short, if indeed it comes short at all, of blasphemy. Baptist theologian Emery Bancroft ascribed this horrid translation to Socinian influence among the KJV translators (see Emery H. Bancroft, CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY, [Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1961; revised edition], pp. 147-8). The Socinian doctrine of the Holy Spirit was roughly the same as that of the Jehovah's Witnesses, whose translation--alone of modern Bible versions--also refers to the Holy Spirit as "it...."
James Page, it is not my intention to point my finger in people's face, I don't believe that only people who use the KJV are saved that would be silly. I was just giving one reason why I believe the KJV is Gods true word for English speaking people. There are many other reasons why I believe the KJV is Gods word, but I really don't feel like arguing about it. Gail Riplinger has a good book called New Age Bible Versions, and is a good read on the subject.
SteveR wrote: 4704 // spoudazw // spoudazo // spoo-dad'-zo // from 4710 ; TDNT - 7:559,1069; v AV - endeavour 3, do diligence 2, be diligent 2, give diligence 1, be forward 1, labour 1, study 1; 11 1) to hasten, make haste 2) to exert one's self, endeavour, give diligence