White Britons no longer make up the majority of people in London for the first time, according to the latest census data which pointed to a cosmopolitan capital increasingly divergent from the national economy around it.
The 2011 data also revealed a population of England and Wales that is generally better educated but less religious than it was a decade ago -- and less likely to live in a home that they own.
Only 45 per cent of London's population were white people of English, Scottish or Welsh heritage, according to the latest data, down from almost 60 per cent in 2001....
I've supported integration. In fact no doubt in the distant past I made some native Americans unhappy that I supported the schools of the late 19th and early 20th century that took Indian children to Europeanize them. I remember some complained but still appreciated the sense of discipline they got. Of course these schools did an extremely poor job of educating them about Christianity -- a complete impossibility in the Romish work houses. No doubt they suffered from the same brutality and sexual molestation that white children suffered in Romish orphanages through at least the 1960's (and later?)
So, I'm hardly supporting separate development. This is another reason that the White Greek Social Societies i.e., middle class street gangs have to be destroyed at state universities as well.
Funny, I don't consider myself a liberal, never have. I have been a Progressive most of my life something that neither radial left or right have liked, but usually despised.
Jim Lincoln wrote: However come 2030 or 2050, I forget which the White tribe will be in the minority. Not so much of a bother if the other tribes thought like us, and from the selfish and greedy behavior of some of the White tribe, they aren't going to be too friendly in the future. We don't need a Latino or Muhammadan culture -- no matter how proud they are of their backwardness and immorality, they should be shown in a good way, why those are the wrong paths to take.
Sounds like a call for separate development. And some people call you a Liberal? You should be ashamed of yourself!
You mean angry old white men voting GOP? Yes, it is part of it, However come 2030 or 2050, I forget which the White tribe will be in the minority. Not so much of a bother if the other tribes thought like us, and from the selfish and greedy behavior of some of the White tribe, they aren't going to be too friendly in the future. We don't need a Latino or Muhammadan culture -- no matter how proud they are of their backwardness and immorality, they should be shown in a good way, why those are the wrong paths to take.
Jim Lincoln wrote: No the above is something of a secular viewpoint, though only partially, because we need to worry not only do these people think like historical British or Americans
Isn't this ethnic variegate demonstrated in America's recent election too?
So? Even before I was a Christian, I didn't care what color of skin a person had. He had no more choice of that then I had. But I have always cared how a person thought! No Great Britain is going to have to worry about, Eurabia - Europe's Future? and perhaps America's too?
No the above is something of a secular viewpoint, though only partially, because we need to worry not only do these people think like historical British or Americans, but even more importantly have they been shown The Roman Road? This is of eternal importance
1
There are a total of 5 user comments displayed | add new comment |