|
|
USER COMMENTS BY :UGH: |
|
|
Page 1 | Page 2 · Found: 57 user comments posted recently. |
| | | |
|
|
3/28/15 10:59 PM |
Ugh | | | |
|
Thread closed Report abuse
|
Another vile post needing to be removed |
|
|
3/28/15 12:38 PM |
Ugh | | | |
|
Thread closed Report abuse
|
Thanks SA MOD. |
|
|
3/28/15 12:17 PM |
Ugh | | | |
|
Thread closed Report abuse
|
Attention, SA MOD. Please delete another vile post below! |
|
|
3/27/15 6:40 PM |
Ugh | | | |
|
Thread closed Report abuse
|
sermon audio moderator Another post by R. Palmer below needs to be deleted. |
|
|
4/25/14 5:58 PM |
ugh | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
John UK wrote: I refer you to the answer I gave you four years ago. Perhaps you could help McDonald out on the Mrs Obama thread. He's a tad confused |
|
|
2/6/14 3:50 PM |
Ugh | | | |
|
Thread closed Report abuse
|
CAB wrote: Yes, all this is true that it is the blood that brings remission (going away) of sin. But you've been selling another way to be forever saved, the penal atonement. I can pull up your old posts and prove it. So tell us, whatever DID happen to your old doctrine to be forever saved by a penal atonement that provided a "no double jeopardy" cover for any and all sins, all paid in advance? Everybody who posts here a lot knows how you are, that you are a morphing hologram with no true beliefs or purpose to even be here, and you invent yourself anew with every post, waste people's time, insist on monopolizing the board with your nonsense and blowing smoke. Have you ever in your life ever had a clear thought or given a straight answer about ANYTHING? How do you now explain your OSAS heresy if you cannot rely on the no double jeopardy argument anymore in the TULIP? The blood atonement is not penal atonement. What is the prideful Godless indecorous woman doing on this board peddling her dearly held heresies?On Eternal Security, you would do well to read: [URL=http://pbministries.org/books/pink/Security/index.htm]]] A W Pink on Eternal Security [/URL] |
|
|
|
Jump to Page : 1 [2] 3 |
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|