Radio Streams
SA Radio
24/7 Radio Stream
VCY America
24/7 Radio Stream
1096

My Favorite Things
Home
NewsroomALL
Events | Notices | Blogs
Newest Audio | Video | Clips
Broadcasters
Church Finder
Webcast LIVE NOW!
Sermons by Bible
Sermons by Category
Sermons by Topic
Sermons by Speaker
Sermons by Language
Sermons by Date
Staff Picks
CommentsALL -1 sec
Top Sermons
Online Bible
Hymnal
Daily Reading
Our Services
Broadcaster Dashboard
Members Only - Legacy

 
USER COMMENTS BY “ FELLOW SAINT ”
Page 1 | Page 16 ·  Found: 356 user comments posted recently.
Survey8/3/07 12:16 AM
Fellow Saint  Find all comments by Fellow Saint
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
3699
comments
OSAS and Abigail,
Satan is doing a good job preparing an empty church lacking that oil, indoctrinating it with the false idea that the Holy Spirit is dormant and doesn't do anything like in New Testament times and if you ask the Father for the Holy Spirit you get a demon instead, contrary to Christ's promise if you ask you are given the Holy Spirit(Luke 11:13). Satan knows what Christ meant. He presented a version of OSAS to Eve and look what happened. He knows what that oil is so he scares people into thinking you'll get a demon instead of the Holy Spirit if you ask of the Father for the Holy Spirit. It's exactly what the devil likes--a frozen stiff rusted church that can't move its limbs and confront the enemy. It's not a surprise we have sects gathering teachers tickling their ears teaching things that are even contradicted by examples in the Bible(like falling away, etc.)

News Item8/3/07 12:03 AM
Fellow Saint  Find all comments by Fellow Saint
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
46
comments
Not quite Hopalong. Are you sure you don't need some correction? Jesus says "He who hears you hears me." I haven't put the Apostles above God. Jesus is the one who promised that what we hear from the Apostles is the perfect truth. Their writtings are alone infallible truth. And "Thy word is truth." He didn't promise a theolgical interpretation after the Apostles is the word of God. He didn't say "He who hears you through a particular sect gathered around a doctrine popularly discussed long after I'm gone, hears me." So I'll still pose questions to you and others--putting your ideas to the test. It's what we're supposed to do. "Prove all things," is what the Apostle says. There are those who believe the word of God constitutes more than what is written. Do you agree with them? I won't do that because God says "Ye shall not add unto this word nor diminish ought from it" and "If any add unto this book, I'll add unto him the plagues." Jesus says "It is written, man shall not live on bread alone but every word of God." There's no guarantee what somebody is saying is God's unadulterated word, except what's in the Bible, especially when those ideas say one thing but the Bible presents an opposing example. I don't believe God will contradict himself.

News Item8/2/07 11:29 PM
Fellow Saint  Find all comments by Fellow Saint
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
46
comments
Hi Hopalong. Thanks. I can't agree about lowering the Apostles below first place as you suggest. Jesus told them to teach all nations. That's a big deal. Jesus held them in high esteem without a doubt. The words in the Bible are God's words...him teaching the church by the Apostles, Jesus saying "He who hears you hears me." That's good enough to put the Apostles first. My concern is too many get caught up thinking What did so-and-so say and then just take it as truth. We've got all kinds of teachers today saying one thing, conflicting with one another, openly denying the scriptures(liberal church leaders especially). The Scriptures tell a time would come when people would heap unto themselves teachers tickling their ears. It's happening today, I believe. Its too obvious. I've just grown tired of all the extra baggage and theological weight. Maybe in time I'll resume reading other works, but being more careful how much honor I subscribe to them.

News Item8/2/07 10:37 PM
Fellow Saint  Find all comments by Fellow Saint
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
46
comments
The Apostle Paul wasn't recommending the corinthians know more by consulting Henry, Scoffield, Calvin, etc. Another verse says "You need no one to teach you." Best to put the Apostles first. Obvious Truth also said this: "I don't think the Bible is all that hard to understand if you read it with an open mind, which I do." He knows well where the fountain of truth is found.

News Item8/2/07 9:30 PM
Fellow Saint  Find all comments by Fellow Saint
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
17
comments
Mike,
According to the testimony of the Lord and His apostles, I have it now and always. "These are written that ye may know ye have eternal life." Can't say anything else, but amen to that. However, it doesn't say "That ye may know ye may have eternal life here and now for eternity even if you gave up on the Lord, openly denied him, fell for another religion, etc." as the OSAS people like to think and teach. It just ain't there. I get the hunch that's what you want me to believe, but why? What's so good about falling for something not in the Scriptures? What's so special about an idea which says falling away isn't applicable to the Church even if some in the Galatian church were described as fallen from grace? Isn't the New Testament good like it is or do we need commentators with their ideas(without divine approval and in addition to the decrees of the Apostles) to help us know we have eternal life?

News Item8/2/07 5:27 PM
Fellow Saint  Find all comments by Fellow Saint
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
17
comments
Mike, I know I'm saved based on the promises of God's word. If I didn't believe that testimony I wouldn't be saved. If I reject it I wouldn't be saved and to go after another gospel besides that which is in the name of Jesus Christ, I'd be as the Apostle Paul says "fallen from grace." I'm not falling for the doctrine which says you'll still be saved even if you no longer believe or choose another gospel. There's no record of this in the New Testament of such a thing ever happening and the Apostles never stated such an idea as acceptable, so I'll question such a doctrine--put it to the test. That's what were told to do.

Survey8/2/07 5:17 PM
Fellow Saint  Find all comments by Fellow Saint
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
3699
comments
Seaton, so those who don't agree with calvinism are defective, I take it? I get that implication. Mormons and the pope among other quasi-Christian groups/cults have similar ideas about those who don't accept their doctrines and question the group's interpretation of the Bible--"you're not spiritual enough, just not quite enlightened yet, etc." I don't know how you come to the conclusion non-Calvinists are working their way to salvation when they emphasize justification by faith alone and that holiness is by the word, the blood of Christ and the Holy Ghost through faith.

News Item8/2/07 4:54 PM
Fellow Saint  Find all comments by Fellow Saint
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
17
comments
Is it wrong to question a theological system, Seaton? If I'm "fallow" due to rejecting Calvinism, that's fine. That's anathema number five placed on me for questioning Calvin or OSAS, but Mr. Calvin and his comrades and their books aren't the infallible rule of faith and discernment. If their word was the seed, I'd agree to being fallow for rejecting it though. But I am assured it's not the seed. There might some truth about the seed in their writings but that's about all.

News Item8/2/07 4:42 PM
Fellow Saint  Find all comments by Fellow Saint
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
12
comments
Actually Seaton, I've heard it differently from the free-willers to this effect: God keeps his promises and is faithful to his covenant. Also there are many Calvinist congregations falling for ecumenism, liberalism and Islam.

News Item8/2/07 2:52 PM
Fellow Saint  Find all comments by Fellow Saint
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
17
comments
How are the decrees of Calvin sufficient, Seaton? I think is what OSAS-Heresy's moniker means is the OSAS doctrine comes from the heresy family. The works of Calvin et al. are not the standard by which we judge somebody as lacking. But if you feel you need Calvin's help to clear things up so you can see the way to heaven, you're entitled to do so. However keep in mind the Bible, not Calvin's institutes or a theologian's notes, contains all that is necessary for a Christian to walk the straight and narrow way to life.

Survey8/2/07 2:26 PM
Fellow Saint  Find all comments by Fellow Saint
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
3699
comments
Abigail,
The reason you and I are presumed to hell is because we are challenging an interpretation of the scriptures...not the deity of Christ, his relation to the Father, the authority of the Scriptures, etc. There is nothing wrong with questioning(and rejecting) a devout following of an interpretation of the Bible(or more precisely certain parts of the Bible). We are called to follow Christ and the testimony of the Bible. Rejecting or even just questioning the validity of Calvinism, OSAS, Roman Catholicism, Mormonism, etc doesn't send someone to hell. We're treated just like the Roman Catholics treated Protestants. Questioning or rejecting a doctrine which draws its own special group/church to follow it means you're bound for hell or are part of a defective church(as said by the pope recently and a basic standard of Mormonism). If others need the help of a favorite commentator to get them to heaven, they are free to use their assistance. However, they are not the rule by which one shall pass judgement on those who question the credibility of these men and their doctrines to which people subscribe.

News Item8/2/07 2:36 AM
Fellow Saint  Find all comments by Fellow Saint
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
17
comments
Text messages from the Bible instead of the pope would do much better. I don't know about that relation to Romanism and the Arminians, Post Haste. I've been basically assigned to the realm of the reprobate by Calvinists and devotees of the Eternal Security doctrine--at least for a total of four anathemas. Seems to me also those who questioned Roman Catholicism were treated similarly. Faith in John Calvin won't save you. Faith in eternal life won't save. It's faith in the Lord Jesus and the words of the Scriptures. If you feel you need the commentaries of Calvin or other commentators to help you get into heaven, you're free to consult with them. However, they are not the rule by which you pass judgement on those who question the credibility of these men and their doctrines to which you subscribe.

News Item8/2/07 1:26 AM
Fellow Saint  Find all comments by Fellow Saint
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
14
comments
Donnie,
I cannot judge you and I don't know what all you are wrapped up in, but we're not talking about becoming a monk or saying prayers 24/7. I don't see in the Bible where God is going to give up on you just because you've gotten yourself into a hectic schedule. On the contrary, I think He can help you get better organized. I was pondering this article more and I began to have many thoughts about the creation account in Genesis. God made a good model for us there. He worked six days and rested on the seventh. I hope and pray you have one day to at least relax from your regular weekly job obligations. Can you take time for worship one day a week for an hour or two(not necessarily sunday, but a day that would be most convenient)? Daily devotion is good also. Take time frequently to let God speak to you from the pages of the Bible and to pray, even if it's just for five or ten minutes..a few scriptures and the Lord's Prayer. Just some of my ways of doing things to help my spiritual life. Maybe this helps you.

Survey8/2/07 12:31 AM
Fellow Saint  Find all comments by Fellow Saint
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
3699
comments
And one final verse: "These are written that ye may know that ye have eternal life." What parts? Only those that lend apparent support to the ES doctrine? No, but the OSAS people like the above quoted verse very much. However, the Bible says "All scripture..." Therefore if you believe, you know. If you confess Jesus as Lord, you know. If you don't deny him, you know. If you don't subsititute another faith for Him and thus fall away unto another gospel or depart from the faith unto seducing spirits, you know you have eternal life. It's evident the above verse does not lend credence to OSAS when we know the entirety of the New Testament is written so we know we have eternal life. Jesus also said "Search the scriptures for in them ye think ye have eternal life." The Apostles didn't say he was refering to a few select promises while brushing over other passages. If such was the case they could easily have told us what parts specifically(the ones that appear to favor Calvinism, OSAS, etc.)

Survey8/2/07 12:04 AM
Fellow Saint  Find all comments by Fellow Saint
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
3699
comments
One more thing I'd like to address Alan is this: "Once saved maybe saved." I am not sure who told you they are maybe saved, but I'm not going to say such. Maybe there are some who'd say that, but so it is with many people who don't believe all the Bible(all means everything on equal terms--the good parts and those bitter warnings and admittancs that some fall away and depart unto seducing spirits). According to the Bible's promises believers are saved, if they walk in the light they are forgiven, and if they don't deny Christ, he won't deny them. I believe in Him. I confess Jesus is Lord. I haven't denied him so I know I'm saved. So how did you come up with the notion that those who question the Eternal Security doctrine are "maybe saved"? We who question your ES doctrine believe in eternal life through Jesus Christ and that's all the Bible requires. If the Apostles gave their approval of Eternal Security(which they nowhere do in very clear terms) then I'd accept it as a binding doctrine. Instead, people here have turned it into a test of right standing or being more spiritual, thus putting it on equal terms with the whole of scripture. This isn't far off from Mormons telling you to pray to get the confirmation that the Book of Mormon is true.

News Item8/1/07 11:13 PM
Fellow Saint  Find all comments by Fellow Saint
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
14
comments
The Scriptures declare in the last days many would fall away, giving heed to seducing spirits and doctrines of demons and even denying the Lord that bought them. This is all prophecy being fulfilled before our eyes.

News Item8/1/07 11:10 PM
Fellow Saint  Find all comments by Fellow Saint
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
14
comments
"And they worshiped the creature more than the creator." So we see it happening today. Gotta get more money, gotta get this done and that done, gotta gotta gotta, get get get, go go go...and for what?.....and....then drop dead! Sad case for many societies. That day of rest is for a good reason: physical and spiritual health. Use it.

Survey8/1/07 9:24 PM
Fellow Saint  Find all comments by Fellow Saint
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
3699
comments
So, Alan, if OSAS is true, what becomes of those denied by the Lord? The Apostles taught: If we deny him he will deny us. In my understanding of OSAS(and Calvinism) it should be "He won't deny us because we can't deny him." If "once in the vine always in the vine" is true, why did the Apostle Paul declare to some in the Galatian church "Ye are fallen from grace."? or say to the Romans that God had authority to not spare the other branches if he didn't even spare the natural ones? CH Spurgeon already was quoted earlier as saying his preaching was his own private opinion. That's all it is...his own opinion and so I should respect Mr. Spurgeon and not take his opinion as a message from heaven or meeting divine approval.
JD, James Arminius challenged Calvinism(and the accompanying OSAS doctrine which naturally flows from Calvinism) long before there were prominent pentecostal women and the Foursquare Church. It was challenged before Arminius as well.

Survey8/1/07 7:46 PM
Fellow Saint  Find all comments by Fellow Saint
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
3699
comments
JD, that's not true about OSAS or the pentecostal movement(except for some people and denominations). The issue between osas or not has been discussed for at least the last 500 years.

Hopalong, to answer you, to the best of my knowledge, no. The sin of presumption is to the best of my knowledge an invention of the Roman Catholic Church.

Eternal Security From Heaven,
We have the promise of eternal life. Now, if eternal life is the equivalent of your ES doctrine, where is it in the Bible? Or are there other words from heaven to add to the revealed scriptures? Why add to the message we already have from heaven? I will have no part in such a matter, adding to God's word. What's written already is sufficient for my faith and life.


Survey8/1/07 11:15 AM
Fellow Saint  Find all comments by Fellow Saint
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
3699
comments
Abide. If I move to a new house, am I still abiding at the former location? Christ says Abide in me. If we "move elsewhere"(later confessing somebody else besides the Lord---you choose whoever suits you--buddha, mohammed, Allah, etc), who are we abiding in?
Jump to Page : back 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18


New Smyrna Beach, FL
Glencoe Baptist Church

Play! | More

Dan Botterbrodt
Frogs and Armageddon - KJO T..

Divers and Strange Doctrines
Sunday Service
Foundation Baptist Church
Play! | MP3 | RSS


The Day the Sun Stood Still

Rev. Joshua Engelsma
Pride Before a Fall

Crete Protestant Reformed
Sunday Service
Video!Play! | MP4

Sponsor:
John MacArthur's "The War on Children"

A new book about prov­id­ing refuge for your children in a host­ile world
https://www.amazon.com/war-..

Sponsor:
New Commentary by John MacArthur

An exp­os­it­ory, word-by-w­ord exeg­et­ical comm­ent­ary on Jonah & Nahum
https://www.amazon.com/jona..

Sponsor:
Start to Finish: Tony Evans Podcast

Feat­ured guests incl­ude Kirk Frankl­in, Tony Dungy, Prisc­illa Shir­er, & more.
https://www.namb.net/podcas..

SPONSOR | 100+

SPONSOR | 100+


SA UPDATES NEWSLETTER Sign up for a weekly dose of personal thoughts along with interesting content updates. Sign Up
FOLLOW US


Gospel of John
Cities | Local | Personal

MOBILE
iPhone + iPad
ChurchOne App
Watch
Android
ChurchOne App
Fire Tablet
Wear
Chromecast TV
Apple TV
Android TV
ROKU TV
Amazon Fire TV
Amazon Echo
Kindle Reader


HELP
Knowledgebase
Broadcasters
Listeners
Q&A
Uploading Sermons
Uploading Videos
Webcasting
TECH TALKS

NEWS
Weekly Newsletter
Unsubscribe
Staff Picks | RSS
SA Newsroom
SERVICES
Dashboard | Info
Cross Publish
Audio | Video | Stats
Sermon Player | Video
Church Finder | Info
Mobile & Apps
Webcast | Multicast
Solo Sites
Internationalization
Podcasting
Listen Line
Events | Notices
Transcription
Business Cards
QR Codes
Online Donations
24x7 Radio Stream
INTEGRATION
Embed Codes
Twitter
Facebook
Logos | e-Sword | BLB
API v2.0 New!

BATCH
Upload via RSS
Upload via FTP
Upload via Dropbox

SUPPORT
Advertising | Local Ads
Support Us
Stories
ABOUT US
The largest and most trusted library of audio sermons from conservative churches and ministries worldwide.

Our Services | Articles of Faith
Broadcast With Us
Earn SA COINS!
Privacy Policy

THE VAULT VLOG
The Day the Sun Stood Still
Copyright © 2024 SermonAudio.