SteveR wrote:
Rodney
What's your position on infant baptism for ewoks?

Dave wrote:
Well my, that's, hilarious brother Rodney, oh Hardi har har ,har!
At least you didn't leave me looking like the only crazy on sa.
Very witty, love ya mate .

Frank wrote:
Well, not to change the subject, but if he said that Ellen G. White was a false prophet, it would be more insightful.

s c wrote:
"Minorities" may be having more abortions but aren't they also having more babies?
Is it a fair comparison if the most abortions are by "minorities" when they are also the ones who have more pregnancies?
...not so sure that this is primarily an inner city problem.
There could be more fairer skinned women who have abortions who get pregnant but because there aren't as many of them getting pregnant,then it would seem that there is a greater percentage of "minority" abortions.
One has to factor in the total number of births and do the percentages that way.

"Total Black Pregnancies: 56,165
Total Viable Black Pregnancies: 53,115

Black Abortions as a Percentage of Total Black Pregnancies: 51.6%
Black Abortions as a Percentage of Total Viable Black Pregnancies: 54.6%

John UK wrote:
One of the things the devil has done, besides replacing God's hymnbook with a man made selection of songs...

There is (as I'm sure you know) more to corporate worship than just singing. There is preaching, praying, reading of the Word, etc. There are examples of preaching in the Word, yet we don't limit preaching to Peter's sermon at Pentecost or Paul's message on Mars hill. We don't limit the content of our prayers to those found in the Bible. We don't hold that responsive reading is only valid for those worshipers in Deut. 27.

No, though we hold to the regulatory principle, we find freedom within that principle. The preacher is allowed, even charged, to apply himself to the proclamation of God's truth and to do so with a passion. How may he do that if the words are not his own? How may we pray - and pray with passion - if we are restricted in our expression. Why must we restrict ourselves to the Psalms - and they are wonderful - when we now have a more full revelation of truth on which to draw?

penny wrote:
its social control, not true community. people censor their real lives and fcbk censors certain views (remember him meeting with Merkel and going after any against islmc invasion?) at best its a convenient tool. tell someone you love them today by instead of writing about yourself and the bird on the ledge outside the window or the rude driver on the road, rather call them, go see them, send them a letter and tell them they matter to you.

penny wrote:
well, Rodney, surprised you can't see it yet. hopefully you will, Christians need to quit being their buffoons...
see here, the state churches eat up the police state and be one with it....
http://massprivatei.blogspot.com/2015/12/churches-are-conducting-holy-ghost-pat.html

Thanks for the information. I was completely unaware of Southwest enrolling a Muslim. SMH. Space, funds, and resources are limited (ok, I know they're not limited to God), so why do we not use discretion on how we use them?

John UK wrote:
Greetings Carol. Yes indeed, I belong to a pioneering work, starting from scratch. And it is a great comfort to know that if Jesus Christ be with us, nothing shall be impossible. Many times, at the Breaking of Bread, we can sense the nearness of our beloved Saviour, giving us encouragement.

CaptCredence wrote:
Climate change I can believe in:
"Behold, he is coming with the CLOUDS, and every eye will see him, even those who pierced him, and all tribes of the earth will wail on account of him. Even so. Amen. " - Revelation 1:7

@Christopher000:

From the article wrote:
“I may get nothing out of this," she told the Tribune. “This is about standing up for my colleagues. If I can be thrown under the statement of faith bus, so can they. Everyone is cast under a cloud of suspicion. If they say the wrong thing, how does one know?”

As for this professor, I googled her name and found her twitter page. It didn't take much reading to figure out her liberal tendencies. How she ever got tenured is beyond me. Good grief.

Could you please tell me wrote:
where...

Paul is dealing with a Corinthian church that was practicing NO discipline. So, he is addressing the church's INACTIVITY in the matter of discipline. He is not addressing the MANNER of disciplining. The fact that Paul doesn't spell out the process in 1Cor.5 does not prove that he would bypass the first two steps.