Sign in or signup
Radio Streams
SA Radio
24/7 Radio Stream
VCY America
24/7 Radio Stream

My Favorite Things
Home
NewsSITE
Events | Local | Blogs
New Audio | Video | Clips
Broadcasters
Church Finder
Webcast LIVE NOW!
Sermons by Bible
Sermons by Category
Sermons by Topic
Sermons by Speaker
Sermons by Date
Staff Picks
CommentsALL -48 sec
Top Sermons
Daily Log
Photos
Stores
Online Bible
Hymnal
Daily Reading
Our Services
Sermon DashboardNEW
Members Only

 
BIBLE, SOCIETY, TECH, PERSONAL SURVEYS | FAVORITES CREATE NEW

All Categories |  Society & Current Events
849 total votes have been cast on this survey | 54 user comments  ( edit survey )

Is it appropriate for a woman to be in a position of authority in the Church or in the Government?
Created: 9/1/2008 | Last Vote: 6 years ago | Comment: 10 years ago
Disclaimer: These surveys are created by PLUS or FULL Members of the site and, unless specified, are not created by the SermonAudio staff nor do they necessarily reflect the site's position on any topic.

 •   Church - NO, Government - YES.
  42% | 354 votes

 •   Government - NO, Church - YES.
  1% | 12 votes

 •   Both Church and Government - YES.
  11% | 92 votes

 •   Both Church and Government - NO.
  33% | 281 votes

 •   There might be exceptions, but only in certain cases of necessity.
  10% | 84 votes

 •   No answer. Skip this survey, I do not care to vote on this topic.
  3% | 26 votes

   

Subscribe to these comments


   11 votes  |  Do you homeschool your children? • 9 years ago
   105 votes  |  Is the 4th commandment binding in the New Covenant? • 9 years ago
   91 votes  |  How many hours a week do you spend in your occupation providing... • 9 years ago
   130 votes  |  How would you describe Brit Hume's recommendation of the... • 9 years ago
   169 votes  |  Do You Celebrate The Christmas Holiday? • 9 years ago
BROWSE SURVEY CATEGORIES | MORE..
   2,720 votes  |  What is your opinion of SermonAudio? Suggestions, questions,... • 8 months ago
   3,978 votes  |  Gay marriage • 8 months ago
   169 votes  |  Do You Celebrate The Christmas Holiday? • 1 years ago
   866 votes  |  Do you think women should have their heads covered during public... • 1 years ago
   740 votes  |  Is it getting harder to find a church in which you agree in most... • 1 years ago
BROWSE SURVEY CATEGORIES | MORE..
This feature is for PLUS or FULL members only. Please log in first | or learn more about favorites.
   9,507 votes  |  What version of the Bible do you use? • 5590 comments
   6,045 votes  |  What is your view of women pastors? • 873 comments
   5,907 votes  |  Do you think the Pope went to heaven? • 1482 comments
   5,305 votes  |  Are you Presbyterian, Methodist, or Baptist? • 444 comments
   4,559 votes  |  How old are you? To determine the SermonAudio age groups... • 111 comments
BROWSE SURVEY CATEGORIES | MORE..
FORUMS | USER COMMENTS | add new  

    Sorting Order:  

· Page 1 ·  Found: 54 user comment(s)

Survey6/10/09 12:06 PM
San Jose John | San Jose, CA  Find all comments by San Jose John
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
Our church has a number of women in authority over womens' and childrens' chruch activities, but only men are allowed to rule where other men are present.

Women in authority in government and society should remain an exception rather than the rule for the simple reason that we need them to BE THERE in the home, raising the next generation.


Survey1/10/09 2:55 PM
Alan H | Washington State  Protected NameFind all comments by Alan H
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
Thanks Neil & Windsong,

Again, being unfamiliar with either the movie or play, from what little I know, it seems like Petruchio expected "a loving submission" without manifesting "a loving authority." It seems that he exploits "the profession of her willingness to submit" to him as well as "those actual acts of her submission." It kind of leaves out an essential part of Ephesians chapter five.

"Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body. Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so [let] the wives [be] to their own husbands in every thing. Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it; That he might sanctify and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word, That he might present it to himself a glorious church, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that it should be holy and without blemish. So ought men to love their wives as their own bodies. He that loveth his wife loveth himself. For no man ever yet hated his own flesh; but nourisheth and cherisheth it, even as the Lord the church:..." Eph 5:22-29

The Apostle has more to say to the husband than the wife...


Survey1/10/09 9:55 AM
windsong  Find all comments by windsong
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
Alan H wrote:
Having never seen nor read this play by Shakespeare, is or was Katherine "the Shrew" to whom the title refers?
Yes, Alan, I should have included that that was taken from "Taming of the Shrew" by Shakespeare. Neil summed the scene up well. We saw the movie with Liz Taylor and Richard Burton.

Shakespeare is very earthy, bawdy may be a better description, and I haven't read much of his work, but Shakespeare-isms pop up in language even today, and are still poignant.

BTW, I was thinking of you when I posted that part, knowing how you like to quote from Scripture that a woman's place is to be silent (in the church). But, Hey, why stop there?

I think you would like the movie - especially where Katherina agrees with Petruchio that the sun is the moon and moon is the sun. Smile.


Survey1/10/09 12:55 AM
Neil | Tucson  Find all comments by Neil
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
Katherine is the Shrew. She's the ill-tempered oldest daughter whom her father insists on marrying off before her more appealing sister. The lines below can be spoken in an ironic manner, which is what some think Eliz. Taylor did in the '60s film version she made with Richard Burton. That would make it more palatable for feminists.

Warning: the "Induction" for this play (omitted from the film) is a bit naughty. Shakespeare sneaks in bawdy stuff elsewhere as well.


Survey1/10/09 12:24 AM
Alan H | Washington State  Protected NameFind all comments by Alan H
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
Having never seen nor read this play by Shakespeare, is or was Katherine "the Shrew" to whom the title refers?

[URL=http://www.opensourceshakespeare.org/views/plays/play_view.php?WorkID=tamingshrew&Act=5&Scene=2&Scope=scene&displaytype=print]]]The Taming of the Shrew Act V, Scene 2[/URL]


Survey1/9/09 11:55 AM
windsong  Find all comments by windsong
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
"Thy husband is thy lord, thy life, thy keeper,
Thy head, thy sovereign, one that cares for thee,
And for thy maintence commits his body
To painful labor both by sea and land,
To watch the night in storms, the day in cold,
Whilst though liest warm at home, secure and safe,
And craves no other tribute at thy hands
But love, fair looks, and true obedience-
Too little payment for so great a debt.
Such duty as the subject owes the prince,
Even such a woman oweth to her husband;
And when she is froward, peevish, sullen, sour,
And not obedient to his honest will,
What is she but a foul contending rebel
And graceless traitor to her loving lord?
I am ashamed that women are so simple
To offer war where they should kneel for peace,
Or seek for rule, supremacy, and sway
When they are bound to serve, love, and obey."

Katherine giving her speech on what she has learned by being tamed by Petruchio.


Survey1/8/09 11:00 PM
paiver | Lakewood Wa.  Contact via emailFind all comments by paiver
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
Every one seems to forget Paul's letter to Timothy 1

8. I will therefore that men pray every where, lifting up holy hands, without wrath and doubting.
9. In like manner also, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with shamefacedness and sobriety; not with broided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly array;
10. But (which becometh women professing godliness) with good works.
11. Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection.
12. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.
13. For Adam was first formed, then Eve.
14. And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression.
15. Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith and charity and holiness with sobriety.
This is church Doctrine


Survey11/29/08 10:12 PM
Jake Hoek | Brandfort on. canada  Contact via emailFind all comments by Jake Hoek
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
God by the apostle Paul leaves us not in the dark. We must distinguish between prophesying and teaching. Remember Mirjam tried to usurp authority over Moses and was sidelined by God Himself with leprosy.
She learned the hard way.
Women BEWARE!

Survey10/21/08 5:59 PM
Miguel | Central America  Find all comments by Miguel
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
(Isaiah 3:12) As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths.

(Ezekiel 22:30-31) And I sought for *a man* among them, that should make up the hedge, and stand in the gap before me for the land, that I should not destroy it: but I found none. Therefore have I poured out mine indignation upon them; I have consumed them with the fire of my wrath: their own way have I recompensed upon their heads, saith the Lord GOD.


Survey10/21/08 5:04 PM
BWS  Find all comments by BWS
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
It is the "mutual submissionists" (egalitarians) that are plainly "half-baked" (as Jeremiah coined, "a cake half turned") outside of scripture.

Paul to Timothy:

"For Adam was first formed, then Eve (doctrine of creation order).

"And Adam was not deceived (by the serpent), but the woman being deceived was in the transgression" (doctrine of the Fall and its order).

These two doctrinal appeals, while they are used in Timothy for the church, are two confirming witnesses much broader in that they prove and confirm "God's social order" (instead of Democracy's "new world order") for male-female relations, since creation and fall. (See Knox's Blast Againt the Modern Regiment of Women, against Queen Mary).

And Sarah Palin is no Deborah.

Meanwhile, the other 'Sarah' of the holy scriptures (Peter exhorts) called Abraham "lord". That Sarah is so politically incorrect today, yet she is the model held up by the Holy Spirit in the inspired writing of the apostle as an example:

"For in this manner in the old time the holy women also...being in subjection unto their own husbands: Even as Sarah obeyed Abraham calling him 'lord'.

Two Sarah's here, only one can be right as a model for Christians or God's social order since creation.


Survey10/20/08 9:21 PM
CMT  Find all comments by CMT
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
Yes, BWS. You are right. This poll was born out of the whole Sarah Palin deal. We've been having fun with a lot of the half-baked complementarians on here.

Survey10/20/08 8:06 PM
BWS  Find all comments by BWS
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
Relevance? Two words: Sarah Palin

Survey10/14/08 11:00 AM
CMT  Find all comments by CMT
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
I agree - it is a judgment on society's men and society in general; however as Christians we still have an obligation to speak out against it and oppose it, like any other type of wickedness.

Survey10/14/08 9:47 AM
PILUT  Find all comments by PILUT
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
Alan H
You have some very valid points, and I do not totally disagree with you. But there is one thing to consider - the sovereign working of God in a nation that is falling into apostasy.

There are time when MEN refuse to lead, and the natural product of that is a Woman, right or wrong, who will take up leadership out of necessity. Although there are those women who crave leadership, I think they are fewer than we think, and I am not speaking of them.

Because men refuse to lead, which is a natural tendency, God will allow a woman to be in his position, like Deborah. Deborah was not God's first and desired choice, but it was because men were not leading. And it is God's last ditch effort to get a country to repent when he allows a woman to be in charge. I am against women outside of the home if there are children. And ultimately it is up to her head - her husband, weather or not he lets her take responsibilities away from home. But there is a bigger thing going on here in America. Women in leadership is not the issue. America repenting is! It is God's mercy that he will let a woman lead, because the alternative is total judgment. And men need to wake up and get back to leading their homes!!!


Survey10/13/08 3:09 PM
Faithful Remnant  Find all comments by Faithful Remnant
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
As far as church is concerned, "A bishop shall be the husband of one wife..." A woman cannot scripturally nor morally be a husband of one wife. As for government....hmmm...my personal opinion is the woman shall be at home to care for the family and housework if at all possible.

Survey10/13/08 2:58 PM
Ashlar  Find all comments by Ashlar
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
The discussion on gender roles and functions all to often promotes
the idea that the female "role/function" itself is somehow demeaning.
Thus the woman would appear to be of lesser authority in society.
But the roles of eg: housewife, mother, nurse, even secretary are not
demeaning but indeed essential to the ongoing upkeep of family, work
and society.
Modern society has accorded various "class" distinctions to many roles and functions whether male or female, eg: labourer. However it is not the role/function that is being judged - it is the person.
Wife and mother are absolutely essential to community and society, but
are simply not recognised as such. From education, a person with a degree is seen to be of greater "worth" in society than those of lesser achievement in education, who may well be making just as essential a contribution as the degree holder, eg: tradesman.
Therefore when we view the Biblical directive today to perceive the wife to be "subservient" to her husband our perception is opaque, to say the least.

"And whosoever will be chief among you, let him be your servant: Mat 20.27


Survey10/1/08 6:47 PM
Christiana  Find all comments by Christiana
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
Christiana wrote:
Alan,
What they need is THE gospel.

Jesus' whole ministry taught that outward conformity (alone) to man-made rules served no purpose in true religion, but that a relationship with God is through the Spirit according to Truth.

When it is necessary to give a message concerning the husband and wife roles, tone should be considered in the delivery.

Grace and Truth must come together. The Believer will not reject such.

Alan,

I tried to edit the previous post of 10/1 12:28 p.m., but failed to do so in a timely manner. There were some words out of place.

Hopefully, the above corrections will make my previous post easier to read.


Survey10/1/08 12:28 PM
Christiana  Find all comments by Christiana
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
Alan,

Thank you for the link on Complementarianism. That describes my belief, since it is Biblical.

My point is: the role of a woman is described in Scripture almost as a passing comment, and should be treated as such.

The born again Believer will submit to the Word! It is pointless to preach submission to the unredeemed. What they need is gospel.

When the Holy Spirit writes the law of God on the heart of the Believer, they do not have to be told "Thou shalt not steal, murder, ..whatever." The Holy Spirit convicts, brings into conformity to the law, sanctifies - that which an external code of conduct can never do.

Jesus' whole ministry was taught that outward conformity (alone) to man-made rules was served no purpose in true religion, but that a relationship with God is through the Spirit. He broke rules that they adhered to as a testimony of righteousness, - like healing on the Sabbath, etc., but served no purpose in worshipping a Holy God.

Only the indwelling Spirit would once again bring the intimacy of the relationship that Adam had before the fall.

This message can be presented by pastors when there is a situation that calls for it. Tone and delivery are key. Grace and Truth must come together. The Believer will not reject such.


Survey10/1/08 10:16 AM
Christiana  Find all comments by Christiana
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
CMT wrote:
That's a beautiful Psalm. And it's completely compatible with Psalm 2, as it is with the rest of scripture.
YES! "Sweeter than honey, more to be desired than gold." Psalm 19

Survey10/1/08 9:24 AM
CMT  Find all comments by CMT
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
That's a beautiful Psalm. And it's completely compatible with Psalm 2, as it is with the rest of scripture.

There are a total of 54 user comments displayed | add new comment |Subscribe to these comments

Jump to Page : [1] 2 3 | last




Steve Lyon
The Peace of God

Colossians 3:15, John 14:27
Sunday Service
Bible Baptist Church
Play! | MP3 | RSS


Don Green
Are You Born Again?

Truth Community Church
Sunday Service
Transcript!Play! | MP3

Bob Vincent
Comfort in the Face of Suicide

Come into the Sanctuary
Sermons by Bob and Others
Staff Pick!Play! | MP4

Sponsor:
Free Book Giveaway

The Sov­er­eignty of God & the Resp­ons­ib­il­ity of Man
desiringrevival.org

Sermon:
Hearing and Doing
Ken Wimer

SPONSOR | 3,500+

SPONSOR




                   
One today is worth two tomorrows. ... William Secker


Gospel of John
Cities | Local | Personal

MOBILE
iPhone + iPad
Church App
Watch
Android
Church App
Fire Tablet
Wear
Chromecast TV
Apple TV
Android TV
ROKU TV
Amazon Fire TV
Amazon Echo
Kindle Reader


HELP
Knowledgebase
Broadcasters
Listeners
Q&A
Uploading Sermons
Uploading Videos
Webcasting
Tips & Tricks
YouTube Screencasts
2-MINUTE TIPS

FOLLOW
Weekly Newsletter
Staff Picks Feed
SA Newsroom
RSS | Twitter | Facebook
SERVICES
Sermon Dashboard | Info
Audio | Video | Podcast
Sermon Player | Video
Church Finder | Info
Mobile & Apps
Live Webcasting
Listen Line
Events Support
Transcription | PowerClips
Billboards
Business Cards
SOLO Sites New!
Favorites New! | QR Codes
Online Donations
24x7 Radio Stream
INTEGRATION
Embed Codes
Goodies
WordPress
Twitter
Facebook
Logos | e-Sword | BLB
JSON API

BATCH
Transfer Agent
Protected Podcasts
Auto-Upload Sermons
Upload via FTP
Upload via Dropbox
Picasa
ABOUT US
The largest and most trusted library of audio sermons from conservative churches and ministries worldwide.

Our Services | Articles of Faith
Broadcast With Us
Earn SA COINS! New!
Advertising | Local Ads
CONTACT
info@sermonaudio.com
Privacy Policy | Support Us | Stories