Sign in or signup
Radio Streams
SA Radio
24/7 Radio Stream
VCY America
24/7 Radio Stream

My Favorite Things
Home
NewsSITE
Events | Local | Blogs
New Audio | Video | Clips
Broadcasters
Church Finder
Live Webcasts
Sermons by Bible
Sermons by Category
Sermons by Topic
Sermons by Speaker
Sermons by Date
Staff Picks
CommentsALL -55 sec
Top Sermons
Daily Log
Photos
Stores
Online Bible
Hymnal
Daily Reading
Our Services
Sermon DashboardNEW
Members Only

 
BIBLE, SOCIETY, TECH, PERSONAL SURVEYS | FAVORITES CREATE NEW

All Categories |  Bible & Theology Issues
866 total votes have been cast on this survey | 31 user comments  ( edit survey )

Do you think women should have their heads covered during public worship?
Created: 5/18/2008 | Last Vote: 1 years ago | Comment: 9 years ago
Disclaimer: These surveys are created by PLUS or FULL Members of the site and, unless specified, are not created by the SermonAudio staff nor do they necessarily reflect the site's position on any topic.

 •   Yes - it is Scriptural and to show their subjection to men
  38% | 331 votes

 •   No - I don't see that the Scriptures teach this
  35% | 302 votes

 •   No - it's old fashioned and doesn't apply any more
  8% | 71 votes

 •   Yes - but I'm not sure why
  2% | 15 votes

 •   Not sure
  11% | 95 votes

 •   No answer. Skip this survey, I do not care to vote on this topic.
  6% | 52 votes

   

Subscribe to these comments


   11 votes  |  Do you homeschool your children? • 9 years ago
   105 votes  |  Is the 4th commandment binding in the New Covenant? • 9 years ago
   91 votes  |  How many hours a week do you spend in your occupation providing... • 9 years ago
   130 votes  |  How would you describe Brit Hume's recommendation of the... • 9 years ago
   169 votes  |  Do You Celebrate The Christmas Holiday? • 9 years ago
BROWSE SURVEY CATEGORIES | MORE..
   2,720 votes  |  What is your opinion of SermonAudio? Suggestions, questions,... • 10 months ago
   3,978 votes  |  Gay marriage • 10 months ago
   169 votes  |  Do You Celebrate The Christmas Holiday? • 1 years ago
   866 votes  |  Do you think women should have their heads covered during public... • 1 years ago
   740 votes  |  Is it getting harder to find a church in which you agree in most... • 1 years ago
BROWSE SURVEY CATEGORIES | MORE..
This feature is for PLUS or FULL members only. Please log in first | or learn more about favorites.
   9,507 votes  |  What version of the Bible do you use? • 5590 comments
   6,045 votes  |  What is your view of women pastors? • 873 comments
   5,907 votes  |  Do you think the Pope went to heaven? • 1482 comments
   5,305 votes  |  Are you Presbyterian, Methodist, or Baptist? • 444 comments
   4,559 votes  |  How old are you? To determine the SermonAudio age groups... • 111 comments
BROWSE SURVEY CATEGORIES | MORE..
FORUMS | USER COMMENTS | add new  

    Sorting Order:  

· Page 1 ·  Found: 31 user comment(s)

Survey3/9/10 8:51 PM
Stephanie DeAyala-Larragoiti | Norfolk, Virginia  Contact via emailGo to homepageFind all comments by Stephanie DeAyala-Larragoiti
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
Girl wrote:
I agree with women wearing hats and/or covering in church, but I don't agree that it's to show their 'subjection to men'. It is to show they are under the authority AND protetion of either their father or thier husband, and certainly not ALL MEN as is implied here. Women may be subject to A man, but not ALL men, otherwise we would end up like the catholics, who teach their women that whatever the priest says for you to do must be right, and you cannot do wrong in doing it. This opens a very dangerous door, to my mind.
hmm. Interesting. I always thought that this was to show subjection to God. Maybe I'm wrong in that. What about the single fatherless woman. I would think she should not wear a headcovering. Just speculating.

Survey2/10/10 5:05 PM
Sabbatarian | God's Commandment  Find all comments by Sabbatarian
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
John UK

"The child of God who appreciates the wonder of God in establishing and maintaining this covenant relationship, and who desires to enjoy covenant fellowship with God, will therefore want to observe the weekly Sabbath, will strive properly to keep it, and will long to enjoy the everlasting Sabbath in heaven.

The rest that God gives His people on the Sabbath Day is the rest of the covenant.

That the Sabbath is a day of rest is clear from three considerations. First, the word "sabbath" means "rest." Second, God called Israel's weekly Sabbath "the sabbath of rest" (Ex. 31:15, 35:2; Lev. 23:3; see also Ex. 16:23). Third, God's law prescribes that on the Sabbath Day we rest from our ordinary daily labor (Ex. 20:10; Deut. 5:14).

Although God's law requires us to cease from our ordinary labors, the true nature of the Sabbath rest is not physical, to be enjoyed in the body, but spiritual, to be enjoyed in the soul.

He who thinks of Sunday as merely a day of physical recreation, or a day on which to catch up on sleep, does not understand the true nature of the Sabbath rest. He who thinks that going to church twice is in itself the keeping of the Sabbath, and so ignores the opportunity that the Sabbath provides to grow in grace.... "(Rev D.Kuiper)


Survey1/3/09 9:49 PM
a wife | NY  Find all comments by a wife
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
I have come to believe this but no one I know does. They think it is just a tradition of the past. So I just grow my hair long and live in Biblical silence.

Survey10/20/08 9:19 AM
CMT  Find all comments by CMT
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
We remedy the problem of the plunging necklines with scarves and buttoned ladies dress jackets. We also observe the woman's headcovering, but it's true that we must be consistent regarding modesty and pay attention to the whole body, not just the head.

Survey10/20/08 8:50 AM
There is Hope | United States  Find all comments by There is Hope
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
Doctor WOMI wrote:
Head?
Let's try to work from the bottom up first.
I think maybe, covering their thighs and chest would be a good start.
R. S Graziotin wrote:
No truer word said . What is happenning with our convictions about modesty??
I agree with the both of you. My wife has remarked on several occasions how hard it is to find modest dresses even in the retail shops. The length may be fine, but the neckline is cut way too low or if it is modest in the neck, the length is too short. As far as head coverings go, Pastor John Greer of Ballymena FPC and Michael Barrett of Faith FPC in Greenville has an excellent series concerning this issue. Very informative and right to the point.

Survey10/20/08 7:12 AM
R. S Graziotin | Aust  Find all comments by R. S Graziotin
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
[AUTHOR]Doctor WOMI[/AUTHOR]Head?
Let's try to work from the bottom up first.
I think maybe, covering their thighs and chest would be a good start.[/QUOTE]No truer word said . What is happenning with our convictions about modesty??[QUOTE]

Survey10/19/08 11:48 PM
Doctor WOMI | Truth Full of Love  Find all comments by Doctor WOMI
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
Head?

Let's try to work from the bottom up first.

I think maybe, covering their thighs and chest would be a good start.


Survey9/26/08 11:30 PM
Anti-antichrist | God's land  Find all comments by Anti-antichrist
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
Yes, this is scriptural. Nothing but the veil openly declares to the unbelievers that a woman is submissive, and this is why most vehemently refuse to wear one (in addition to loving their glorious hair).

[URL=http://biblebeliefs.atspace.com/IstheHeadcoveringReallyanIssue.html]]]Is the Headcovering Really an Issue?[/URL]


Survey9/26/08 2:19 PM
Christiana  Find all comments by Christiana
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
Pastor Philip Lazar, India wrote:
Dear Christiana, How do you adorn the doctrine of God according to (Titus 2:10)? Why Ap.Paul admonishes a pastor to take care of their “conduct” in the church (1 Tim 3:15) and to be an example “in Conduct” (1 Tim 4:12); and Ap.Peter admonishes the wives that by their gospel-exalting “pure conduct” can win their husbands to Christ (1 Pet 3:1-2)?.
Cont...
Thank you Pastor for your kind salutation.

I do not contend with the word of God, or with your presentation; however, I do contend with some whose interpretation is without grace, and beyond what Scripture says. Those pastors who are on the SA site are Ovadall and Morecraft.

Pastor Derek Carlsen, on the other hand rightly presents what God says on the matter - no more and no less.

Sorry, I don't know how to link his message.

Thank you for your concern.


Survey9/26/08 1:18 PM
Pastor Philip Lazar, India  Contact via emailFind all comments by Pastor Philip Lazar, India
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
Dear Christiana, Does “Doings” matters in Christ? We are called blessed in our “doings” (James 1:25). Truly we are free (Gal 5:1) even Jesus affirms it in (Matt 17:26). Does it mean that we can abstain from paying tax in violation of (Matt 17:27;Rom 13:6-7)? We are called by an “honourable name” (Jam 2:7) such name is not given to unbelievers (Isa 63:19). How do you adorn the doctrine of God according to (Titus 2:10)? Why Ap.Paul admonishes a pastor to take care of their “conduct” in the church (1 Tim 3:15) and to be an example “in Conduct” (1 Tim 4:12); and Ap.Peter admonishes the wives that by their gospel-exalting “pure conduct” can win their husbands to Christ (1 Pet 3:1-2)?.

Cont...


Survey9/22/08 10:16 AM
Christiana  Find all comments by Christiana
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
johninatlanta wrote:
Christians should not waste their emotional energy and time on these debatable matters....too many souls out there headed for hell and thats where we should be focusing.
Amen to that! I find it disturbing that this is even up for discussion, yet SA listeners are buying into this. For consistency one would also have to subscribe to "women not cutting their hair." 1 Cor 11:15 "Women not braiding their hair, or wearing gold or pearls or costly clothing." 1 Tim 2:9 "Men condemned for wearing long hair." 1 Cor 11:14 WHERE DOES IT END?????

"O foolish Galations, who bewitched you, into following a different gospel?" "Having been delivered, are you now seeking to establish your own righteousness?" This is very grievous to the work of the Holy Spirit. Eternal rules and regulations serve no purpose towards salvation. From the heart of one "born again" springs of living water flow.

To Mrs. Sandra M. who posted regarding headcoverings on 9/21/08 on sermon preached: "Don't adhere to a system of legalism." Jesus Christ has set us free! Don't get tangled up in legalism. Muslim women wear headcoverings. Do you want to be associated with them and their false god? This is very disturbing that a pastor would advocate such.


Survey8/21/08 11:37 PM
johninatlanta | atlanta  Find all comments by johninatlanta
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
I think by reading these comments and general thoughts that have been presented to me from biblical scholars this falls square into the category of a debatable matter as described in scripture. Therefore it should not even be debated. Christians should not waste their emotional energy and time on these debatable matters....too many souls out there headed for hell and thats where we should be focusing.

Survey8/17/08 12:37 PM
Pastor.Philip Lazar, India  Contact via emailFind all comments by Pastor.Philip Lazar, India
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
Two strong reasons are given by the divinely inspired author to the confused corintian Church.

1. Because of heavenly presence in the gathered Christ's community 1 Cor 11:10(Lk 15:10; Heb 12:22; 1 Pet 1:12)

2. It's apostolic direction in all churches that should be followed 1 Cor 11:16.

If any argument that rise against these reasons given by the apostle,than that person and exegete is called as a "contentious"

Comment will be answered.

Pastor. Philip Lazar, India


Survey8/17/08 12:20 AM
Cajun Dude | Louisiana  Find all comments by Cajun Dude
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
Double Amen to Girl from Australia!

These girls shame us men more often then not.


Survey8/14/08 1:47 AM
Girl | Australia  Find all comments by Girl
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
There is Hope, I could echo your name right back at you! It's nice to hear a man other than my father say that. My father is one of the few men who not only profess that viewpoint, but actually live it as well, so I've been very blessed to grow up in that environment.

I'm glad to meet you


Survey8/13/08 4:27 PM
There is Hope | United States  Find all comments by There is Hope
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
Girl wrote:
I agree with women wearing hats and/or covering in church, but I don't agree that it's to show their 'subjection to men'. It is to show they are under the authority AND protetion of either their father or thier husband, and certainly not ALL MEN as is implied here. Women may be subject to A man, but not ALL men, otherwise we would end up like the catholics, who teach their women that whatever the priest says for you to do must be right, and you cannot do wrong in doing it. This opens a very dangerous door, to my mind.
Girl from Australia,

You made a very excellent point. The scripture teaches that the wives are to be under the authority of THEIR OWN husbands, not all men in general just as husbands are to LOVE THEIR OWN wives. Your first and foremost authority as well as the men is to God himself and the Lord Jesus Christ, who is the Head of the church.

I have found that most fundamentalist men, baptist in particular, treat ALL women like they are second rate and should submit to ALL men, not just their own husbands.

I speak as a man and say that that attitude is a disgrace to biblical Christianity and is a mockery to the command of our Lord Jesus Christ.


Survey8/13/08 3:53 PM
Girl | Australia  Find all comments by Girl
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
I agree with women wearing hats and/or covering in church, but I don't agree that it's to show their 'subjection to men'. It is to show they are under the authority AND protetion of either their father or thier husband, and certainly not ALL MEN as is implied here. Women may be subject to A man, but not ALL men, otherwise we would end up like the catholics, who teach their women that whatever the priest says for you to do must be right, and you cannot do wrong in doing it. This opens a very dangerous door, to my mind.

Survey8/13/08 3:46 PM
William Gilmore | Portland, OR  Find all comments by William Gilmore
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
It seems to me that the question is not presented with sufficient care. 1 Corinthians 11:5 speaks not of the broad category of "women," but rather of "every wife." In addition the verses speak of a wife who "prays or prophecies;" not every woman who attends "public worship."

After researching this text my wife and I have decided that when she is placed in a situation (public or private) where it may appear that Christianity has "turned the world upside down" concerning traditional gender roles she should have "a symbol of authority on her head;"i.e. a prayer veil that covers her whole head. This is "because of the angels" (v. 10) not the culture. We also agree that this is in addition to her long hair which God has graciously provided as a covering for her as she worships and prays on an ongoing basis.


Survey8/12/08 1:18 AM
JoyfulJohn | NE Wisconsin  Contact via emailFind all comments by JoyfulJohn
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
A womens head cover is Yahshua!

Survey8/6/08 5:41 PM
Raani Starnes | Fort Worth, Texas  Go to homepageFind all comments by Raani Starnes
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
• Groups | Comments
Some of those who answered yes probably meant WITH HAIR.

There are a total of 31 user comments displayed | add new comment |Subscribe to these comments

Jump to Page : [1] 2 | last




From Blasphemy to Faith
Dr. Peter Masters

Hourly: Prophet Praying for Death - 9
Dr. Joel Beeke
Heritage Reformed...
Staff Picks..

Don Green
The Purpose of the Church

Truth Community Church
Midweek Service
Transcript!Play! | MP4

E. A. Johnston
Church Folk Boiling Mad In..

Evangelism Awakening
Special Meeting
Play! | MP3

Sermon: From Eternity to Eternity
Dr. James M. Phillips

SPONSOR | 14,400+

SPONSOR




                   
Service is the overflow of superabounding devotion. ... Oswald Chambers


Gospel of John
Cities | Local | Personal

MOBILE
iPhone + iPad
Church App
Watch
Android
Church App
Fire Tablet
Wear
Chromecast TV
Apple TV
Android TV
ROKU TV
Amazon Fire TV
Amazon Echo
Kindle Reader


HELP
Knowledgebase
Broadcasters
Listeners
Q&A
Uploading Sermons
Uploading Videos
Webcasting
Tips & Tricks
YouTube Screencasts
2-MINUTE TIPS

FOLLOW
Weekly Newsletter
Staff Picks Feed
SA Newsroom
RSS | Twitter | Facebook
SERVICES
Dashboard | Info
Cross Publish New!
Audio | Video | Podcast
Sermon Player | Video
Church Finder | Info
Mobile & Apps
Live Webcasting
Listen Line
Events Support
Transcription | PowerClips
Billboards | Biz Cards
Solo Sites
Favorites | QR Codes
Online Donations
24x7 Radio Stream
INTEGRATION
Embed Codes
Goodies
WordPress
Twitter
Facebook
Logos | e-Sword | BLB
JSON API

BATCH
Transfer Agent
Protected Podcasts
Auto-Upload Sermons
Upload via FTP
Upload via Dropbox
Picasa
ABOUT US
The largest and most trusted library of audio sermons from conservative churches and ministries worldwide.

Our Services | Articles of Faith
Broadcast With Us
Earn SA COINS!
Advertising | Local Ads
CONTACT
info@sermonaudio.com
Privacy Policy | Support Us | Stories