00:00
00:00
00:01
Transcript
1/0
If you turn in your Bibles to
2 Samuel chapter 16, we're up to verse 5. Here are the inerrant
word of God. Now when King David came to Bahurim
there was a man from the family of the house of Saul whose name
was Shimei, the son of Gerah, coming from there. He came out
cursing continuously as he came. And he threw stones at David
and at all the servants of King David. And all the people and
all the mighty men were on his right hand and on his left. Also
Shimei said thus when he cursed, Come out, come out, you bloodthirsty
man, you rogue. The LORD has brought upon you
all the blood of the house of Saul in whose place you have
reigned, and the LORD has delivered the kingdom into the hand of
Absalom your son. So now you are caught in your
own evil, because you are a bloodthirsty man. The Naboshai, son of Zeruiah,
said to the king, Why should this dead dog curse my lord the
king? Please, let me go over and take
off his head. The king said, what have I to
do with you, you sons of Zeruiah? So let him curse because the
Lord has said to him, curse David, who then shall say, why have
you done so? And David said to Abishai and
all his servants, see how my son who came from my own body
seeks my life. How much more now may this Benjamite
let him alone, let him curse for thought. So the Lord has
ordered him. It may be that the Lord will look on my affliction
and that the Lord will repay me with good for his cursing
this day. And as David and his men went
along the road, Shimei went along the hillside opposite him and
cursed as he went, threw stones at him and kicked up dust. Now
the king and all the people who were with him became weary. So
they refreshed themselves there. Father, we thank you for this,
your word. It is our desire to honor you, to please you as we
respond to it. And we pray that you would open
up the eyes of our understanding and that the meditations of our
heart and our continued worship would be acceptable in your sight.
In Jesus' name, amen. It's been a lot of fun having
international students in our home over the years. And it's
especially been fun for us to see how quickly they begin to
learn English. But one of the things that almost
all of our students have struggled with has been the meaning of
idioms. And I logged on to one of the
student forums and a question came from a student whom I did
not know about this British idiom. It's not cricket to kick a man
when he's down. Now, here was one of the helpful
explanations from a fellow student. He said that it means, do not
this man frustrated, distressed when supplemented on foot. And
the Chinese student was probably wondering, you know, how that
was any easier than the idiom. I could not understand either
one in the response as it was obvious. Idioms can sometimes
be very difficult to understand, but I think this one is fairly
straightforward. Cricket was a a game that was
played by the royalty and the lords of old. And it was a gentleman's
sport. It was something that you were
required to be very fair in playing. You were not allowed to resort
to any kind of abusive playing. In fact, sometimes they would
even applaud when somebody got a a wicket, took a wicket or
scored a shot. And it was normal that if the
empire did not see you doing something that was wrong that
you would just own up to it on your own. So cheating was not
considered to be cricket. It was not a gentlemanly thing
to do. And of course the The expression,
it's not cricket, began to transform from meaning not just that it's
not sportsmanlike, but it began to mean it's not fair, it's not
proper, and it was used in a lot of different contexts. And then
the other part, to kick a man when he is down, was taken from
a totally different sport, from boxing. When a person was knocked
out, he was on the ground, you don't start kicking him in the
head and in the groin and in the kidneys. It's not fair. Or to mix metaphors, it's not
cricket. And this expression has been
used to describe poor behavior in any area of life. Earlier
this year, Rick Warren's son Matthew committed suicide. And
you can just imagine the devastation that happened to the whole family. And he was given kind of a knockout
punch, so to speak. He was on the ground. And yet,
despite that fact, people just started piling on. They came
out of the woodwork from nowhere, started piling on to the family. Now writing all kinds of hate
mail like Rick deserves worse than that and his family deserves
worse and one letter said I hope his son went straight to hell.
Now what was particularly distressing to me when I read that was it
wasn't just the homosexual community that was attacking him like this.
Even Christians were piling on in his life and just giving abusive
language to him. And it's just not cricket. It's
not appropriate. I get upset when I see things
like that. When we saw in one football game, was it last year,
where somebody was trying to twist the head of a player that
was at the bottom of a dog pile. It's just not cricket. That's
not appropriate. And this passage here, what Shimei
was doing is just not cricket. He's kicking David in the emotional
kidneys when he is down. And what's weird about this is
that Shimei is willing to kick David when he's down, but he
was not willing to spar with David when David was in power.
Now, Nathan the prophet was. Nathan, you know, he confronted,
he criticized David, but he did it in a gentlemanly way. The
way he criticized David was a proper approach to cricket so to speak. And David didn't like it but
it was still appropriate. Based on the wording most people
assume that Shimei was introduced to David for the first time here
and we see that he was a coward in chapter 19. The only time
he has boldness to oppose David is when David is on the proverbial
mat and even then he's not playing fair. So take a look at verse
5. Now when King David came to Behorim there was a man from
the family of the house of Saul whose name was Shimei, the son
of Gerah, coming from there. This is the first time that we've
heard of this man and so the question comes, why is it the
people who don't have the guts to oppose injustice in David's
life when he's in power are now coming out of the woodwork when
he is feeling helpless? And I will have to admit it does
sort of look like Shimei has courage here. His anger gives
him a kind of courage. But I don't think he was as close
to David as is shown in the painting that's in in your your outline
there. Verse 13 indicates he was way
up on a hill throwing rocks, probably just far enough away
so that if anybody came after him, he'd be able to run. Right.
and hopefully outrun them. And you've got to piece together
two passages to understand what's happening here. When David comes
back to the throne in chapter 19, Shimei, oh, he immediately
asks for forgiveness. He's peaches and cream. He's
supportive of David. And the only explanation that's
made any sense to me that can reconcile the passivity of Shimei
earlier than this chapter and the passivity in chapter 19 and
following, reconcile that with the volcanic eruption in this
chapter is pent up frustration and bitterness. It's sort of
like the phenomenon that happened in the L.A. riots. People there
that were interviewed afterwards said that they did things, even
dangerous things, that they would never have done in their more
rational moments. But the loss of order that was
sparked by that first act of violence unleashed a torrent
of bitterness and frustration that had already been bubbling
underneath the surface. It's irrational in many ways,
but it doesn't take much to get a law-abiding citizen to irrational
rage if they have never dealt with the underlying bitterness
that is there. And you can see the irrational
outburst and the stream of emotion in the last phrase of verse 5. He came out cursing continuously
as He came. This is not just a brief angry
outburst. it is continuous. How long has
he been doing this? Well some commentators assume
based on verses 13 through 14 that he was doing this all the
way up to the Jordan River which would have been a 21 mile meandering
route descending 3,700 feet. Now based on verse 13 where it
talks about him being up on the hill I'm assuming it's only between
Bahurim and the Jericho plain. So that's about nine to 10 miles
where there's a lot of rocky, craggy hills and things through
that region. But even nine to 10 miles, that's
a long time for him to be expressing this kind of anger and rage. Why would an otherwise peace-loving
man be going so ballistic? And the answer is unrestrained
anger. And his anger keeps building
because his angry words reinforce angry emotions and angry thinking. Anger that is not restrained
can make people do some quite irrational things that they will
later on regret. Now, when David is surrounded
by at least 1,000 people, it might seem a little bit stupid
for Shimei to be cursing and throwing stones. In effect, this
was a symbolic stoning, sort of like what they do in the Middle
East, you know, when they burn an effigy or they burn a flag.
They're wishing they could do the same thing to the person
or to the country. and it involves some physical
abuse because probably at least some of those stones have connected
with some of the people in his entourage. Verse 6 says, And
he threw stones at David and at all the servants of King David,
and all the people and all the mighty men, were on his right
hand and on his left. Now I think I'd be a little bit
nervous throwing stones at David if I was as close as the picture
pointed. I think that picture is dead
wrong. And I put it in there because
I want to address this misconception. We find in chapter 19 that he
was a scaredy cat. This is really more akin to the
Middle Eastern scenarios you see on TV where you get a gang
of teenagers throwing stones at Israeli soldiers knowing full
well they're not going to get shot at or if they do get chased
down They'll be able to quickly run and take off and try to hide. There was some distance between
Shimei and these men because they had to go up a steep hill
in order to get him. Now I hunted because I know the
terrain based on my... I've got a kind of a video thing
that looks at all of the Middle East there. I couldn't get a
good picture. The picture that I put into your
outlines gives you a little bit of perspective, but there's a
lot of places, actually most of that road, that's very, very
steep. And it would have given him the
ability to throw stones and it would have been fairly easy for
him to run away. By the way, this is exactly the
same road that the man on the Good Samaritan story was ambushed
on. And bandits could hide in the
crags and crevices and there's all kinds of places along that
road where they could hide. And so I say this because if
you understand the geography there, you realize Shimei is
a little bit safer than you might immediately think. And he would
have been able to throw stones and run if anyone came after
him. But this is the kind of irrational
rage that I have on occasion seen a wife use against a husband
where she will throw things at him and cuss him out knowing
that he's probably not going to hurt her. Rage can make people
do extremely unreasonable things but certainly David is feeling
kicked when he's already down. Verse 7, also Shimei said thus
when he cursed, come out, come out you bloodthirsty man, you
rogue. Now most versions give the meaning
of the Hebrew idiom come out, come out with slightly different
variation, get out, get out. Okay, he was in Benjamite territory
and he was not welcome there. And the implication is that Absalom
would not be welcomed there either. Apparently there was a lot of
bitterness that had been fomenting in the Benjamite region against
David. A lot of hatred that was there
and it later leads to another revolt. The reason for the hatred
is found in the accusation that he was a bloodthirsty man and
a criminal which is what the word rogue means He goes on in
verse 8 to amplify Saying the Lord has brought upon you all
the blood of the house of Saul Implying what? that he and probably
a bunch of his other relatives had thought that David had killed
Saul and his household. Now it was false information
but it may explain why it took seven years before the northern
tribes were willing to join with David a number of years before,
21 years before. The rumor mills that Saul had
started were continued by Abner and by the various Saulides. And here was one person who had
been poisoned by those rumors. He obviously believed the false
rumors. But I have seen people get angry for the wrong reasons
and at the wrong people, interestingly, for long periods of time. Pastor
John Underhill's mother and his wife were at a garage sale one
time. And there was a man who overheard
them talking and he came up to them and said, I see that your
name is Underhill. Are you related to a minister?
And Carolyn, his wife said, yes, my husband's a minister. And
she told him where. And the man said, well, I could
tell you a thing or two. And the mother said, Go ahead,
I've heard it all. And the man explained how when
he had gotten married, he had asked the senior pastor of their
church, which was Fourth Memorial Church, to conduct the wedding.
And the pastor never showed up. He did have a substitute, but
he never showed up, never even told him that he was going to
have a substitute do it for him. And this man held this against
him all of those years, had been bitter against him for quite
some number of years. Well, Pastor Underhill's mother
thought that was a little bit strange. She didn't recall anything
like that happening. She said, well, how many years
ago did that happen? He said, 30 years ago. And she
said, well, we didn't even move into the town until 25 years
ago, so it must have been a previous pastor. So they got that all
straightened out. But here was a situation where
a man had been bitter at the wrong person for 30 years just
like Shimei had been bitter against the wrong person David for 28
years. Mr. Russell, his bitterness can
happen. He had wrongly assumed all this
time that David had killed all of his relatives and so it's
no wonder that he was bitter. And so the question I ask is
how many times do we get angry based on a report? Maybe it's
misinformation. We've never checked out the report
to see if the facts really hold up. We've just automatically
gone into angry mode. So the whole verse says, the
Lord has brought upon you all the blood of the house of Saul
and whose place you have reigned. And the Lord has delivered the
kingdom into the hand of Absalom, your son. So now you were caught
in your own evil. because you were a bloodthirsty
man. Now the phrase you were caught in your own evil implies
that David had taken the kingdom illegitimately just like Absalom
was now taking the kingdom illegitimately. And these are false accusations
that would have been hurtful in the extreme. because they're
the exact opposite of what David had done. Saul was the murderer.
Saul was the one who was chasing down David and David had been
loyal. David was the victim. Saul was
the one who had unnecessarily endangered the lives of his soldiers. Shimei really should have been
mad at Saul for having needlessly lost life. You see, even though
Saul had repeatedly tried to kill David, David had spared
Saul's life on more than one occasion, even though it had
been so easy to end it all and to kill Saul. But he loved Saul.
He loved Jonathan. And to be accusing David of murdering
Saul's family is an incredibly low blow. So low that it wasn't
cricket. Now, of course, David realizes
that even though he isn't guilty of killing Saul's family, he
was a murderer and He was a rogue. He had slept with Bathsheba,
a capital crime, and he had arranged for the death of Uriah, another
capital crime. So even though he had gotten
off on a technicality, and we saw before it was a technicality
where it was impossible to bring a court trial against him, in
God's eyes he still was worthy of death. So even though Shimei
is applying his criticism in the wrong way and with the wrong
information and with the wrong application, There is a sense
in which there is an element of truth in what he has to say. But as far as any court is concerned,
Shimei's public accusations would be totally false and subject
to a penalty due to a false witness, if indeed this was a court. And in this, I think Shimei stands
as a warning to us. We must not simply forward the
latest funny Facebook harangue against some politician simply
because we don't like the politician. Some people think like Shimei
and they think, well, even if every accusation is not true,
you know, this person deserves it. It really doesn't matter
anyway. Yes, it does matter. It matters in terms of your own
integrity. Toby has rightly pointed out
that some Facebook forwards are simply slander. And I don't know
which ones he had in mind, but I'm thinking of ones like the
situation, the quote from Bush. that he supposedly says that
the Constitution is just a blankety blank piece of paper. You know,
who cares about it? And liberals and conservatives
both have been forwarding that about Bush, even though it's
been for years shown to be a false statement. Same is true about
The Obama picture, you know, where he is saying the Pledge
of Allegiance with his hand over the wrong part of his body. Well,
you look at his ring finger and you can immediately see that
it's just been inverted on Photoshop or something like that. So, here's
the point. Whether the person you are slandering
is a good guy or a bad guy, it doesn't matter. It's still slander.
If Shimei had accused David of adultery, and accused David of
killing Uriah that would not be slander. That would have been
perfectly appropriate for him to say you don't deserve to be
on the throne. You killed Uriah and we all know
it and you should step down voluntarily. That would not have been slander. But Shimei could care less about
Uriah. What he's mad about is that the
Saulides are not on the throne any longer and so he spreads
this rumor that's been going on that's never been documented
and in fact is a false rumor that he has killed off all the
household of Saul. And it was because this was indeed
slander, false accusations, that David later on tells Solomon,
you know what you can do with Shimei. He didn't feel he could
deal with it at this point because he'd come out looking like a
hypocrite. Now in chapter 19, we do find that even Shimei recognizes
that what he had said here and what he had done was wrong and
that it was sinful. And let me read that for you. Chapter 19 beginning at verse
18. Then a ferry boat went across
to carry over the king's household and to do what he thought good.
Now Shimei, the son of Gerah, fell down before the king when
he had crossed the Jordan. Then he said to the king, do
not let my lord impute iniquity to me or remember what wrong
your servant did on the day. that my Lord the King left Jerusalem,
that the King should take it to heart. For I, your servant,
know that I have sinned. Therefore, here I am, the first
to come today of all the house of Joseph, to go down to meet
my Lord the King. But Abishai, the son of Zeruiah,
answered and said, shall not Shimei be put to death for this,
because he cursed the Lord's anointed? And David said, what
have I to do with you, you sons of Zeruiah, that you should be
adversaries to me today? Shall any man be put to death
today in Israel? For do I not know that today
I am king over Israel? Therefore the king said to Shimei,
you shall not die. And the king swore to him. So
just as God had been gracious to David in chapter 12, David
is being gracious to Shimei in chapter 19. He recognized that
some people say stupid, stupid things in the heat of anger,
and it doesn't in any way justify the anger or the things that
were said, but David takes it in stride. Now, both in chapter
19 and here in chapter 16, Abishai says emotionally charged things
that he should not have said. He responds in kind. So back
in chapter 16, verse 9, Then Abishai the son of Zeruiah said
to the king, Why should this dead dog curse my lord the king? Please let me go over and take
off his head. He recognized that cursing the
king is a sin and many evangelicals do not recognize this to be true.
So let's think about this a little bit. Though the Bible allows
prophetic rebuke against tyranny, and you've got a long history
all through the Old Testament and the New Testament of prophetic
rebukes against tyranny, these were true accusations against
bestial governments. They are not simply angry tirades
against authority. Shimei is bringing false accusations. He's really not thought through
them. Let me read you some of the scriptures
that I've put in your outlines, because when we speak against
the evils of our culture, it is imperative that we do so lawfully. Otherwise, we ourselves lose
credibility. And by the way, Jesus said we're
not ever to judge anybody. Judge not that you be not judged,
for with what judgment you judge, you will be judged. What he's
saying is don't ever bring any independent things. What you
do is you bring God's word as his judgment against people. You're not just judging them
independently. That's why later he says, judge righteous judgment.
How do you do that? By bringing the word to bear in their lives. And that's the principle. And
Exodus 22, 28 is probably the strongest verse that's against
cursing the king. says you shall not revile God
nor curse a ruler of your people. Now I want you to notice first
of all that this is not an absolute prohibition of cursing a ruler.
If it was, Man, the Old Testament prophets would be in deep trouble
because they brought curses against rulers all the time. The apostle
John would be in trouble when he wrote the book of Revelation
because that is calling down God's curses upon bestial empires. John the Baptist would be in
trouble. We'd be in trouble when we sing the imprecatory Psalms.
See, God commands us to call down His curses upon rulers who
are His enemies. And so it's similar to the balance
that we see in Matthew. Matthew forbids us from bringing
our judgment, but it does not forbid us from bringing the Bible's
judgment to bear in their lives. And this passage forbids us from
bringing our own curses, but does not forbid us from bringing
God's curses against His enemies and against His people. And so
just as an example, if I were to confront a person who was
living in adultery and tell him, brother, you should not be doing
this. You need to repent of this sin. And he says, you know, it's
none of your business. Jesus says, judge not that you
be not judged. My immediate response would be,
look, I'm not judging you. I'm a sinner too. I'm under the
judgment of God's word. It's because I love you that
I'm bringing the Bible's judgment. This is God's judgment, not my
judgment, okay? And because I love you, I'm calling
upon you to repent. So that's the kind of balance
that we are talking about here. David wrote curses in the Psalms
against both Saul and Absalom, but those Psalms were asking
God to judge them in His courtroom, not independent curses. So let
me read that verse again. You shall not revile God nor
curse a ruler of your people. Now the Hebrew poetry, one phrase
interprets the other and the parallelism there indicates that
we must never curse a king in a way that would curse God, would
curse God's authority. But what happens when a ruler
steps out? If this is God and he steps out
from under God's authority, he no longer has a chain of command
that really goes to God. And so when you're calling down
God's curses upon that action and his holding to that action,
you're not cursing God, okay? Because he stepped out from under
that chain of command. But we are not to throw off legitimate
God-given authority simply because there are some things that we
disagree with. If a ruler is appointed by God,
any lawful orders that he gives must still be honored and respected.
And if, because there is tyranny, we disrespect all the orders
of a tyrant, we throw off the legitimacy of all civil authority,
then we are falling under the condemnation of Exodus 22, verse
28. Ecclesiastes 10 verse 20 is similar. Do not curse the
king even in your thought. So even our inward attitudes
need to be respectful to all authority. Now of course that
begs the question of what is lawful authority, what's not
lawful authority. Romans 13 says, let every soul
be subject to the governing authorities for there is no authority if
not from God. And the authorities that exist
are appointed by God. Therefore, whoever resists the
authority, resists the ordinance of God, and those who resist
will bring judgment on themselves. So it's a serious thing to resist
lawful authority. It says we are going to be suffering
under God's judgment. And I'm a whole lot more afraid
of God's judgment than I am of a king's judgment. So when critiquing
authorities, as the Bible gives us a long tradition of doing,
it's critical that we bring the Bible's opinion of their behavior
and not simply judge them independently. What I'm trying to do here is
I'm trying to give you a little bit of a theology of individual
interposition, because it's appropriate not just for governments to interpose
themselves, but individuals to do so as well. 2 Peter and the
limits. The Bible gives limits to where
our interposition can go. 2 Peter 2 says, Then the Lord
knows how to deliver the godly out of temptation to reserve
the unjust under punishment for the day of judgment, and especially
those who walk according to the flesh in the lust of uncleanness
and despise authority. They, that is the ones who despise
authority, are presumptuous, self-willed. They are not afraid
to speak evil of dignitaries, whereas angels who are greater
in power and might do not bring a reviling accusation against
them before the Lord. But these, like natural brute
beasts made to be caught and destroyed, speak evil of the
things they do not understand and will utterly perish in their
own corruption." This isn't an indictment against a law that
goes on in Facebook. People routinely mock and speak
evil of dignitaries without even checking out if the facts are
true or not. Now there was plenty enough that
Shimei could have respectfully and lawfully criticized David
for without adding these false accusations that he had murdered
Saul's whole household. And certainly there was nowhere
in the Bible that it allowed Shimei to be throwing stones.
That's abuse. Jude 8 through 10 says much the
same. Likewise also these dreamers
defile the flesh, reject authority and speak evil of dignitaries.
Yet Michael the archangel, in contending with the devil, when
he disputed about the body of Moses, dared not bring against
him a reviling accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke you. Now
I want you to notice he lets God bring the judgments and God
bring the curse. He doesn't do it independently.
And when you pray the imprecatory Psalms, you're doing exactly
the same thing. You're doing exactly what Michael the archangel
did. You're saying the Lord rebuke you. You're bringing God's rebuke
by agreeing with the scriptures. And so that's the balance there.
The next verse says, but these speak evil of whatever they do
not know. And whatever they know naturally, like brute beasts
and these things, they corrupt themselves. But that phrase,
these speak evil of whatever they do not know, I think is
an indictment of a lot of forwards of email and a lot of forwards
on Facebook. So point A says there is an element
of truth in what Abishai is saying. Okay, he's upset. Shimei should not have engaged
in this misinformed cursing of the king. It was clearly a sin.
And if it had been a false accusation before a court, it would have
also been a crime. Now there is actually disagreement
among commentators as to what he's doing here. Is he just cursing
or is he trying to convince these people over a 10-mile stretch
to string David up from the nearest tree? That's what I think he's
trying to do. He's trying to, there's a court
kind of a situation here, and he's cursing him, bringing every
evidence he can to get these guys to turn against David and
execute him for murder. But let's anyway, for the sake
of the argument, assume that that's right. There is debate
on that. But let's assume this is an accusation in a court that
Shimei had engaged in a crime, was asking these people to kill
him. Abishai is still wrong. Even in a worst case scenario
Abishai is still wrong. It's wrong first of all because
it is returning tit for tat, name calling for name calling,
anger for anger, bitterness for bitterness. He's not responding
to these false charges with reasoned answers and saying no this is
not true. We know exactly what the facts of the situation are.
Instead Shimei's anger arouses anger in Abishai. Shimei's disrespect
causes Abishai to show equal disrespect. Abishai says, why
should this dead dog curse my Lord the King? Now commentators
say that's about the worst insult you could bring. Call a person
a dead dog. Calling him a dog, that's bad
enough, but a dead dog? And so if for the sake of argument
someone says that Shimei is bringing an accusation in court that is
false accusations, is disrespect, deserved the death penalty, It
can be pointed out that Abishai is using exactly the same disrespect
and is wanting to go and kill this person is really no different
than the lawlessness that Shimei is engaging in. He too allows
his anger to boil over into unreasonable words. And this too is a good
reminder to us to be slow to anger, slow to speak, James says,
the wrath of man does not produce the righteousness of God. There
is a place for righteous anger. I'm not denying that at all.
But it is exceedingly rare when we actually have an anger that
is unstained by sin. It's exceedingly rare. Exceedingly
rare. That's why one writer said, a
person who is angry on the right grounds against the right persons
in the right manner at the right moment and for the right length
of time deserves great praise. It's tough to do because anger
is like nitroglycerin. It's so unstable. It's as likely
to blow you up and to blow your loved ones up as it is to blow
sin up. Now God has designed anger to
blow sin up, you know, to make us make us determined to continue
to pursue the path of righteousness even if sin is clouding the way.
But unless our anger is sanctified by God's grace and it's strictly
limited by the provisions of God's Word, It's just very very
difficult to keep sin out of it. It's usually sinful. So be
extremely cautious of allowing anger to make you go off half
cocked in your speech. James tells us be slow to anger
and slow to speech. Now I've already kind of dealt
with point C. So I won't deal with it here, but we do see Ishimiai's
willingness to kill him involves him in the same hypocrisy. Now
what I'm doing is I'm giving these reactions to paint a context
within which David's reaction is remarkable, absolutely remarkable. Before we get to David, let me
make one more application of Abishai's reaction. Do we harp
on other people for doing exactly the same things that we have
done? Randall Smith told about an elderly couple that was taking
a vacation all over the states and they stopped at a roadside
restaurant and got a meal. And when they got up from their
table to leave, she accidentally forgot her glasses on the table.
She didn't discover for a few miles down the road that she
didn't have her glasses and said, oh, you need to turn around and
get my glasses. And what made matters worse is he had to drive
quite a ways further before he could find a place to get back
around. Needless to say, he was upset. He fussed and fumed all the way
back, complaining about her stupidity and how this was so unreasonable,
how thoughtless of you. He was just berating her. And
when they finally got out of the car to retrieve her glasses,
the old man said, well, as long as you're going back in there,
you may as well get my hat too. Wow. You could understand if
she wanted to punch his lights out, right? She could have been
very upset. Now, from what I understand,
she did not respond like Abishai. She responded more like David
did. But put yourself in her shoes. It is so easy to respond
like Abishai did. So easy. Now, with that mental
picture in your mind, I want you to amplify it many, many
times worse, and I think you get a little bit of an idea of
appreciation for how David responds to Shimei and how he responds
to Abishai. Even though David was by no means
perfect, he does show the grace of God in this response. First
of all, he rejects bitterness and revenge, verse 10. But the
king said, What have I to do with you, you sons of Zeruiah?
So let him curse." Now we've already seen in the past that
both Abishai and Joab, two brothers, tended to be governed by impulsive
anger. And bitterness and revenge and
it poisoned them more and more until joab actually involved
himself in a murder Now in past chapters, we've seen already
that david sought to model forgiveness to them He sought to instruct
them in forgiveness and he tried to encourage them to engage in
forgiveness as well but when they overlooked a fault It was
only because David pretty much forced them to do so. They had
no heart in it. And it kind of reminds me of
the British dramatist Frederick Lonsdale. He had taken his friend
Seymour Hicks to the Garrick Club in London for a New Year's
Eve party and he noticed that Lonsdale was refusing to even
be around his what he thought was his friend. And he asked
him, how come you don't go over there and wish him a Happy New
Year? And he said, well, we've had a falling out and he's no
longer my friend. I don't want to be around him,
let alone wish him a Happy New Year. And Hicks said to him,
oh, you must. It is very unkind to be unfriendly
at such a time. Go over now and wish him a Happy
New Year. So Lonsdale crossed the room
and spoke to this guy that he now despised. And he said, I
wish you a Happy New Year, but only one. That's about all that Joab and
Abishai could do. You know, is wish somebody, okay,
I won't kill you this time. That's about the most that they
were able to do. Even their overlooking of false
was only because David insisted on it. In this chapter Abishai
wants to kill Shimei and again in chapter 19 he wants to kill
Shimei. And David recognizes that both
sides in this debate have allowed their emotions to become poisoned
through faulty thinking. They're not thinking in terms
of grace. And the literal Hebrew response
is this, what to me and to you. Now it's a Hebrew idiom that
I think is better translated, do we agree on anything? Two
other translations worded, what do we have in common? What is
there in me that is also in you? So David recognized they had
been poisoned and he doesn't want his heart to be poisoned
by these attitudes. And he doesn't understand how
they can persevere in their bitterness. It does them no good and he writes
an entire psalm to counteract these kinds of bad attitudes,
Psalm 37. Psalm 37 was written as a direct
response to this ungodly interchange between Abishai and Shimei. So David's first good response
was to make sure, and you can see it so much in Psalm 37, but
some other Psalms as well, to make sure he was not poisoned
by the bitterness that was flowing very palpably between Shimei
and Abishai. The second thing that David does
right is that he tries to see this in the context of God's
sovereignty and discipline. Now when he says, So let him
curse, because the Lord has said to him, curse David, who then
shall say, why have you done so? And when verse 11 says that
God has ordered or commanded Shimei to do this cursing, he's
not implying that Shimei has a direct prophetic line to God
and God has prophetically spoken to him, go ahead and curse David. No, he's talking about God's
word in providence. And let me explain how that all
works. at the time of creation, what is it that made this world? Every aspect of it. It's God's
Word, right? When God commands, let there
be light, there is light. And the same is true of everything
else. And Job says, when God commands The lightning strikes
the mark, okay? And there's other passages that
talk about God's Word going forth and causing the nations to go
to war. So that's God's Word in Providence. His commands, His Word structures
all of life. And David already knew from a
previous prophecy in chapter 12 that the sword was not going
to depart from his household. God has decreed this very thing
to happen. It was an obvious fulfillment
of prophecy. It was disciplined because of his sin with Bathsheba
and his killing of Uriah. So David's attitude is basically
that even though Shimei's got things wrong on whom he had murdered,
he was going to listen to this accusation anyway because, hey,
this is a part of God's discipline. both prophesied and providentially
ordered. And this was Matthew Henry's
understanding of this passage. He says, as it was Shimei's sin,
it was not from God, but from the devil in his own wicked heart.
nor did God's hand in it excuse or extenuate it, much less justify
it, any more than it did the sin of those who put Christ to
death." Acts 2, 23, Acts 4, 28. But as it was David's affliction,
it was from the Lord, one of the evils which he raised up
against him. And even though John Wesley was
an Arminian, he has exactly the same understanding. He said this,
And this is ground enough for this expression, the Lord said,
not by the word of his precept, but by the word of his providence,
in respect whereof he is said to command the ravens, 1 Kings
17 verse 4, and to send forth his word to senseless creatures,
Psalm 147, 15 and 18. Who shall reproach God's providence
for permitting this, or who shall restrain him from executing his
just judgment against me? And so I think it's really wise
to be examining God's hand in our lives when people are doing
horrible things to us. They're attacking us. Why has
God allowed this? If those attacks are a part of
God's discipline in our lives, getting too angry, it's appropriate
to get upset, but getting too angry at the sin of those other
people that are hurting us could blind us to what God is doing.
Yes, they're wrong. But is there any truth to what
they are saying? I think that's what our perspective
should be. I had a professor at seminary
who always looked for the grain of truth in any criticism that
was brought to him, no matter how off the wall it was. Even
if that person was 98% wrong, In the criticism that he was
bringing, he sought to repent of the 2% that he was doing wrong
before he started to correct their misunderstanding about
the 98%. And I think we all should strive
to do that. However, if instead of doing
that, we get outraged at the 98% that they have gotten wrong
about us, what's going to happen? Our anger is going to totally
blind us to the 2% that we're wrong on and totally blind us
to what God Himself is seeking to bring into our lives. And
I think it would be a whole lot better to examine our own sins
with a magnifying glass, like David does in at least a few
of the Psalms that he wrote during this period, and not be looking
with a magnifying glass at the sins of Shimei. Recognize it,
yes, but say, first of all, Lord, is there anything in me that
may have caused this outrage? this outburst from Shimei. When
we're quicker to see our own sins than the sins of others,
then we will tend not to become bitter. The third thing that
David did right was to give himself a bird's eye perspective. If
you take a look at verse 11, David said to Abishai and all
his servants, see how my son who came from my own body seeks
my life. How much more now may this Benjamite
let him alone and let him curse for so the Lord has ordered him.
In effect, he's recognizing that Shimei has far more reason to
be angry at him than his son does. Shimei had been related
to the king. Now he has nothing. He lost everything.
And not only that, Shimei, because he was related to King Saul,
he's probably only heard one side of the story. I mean, there's
a sense in which David can sympathize with his anger, even though he
doesn't justify his anger. But there's more. David recognizes
both that there's an element of truth in what Shimei has said,
but he recognizes he deserves far worse than what Shimei has
been dishing out to him. And anytime we can look at the
tragedies that we experience and realize that we deserve far
worse than we are experiencing, it helps us to handle them a
little bit better. In fact, that's one of the things that the book
of Philippians says that God's grace produces in us. It makes
us so recognize the sinfulness of our hearts. I mean, even the
Apostle Paul, he considered himself to be the worst of sinners. And
you look at him, how in the world can you seriously say you're
the worst of sinners? Such a godly man. But that's how deep, how
bright the spotlight is shining in his heart. that when we see
ourselves as the chief of sinners, we're much less likely to want
to resort to revenge. We're gonna be saying, Lord,
I am so thankful that that's all I'm receiving. I deserve
so much worse at your hands. Pastor Kenneth Sawyer of Newport
News, Virginia said that he could see this kind of change rather
vividly in the life of one of his members. It was a truck driver
who had recently gotten saved. And in their small group, one
of the exercises that they had was everybody was to go around
and share what changes God had wrought in their lives since
they had gotten converted. And the truck driver said, well,
when I find somebody tailgating my truck, I no longer drive on
the shoulder of the road to kick up pebbles and rocks on them.
I didn't even know that was a tactic truckers use. But here was God
working in his heart taking away any inkling any desire to bring
revenge upon people who were mistreating him. OK. Anyway it's
a wonderful change of God's grace and we all need it. That's one
of the reasons why Romans 12 gives so many ways in which we
can practice this and not be overcome by evil but to overcome
evil with good. And that's the problem with Abishai
and Joab. They were overcome by evil. The
fourth thing that David did right was to humble himself before
God. Verse 12, It may be that the
Lord will look on my affliction, that the Lord will repay me with
good for his cursing this day. Now the word for affliction in
Hebrew is elsewhere translated as either iniquity, guilt, or
the punishment due, guilt. So David sees himself as being
under God's discipline, and he thinks the only appropriate thing
for me to do if I'm being disciplined is to humble myself before God. Yeah, if there wasn't discipline,
there's plenty that would be appropriate to criticize Shimei
about and to be upset there with Shimei about, but he doesn't
want the fact that Shimei is wrong to cloud his own vision
and to keep him responding humbly. He knows that God exalts the
humble and he abases the proud. And so he is praying, Lord, will
you please exalt me as I humble myself? And God did. God did
exalt him. And so responding to providence
and humility is another tool to help avoid getting bitter.
The last thing that David did was to commit himself to endurance
and perseverance. Verses 13 through 14. And as
David and his men went along the road, Shimei went along the
hillside opposite him and cursed as he went, threw stones at him
and kicked up dust. Now the king and all the people
who were with him became weary, so they refreshed themselves
there." Now it takes self-control to not respond sinfully to such
Infuriating nonsense. Okay. It's like Satan is trying
to get David to Any way he can to get David to respond pridefully
and sinfully to what shimmy I is doing all along this Jericho
Road He's trying to get David to do something. He will later
regret now David does not bite. I But it takes endurance to keep
on keeping on when life is not fun. And this, too, is part of
God's calling upon us. Now, it's really at a juncture
like that that we need to pray. We need to cry out to God with
our frustrations. We need to lay our frustrations
at the feet of Jesus. We need to learn to worship,
even in the midst of pain, to respond to God in faith, to say,
Lord, help me to respond to these people in an appropriate way.
And I do not think it is by accident Let me make sure the number is
right here. 17 or 18 of David's psalms are
dated to this period. It's an incredibly short period
of time that David is in exile. 17 or 18. Now some scholars actually
think that there are 23 psalms that belong to this period, but
I'm convinced that five of those that they ascribe there actually
belong to his running from Saul. But even the low figure of 17
Psalms during this period is really incredible. And these
Psalms show that the pain of betrayal and loneliness and false
accusation and loss and unknown future drove David deeper and
deeper and deeper into the heart of God and strengthened him enormously. It would not surprise me at all
if the Reformed leader that we talked about last week If he
grows more in these upcoming weeks than he has ever grown
in his life, somehow God does this through the pains that we
go through and even through the failures that we go through. While Joab and Abishai were focusing
on how they had been wronged and therefore they missed out,
David was focusing on God and what God's intentions were. And when you read those psalms,
that I won't all list out for you here, but you find a depth
of God's grace that is unusual. David had learned how to benefit
from God's negative providences. And if you would like to learn
how to do so, there's a book by the Puritan writer Thomas
Boston that is remarkable. It's called The Crook in the
Lot. The Crook in the Lot. And there's
a modern edition of that by Curtis Crenshaw. It's been updated in
its English, a lot easier to read. That's called How to Profit
from Our Afflictions. It's a tremendous book. It helps
you to grow like crazy during those times where you're experiencing
tough, tough times. In fact, the tough times that
Curtis Crenshaw was going through is that the IRS had falsely accused
him of owing $65,000, and they were going after everybody in
their church. And they would win in a court case, and then
they would bring up other charges. And they'd win in that court
case. It was incredibly grueling. It was a very, very stressful
time. They ended up winning on all of the counts. But what was
even more stressful was they were stabbed in the back by their
own presbytery and the PCA, who assumed if the IRS says that
you're guilty, you must be guilty. They didn't even bother to investigate.
And so he felt really betrayed, but rather than getting bitter,
He got better by his responses from that book. I highly, highly
recommend that you get that book if you're going through tough
times. Now it's true that David's faith, his peace, his love, his
other graces were tested to the limits. But they made him grow
so great in God that he produced some masterpieces of Psalms during
this period that have ministered to countless thousands. And I
doubt they would have ministered as deeply as they do. Psalms
like Psalm 27, one of my favorites, if he had not gone through that
time of pain. Psalm 37, let me just read you
the first 11 verses to give you a little bit of a feel for how
David's heart was responding directly to this interchange
without anger or bitterness. Do not fret because of evildoers,
nor be envious of the workers of iniquity, for they shall soon
be cut down like the grass and wither as the green herb. Trust
in the Lord and do good. Dwell in the land and feed on
His faithfulness. Delight yourself also in the
Lord, and He shall give you the desires of your heart. Commit
your way to the Lord. Trust also in Him, and He shall
bring it to pass. He shall bring forth your righteousness
as the light and your justice as the noonday. rest in the Lord,
and wait patiently for Him. Do not fret because of Him who
prospers in the way, because of the man who brings wicked
schemes to pass. Cease from anger and forsake
wrath. Do not fret, it only causes harm. For evildoers shall be cut off,
but those who wait on the Lord, they shall inherit the earth."
For yet a little while, and the wicked shall be no more. Indeed,
you will look carefully for his place, but it shall be no more.
But the meek shall inherit the earth and shall delight themselves
in the abundance of peace. But I especially like verse eight.
Cease from anger and forsake wrath. Do not fret. It only causes
harm. If you are a Shimei who has been
given false information about a David, you better investigate
before you allow yourself to get upset and get angry. You
know, Shimei believed a report without investigating and it
caused him to have this anger for who knows how long. The first
one who tells a story, the Bible says, sounds convincing until
somebody else comes along and investigates the story. And don't
allow your anger to explode or to cause you to do stupid things
like Shimei did. And for sure, don't kick David
when he is down. Every Shimei needs this advice.
Cease from anger and forsake wrath. Do not fret. It only causes
harm. Now, if you're an Abishai who's
having rocks thrown at you and insults given to you, don't respond
in kind. Don't stoop to the level of a
Shimei. That's what Abishai did. Do not
allow someone else's anger to make your anger explode. follow
David's advice, cease from anger and forsake wrath. Do not fret. It only causes harm. And if you are a David who was
pulled in a tug of war between Shimei and Abishai while you're
running away from Absalom, don't despair. Don't lash out. David's advice is still the same.
Cease from anger and forsake wrath. Do not fret. It only causes
harm. May God's grace enable us to
respond just like David did here. Amen. Father we thank you for
your word and for the illustration of the biblical principles that
we see all through your word and we pray that we would become
living epistles read and known by men as people of grace people
like David here who are quick to repent and quick to humble
themselves and slow to wrath and slow to anger. Father, transform
us and sanctify us by your word. We pray in Christ's name. Amen.
Why Kick A Man When He is Down?
Series Life of David
The irrational rage between Shimei and Abishai and the great self-control exhibited by David (also exhibited in the Psalms written during this period) is the framework for a unique discussion of anger, lack of sportsmanship, lack of self-control, slander, cheating, unfair critiques, and other sins.
| Sermon ID | 9953161844250 |
| Duration | 57:20 |
| Date | |
| Category | Sunday Service |
| Bible Text | 2 Samuel 16:5-14 |
| Language | English |
Add a Comment
Comments
No Comments
© Copyright
2026 SermonAudio.