00:00
00:00
00:01
Transcript
1/0
Let us turn please to two passages
tonight. First of all, Genesis chapter
6 and then the book of Romans. Genesis chapter 6 and then we're
turning to the book of Romans and chapter 1. For those who have just gathered
with us tonight, we are have begun and are continuing through
a study of Calvinism and the five points of Calvinism, which
is really a study of the doctrines of the faith, the Christian faith
that is. So we commenced last week by
looking, really giving a primer on Calvinism, where the name
originated, where it began, and I trust that you have remembered
at least something of that message from last week. But we come tonight
to the first point in the five points of Calvinism. As you remember,
we had that little acrostic tulip, T-U-L-I-P, the first T being
total depravity, which is part of the defence of the Calvinists
that was presented at the Synod of Dort in 1618-1619. So come with me this evening
then to the Book of Romans, Chapter 1. 24 Wherefore God also gave them
up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own heart, to
dishonour their own bodies between themselves, who changed the truth
of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more
than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen. 25 For this cause
God gave them up unto vile affections, For even their woman did change
the natural use into that which is against nature. And likewise
also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their
lust one toward another. Men with men, working that which
is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompense of
their error which was meet. And even if they did not like
to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate
mind, to do those things which are not convenient, being filled
with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, coppice, maliciousness,
full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity, whisperers,
backbiters, haters of God, despiseful, proud, boasters, inventors of
evil things, disobedient to parents. without understanding, covenant-breakers,
without natural affection, implacable and merciful, who, knowing the
judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy
of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that
do them. Then if you go over to chapter
3, verse 23, the verse that we all know, For all have sinned,
and come short of the glory of God. Then chapter 6, verse 23, For the wages of sin
is death, but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus
Christ our Lord. Amen. So those are the verses
that we will be leaving with you tonight. And I trust that
God will bless them to your hearts. So the first point that the Calvinists
presented at the Synod of Dort in 1618-1619 as a defence of the Reformed
faith was man's total inability or man's total depravity. Otherwise known as, well we could
say, man's complete foe into sin as a complete creature, body,
mind, will, affections, heart. It was all completely affected
by sin. The doctrine of man's total inability
was not first declared at the Synod of Dort in the Netherlands,
South Holland in the years 1618, 1619. I did say to you last week that
there's a very important date in the calendar of the Reformed
faith, the year 1618, 1619, when that illustrious synod of men,
godly men I might say, who stood to defend what had always been
believed to be biblical amongst the Dutch churches. As we said,
that synod or that gathering of assembly of people was not
for the arrangement of Christian truth. It was set for the defense
of the gospel. It was not so men could maybe
understand or have defined what the gospel actually was. But
it was called to settle a controversy that was pulling the Dutch churches
apart. We took you back to the year
1610, whenever we said that almost civil war broke out in the land
of Holland because of a group who followed a man by the name
of Jacobus Arminius. Those people over time became
known as the Arminians. But yet they so persuaded the
authorities in Holland that they actually had Calvinists, those
who followed the teaching of John Calvin and Theodore Beza,
John Knox, the other men of that time, had them banned from preaching
in certain places and in other places where they otherwise would
have had freedom. So that's the kind of controversy
that these men were facing to settle in the years 1618-1619.
The Arminianism is not about the extent of Christ's atonement. Many people will say that the
controversy between Calvinism and Arminianism is in regards
to who or for whom did Christ die. That's not the case. That
certainly is a part of it, but it is a very broad spectrum.
We said that the Arminians had five points. And the five points
that they presented at that synod, they failed to defend from Scripture.
They were asked to come and justify from God's Word what they believed,
but they refused to do so. And the synod took the five points
of Calvinism in response to those five points of Arminianism, and
they found them to be agreeable to, founded upon, the Word of
God. One of the things that the Arminians
denied was man's total depravity. They would not accept that when
Adam fell, his actions and his Adam's actions had serious implications
for the human race. They believed that man was not
a fallen creature. They believed that man, as one
preacher said, it's like a man falling off a five story building
onto the pavement. And the Arminian believed that
that man could redirect himself and could go to maybe a phone
box and phone for help. And he could help himself. Whereas
the Calvinist, he would believe that a man who has fallen from
such a great height has fallen to this death. I believe fully
that God's word teaches you, and I trust you will see this
tonight, that man spiritually has fallen to his death. He is
not somewhat affected by sin, that he can still exercise good
and have love and desire towards God. That's just not the case.
The controversy raged, and still rages today, between those who
believe that man is totally depraved as far as the biblical extent
is, that is, he cannot bring himself to God. And those who
say, no man, was maybe affected, he was maybe slightly put out
of sorts, but he can still do spiritual good. That is the teaching
that was brought before the Synod of Dort. Now, in order to understand
the doctrine of man's total depravity, we need to go back to the 5th
century. You're getting a history lesson
here tonight. I hope it's worthwhile. We go back to Augustine. Some of you may have heard the
name Augustine. He was the Bishop of Hippo, North Africa in the
year AD 395 to the year AD 430 thereabouts. Augustine was a man who taught
or held on to the teachings of John the Apostle. You have to
remember that John, in A.D. 100 perhaps, was the last of
the apostles, the last man who carried the torch of truth. There
were no more after John. And we fall into what you may
say was the beginning of the dark ages, where there were men
here and there who did have the truth, but that was so confused. And men lived lives that were
licentious, rampant vileness. Sin was in every place, and even
in the church. Oh yes, religion carried on.
But it was so confused with paganism that very few people knew what
the truth actually was. But there were men like Augustine
who, in the year 395, was able to define doctrine and
to present truth. And one of those truths that
he sought to uphold, indeed his whole ministry was very much
argumentative. It was very much embroiled in
controversy. Because how else could it be?
He was fighting for the truth. He was standing for the truth
against men who believed not the truth. So his ministry in
many ways was defensive. It was controversial. But we need to go back to Britain
around the same time. There was a man called Pelagius. I know these names may not be
familiar to you. Pelagius was a British monk who was actually
believed he was born in Britain. But Pelagius was driven out of
Britain and he arrived in North Africa with his teachings. Now
Pelagius denied total depravity. He totally removed it. He believed that infants were
born innocent, that they were born perfect in the same way
that Adam was. Now Pelagianism, as it's known,
teaches that. that each and every one of us
is born completely without sin. There is no such thing as original
sin, being passed down from the fathers. David said, in sin did
my mother conceive me. But Pelagius, he said no. He had a brilliant mind, he was
a prolific author, but his existing writings show him to be at complete
variance with the teachings of the Apostle Paul, the Apostle
John, Peter and with Augustine. Now he came to North Africa,
which of course brought him into direct conflict with this godly
man, Augustine. Now I just must say here, Augustine
was no angel. You read his life, he was a most
wicked young man. lived in sin for most of his
early life. Immorality. It's not a testimony you'd be
very proud of. But nevertheless, God used him to hold the torch
of truth in a time whenever it was needed. But in his most famous
work, that is Pelagius, which is known as called A Treatise
on Free Will, he states there that, listen to this, all men
are born neutral with the capacity to do good or evil. He also taught
that by Adam's first sin, that is, the first sin, Adam injured
only himself. Injured himself. Didn't destroy
himself, but Adam injured only himself, not his posterity. Now, do you see where I'm coming
from? Pelagius was teaching that Adam
destroyed himself, but his sin did have no effect on you or
anyone else. That was the teaching of this
man. He was in fact saying that every
man is born in precisely the same condition that Adam was
born. Adam was born perfect. Pelagius
taught that we are too. And you can see how that brought
another controversy in the year AD 395. Because Augustine, he
was arguing at this time, no, we are fallen, we are dead in
sins, we are completely ruined. Our minds, our wills, we can't
even think godly. We can't even bring ourselves
to God. We're like the man who came off the five-story building.
We're dead. Destroyed. No life. Unable to think. Unable to cry
out for help. Unable to shout for assistance. We can't do that. That's man
by effect of the fall. Now this dispute between Pelagius
and Augustine plays a major part in our understanding of the Calvinist
position on total depravity. We need to begin here. Because
when we come to the Synod of Dorton 1618, these men were not
presenting a new teaching. They were upholding what Augustine
had warred with Pelagius against, saying, no, we are destroyed
by sin. We are completely corrupted. So do you see why I bring you
through history? Augustine, man is totally depraved. Senator Dort, we believe that
the scripture teaches man is totally depraved. Westminster
Confession of Faith, 1647, to which I assign to, and which
you as members of this church have agreed to, teaches that
man is entirely and totally corrupt. Why do we believe that? Because
it is founded upon and agreeable to the Word of God. Now there's another man I want
to introduce tonight. So there's Augustine, Pelagius,
Jacobus Arminius, John Calvin, of course, He's always drawn
into these things somewhere. Another man by the name of John
Cassian, born in the year 360 AD. Now this man, John Cassian,
or Cassian, was an opponent of Augustine. And he didn't agree
with Pelagius. So he created something that
became known as Semi-Pelagianism. You know what it is, it's a halfway
house. He took something from this side, he took something
from that side, and he created a whole new system of doctrine
which is Arminianism. What is Semi-Pelagianism? It
was presented at the Synod of Dort. I know this may be heavy
thinking tonight, but I trust you will see the reason why it's
important that we look at this. Was this man right? Of course
he wasn't. There's no rightness, it's not
true, to bring together something that is a mixture of truth and
error, and present it as something, well it's only a compromise on
this side, compromise on that side. Well, sure, it must be
right. There's truth on both sides.
No, it's not. As I said, he disagreed with
the truth. That's it. He disagreed with
Augustine, but he disagreed with the truth. He disagreed with
the false, but he brought in the false with the truth. And
we have this teaching today that Cassian said, like Pelagius,
that Adam's fall into sin didn't totally corrupt you and I. It
injured us. It left us, yes, corrupt, but
not totally corrupt. We can still choose to do good. And that's what you have today
in the system of easy-believerism and Arminianism. Where there's
a gospel presented that men are not dead in trespasses and sins,
but are free to choose Christ when and where they will. It's
not the gospel, men and women. But that is semi-Pelagianism.
So there you have the history behind this. We arrive now at
Dort. It lets us see that prior to the Senate of Dort, this controversy
had been raging. But the Calvinists, they formulated
it for us. And they now tell us, here's
the first point, total depravity. Biblical Christianity. So what
do we want to consider tonight? I hope we have time to go through
this this evening. The first place I want you to
turn is Romans chapter 5 in the verse number 12. As a verse we
all know, wherefore as by one man sin entered into the world
and death by sin and so death passed upon all men for that
all have sinned. That brings us to consider original
sin. The original sin was a very important doctrine, not only
to Augustine, but to the Dutch churches in every church since.
It was central to understanding the doctrine of total depravity.
What is it that corrupted man? What is it that brought man into
a state of sin and misery as our Catechism teaches? Well,
here it is. By one man, sin entered the world. Pelagius says, that's right,
Adam was corrupted by his sin, but as for everyone else, they're
fine. Semi-Pelagianism or Arminianism says, no, they were corrupted,
that is, Adam was corrupted and the whole human race was corrupted,
but not completely. The Calvinists say, Adam was
corrupted, his whole human race was corrupted, and outside of
Christ and the gospel, there's no hope. That's Calvinism. Look at verse 12 again with me.
One man's sin entered into the world, and death by sin, and
so death passed upon all men, for let all have sin. Pelagius,
I don't know where he got his logic from. But I read in the
Apostle Paul's writings, which he had, by the way, that the
proof that sin has affected you and I is death. Now, what man
would be His right mind willing to stand up and say that death
is not the result of the fall. Men are dying all round us. Young
and old. And it's the result of sin, men
and women. It's not the result of some catastrophic occurrence
or just human nature taking its course. If we were all created
Original sin not affecting any one of us, that means you and
I would live like Adam. But that's not true, of course.
So how does a semi-Pelagian get out of that? He says, well, that's
part of the partial corruption. Man dies. But as regards to his
mind and will, he can do what he wants. He can choose Christ
or he can reject Christ. But the Calvinist says, no, no,
no. Martin Luther said this. He spoke about the bondage of
the will and he says, you men are in bondage to your will and
you can will only to do evil. You are in complete bondage,
sinner, tonight. You can't do one spiritual good or one spiritual
action that God will find meritorious or any good in. There's nothing
pleases him in you because you're a corrupt, dead sinner. Adam. Look at Romans 5 verse
19. Adam was our federal head. This
is how you explain this. Adam's sin, now I know it's a
big word, imputation. Adam's sin was passed over. It was imputed. It was laid to
your account. In other words, Adam, as he acted
in the Garden of Eden, he acted on your behalf. Tony Blair. Gordon Brown, George
Bush or Barack Obama, what they do as the leaders of their country
has repercussions on the citizens of that country. And we either
share in the benefits of that decision made by that leader
or we reap the consequences of that leader. I was just reading
a whole thing last night in George Bush about, I think it's a very
unfair criticism I have to say, about how he, by his actions,
has made America one of the most despised countries in the world.
I think it's very unfair, but nevertheless, can I say to the
congregation, it shows us that the decisions that a man makes
politically has far-reaching consequences. Whether it be Stormont,
or whether it be the White House, or anywhere else, when a man
makes a decision, it has far-reaching consequences. for his people,
for his citizens. The benefits will be passed on
or the consequences will be felt by you and I. And sometimes we
complain about that when you go to fill up your car at Tesco
or wherever else you fill your car up. You complain and say,
here we go again, our government has taken this decision and now
look at it, we're paying for our diesel, for our fuel. But
that's the system in which we live. It's a representational
system. Men make decisions. We feel the
consequences. If I, as the representative of
my home, take the decision that my children will have no more
food, they will feel the consequences. If my wife says, you're not going
to have any more food, the consequences will probably be good and beneficial,
at least for the time being. But you can see what I'm saying.
I am the representative of the home. You men are. Decisions
you take, your family feel them. Consequences also of your actions,
whatever you might decide to do. And that's how we understand
the doctrine of total depravity. Adam sinned, he was a representative,
which means his, what he has done, affects you and I. He damned himself, which means
he damned us too. We haven't the time to go into
everything about the imputation of Adam's first sin, except to
say that we, by our consent, agree to it. By our actions. I remember reading the story
of a young lad in his school. And he had an apple. And he wasn't
eating the apple, and the teacher said to him, why are you not
eating your apple, young man? And he says, well, there's a worm that's
just come out of it. Good enough reason. And a teacher who was
a believer said to the young man, well, tell me, did the worm
come from the inside or did it come from... did it eat its way
into the apple or did it eat its way out? The young lad says,
I haven't a clue. He says, it ate its way in. Of course it didn't. And the
teacher took that little simple illustration to explain how original
sin works and how it manifests itself. And the teacher explained
to that young lad and to the class that how the worm, the
worm egg, was planted in the blossom and how that it hatched
in the core of the apple. And over a period of time, that
worm began to eat its way out from the inside out. And that's
the original sin, men and women. The seed of sin has been planted
in our nature. And over time, that sin breaks
forth into what we call actual sin. And men are sinning, men,
in God's word indeed. I mean, the scripture teaches
that very plainly, that no man, even the child, it's not too
long after his birth that he begins to really express his
new nature. Sinful, corrupt. A fact of completely. But nevertheless, We need to
understand that Adam was our federal head. He acted on our
behalf and he constituted us as sinners. Look at verse 19
of Romans 5. For as by one man's disobedience
many were made sinners. One man, many sinners. The seed has been sown. We are
dead. Spiritually that is. Dead in
sin. That is why Paul could say, look
at Ephesians 2, verse 3. He could say, we are all by nature
the children of wrath. We are all by nature doomed. We are damned by God because
of one man's sin. What he has done, his actions
are my actions. His thoughts were my thoughts.
And I own my sin because of Adam. There was a preacher once said,
He was listening to a group of young men who were arguing over
the doctrine of original sin. And he said to them, Do you believe
in actual sin? And the young men said, Yes,
of course we do. Do men sin thoughtward indeed? Well, they do. They murder.
They commit fornication. They lie. They do all kinds of
things. We believe that. The old preacher turned around
and said to them, Have you ever seen a tree growing without a
root? The seed's there. The root's there. And very soon
that It will begin to grow and the branches will appear. And
there you have the proof. Your heart, men and women, your
hearts, my heart, is the fountainhead of sin. But that brings us to
consider something else here, and that is the free will of
man. Is man free to choose? Because that was the great controversy
at the Senate of Dort. The Arminians, their theology
taught, no man has complete freedom of his will. He can do with the
gospel what he wants. He can come to Christ when he
wants. Whereas the Calvinist said, listen,
man's will, that is how you think young man, woman is completely
dead. See, Adam was born with a will
that was completely towards his God. He loved to serve his God.
He didn't serve God because he just wanted to. And now that man has fallen,
his mind is towards sin, always to sin. Completely corrupted. If I could have you just think
for a moment. The choices you make in life
are always determined according to the direction of the will.
Why is it the believer thinks Godwards? It's because in redemption
his will has been changed, renewed. Why is it the sinner can never
bring himself to think other things than sinful things? Even good things that he determines
as good are sinful. I can think of a man I knew. And for you to look at him, you'd
have thought, there's a very good church-going man. He gives
his money into the church. He attends church. But why does
an ungodly man do that? You know why? Because there's
a sinful thought in his mind that tells him, I am making myself
acceptable to God. And that man I'm thinking of,
that was his idea. He would have told you that.
Which lets you see tonight that you may say, well, how does it
explain the good works that man does? There are men in this town
and they're good men. They give money to charities.
They give money to those in need. But deep down in their hearts,
if they know not Christ, their will is still towards evil. Thinking, this is good. I'm making
myself acceptable to God. No man can charge me. Oh, I do
this. I do the other thing. How can
you say I'm a sinner? Your will tells you. Your will
is corrupt. You do not have a free will.
Oh, I can do what I want. I can do a bad thing if I want. Or I can do a good turn if I
want. No, you can't. You are corrupt. And as Luther
said, your mind, your will is in bondage. You choose only to
do those things which are evil. Can I quote from the Westminster
Confession here? Section 3 of chapter 9. Man by his fall into
the estate of sin hath wholly lost all ability of will to do
any spiritual good accompanying salvation. So is a natural man,
being altogether adverse from that good and dead in sin, is
not able, listen to this, is not able by his own strength
to convert himself or to prepare himself thereby. Can a dead man
lift himself up to God is the question. Of course he can't. But who is it brings the dead
to God? Do you remember that? day that Christ stood outside
the grave of Lazarus. He who was dead four days. I
mean, Pelagius and John Cassian would say he wasn't really dead.
He probably heard the voice of Christ, they would say. And he
chose to come out of that grave. He could have chosen to stay
in, you know, Lazarus. But he decided, no, I think I'll come
out. That's Arminian theology. Talbot says, Lazarus was stinking,
he was dead, he was corrupting. But yet the voice of Christ called
him, and Lazarus could do nothing else but come forth. And you
will find this when we come to examine irresistible grace. That when God calls a sinner,
that sinner, as you will know, believer, that night the Lord
saved you. You could do nothing else but
come forth. Respond to the call of the gospel.
There was something about that night, or that day, or however
it happened. You'd heard the call of the gospel.
You young men, for example. There's many times you've been
under the sound of the gospel. Older people, for years maybe.
And it's never dawned on you your need of Christ. Then all
of a sudden, there's one evening you're under the ministry of
the gospel. And the words that the preacher
were using were like nothing you'd heard before. You've heard
the text preached on a hundred times. But as the Word of God
made effect on the Word, He draws you to yourself. He does for
you what you cannot do for yourself. Convert yourself, or even prepare
yourself. Augustinianism. That was a teaching
of Augustine taught that by Adam's transgression, The will of man
was completely and utterly lost. That is the freedom. Freedom
to do, to choose for good was completely lost. It's a very
important teaching. But there's something else we
must as we move on here, and that is that man has not only
lost the freedom of his own will, but he has been entirely corrupted. Turn please to Romans 3 and verse
number 10. This really is the evidence of
total depravity. And you don't have to go too
far to find the evidence of the corruption that is in man. But Romans 3 in verse number
10. As it is written, there is none righteous, no, not one. Now if you go to Genesis chapter
2 and chapter 3 verse 7, and study the actions of Adam as
a fallen creature. He loved his Lord, he walked,
he talked in the cool of the day, But after the fall, we find
that every action of fallen man is emblematic of man's fallen
nature. What was the first thing? We
find there in Genesis 3 verse 7, that the eyes of them both
were opened, and they saw themselves to be naked. But the word there,
saw, referring to them seeing their nakedness is actually more
than that. It's really to express that they not only saw that they
both were naked, but they actually felt something. They felt a nakedness
in themselves. That's the intensity of the verb
there. They saw, but they felt the awful
destitute. Nakedness of their soul. Yes,
their bodies were naked. Before, there was no shame. But
now they run and they hide. That's the second action. They
run to the darkest part of the garden. John 3 verse 19. Man
loves darkness rather than light. Whereas before, Adam loved the
light. But now we find he runs to the
darkest part of the garden. Just like the unconverted man.
by means of his own good works. He tries to clothe himself. Adam
sought to clothe himself, but as we find, the Lord comes and
reveals his nakedness to them. That's why the Lord tells us
in Romans Revelation 3 verse 18. He says to men who are ungodly
and wretched, why don't you come and buy raiment, white raiment,
that you may be clothed and without shame. But your nakedness may
not appear. See, men are completely stripped
of righteousness. There are many other things we
could bring before you there. But look at John 3, verse 19.
I've just quoted from it. John 3, verse 19. This is the
condemnation. That light has come into the
world. And men love darkness rather than light. Why is that
so? Because their deeds were evil. Adam ran from God because his
deeds were now evil. He was corrupted in his thought
life. His thoughts toward his wife's
own body were corrupted. He was ashamed of those thoughts.
He seeks to hide those thoughts. It was the same with Eve, her
husband. And both of them now realize there is something wrong
here. They begin to think about one another in different ways.
And over time, we find that that has gradually developed in men
until we come to Romans chapter 1. What do we find? Look with
me at verse number 26. For this cause God gave them
up to their vile affections, where even the woman changed
the natural uses of them that is against nature. Sodomy, every
other kind of vileness, is an expression of the corruption
that began in Eden. Their own bodies, nakedness.
It doesn't make pleasant reading, men and women, but it goes to
show you that in here There are the seeds of depravity that no
one of us can control. The heart is deceitful above
all things and desperately wicked. Who can know it? Who can understand
the depravity of the heart of this man? No one. Again, can I read from our confession?
The guilt of this sin was imputed, and the same death in sin and
corrupted nature conveyed to all their posterity. It was passed
on, descending from them by ordinary generation. But listen to this.
Confession of Faith, chapter 6, section 4. From this original
corruption, whereby we are utterly indisposed, disabled, and made
opposite to all good, and wholly inclined to do evil. That is
the will. We're turned that way to do evil. I take you back to the Synod
of Dort here. Jacobus Arminius, of course he was not there, but
those who were his followers, Arminians, held to the view that
man was only injured by sin, not ruined by sin. Their teaching
was semi-Pelagian. The man was just kind of corrupted,
though he dies as a result of the fall of Ras Pelagius. I denied
that. He says, no, look, it hasn't
affected you whatsoever. But these men said, well, we
can't accept that, but we'll teach this. They're kind of injured. But my confession tells me I
am disabled, indisposed, unable, completely paralyzed, unable
to bring myself, and that's true of you, from the womb. I want
everyone here tonight to turn to Psalm 58 and verse number
3. Pelagius taught that the infants who were born were not born in
sin. But Psalm 58 and the verse number
3 sets it forth very plainly that all infants from the womb
are corrupt. The wicked are estranged from
the womb. They go astray as soon as they
are born, speaking lies. Now, how do you get around that?
I don't know. As soon as they are born in the
womb, they go astray and they are speaking lies. Psalm 51,
verse 5. With old I was shaven in iniquity,
and in sin did my mother conceive me. The heart is deceitful. Jeremiah 17, verse 9. I don't know. Could it be any
more plainly? Man loves to give free expression
to his own wicked heart. You look with me there at Romans
again, chapter 2. I'm sorry, chapter 3. Verses 10 right through to verse
19. There's none that understand it. There's none that seek it
after God. You know what that's saying? The mind is completely gone.
Can't understand. They're all gone out of their
way. No direction. Verse 12. They are all together
becoming profitable. There's none that doeth good.
No, not one. Now, have I got the Scriptures
wrong when a man says to me, no, I can do good? If you want
to be technical, you say, no, you're semi-Pelagian. Just tell
him he's on C if he's unconverted. He needs Christ to show him his
need. Their throat is an open sepulcher.
Verse 13, their tongues use deceit. 14, their mouth is full of cursing,
bitterness. Verse 15, they think nothing
of shedding blood. Their feet are swift to shed
blood. 17, their way of peace have they not known. 18, the
fear of God before their eyes is not there. Look at verse 19, part B. All
the world guilty before God. We've not only been We are not
only brought into this world with sin. We are guilty. We are condemned. Look at Romans
5 with me in verse 14. Nevertheless, death reigned from
Adam to Moses. even over them that had not sinned
after the similitude of Adam's transgression." Now that's a
very difficult verse for you to understand. But it's really
saying this. Death reigned from that period between Eden and
the giving of the Ten Commandments. Now sin is the transgression
of the law of God. Which means men die because they
break God's law. But there was no law given before
Sinai. That's what Paul's saying. Now
there was a law, but we're saying we didn't have the Ten Commandments.
But they were there. They were given to Adam in the
Garden of Edom. But nevertheless, the truth is here. The man who
says, well listen, there were no Ten Commandments until the
year when God gave them at Sinai. So, how do you explain sin? How
do you explain death before the Ten Commandments? Well, it's
very simple. Original sin. Death reigned from
Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned. That is,
Even those that had not known the law of God in its ten commandments
or its summarized form. They still died and they died
as sinners because we're told here, Adam's transgression. He was a figure of him that was
to come. He was a representative and he was a picture of Christ
who would come. Can I close this evening by looking
at the cure for man's inability? Man gives free expression to
his wickedness. And can I just say to you tonight
that even in hell, man unleashes the full extent of his depravity.
In the Gospels, we're told that men in hell, they wail and they
gnash their teeth. And I've heard preachers saying
that's in repentance. It's completely unscriptural.
Men in hell, the word nashir means they grate their teeth
in anger and hatred for God. You know, on earth, that's why
I said right at the beginning, man's depravity needs to be understood
in a biblical context. Sproutsy speaking, he can do
nothing. But it's true, isn't it? Men do good works. They are restrained. Their heart's capable of murder,
but they don't murder. There is a grace that restrains
them. There's something that holds them in. But in hell, where
there is no grace, there's no actual restraint on the heart
of man. It's a bursting forth of the
fountainhead of complete wickedness, total depravity. And men will
actually curse God to their face. I've heard men say, preachers,
that men become repentant in hell. No, they don't. There is
not one repentant sinner in hell, and there never will be. They
grate their teeth, they grind their teeth, and they curse God
for their damnation. Men and women tonight, is that
going to be you? Am I speaking to some young man
or someone here in this meeting tonight who will be among that
company that the Lord says there will be wailing and gnashing
of teeth? Grating their teeth? Venting
their anger against God for damning them. That's what the Bible tells
us. Calvinists are presented as having
no love for people. It's not true. These men were
seeking to get the right remedy for the problem. The medical practitioner, if
he doesn't diagnose the patient the right way, He's going to
get the remedy wrong, the cure wrong. It's true that I've heard Reverend
Beggs warn us time and time again in the theological hall, men,
if you get total depravity right, you'll get the gospel right.
That's why we're not in the business of making men feel good about
themselves. We're not in the business of making men feel,
well, I'm not too bad. The men are totally depraved.
And the last thing that I want to be doing is ending up administering
the wrong cure. That's where easy believism comes
from. That man isn't too bad, that
he's only been injured. Listen, there's problems in your
life. No, no, no. Your life is completely ruined. And that's the gospel men need
to hear. Where does that cure come from? It comes outside of
man. It comes from God Himself. God's cure is a redemptive one.
Look at verse 19 with me of Romans chapter 5 as we close. For as
by one man's disobedience many were made sinners. That's the
disease. You're corrupt. But read on with
me, please. So by the obedience of one shall
many be made righteous. Is that not a wonderful gospel?
So by the obedience of one man, like Adam, he who was after the
similitude of Adam, the figure to come, he has kept the law
of God. He has died in the place of his
people. And those for whom Christ died,
they now feel the implications of his success. Romans 5.19, By the obedience
of one shall many be made righteous. One man plunged this the whole
human race into death, sin and misery. But yet by one man, many
are lifted, made righteous, given a new mind, a new will. Seek
Christ. He imparts strength to the soul.
He illuminates the mind. He takes a stony heart away.
He gives a heart of flesh. He draws them to Himself. There are some verses I would
love to leave with you, but I quote them now. John chapter 5, verse
40. Ye will not come to me that ye
might have life. Does that not blow the doctrine
of free will into a million pieces? Ye will not come to me. You will
never come to me. But the Lord says, He that cometh
to me, I will in no wise cast out. You know what he's saying?
You cannot come. Though you're commanded to come,
it requires me to bring you. And the Lord does bring you,
and that means if He does bring you, He will certainly bring
you. He won't leave you halfway. It's an awful gospel, men and
women, to say to a man, God has done His bit, now it's up to
you. Will you choose Christ or will
you just leave it? God's not in the business of making men
half righteous. God says, I will justify the
ungodly. And you thank God for that tonight.
That's the gospel. That whenever you come to Christ,
you're brought to Christ. When you come to know Christ,
you can rest content. You are a justified man. There is therefore now no condemnation
to them that are in Christ Jesus. I trust this makes sense to you
tonight. As we commence our series on this, I wanted to get this right, that
you all here tonight will understand that we're all dead and trespasses
and in sins. Ephesians 2, verse 1 and 2. But by grace are we saved. And
that not of yourselves, you're lying like the man from the five-story
building It can't move. It's not of works. It can't even crawl. It can't
move a muscle. But there's One who comes alongside.
And He breathes life into us. Resuscitates us almost. And we have life forevermore. I trust tonight that many of
you tonight who know not the Lord will seek this Christ. There
is no hope outside of Him. May the Lord bless His Word.
Calvinism, Free-will, Total Depravity, Augustine, Pelagianism and Semi-pelagianism
Series Doctrines of The Faith Series
Tracing the doctrine of Total Depravity from Augustine to the Synod of Dort and the Conflict between semi-pelagianism and Calvinism.
| Sermon ID | 91309155564 |
| Duration | 49:31 |
| Date | |
| Category | Sunday - PM |
| Language | English |
Documents
Add a Comment
Comments
© Copyright
2026 SermonAudio.