00:00
00:00
00:01
Transcript
1/0
Again, I'm reading from Luke
22, and I'm going to read verses 63-71. Luke records, And the
men that held Jesus mocked Him and smote Him. And when they
had blindfolded Him, they struck Him on the face and asked Him,
saying, Prophesy Who is it that smote thee? And many other things
blasphemously spake they against him. And as soon as it was day,
the elders of the people and the chief priests and the scribes
came together and led him into their council, saying, Art thou
the Christ? Tell us. And he said unto them,
If I tell you, ye shall not believe. And if I also ask you, ye will
not answer me, nor let me go. Hereafter shall the Son of Man
sit on the right hand of the power of God. Then said they
all, Art thou then the Son of God? And he said unto them, Ye
say that I am. And they said, What need we any
further witness? For we ourselves have heard of
his own mouth. May God bless the reading and
the hearing of his word once again in this place, and let's
go, Lord, together in prayer. Gracious and loving God, we are
thankful that you are a God who feeds his people. As the Israelites
of old were in the wilderness, you provided them daily the manna
and the quail as the prophet Elijah was in the time of drought
provided for by the ravens who brought him food and nourishment. So you have provided for your
people in our days your Word to feed us and to nourish us.
And so let us receive this from you today as the hidden man of
your Word. We ask this in Christ's name.
Amen. And you may be seated. Well, if you've been watching
television news or watching your computer screen in recent months,
you have no doubt seen many of the horrific scenes coming out
of places like Iraq, where prisoners have been taken by Muslim extremists
and they have been humiliated and they've been beaten and they
have been mocked very often then before being put to a gruesome
death. There have even been some very
unsettling presentations of people who are Christians. Now, oftentimes,
you know, when they say someone there is a Christian, it may
mean simply that they are part of a historic Christian church
and not necessarily their evangelical believers. But I've even seen
some where these people are forced literally at knife point or at
gunpoint to recant or to make a Muslim profession of faith
and then they are summarily executed. People mocked, beaten, humiliated. Well, some of those things would
probably provide a background or a closer reality for us this
morning for understanding something of what Christ experienced as
it is described here in the gospel of Luke and in the other canonical
gospels. In fact, the backdrop of seeing
men humiliated, mocked and beaten before being summarily executed
is probably a closer picture to what Jesus experienced that
we would really care to know. We'd rather have one of those
cleaned up passion plays. that are put on in churches where
there's sort of a clean and a neat presentation of these things. But those last moments of our
Lord when He was mocked and beaten, these were not some cleaned up
performances upon the stage. But what we see are pictures
of real depravity, real cruelty, real violence and real suffering
that our Lord underwent, the type that makes us want to turn
our heads away and disgust, not even to look upon them. When
our old Reformed forebears wrote the catechisms that teach biblical
truth. They described how Christ, our
Redeemer, executed or carried out what they called the offices
of a prophet, of a priest, and a king, both in his state of
humiliation and exaltation. And later, that catechism describes
how Christ's humiliation consisted not only in his lowly birth,
but also, as the catechism puts it, in his undergoing the miseries
of this life, the wrath of God and the cursed death of the cross. And what Luke is going to paint
for us today as we look at this segment of Jesus on trial is
a picture, a master portrait, picture, verbal picture of Christ
in the state of humiliation. And so this is what we have to
meditate upon today. Last time I noted that all the
Gospels agree that Jesus underwent two trials before he went to
the cross. First, there was a religious
trial that took place before the Jewish authorities. And then
secondly, as we'll see in upcoming messages, there was a civil trial
that took place before Pontius Pilate, because the Jews did
not have the civil authority to put Jesus to death. And in
the religious trial, the charge against Jesus is going to be
blasphemy. In the civil trial, it is going to be insurrection. He is trying to make himself
to be a king. We know that on the night that
Jesus was arrested, according to John's gospel, he was taken
first to Annas, who had previously served as the high priest, and
then he was taken to Caiaphas, who was the current high priest.
Luke is describing how Jesus was being tried there through
the night of His arrest. And I noted last week that really
there were two trials, right? There was the inside trial where
Jesus was being examined. And then outside, what we saw
last week was the outer trial where Peter, the disciple, was
being examined by the bystanders as they stood around the fire.
And whereas Peter, failed in his trial, denying that he even
knew Jesus, even though he had promised that he'd be willing
to go to prison even later on in his life for Christ. We noted
finally last week that though Peter fails in his trial, Jesus
will triumph in his trial as he will demonstrate his obedience
to the will of God, just as he did when he prayed in the garden. not my will but thine be done,
showing both his active and passive obedience to the will of God. If you read through the gospel
accounts, again, they all mention these trials. Each one of them
gives a unique account of it. And that's why we have four gospels.
The Hebrew scriptures taught that every important matter had
to be established by two or more witnesses. And so we have more
than one witness that gives account of what happened to Jesus. And
particularly Matthew, Mark, and Luke tell things very similarly,
but again, each tells it uniquely. And Luke, remember at the very
beginning, if you remember way back when we started this series,
back in Luke 1 verse 3, Luke particularly said he wanted to
tell his gospel in order to set in order or in sequence the events
in the life of Jesus for Theophilus, the man for whom he wrote this
gospel, so that he could be catechized or taught the basic things about
Jesus. And it seems that if we look
at this account, Luke wants to focus upon four main points or
four events that happened to Jesus while he was on trial before
the high priest and before the Sanhedrin, before he was handed
over to Pilate. The first of these things is
that Jesus was abused physically and verbally by those who guarded
him particularly during the nighttime interview that took place at
the home of the high priest. Secondly, Luke says, at daylight,
after this night of being interrogated and being abused, at daylight
Jesus was taken before the Jewish council or the Sanhedrin where
he was in particular asked if he claimed to be the Christ or
the Messiah. And they did this not because
they were honestly interested in his answer, but because they
wanted to entrap him. They wanted him to say that he
was claiming to be the Messiah so that they could use this as
evidence to condemn him. And then thirdly, during this
interview, Jesus identified himself as the Son of Man. And the backdrop
for this we're going to look at and see is in the book of
Daniel, the 7th chapter, the 13th and 14th verses. Daniel's
vision of the Son of Man who would come in a cloud with power. Jesus identifies himself as the
Son of Man. And then the fourth thing that
Luke wants to Make sure that we know the fourth point, or
in this sequence is, Jesus was asked if he considered himself
to be the Son of God. And when he answered in the affirmative,
yes, I am the Son of God, his interrogators decided, now we
have the evidence that we need to condemn him. So, Luke is pointing
us to these four events, sequence of events. And so let's let's
turn and meditate, if we can, on each one of these in turn
following Luke's flow. First, Luke describes how Jesus
was abused. by those who were guarding Him. And we see this in verses 63
through 65. In verse 63, Luke begins, And
the men that held Jesus mocked Him and smote Him. We can just start off with that
opening phrase, and the men that held Jesus. The verb here in
Greek is synecho. In addition to simply meaning
to hold, to have a grasp upon, the verb can also mean or have
the sense of to surround, to hem in, or to encircle. And so we're supposed to, I think,
get a visual picture. Luke often, and the other gospel
writers, paint a visual picture through their words. The idea
is that they're encircling Jesus. They're holding Him in, pinning
Him in by encircling Him. And think about it. This was
the age before anyone thought anything about humane treatment
of prisoners in custody. I've had the opportunity over
the last year or so to teach, as you know, a couple of courses
in a prison. And I can tell you, having gone
through the orientation for people to go in there, that there's
a lot of care for the humane treatment of prisoners, at least
by the staff, and even a lot of watching as to how prisoners
treat other prisoners. But remember, this is the first
century. There's no such concept of humane
treatment of those who are in custody. In the first century,
you were guilty until proven innocent, and the punishment
began even before your trial ended. Here's one of the ironies. It is the life of the man that
they're encircling and beating. It's the life of this man That
will change the way prisoners are treated. That's one of the
one of the ironies of this, the teaching of this man that says
every person ought to be treated humanely, even if they've been
accused of crimes. Luke continues, and he says here
in verse 63 that they mocked him The verb here in Pisa means
to ridicule, to make fun of, to trick or to deceive. And they
smote him. They beat him. They struck him. They hit him. And we don't know
which was worse probably for our Lord. Was it the emotional
abuse that they inflicted upon him as they mocked him? Or was it the physical abuse,
the pain of the blows as they hit him. And I feel sure that
probably no physical blow probably hurt our Lord as much, humanly
speaking, as when His eyes, remember, had locked upon Peter. Look back
at verse 61. The Lord turned and looked upon
Peter when Peter denied Him. So vociferously, that third time, I imagine none of the blows that
were laid upon Christ here by these guards hurt as much as
the blow of Peter's emphatic denial. There were blows that
were laid upon our Lord which no human eye could see. Then,
in verse 64, we see one example of both the emotional and the
physical abuse that was laid upon our Lord. As the guards
had probably picked up from the trial what they had heard about
Jesus was that either he claimed to be a prophet or people said
he was a prophet, and so in their sadistic cruelty, they decide
to make up a game. And look at verse 64, "...and
when they had blindfolded him, they struck him on the face and
asked him, saying, Prophesy, who is it that smote thee?" Again, you get it? He claims to be a prophet. Well,
prophesy then! Jesus, who's the one who struck
you? We talk these days about bullies
and bullying as the public school system is about to start up again.
There'll be more and more talk of this, I'm sure, more and more
stories about bullying. But we don't really know what
bullying is. Consider the bullying that our
Lord underwent for our sakes. We see first in this the physical
brutality that our Lord endured. If you look there in verse 64,
the little phrase, they struck him on the face. By the way,
this is another place where this only appears in the traditional
text, and it's a phrase that's omitted in some of the modern
translations. I think it should be retained. If you look at The
little phrase, the verb, therefore, to strike him in the face is
the Greek verb tiptoe, and it's the root for the English word
type, which has the sense to hit so as to leave a mark or
an impression, or we might say a bruise. Some of us in this
room, me certainly included, are old enough to remember typewriters. Yes, children, go to a museum
and you might see a typewriter. When I was in high school, one
of the classes I took was typing. It ended up being useful because
I was able to use it on a computer keyboard later on. And even when
we were missionaries in Hungary, one of my prized possessions
that I got there was a Hungarian typewriter that had the Hungarian
letters on it. I ended up giving it to a Romanian
pastor who was as happy as a clam to get this old Hungarian language
typewriter. But if you remember the old typewriter,
when you struck a key, What happened was the type went up and it had
the physical imprint of the letter and it struck the ribbon and
impressed the mark upon the paper. And so it's that word there that
comes from this Greek root that means to strike, so as to leave
a mark. They struck our Lord upon the
face so that a mark, an impression, a bruise was left. We can think
of what the prophet Isaiah spoke in Isaiah 53-5 when he prophesied
about the sufferings of our Lord. And he said, but he was wounded
for our transgressions. He was bruised for our iniquities. There was the physical suffering
Jesus endured. We also see the irony of their
mockery. Prophesy! He thinks he's a prophet! Prophethood! Blindfolded! We'll
strike it! Who's the one who hit you? Prophet! You can imagine them saying things
like that. And of course, there's irony
in this, is there not? Because what have we seen in this Gospel?
In particular, more recently, what have we seen? Yes, Jesus
is a prophet. He is the great prophet, priest,
and king. Everything that He has prophesied
has come to pass. Remember, before He entered into
Jerusalem, He sent His disciples ahead and He said, you're going
to find a man who has a colt of a donkey upon which no one
has ever ridden. and bring it to me, and they
go and they find it exactly as Jesus said. His prophecy was
absolutely true. And remember, when he wanted
to prepare the Lord's Supper, or the Passover, and he sent
his disciples ahead, and he said, you're going to see a man carrying
a water pitcher, follow that man to the room he's going to
go, and then tell him the Master has need of it, and they do,
and it happens exactly as Jesus predicts. What else happened?
He predicted that one of the disciples would betray him. What
happened? Judas betrayed Him. What else
happened? He predicted that Peter would
be tested and tried, and that he would fail. And what happened?
We've just seen Peter deny Jesus three times before the cock crowed. Everything that Jesus has predicted
has come true. And in fact, Jesus even predicted
the very suffering He's undergoing at this moment. If you were to
go back and look at Luke 9.22, after Peter had made the confession,
you are the Christ of God, Jesus had said in Luke 9.22, the Son
of Man must suffer many things and be rejected of the elders
and the chief priests and the scribes and be slain and be raised
the third day. He predicted the suffering he
was undergoing, and yet these men are ironically mocking him
and saying, oh, you're a prophet. Prophesy who's striking you. Their silly mockery reminds me
of the Russian cosmonauts who, when they went into orbit the
earth and space, they mockingly reported, there is no God. We cannot find Him here. He must
not exist. Silly men. You prove nothing
when you claim that God does not exist because you cannot
see Him in space as if we thought He was out there orbiting the
earth. So these men prove nothing but
their own spiritual darkness in mocking our Lord, who is the
perfect prophet, priest and king. Note especially how Luke concludes
this scene of abuse, verse 65, "...and many other things blasphemously
spake they against him." The word here that's translated blasphemously
speaking in Greek is blasphemeo. When you're learning Greek and
you get to a word like that, you're like, I can translate
that every time because it's the root for our same English
word, to blaspheme someone. Blasphemeo. And though it can
mean to speak against, to slander, or to insult a man, you can blaspheme
a man by slandering him or insulting him, the most powerful meaning
of this verb is what? to speak sacrilegiously or profanely
about God. That's what blasphemy is. To
speak sacrilegiously or profanely about God. So what is Luke's not so subtle
point? What does Luke say? Look at verse
65. And many other things blasphemously spake they against him. I think what Luke is doing is
he's giving some relief to believers when they read this passage,
because he's reminding us of who Jesus is. To blaspheme Jesus
is to blaspheme God, because Jesus is Lord. the one whom these
men scorn and ridicule, myriads will fall down before and worship
as King of Kings and Lord of Lords." I think Luke gives us
this verse to alleviate our disgust at how Christ was so shamefully
treated. The second of the four events
that Luke narrates then in verses 66-68 is his trial that took
place at daybreak before the Jewish council or the Sanhedrin. It starts off in verse 66, and
as soon as it was day, the elders of the people and the chief priests
and the scribes came together and led him into their counsel. Now, many people, scholars, look
at this and they noted that in later Jewish custom, we have
the writings of some of the later rabbis that say it wasn't legal
to have a trial at night. that a trial had to take place
during the day, and probably, even though those rabbinic writings
were later on, probably the same custom held true during the time
of Jesus. They had to wait until the morning
to gather together the Sanhedrin, which was a sort of Jewish council
that was given some autonomy by the Romans to rule, particularly
in religious issues. among the Jews as the Romans
were occupying the land of Palestine. Luke says it consisted of the
elders of the people, the chief priests and the scribes. Some
other historical notes that we have say it consisted of 70 men.
who were gathered together. Perhaps all of them were there,
perhaps not all of them were there, we don't know. But they gathered
to sort of give a rubber stamp of approval to the decision to
condemn Jesus and to seek his execution at the hands of Pontius
Pilate. Do you notice that some, usually
I think those who want to do something unjust, they usually
try to do it as quickly as possible. before anyone can have the time
to think or to reflect upon their actions. Young people, keep this
in mind. There's almost no decision that
you can make in life that isn't helped by taking more time and
being patient and thinking about it a bit more. And what people
want to do when they want you to do something unjust is they
try to rush you to a judgment quickly. And this is what the
Sanhedrin, this is what the Jewish leaders are doing. They want
to quickly try Jesus at night Gather the Sanhedrin in the morning.
He's only been arrested. It's been only been about 12
hours probably that he's been held. And they want to immediately,
even less than that, they want to immediately seek his execution,
the death penalty for him. Think about our Lord's suffering
and humiliation at this point. He has not slept through the
night. His dearest friends have betrayed
him and denied him. And he has been physically and
emotionally abused by cruel and sadistic men. And then he faces
in the morning light another round of questions. In verse
67, the question that they posed him is this, Art thou the Christ? Tell us. And you probably well
know that the English word Christ is really a title, it means Messiah,
or it means the Anointed One. Jesus knew that those in the
Sanhedrin, the religious authorities, the elders, the scribes, they
were expecting a different kind of Messiah. They were expecting
a political Messiah who would come and build a kingdom on earth,
rather than the kind of Messiah that Jesus came to be. A spiritual
Messiah who would build an unseen kingdom, heart by heart and life
by life. Think about it, even Jesus' own
disciples did not understand the kind of Messiah that he had
come to be. This is why we can again look back to Luke 9, verse
20, when for the first time Jesus asked the disciples, who do you
say that I am? And Peter says, you are the Christ
of God. And right after that, Luke 9,
verse 21, it says, Jesus straightly charged them and commanded them
to tell no man that thing. And lots of people puzzle over
that. If Jesus is the Christ, and Peter confesses He is the
Christ, why does He warn His disciples not to go and tell
this to anyone? And the reason is because He
knew that His disciples didn't really understand what kind of
Messiah He had come to be. He knew that they didn't properly
understand. They didn't understand that He
had come to be a suffering Messiah, a bleeding Messiah, a dying Messiah. And if His disciples did not
understand, Surely these religious authorities did not understand.
That's why when they asked this, Luke records in verse 67, when
they asked, Are you the Christ? Art thou the Christ? Jesus replies,
look at verse 67, If I tell you, ye will not believe. If I tell you, ye will not believe. I want to suggest that that little
phrase is worthy of our meditation this morning. If I tell you,
you will not believe. The problem with unbelievers
is not that they have never heard the gospel, or that they have
not heard the gospel in a compelling manner. The problem with unbelievers
is that they are spiritually incapable of hearing the gospel. They are spiritually incapable
of believing in Christ. Their hearts are hard toward
Christ. Their eyes are blinded to Christ. Their ears are deaf to Christ. If I tell you, you will not believe,
Jesus says. Consider two parallels in the
Gospel of John. One from chapter 8 and one from
chapter 10. In John chapter 8, Jesus is talking
with a group of men who are challenging him. And in John 8, 42 and following,
Jesus says this to these men. He says, if God were your Father,
ye would love Me, for I proceeded forth and came from God, neither
came I of Myself, but He sent Me. And then He says in verse
43 of John 8, Why do you not understand My speech? Even because
ye cannot hear My word. And then this must have really
bug them, because these were Jews and they were claiming,
our father is Abraham. Jesus says, John 8, verse 44,
Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father
ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning
and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When
he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own, for he is a liar
and the father of it. And because I tell you the truth,
ye believe me not. Then in verse 47 of John 8, Jesus
says, He that is of God heareth God's words. Ye therefore hear
them not because ye are not of God. Does that sound like what
Jesus says here when He's on trial? If I tell you, you would
not believe. The other passage I've laid aside
this is in John 10. John 10 is when Jesus tells the
parable of Himself being like a shepherd, and His people being
like His sheep. And it says in John 10.24, Then
came the Jews round about Him and said unto Him, How long dost
Thou make us to doubt, if Thou be the Christ? Tell us plainly. It's another situation where
people are coming and saying, Are you the Christ? Are you the Messiah?
Tell us plainly. John 10.25, Jesus answered them,
I told you, and ye believe not. The works that I do in My Father's
name, they bear witness of Me, but ye believe not, because ye
are not of My sheep. As I said unto you, My sheep
hear My voice, and I know them, and they follow Me." If you're a believer, you hear
the gospel. Your heart is strangely warmed.
Your ears acknowledge you hear the voice of your shepherd. If
you're not a believer, if you're not among the elect, you can
hear the gospel be preached all day long and it leaves you cold
and indifferent to it. This response of Jesus to his
interrogators here again in verse 67, If I tell you, ye will not
believe, deserves our meditation. For it underlies a common error
in church practice, and that is the error of pragmatism. Now, we should use all biblical
means. And what are the biblical means
for the spreading of the gospel? the preaching of the Word. God
was pleased by the foolishness of preaching to save those who
would believe. Paul writes in 1 Corinthians chapter 1 in Romans
10, he says, faith comes by hearing and hearing by the Word of God.
We should be diligent in using all biblical means to reach the
lost. But There are those who begin
to think that the reason people do not believe is merely because
they have not heard the gospel in the right way or by the right
medium. The same logic drives the desire
for new Bible translations and for new worship styles and for
new evangelistic methods. Here's the problem. Let's take
Bible translations. The main reason people don't
find the Bible interesting is not because the old translations
are too hard to understand. The main reason people don't
find the Bible interesting is because they're not believers.
And even when you're a believer, you've got a lot of slothfulness
and a lot of the world's ways to overcome. The reason, the
main reason that people do not respond to the reading of the
Scriptures and to the preaching of the Gospels, not because it's
not relevant enough for them, because it hasn't been couched
enough in the clothing of this world and this age, but it's
because apart from the regenerating work of the Holy Spirit, they
cannot believe in Christ. If I tell you You will not believe,
Jesus says. Remember the prophet Isaiah,
Isaiah 6, when he is commissioned to be God's prophet. This is
quite a commission that God gives to Isaiah, Isaiah 6, 9 and 10.
He says, go to this people. Go to this people and tell them,
hear ye indeed, but understand not. See ye indeed, but perceive
not. Make the heart of this people
fat, and make their ears heavy, and shut their eyes, lest they
see with their eyes, hear with their ears, and understand with
their heart, and convert and be healed. Jesus continues this
train of thought in verse 68, And if I also ask you, ye will
not answer me, nor let me go." Here he notes that not only can
they not properly hear him, but they also cannot properly answer
or speak to him about the Messiah that he has come to be. And he
also lays bare their disingenuousness. They're not asking him truly
if he's the Christ because they want to know. They have no intention
at all to declare his innocence and to let him go. He reveals
their hearts. Now, they are put on trial. They
have thought to put Christ on trial. He instead puts them on
trial. If I tell you, you would not believe, you cannot answer,
and you will not let me go. The third point in the sequence
then is in verse 69. Jesus identifies Himself as the
Son of Man. along the lines of Daniel 7,
verses 13 and 14. In verse 69, just after being
asked if you are the Christ, he says, Hereafter shall the
Son of Man sit on the right hand of the power of God. The phrase
there, hereafter, literally in Greek, it means from this moment
or from this now shall the Son of Man sit on the right hand
of the power of God. And again, Jesus is drawing upon... He knew the scriptures, the Old
Testament scriptures, the Hebrew Bible, better than any man who's
ever lived. He's drawing upon Daniel 7, verse 13 and 14, in
which Daniel said, I saw in the night visions, and behold, one
like the Son of Man came with the clouds of heaven, and came
to the Ancient of Days, and they brought Him before Him, and there
was given Him dominion and glory and a kingdom, that all people,
nations, and languages should serve Him. His dominion is an
everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away, and His kingdom,
that which shall not be destroyed." Jesus is essentially saying here
in verse 69, I'm the one about whom Daniel is speaking. I am
the Son of Man. I am the One who has been given
by the Father power and dominion and authority and people from
all nations will worship Me and serve Me. And He is also saying,
I am the One who will come again at the end of the ages in the
clouds of heaven to judge the living and the dead. The One
who soon after His crucifixion, resurrection and ascension will
be seated in session at the right hand of God the Father Almighty.
Fourthly then, they ask Him if He is the Son of God after He
makes this claim for Himself. In verse 70 it says, Then said
they all, Art thou then the Son of God? Notice all the spiritual
titles that come up in this trial. Is He the Christ? Is he the Son
of Man? And now, is he the Son of God? And when he goes to trial before
Pilate, the question will be, have you claimed to be a king?
So, again, all these titles, Messiah, Son of Man, Son of God,
King. Who is Jesus? Notice that when
they ask this question, it is, art thou then the Son of God? There was a phrase, you see it
sometimes in the Old Testament, Son of God, which seems simply
a human being is a believer, someone who worships God. But
here is the definite article. Are you claiming to be one who
has a special relationship with the Father that is unique and
is shared by no one else? Are you, as the writer, author
of Hebrews puts it in Hebrews 1.3, are you the brightness of
His glory and the express image of His person? Are you the Son
of God? Of course, Son of God is a title
of Godhood. A lot of times, when you think
concretely, you hear this and you think, you know, literal,
physical Son of God. Of course, this is not a reference
to some coarse physical understanding of Jesus as God's offspring,
God the Father's offspring, as Muslims often misunderstood it.
and as Mormons misunderstand it. It's a question of whether
Jesus shares in essence the very being of God the Father Almighty. Is He the brightness of His glory
and the express image of His person? In John 10.30 Jesus said, I and
my Father, we are one. Jesus claimed a unique relationship,
the Father is only explained by the Trinity, that God is Father,
Son and Spirit, and he is the Son of God. Luke records second
half of verse 70, that Jesus responded and said, ye say that
I am. Ye say that I am. Believe it
or not, there have been those who have read this account. And
they pointed to this reply and they said, see, Jesus never claimed
to be the Son of God. He only said, you say that I
am the Son of God. They overlooked the fact that
Jesus was apparently using an idiom here to express an obvious,
affirmative answer to their question. The New King James Version thus
renders Jesus' reply, You rightly say that I am. That's probably
what the idiom meant. Ye say rightly that I am the
Son of God. The New American Standard Bible
simply translates the idiom, Yes, I am. This is the proper interpretation
of Jesus' words as given is proven by two things. First, if we compare
the Gospel of Mark, Mark chapter 14, verses 61 and 62, as it records
this same interaction, Mark records that the high priest asked him
and said unto him, Art thou the Christ, the Son of the Blessed,
the Son of God? And Mark records in verse 62
of Mark 14 that Jesus said, I am. Ego, I me. I am. The second evidence that proves
the proper interpretation of this is that Jesus affirmed that
he is the Son of God is the response of those who heard him. Look
at verse 71. And they said, what need we any further witness? For we ourselves have heard of
his own mouth. The second proof is that this
is exactly the way those who stood there understood what he
said as an affirmation. Are you the Son of God? And his
response is, ye say that I am, ye rightly say, I am the Son
of God. And they take Jesus' words here
as his signature on this death warrant. He has, from their perspective,
committed blasphemy in that He has made Himself equal to God. He has taken titles for Himself.
He has called Himself the Christ, the Messiah. He has called Himself
the Son of Man. He has called Himself the Son
of God. Well, having worked through the
passage, let me bring us finally back round to where we got started.
What we are seeing here again, is a master portrait of the humiliation
of our Redeemer. He was mocked. He was smitten. He was stricken for us. He was bullied for us. God incarnate
was blasphemed by sinful men for us. He was misunderstood
for us. Have you ever been misunderstood?
That's the most frustrating thing in the world. The Lord was misunderstood
for us. You probably know that there's
been much in the news this week about all the civil unrest outside
of St. Louis, Missouri. after a young
man was shot by the police. And immediately there were those
in the media grabbing the racial overtones and they began to paint
this young man as an innocent victim, a young college student
who was executed, even they said, by overzealous police. We certainly
don't know all the circumstances of that, and we shouldn't pass
judgment. One of the crazy things about it is, having you wanted
people to say, some of those authorities, having you wanted
them to say to the critics, guys, you live in America where people
are innocent until proven guilty. And also, friends, people have
to be accountable for their actions. And also, has anybody asked about
the parents of this young man? Their responsibilities? But in
the end, initially, the urge was to paint him as the innocent
victim. And then, as you know, probably
know, video came out of this innocent man robbing a store
and strong-arming a shop owner. Again, I don't pretend to know
this situation or to think that I can evaluate it, but my point
is, that if you look close enough, there are very few, dare I say,
any completely innocent victims in life. We all deserve the wrath
of God, both in this life and that which is to come. Luke 13,
remember Luke 13 when Jesus was asked, what about the people
who were killed by Pilate? What about the people on whom
the Tower of Siloam fell? And how did Jesus respond? He
said, do you think those people were any more sinful than you?
You too should repent lest you perish. There has only been one
man, one man of whom this might not be said. There has only been
one man who was tempted in all points, even as we are, and yet
was without sin. And that man, as Isaiah put it,
was wounded for our transgressions and was bruised for our iniquities. That man, as the Apostle Paul
put it in Philippians 2.8 in the Christ hymn, that man was
being found in fashion as a man And He humbled Himself and became
obedient unto death, even the death of the cross. And here
is the most amazing part. If God would not melt your hard
hearts, if God would not open our blinded eyes, if God would
not unstop our deaf ears, We would not believe, even if we
heard it spoken plainly from Christ Himself. And yet, by the grace of God, who are we but the people whose
eyes have been opened, whose ears unstopped, whose hearts
softened to understand that He is the Christ. He is the Son of Man. He is the
Son of God. Amen? Let me invite you to stand
together. Let's pray. Gracious and loving God, we stand
here with shame to think of how Christ was treated with shame
because we know that in our unregenerate state, we are capable of the
same types of shameful rejection and even worse than what Luke
describes. And we are reminded of the one
innocent man who stood and took upon himself the scorn and abuse
that we laid upon him. and who could say from the cross,
Father, forgive them for they know not what they do, and who
took our rejection and made it your acceptance. And we are in
awe of that today. We praise you for it. We admire
you for the wisdom of your plan. Gracious God, help us to understand
it. Help us to prize it. Help us
understand the privileged status we have been given as believers.
We ask this in Christ's name. Amen. Amen. Let's remain standing.
Christ on Trial
Series Gospel of Luke Series
| Sermon ID | 81814820223 |
| Duration | 53:48 |
| Date | |
| Category | Sunday - AM |
| Bible Text | Luke 22:63-71 |
| Language | English |
Documents
Add a Comment
Comments
No Comments
© Copyright
2026 SermonAudio.