Terrorism in Britain, and we particularly looked at the spate of terrorist attacks. Westminster Bridge earlier this year on March 22nd, the Manchester Arena terrorist attack on the rock concert, a massacre, at least 22 children killed by a suicide bomber, so-called. And then on the 3rd of June, Just before Pentecost Sunday, a van drove at high speed across the London Bridge, deliberately plowing over groups of people, and then three Muslim jihadists jumped out and started stabbing people with kitchen knives, 12-inch blades. The Muslim mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, has claimed that such terrorist attacks are part and parcel of living in a big city. which is the sort of thing that you could just imagine from Lord of the Rings that all grades are just part and parcel of living in Middle Earth. And that's Sadiq Khan's kind of role today. So what is inspiring and provoking such hideous terrorist attacks and what is the philosophy behind terrorism? What can be done to counter or uproot and prevent such terrorism from occurring in the future? So, this secret history of terrorism and how to defeat it this week, we're wanting to look at what is terrorism and how we can beat it and where does it come from. Webster's Dictionary of the English Language, we've got them on the shelf there, those nice big doorstopper green 1828 Webster's Dictionaries, defines terrorism as the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce for political purposes. Terrorist is defined as a person who advocates, uses terrorism such as agent or partisan of the revolutionary tribunal during the reign of terror in France. To terrorize is defined in Webster's dictionary as to dominate or to coerce by intimidation produced widespread fear by acts of violence such as bombings. Now, many authorities today claim it's very difficult to define terrorism. Quite a few lectures that I've looked for online, both video, audio and even in written articles, they all wring their hands about how difficult it is to define terrorism. No, it is not very difficult to define terrorism. Webster just showed us it's extremely easy to define these terms very clearly. It is to coerce or to intimidate by force or the threat of force for political ends. However, many government policies would fit the dictionary definition of terrorism. I mean, is not bombing of cities terrorism? In fact, they even called them terror bombings during the war. That was actually the title they used. The aim was to terrorize the population, to make them want to give up. And so, the very definition of terrorism would fit a lot of government policies, and so they prefer to pretend that there's a problem defining the terms. Basically, it's hypocrisy. When we bomb civilians, it is strategic bombing, or it's a saturation bombing. When our enemies bomb civilians, it's terrorism. See? So, terrorism is what they do to us. What we do to them, we use a different term for. This is the kind of thing our Lord Jesus condemned, as you go planking your own eye on you, talking about the speck in someone else's. Okay, what are the historic roots of terrorism? Some historians trace the history of terrorism to the Saqqara Zealots in 1st century Judea. They were known as Saqqara Zealots because of the curved Saqqari dagger that they used. They used to go in the middle of a crowd and just stab someone without warning. Could be anyone, didn't have to be. They did stab important people like once the governor of Judea, but generally speaking it could be just anyone, then disappear, so people didn't know who would attack when, and to make people afraid of gathering in public. And they caused absolute havoc. The Tarpayan rock became the traditional place from which traitors were held. Now, we know who the Zealots are, at least somewhat, because we know one famous one was Barabbas. Barabbas was one of the Zealots who was imprisoned to be condemned to death, and When Pontius Pilate wanted to release Jesus, he said, who shall I release, Jesus or Barabbas? Well, obvious choice. You've got a man who did miracles, healed the sick. made the lame to walk and the blind to see and then you've got this murder of Barabbas and yet the mob chose Barabbas released Barabbas to crucify Christ extraordinary but Barabbas was one of those now we also know Judas was in fact his name Judas Iscariot he's also of the Sicarii so Judas was also a zealot then there was Simon the zealot one of the followers of Jesus actually stayed faithful to the Lord. So the zealots were around at the time and they caused the absolute havoc that led to the annihilation of Israel and Jerusalem in 67 to 70 AD. First of all they took the temple, they murdered the governor, they wiped out the entire Roman garrison even after they surrendered, murdered them all. Of course, the might of Rome was going to come on them like a ton of bricks. They'd never let them get away with that. But they had a reign of terror, these zealots, in Jerusalem. They murdered and massacred more people probably than the Romans had left to murder when they got there. And the destruction of Jerusalem by the Zealots even before the Romans got down to General Titus was hideous. So the Zealots were really particularly a bad group of terrorists and in fact they may be the earliest example of terrorists the way we understand them today. and we also know of the Zealots as having this last hold out on Mount Masada and in fact rather than let the Romans defeat them in the end they killed everyone, men, women and children. They slit all their throats, it was a huge massacre, a lot of people up there. They could have held out for a long time but the Romans built a literal... Have you been to the top of Masada? Yeah. They still have that ramp that the Romans built up to reach this amazing fortress built by King Herod the Great. But that's how extreme the zealots were. They even killed their own children rather than surrender. And at the end they were just rolling rocks down on the Romans. There are people today who claim to be still of the Sicarii, the zealots of Zion, and who believe that they've still got a cause. The first time the word terrorist was used is in the French Revolution. They spoke of the reign of terror and they were described by Edmund Burke as terrorists. The terrorists were the hellhounds that were let loose on the people of France, who murdered and massacred the way across France. 40,000 people's heads chopped off by the guillotine, 300,000 killed by firing squads and then another 6 million killed in the hideous French Revolutionary Wars that followed for the next 25 years. Terrorism came to Britain, well we mentioned an attempted terrorist attack last week of Guy Fawkes, which is pretty famous. The Catholics tried to blow up the British Palace of Westminster, including the House of Commons, the House of Lords, to kill King James I. They failed. But at any rate, Terrorism came to England really in the 1880s through the Irish Republican Brotherhood, the Finians, and they exploded a bomb in the London Underground, for example, at Gower Street in 1885. They also tried to rescue the conspiracy leaders from police van passing on the railway bridge in Hyde, Manchester in 1867. These were some famous outrages and shocks. They also were imprisoned some of these Fenian bombers in Mount Joy. And then December the 13th 1867 there was the Clerkenwell outrage. The prison wall was blown up and killed a lot of people, damaged a lot of territory. They were just trying to release one of their prisoners who was in this prison. Well, there was the 1916 Easter Uprising in Dublin where the Irish Republican Army attempted to seize their independence in the middle of the war. So you can imagine the British were busy on one side fighting in France and in Belgium. and the Irish do the stab in the back behind them, as the British called it. So the British unleashed tanks on the people of Dublin. In fact, a lot of Dublin was just laid waste. You couldn't believe the destruction. Using artillery and tanks in the middle of Dublin to suppress the rebellion, the Easter Rebellion. That was destructive. Interesting how the British were so judgmental of South Africa and Rhodesia when we were fighting terrorism here, because when they were dealing with Irish Republican army terrorism in Ireland. They had no problem holding people up. I mean, imagine if you had pictures of Southampton police holding people up in this sort of manner on the streets, just, you know, no warrant, no reason, just searching everybody. Of course, there were bombings like the S-Plan, 1939, 1940, the IRA were doing bombings in England. This is a more recent bombing, 1974, the Bristol Guildhall. But this is how British police were treating Irish rioters, demonstrators at that stage. Imagine if this was South African police at the same time. This is the British Army opening fire in the 1980s in Ireland. This is in Londonderry. I mean, just imagine if this is a picture of South African police doing this. But they had terrorism like we did. In fact, do you know that the people who actually enabled the ANC to do the Church Street car bombing and others with the IRA. The IRA were helping the ANC with their car bombs and other high technical things. Airy Neve, who is a personal friend of British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, was murdered by a car bomb as he left the car park under the Palace of Westminster. Absolutely hideous. I mean, the audacity to do this bombing right at Westminster. It's a very symbolic thing that the IRA are after. They used a mercury tilt-switch bomb and that's the same kind of mechanism they enabled the ANC to use, actually the IRA did the bombing, but the ANC got the credit. It was done for them on their request for the Churchill bombing in 1983. The same kind of people, the same kind of tactics. And the IRA devastated Britain with a whole range of bombings, including the Glasgow airport attack, although this one actually was done by Muslim terrorists, smashed into the airport, and interesting how here you've got the British trying to put out the the bomber, the terrorist. It's one of these interesting things that instead of shooting terrorists they try to give them all the help that they can. Obviously we've got a different mentality to our enemies. So this was the Glasgow bomber and then there was the hideous Lockerbie bomb where the Pan Am flight was with a suitcase bomb crashed into a village in Scotland. Imagine these people just mining their own business on the plane or on the ground and suddenly huge balls of fire, crashing chaos, you know, like apocalypse now. And the destruction of these people who are probably as peaceful as anything, assuming, I mean, how safe can you be in Scotland? And yet there this 747 Jumbo Jet suddenly descends and causes mayhem on the ground. So this is just the names of the people killed in the 21st of December 1988 Lockerbie disaster. So that's a bit of the background, we looked at that more last week, but this week what I'm wanting to get into is the roots of the modern terrorist threat. and the role of Special Operations Executive S.O.E. You might have heard of S.O.E. before. There's a mountain of films out on it. There's a new one that's just making the circuit called Allied which basically tries to glamorize the assassination operations of S.O.E. during the Second World War. S.O.E. the Special Operations Executive was formed by order of British Prime Minister Winston Churchill on 22nd of July 1940. Now bear in mind he only became British Prime Minister in May 1940, but already by July 1940 he's ordering the Special Operations Executive to be formed. Why that timing? He's barely become Prime Minister. Well, Britain had just lost the Battle of France, they'd been ousted off the continent after an embarrassing barely six weeks of war, they had had to flee from Dunkirk and so the British Army had lost. What didn't happen in four years of the First World War happened in the first six weeks of the second on the Western Front. So Winston Churchill's directive to SAE was to set Europe ablaze. And to this purpose SAE was to conduct espionage, sabotage and reconnaissance in order to aid local resistance movements. That's the word he used. They modelled the SOE on the Irish Republican Army. This is in their textbooks, this is in their history books, this is what their chiefs have all said. We modelled SOE on the IRA. Now you may ask, why? I mean, the IRA had done the most hideous bombings, terrible outrages, it was a terrorist organisation by every definition of the word. Why would you model the premier British military operations executive of the Second World War on the Irish Republican Army? At the height of the Second World War SAE controlled or employed about 13,000 people. They were known as Churchill's Secret Army or the Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare. SAE headquarters was located in Baker Street and this led to its personnel referring to themselves as the Baker Street Irregulars. In fact you can still see their headquarters in downtown London, SAE headquarters now it's a normal building but they've got a plaque at the entrance which the Mayor of London smilingly posed next to. Now this to me would be akin to posing next to a sign saying in this which they've got in Britain too. People put plaques saying that this is the home of the holy Mujahideen, the holy warrior who did the suicide bombing and so on and the parents are quite proud they put a brass plaque there that they are the parents of you know this is the home where this what we call a suicide bomber but what they call a holy warrior or Mujahideen. Because Special Operations Executive was actually a terrorist operation. Well, they were modelled on a terrorist operation, the IRA. And so SAE, a secret service which supported resistance in all enemy-occupied countries. That's hardly the truth. In fact, they did assassinations in neutral countries like Sweden, Switzerland and Spain as well. It wasn't just enemy-occupied countries. It was a classic terrorist operation. Although ostensibly meant to focus on countries occupied by the Axis, meaning Germany, Italy or Hungary, Algeria or Japan. SAE operated in countries like Sweden, Spain or Switzerland and they did assassinations and explosions and bombings all over the place. Hugh Dalton, the Ministry of Economic Warfare. What an interesting title. Did you even know there was such a thing? A Ministry of Economic Warfare. Appointed to take responsibility for SAE as Dalton left Prime Minister Winston Churchill's study he was instructed, now set Europe ablaze. to what purpose? So this is Hugh Dalton. I mean, I don't know what you think, but when I look at this chap, he's the kind of person you expect to see on a child pedophile ring or pornography ring. He just looks really reprehensible to me. Well, he was. I took these pictures in the Imperial War Museum 2014 at the 100th anniversary of the outbreak of World War I I went to Imperial War Museum and aside from a massive exhibit on the whole of the ground floor on the First World War as you'd expect they had a section for SOE and I was intrigued to see how they told me SOE performed 16,000 assassinations, ambushes and sabotage operations on the continent of Europe between 1940 and 1945 That's more than the ANC, PAC, ZANU, ZARPU, FRELIMO and the MPLA combined ever achieved. This is one of the grandfathers of, well, the great-grandfather of modern terrorism is the IRA, but it seems like the grandfather is the SAE. SAE was often concealed behind such names as Joint Technical Board or the Inter-Service Research Bureau. Handbooks and pamphlets on guerrilla warfare, it's a nice name for terrorism, were produced. Weapons were delivered and developed for guerrilla warfare. They called it Churchill's Toy Shop. Here you've got Colin Gubbins. He was the man in charge of operations. Major General Colin Gubbins was Director of SAE from August 1943 and he had wide experience of clandestine operations and he said he put into practice many of the lessons he had learned from the IRA during the Irish War of Independence. and his predecessors said the same. The aims and objectives of SAE revolved around sabotage and subverting countries under control of Axis powers. For this purpose you've got this phenomenal silencer on a Sten gun, for example. A Sten gun is a submachine gun. I think you could even have a silencer for a submachine gun. One of the early high-profile operations was Operation Anthropoid, another new film that's come out to try and glamorize SAE assassinations in the public sphere today. The assassination of the governor of Moravia and Bohemia, Reinhard Heinrich in Prague, had disastrous consequences for everyone involved. I mean absolutely catastrophic. He was the governor of what today we would call the Czech Republic, then they called it Bohemia, in Operation Anthropoid. Now these are two of the assassins who were sent. They were Czech people who joined SOE, who were trained in Britain, but there were a lot of them. There's a whole range and this, the target was Reinhold Heydrich. He was the archtop Aryan National Socialist top fencing champion. He was the athlete of athletes. He was a young man at that stage and a rising star. He was what they would have called one of the princes of the Third Reich. And so for the symbolic purpose of killing him now, people were saying in SOE and the British High Command when they heard about this plan said, this is how you're going to cause trouble. You kill someone like this, there's going to be massive repercussions. The people in Czech are basically being left alone. You're just going to bring chaos and mayhem amongst them. And in fact that's what Churchill said, that's what we want. We want murder and mayhem on the continent. It's too peaceful there. And so here's Reich, protector of Bohemian Moravia, Reinhard Heinrich. And you can see this man has got all the medals, just about everything you could want. He's the soldier's soldier. And he was driving on his own, no bodyguard. driving through Prague and his, just this driver and him, interestingly enough, as a bomb was thrown, and the man who stepped into the road with a Sten gun, the Sten gun failed to operate. It jammed, which does not speak well of the SAE training. They threw multiple bombs, there were several around there, it wasn't just the two primary assassins. When the primary assassin, the chief of the operation, Sten, failed to operate, Heinrich stood up calmly in the passenger seat, drew his revolver and was about to fire when he started having bombs thrown at him. And you can see the damage done to the vehicle. This was a high profile terrorist assassination. With the express purpose, for the very same purpose that all assassinations and terrorist actions are taken, it was done with the purpose of creating a backlash. You could see, you'd often wonder, why are some terrorist attacks done? They want the authorities to clamp down so that the people can feel oppressed. I mean, they've got roadblocks, they've got searches, maybe house-to-house searches, and then you see this as oppression. Remember, Salafi used to be a place where you could travel anywhere freely, didn't even bother to lock your doors at night, let alone burger bars. But the more the terrorism occurred, the more there were roadblocks, the more burglar bars went up. And that's what the terrorists want. And then they say, that was apartheid. Well, actually it was the ANC causing the chaos to make the police clamp down. Because, you know, when your friends are getting murdered and relatives are getting killed, obviously people are going to react. And they fled to this church, the Church of St Cyril and Methodius. And this is where all the ringleaders and the assassins and so on were. were cornered and they were wiped out. Although, in the movie that they've produced now, these people managed to wipe out vast amounts of these professional German soldiers coming into them. In fact, there was something like eight Czech resistance fighters were killed there, and less than four German soldiers killed in the operation. But in the movie, it looks like they wiped out divisions in defending this Actually, it's not just a church, it was like a basilica. Very thick walls, very easy to defend, but in fact it wasn't quite as amazing as the make-out in the film. In fact, most of the assassins kill themselves rather than fight. So, anyway, who cares about the facts? Hollywood's made a story the way they would like it to be, not the way it actually was. SAE's key objective was to ferment hatred and conflict between the population of Axis-occupied countries and the occupiers, to force the Axis to expend manpower and resources in maintaining control of the territories that they occupied. The aims and objectives of SAE revolved around sabotage and subverting the countries under control of the Axis powers. As Proverbs 17.11 says, an evil man seeks only rebellion, and that's exactly what Churchill said he wanted. He said, I want you to start rebellion in all these countries. And he was told plainly by his intelligence chiefs, well, there is no resistance movements in Czech Republic because the people are very happy there. It's peaceful. In fact, they delighted that they've avoided what's come to Poland and other parts because they negotiated a treaty and it's all being honored. In fact, Venice who was the President, he was paid a pension all the time while Germans were occupying, never mistreated, and this is what they wanted, but the British wanted chaos in Belgium and in Holland and all these places, because you've got to make the enemy's rear areas ungovernable. I think we've heard that term, make areas ungovernable. And so to this end SAE created secret armies and guerrilla forces to sow murder and mayhem. That's their words from their textbooks. We were to sow murder and mayhem behind the lines. And so they had Section or Station 12 which produced a whole lot of... I don't know if you've seen this sort of gun. This gun is a one-shot. They distributed these by vast numbers. The goal being to encourage people to walk up to some German soldier somewhere off-duty, shoot him from behind and then steal his weapon. And so this is the kind of, you know, upgrade your weapon. So they dropped these extremely cheap rubbish, I think Americans call them a zip gun, that they might use in gangster areas. Now these underground armies became a model for the Marxist liberation movements, which tore Africa apart during the years of decolonization. Now, I just love this term, Churchill's secret defense army. I mean, what are you defending if you're attacking other countries? The KGB built on the example of SAE, because SAE was actually an example of excellence if you're a terrorist revolutionary movement, because these people really fomented revolution. And so they modelled their terrorist movements, what they called National Liberation Armies, on SAE, training and fomenting terrorist campaigns throughout the world, including the Muslim terrorists who continue to plague civilised society to this day. 2 Chronicles 19 verse 2 says should you help the wicked and love those who hate the Lord therefore the wrath of the Lord is upon you so one answer I'd give to our British cousins brethren as to why are these terrible terrorist attacks happening to us well much as I love so much of what the British Empire stood for and achieved in terms of civilization and missions around the world they sowed in terror and they are reaping terror SOE developed a wide range of explosive devices for sabotage such as limpet mines, shape chargers and time fuses which have been used against our people in Rhodesia, South Africa and South West Africa in more recent memory. But they were first developed by Baker House by SOE. The sleeve gun, that you could, as you're coming up to shake a person's hand, but you've got the ability to fire, I mean, the person thinks you're offering him his handshake hands, but it's a sleeve gun. It's an assassination device. Who thinks of such things? The time pencil. which you could literally, it looks like a normal pen, but actually it's a detonator. You activate, you stab it into the plastic explosive, and you walk away and this will tick, tick, tick. Well, in fact, it doesn't tick, tick. What it does is you crush the vial of acid, which then corrodes the retaining wine. When that finally corrodes, which takes a few minutes, then it'll explode. So this is to give you time to get away from setting the device. So these are all what they call secret agents and heroes are what we I mean I grew up from age six we had terrorism people being murdered in Rhodesia and it was part of our life I never thought of terrorists as guerrillas freedom fighters heroes and yet I was going to movies where they were glamorizing this because that was done by the British and the Second World War in Europe so it was good but then after a while I couldn't help but draw the dotted lines that But they were doing in France the same sort of things that the terrorists are doing to us now. What makes that good and what's happening to us bad? How can I justify the one and condemn the other? As plastic explosive is inert and it requires a powerful detonator to cause it to explode. I mean, you can throw plastic explosive, you know, we could toss plastic explosive backwards and forwards here. And it wouldn't be any danger. It's a good thing to carry. It can't explode on its own. You need a detonator. So it's generally safe to transport and store. You can pack it into your cast that you've got around your fake broken arm or whatever. So there's all sorts of ways of being able to smuggle plastic explosives in. SAE used plastic explosives in everything from car bombs to exploding rats. Dead serious. Here is a group of them who purchased rats to kill them and stuff and sew plastic explosives in them with timing devices so they would leave a dead rat on the road to explode or throw it. Why would you need exploding rats? It just boggles the brain what they were thinking. SAE also experimented with lubricants laced with grinding materials to introduce into a vehicle oil system, railway, wagon, axle boxes and incendiary devices disguised as any kind of innocuous object. So the goal was to encourage people to put into, and I remember even 1970s, petrol caps weren't locked. Because petrol is so cheap. I remember my father pulling up to a petrol station and saying 25 cents please. And that wasn't a joke and he wasn't being a cheapskate. 25 cents bought you a lot of fuel. So the petrol caps weren't locked and I know that because my brother taught me by the time I was six how to siphon petrol out of cars to make petrol bombs which we used for gang fights out on the bush areas behind our home I mean the things boys get up to, it's shocking. But it was easy to soften petrol, make a petrol bomb. I knew how to make a petrol bomb by age 7. And the British were training people how to introduce into petrol caps something that's going to mess up the whole system. Sugar in a petrol tank, that sort of thing. But worse. They then got explosive material which they concealed in coal piles to destroy locomotives and fireplaces. So, imagine, you've got amongst the coal piles, which aren't secured, I mean, who secured coal piles? And you've put in some that's actual coal, but inside it's an explosive. So, some poor persons shoveling coal into their home and next thing, kadoom, or in the locomotive, even better, for their purposes. Landmines were disguised as cow dung. Churchill's toys include the anti-tank sticky bomb, which is a bomb you could just throw and it would stick to the metal surface of whatever you sent and then it would explode to cause more, instead of bouncing off and causing less damage. So they thought that the sticky bomb popularized in saving private Ryan. Then there was the ingenious Limpet diving mine. For decades this vital work was kept hidden, but now, thanks to a new book, the antics and inventiveness of the SAE in developing new weapons has finally been disclosed. Most people never knew about most of what SAE did. In fact, SAE has only recently really started to become known, and we've got a flurry of Hollywood films saying, oh, isn't this wonderful, whereas actually I think it's hideous. SAE even revived medieval devices such as the caltrop. You can see what a caltrop is at the Castle Museum during a tour yesterday. Used to burst tyres of vehicles or to injure foot soldiers. They throw these caltrops around. I mean imagine you're walking along and you step on one of these. No matter which direction they fall, there's always a sharp point sticking up. Some demon-possessed character designed these to crippled cavalry and foot soldiers. Absolutely disgusting. And the British were sewing these things around the felts during the Angliboer War to cripple commando's horses. Some estimates are we lost over 400,000 horses during the Angliboer War which is why there's a monument to the horses in Port Elizabeth which the EFF thought they needed to attack. But what kind of six sinister character thinks of reviving the Caltrop and throwing these around in Europe. That can't tell who's going to step in it. Male or female, young or old, animal or human, friend or enemy. But this is not the way you fight wars. SAE also produced crossbows to shoot incendiary bolts. Now, I know about crossbows, I've been shooting crossbows for decades, but look at the kind of crossbows they came out with. Okay, they've got the aluminium ones, but then they've got the crossbow bolts which included the opportunity to screw onto the end explosive devices. So for example they would then have the multiple warheads, secondary steel penetrator, airbursts and other kind of bolts. These are silent assassins. I don't know that I've seen any war film that's ever even hinted at the existence of such weapons that they were using in the Second World War. S.E.E. was a little devil's kitchen of cooking up new ideas of murdering and mutilating people. S.E.E. produced exploding pens, guns concealed in tobacco pipes and other exotic devices, and if you I think that sounds bizarre. These are the diagrams. You've got the hidden knife and a pencil. You've got the pipe pistol, so that you can be smoking a pipe, aiming it, and firing. I mean, easy for assassinations. And all kinds of totally illegal by the Geneva Convention. Dum-dum, exploding bullets. These are things that were expressly forbidden by the Geneva Convention in use in warfare. And of course, the dagger boot. and why is it so thin? It's designed to fit between ribs because our hearts and vitals are protected behind rib cage and so the idea is that even if it hits the rib it's going to glance off and go into the vital to go to slide between ribs. So again they're not just thinking normal knives they're thinking assassination. There's even the penny cutter cable tool to hide and cut things. They designed new kind of stickers to leave false footprints so it looks like a person's barefoot when they're not. Then of course the classic spy radio kits, which that's what it used to take. Our cell phones today can do a lot more than what that could do back then, but that was advanced for that time. And so a person carries a normal, that would have been the kind of case that almost anyone would carry for travel, school and inside was a full-on radio kit. They distributed thousands of these radio kits to resistance movements, spies and so on throughout Europe, and they said, for example, from 1941 to 42, all the way to the end of the war, the British knew the exact deployment of every German division unit. They said never in the history of warfare has any army been as well informed about what was on the other side of the hill. They knew every single detail about every single installation from down to the smallest to the largest. Ships, U-boats, aircraft, everything about Germany. They knew exactly what they were doing, often before the German commands themselves received the orders, because of Enigma, which is a whole other operation. the Code Decrypt, the General Communications HQ in Bletchley Park. So these are just the average kind of demolition display that SAE puts on at the Imperial War Museum. Now prior to, and the funny thing is, just on the same level next door you've got example of what the terrorists are doing, IRA and the Muslim terrorists, and it looks like they've learned from SAE because the same tactics, same type of weapons, and you're thinking on one side the crowds say This is our terrorism, and then that's theirs, and their terrorism's bad. Ours is good. Which, I don't know what others are thinking, but I look at this and I think this is shameful. Here's the Semtex or the classic explosive, the plastic explosive that they provided thousands of tons to Muslim, sorry, to Marxist terrorist groups across Yugoslavia and Greece and all over Europe to cause murder and mayhem. Of course the parcel bomb was something they specialised into. They did parcel bombs. They killed quite a lot of key people. And this is the classic letter bomb. This is something else you can see in the British and Imperial War Museum. This would be a more modern version of the letter bomb, of course. And in the parcel bombs they were using nails to help spread more shrapnel. Which is exactly what the PAC terrorists did at the St James massacre. they taped nails around the bombs. And of course you've got, this is a standard type of bomb, like what the Unibomber used in something like a suitcase. But of course the SAE were using these suitcase bombs, very similar to this. Plastic explosives like these This is classic what they call C4. It's a version of plastic explosive. See, here people talk about Semtex and C4 and plastic. It's all basically the same kind of things. And this is the kind of detonator that they're using in it. And this is now for commercial purposes. So SAE supplied Marxist resistance forces throughout Europe, throughout Southeast Asia and China with thousands of tons of top class military weapons and explosives. Thousands of tons. And here's just one of their requests for dropped soonest 300 stens, 250 marlins, 2000 pounds of plastic. That's a ton of plastic explosives. This is just one order from an Italian Marxist terrorist group to SE, which was provided. So numerous military leaders were absolutely horrified. I mean British military leaders were horrified at the terror tactics used by SAE. For example, Field Marshal Montgomery, under whom my father served in the 8th Army, he's on record as having been disgusted by what SAE did. This is absolutely reprehensible and low class. For example, SAE launched an assassin's attempt, launched by submarine, on Urban Rommel's HQ to try and assassinate Urban Rommel, the leader of the Afrika Korps. They failed and Urban Rommel ordered that the defeated British commanders be given the same honour as military funeral under British flag, no less bad enough that they'd captured. And while The general order on both sides, Axis and Allied, was that saboteurs and assassins behind the lines got the death penalty. I mean, the British assassinated people who were just agents of influence and spies in Britain who'd done nothing more than send coded post things. They put them from a firing spot. And so you can imagine Germany, when they were having these assassinations, assassinating people such as the governor of Bohemia, they all did the same. But Erwin Rommel refused to practice that, that captured commanders were just treated like any other prison of war, even though they'd been involved in an assassination attempt behind the lines. Well, when Field Marshal Montgomery found out, he was horrified. I mean, you can't do this sort of thing, sending in killers in the middle of the night to try and assassinate the opposing general. North Africa was a place of clean warfare, there was no atrocities, and yet SAE, without even the knowledge of the local, because they answered to Churchill himself, they didn't answer to the local commanders, so you can imagine Montgomery says, we don't do this sort of thing, how dare you come into my area and try and assassinate the opposing general in such a disgusting way, and anyway, it failed. But there were a lot of British generals who were on record saying this is not cricket, this isn't war, this isn't right, this is unjust, you don't do this, I think it's against the Geneva Convention. What if they start doing the same things to us? Do you realize we've got an empire spread around the whole world? If others started to behave like this how could we control India or Kenya or anywhere else? Indeed, I mean the people overseas got the message because the British film industry were glamorizing these terrorist attacks and A whole lot of people like the Mau Mau got the message and Joe McKenna says, thank you. That's a brilliant idea. That's exactly what we're going to do. They supported Tito's partisans in the kingdom of Yugoslavia. Isaiah 59 verse 13 says, in transgressing and lying against the Lord and departing from my God, speaking oppression and revolt, conceiving and uttering from the heart words of falsehood. We are fighting for freedom. We're fighting for Christian civilization. We're fighting for democracy. Really, then why are we allied with the Soviet Union? Why are we helping mass-murdering Marxist terrorists like Tito's partisans in Yugoslavia? Even before the Tehran Conference of 1943, SAE had stopped supporting the royalist government-in-exile of Mihailović and channelled most British support to the communist partisans of Josip Broz Tito, who was a dirty little Marxist murderer. And he wasn't the government-in-exile. He wasn't the king of Yugoslavia. Why was he giving the British support? Britain's meant to be a royalist country and yet they They betrayed the Royalists and they helped the Marxists in Yugoslavia. Why? So you can see here some of the wartime pictures depicting what is Yugoslavia, what is Croatia, where the Italians or where the Bulgarians were occupying. Because it was a complicated situation. Remember, Yugoslavia never existed before the Versailles Treaty and doesn't exist now. Yugoslavia was specifically put together to punish Austria, to take as much territory away from Austria, and put it under Serbia, who had started the First World War in the first place with the assassination of Austria-Franz Ferdinand. And so, you have, in fact, today, six countries where there was Yugoslavia then. As Bill Bathman said, six nations, five languages, four religions, three alphabets, two calendars, but only one political party, the Communist Party of Josef Tito. And Bill Baffin said one of the worst countries he worked in, in Eastern Europe, was Yugoslavia. Forget about Yugoslavia being spoken of as some kind of independent, just as brutal a Marxist-atheist dictatorship that persecuted church it could be. Well, here are some of the SOE's propaganda pictures of Yugoslav partisans being transported on oxcarts to field hospitals. and typical Serbian village in the mountains of Yugoslavia were oxcarts being used to help a wounded American airman who'd obviously been bombing further north and shot down the way back. So these are SAE pictures of their partisans. And they've written books about the resistance and the Allies and the rivalries that doomed Yugoslavia. Well, in fact, then you get absolute lies like beacons in the light with the OSS and Tito's partisans in wartime Yugoslavia. I mean beacons of light? You're kidding. These are the people who were the darkness. They were Marxists. And so here's one of the British operators of SAE who worked behind the lines and he was meant to be helping Drozd Mihaljevic, the the king of Yugoslavia and his Chetnik guerrilla forces who've been slandered in all kinds of Allied films. If you've seen Force 10 from Nazarone or Return to Nazarene, there was first the guns of Navarone and there were a few others afterwards and they're trying to make out like the Chetniks are the worst. Well no, they were the closest to the British. They were royalists, they were fighting against the Marxists, and yet, in order to justify the treachery done to the Yugoslav royalists, they have demonized them in movies. So this was the flag of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia. What replaced it? The Red Star, when Tito took over. the Kurdovols of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia and this is a magazine written during the war saying General Draž Mihaljević the war minister and Chetnik commander-in-chief was Hitler's number one headache and so they have said that this is you know he's he's the real real fighter well didn't matter they didn't care for Draž Mihaljević both the SAE and OSS gave their support to Tito. And so here you've got the so-called Chetniks who get damned by Hollywood because Hollywood seems to have a love affair with communism. And here the Chetnik royalist anti-communist forces are struggling to fight. You can see the weapons they've got in their hands look like what they've captured from the Soviets. What's more likely is that they might have even been provided these by forces who'd defeated Russians on the Eastern Front because some of their people would have gone there and been fighting as part of the coalition. So sadly here you can see Colonel Robert McDowell of the Office of Strategic Forces on the far left. So OSS man. Little did poor General Mihaljevic understand how OSS and SAE was betraying everything to the Marxists to make sure Tito stabbed these people in the back and destroyed all freedom in Yugoslavia. So here's an SAE propaganda picture showing how Tito's communist partisans, 30% were women, and they sort of make it out to be a nice bunch, although they were the worst murderers. They actually did an absolute genocide after the war. They killed hundreds of thousands of Germans who had lived in the areas that were called Yugoslavia, before it being, of course, the Austro-Hungarian Empire, and they'd lived there for centuries. They were annihilated. Absolute genocide at the end of the war. So here's Marshal Tito. You can see him on the far right here. This is one of the most brutal mass murderers. He killed a minimum of a million people after the war in cold blood. bronze teeter. This is a wartime picture. Notice the Hammond sickle on the red star on his hat. So there was no secret that he was communist. But this is the man that the Allies gave all their support to, and he became one of the worst of the dictators in Eastern Europe, as Bill Bethlen testifies in his book going through, and Brother Andrew and others. So the Tehran Conference in 1943, here you've got the so-called Big Three of the Allies, And, interesting, they represent the democracies. Not that anyone ever elected Churchill before 1950, but he wasn't elected in the Second World War. They didn't have an election from, what was it, 1935 to 1945. There was no election because he just did a coup, took the power, but that's a democracy. And of course, Charles Stalin, nobody ever elected Stalin, but they're the democracies. Don't worry about, you know, facts. And at Tehran, they were already deciding a whole lot of things. Notice how they are speaking about, in these events, the bombing of Germany. Yes, look at this. 1,500 more tons of bombs dropped on Berlin. I mean, that's in the same New York Times paper. What's dropping 1,500 tons of bombs on a city called when the Boston bombing took place, which killed two people and injured many? The President, I use the word in commas and italics, small p, Obama, said anytime bombs are used on civilians it's terrorism. Now I actually agree with Obama on that one, but then why is he such a pal of Mandela who was responsible for how many bombings? And so here you've got these creeps who are dividing up the world between them. Now, you know, when they were accusing Hitler of world domination Well, actually, world domination is what these people are doing, because Germany didn't have an aircraft carrier. How are you going to have world domination without an aircraft carrier? And they didn't have a landing craft. How are they going to invade England, let alone America, if there wasn't one single landing craft? How were they going to transport any Tiger tanks across the channel. They didn't even have the mechanism for that. They didn't think it important. They didn't have a four-engine bomber. But these people, well, okay, Britain had 13 aircraft carriers, America had 11 aircraft carriers, and, of course, Stalin had the biggest army the world had ever seen, but they were the ones doing war domination. But, of course, you've got to accuse your enemy, who was just trying to reclaim the land stolen from him in the First World War through a Versailles Treaty. Joseph Stalin cynically said that death of one person is a tragedy. But the death of millions is just a statistic. That's the kind of low-life scum he is. But here you've got another picture I bet you haven't seen. And here you've got Franklin Delano Roosevelt, they've got Churchill, and a whole lot of Arabs. This is at the Cairo conference, and this predates the Tehran conference. And this is where they were agreeing to a lot of what the Muslim nations would get after it. So it's an intriguing thing that a lot of the Muslim terrorism that you saw later came from the very people who were allies of the Allies during the Second World War. Should you help the wicked and love those who hate the Lord, therefore the wrath of the Lord is upon you. Why is so much evil happening to Britain and America today? Could it not be in having sown seeds of terrorism during the Second World War, and supporting so many Marxist terrorist groups since the Second World War, that what you sow is what you reap. Also in Greece, SAE, that's the British and OSS, that's the American operatives, favoured the communist guerrilla forces and effectively provided the weapons which the Marxists used in the Greek Civil War that followed World War II. There would have been no Greek Civil War if there hadn't been SAE and OSS. training these people how to be terrorists so excuse the euphemism liberation of Greece but in fact I hear you've got British troops walking when they say liberation of Athens well in fact even the British history books say there was no battle for Athens or Greece because Germany withdrew their forces there before the British got there because they were overstretched they couldn't They'd gotten into Greece in the first place because Italy was in a battle with Greece and were losing, and the British poured into Greece, which is neighboring Bulgaria and Romania, where Germany got all their petrol from. All Germany's petrol, at that stage, because later their oil from coal managed to get them a fair bit, but never enough. They needed to protect Romania, and with the British pouring into Greece, threatening the plushly oil fields of Romania, Germany was forced to counter-attack by taking Yugoslavia to get to Greece in order to stop a southern threat, because they were about to have to fight a pre-emptive strike against the Soviet Union, who were preparing to invade Europe, and that was delayed fatally by two months by the Greek Yugoslav campaign, which was needed to protect the southern flank and protect the oil resources in the war. But anyway, here the British soldiers who had liberated Greece and they gave vast amounts of weaponry and terrorist training to the Greeks, mostly to Elas. Here's the woman guerrillas of Elas, and by the way, Elas is nothing other than the Marxist, the communist Red Army of Greece that then fought a terrible civil war. Now, notice the British weapons, the British uniform, the British berets that the communist terrorists were using in Yugoslavian. So you can see during the Greek Civil War. Notice total British look. The berets, the uniforms, the badges, the boots, the weapons. Yep, and on this occasion we've got an American M3. No Soviet weaponry visible. The Greek Civil War was armed entirely by the allies by the folks in the British side. So here you can see also the German occupied areas on red, the Italian occupied areas on blue, Bulgarian on green and so it just gives a bit of an idea as well when people speak about you know Germany taking over Greece well that's not exactly true. Although they did take Crete because that was a major operation from where Allied bombers could threaten the Plashti oil fields in Romania. There's a whole lot of tactical reasons as to why different things happened. But notice this is after the British liberation of Athens so-called. You see open, I mean you've got to be blind to miss that that's a Hamelin sickle. This is the kind of marches taking place by Elias. And during the Greek Civil War You had some of the folks who were fighting on the nationalist side were using old German helmets because they said they were the best. They actually protected more of your head and were a lot more sensible than Allied helmets. There's a British military study that 5,000 lives were lost of the British Army in the war because they refused to adapt their helmet design, which was basically Middle Ages style, to the German design for just moral purposes, even though the German design was obviously more intelligent and the Americans have now followed that with their designs of helmets, to have it sloped backwards and protect your neck and your ears better. The British had just this little funny... I've got my dad's one at home still and I wouldn't want to go to battle with that because that didn't protect much at all. And so they said just on a tried patriotic basis they didn't adjust their design of the helmets and so these 5,000 headwinds would have been avoidable according to British military study if they'd just done the sensible thing instead of just being stubborn. Again these look like British artillery pieces being used during the Greek Civil War. And the Greek Civil War was a tragedy, a lot of people died, there was a lot of massacres, hideous, but this is all part of what was sown by SOE and OSS in a country that was quite peaceful beforehand. And here they've got a monument to what they call the main Greek resistance forces, but actually they were the communist forces. That was bad, but at least Greece stayed out of the communist orbit by a lot of hard fighting and hundreds of thousands of deaths. But the betrayal of Albania to Stalinism was absolutely hideous. In Albania SOE and OSS operatives supported the communist partisans of Envahoya, who turned Albania into the most brutal Stalinist dictatorship after the war. I've ministered in Albania, I got in there just as the Berlin Wall came down and Tirana opened up. Tirana had an order from Envahoya, no cats allowed in the entire capital, because cats apparently don't obey orders. So communists have this pathological hatred for cats, it would seem, and I was delighted when I got done on my first mission to have several cats find me out, which just goes to show, you're even at underground cats in communist places like in Albania. Joseph Stalin in Vohoya declared Albania the first truly atheistic country in the world. He killed the last minister publicly, dragged him around behind a vehicle in the main square in Toronto. gave the Cuban embassy the last Orthodox church that was open in Tirana and so on. He is a real, brutal, sadistic, mass-murdering thug. And here you can see the kind of emperor worship in Vohoya. If you haven't heard his name, he is one of the most hated people in Eastern Europe. And you can see, how is it that the whole of Yugoslavia, Albania, Bulgaria ended up in Soviet hands? The Russian army didn't come there. It was given to them by SAE and OSS who did everything they could to subvert all the patriotic, loyal, royalist, anti-communist groups. And you even get this in their own books now that they admit. In fact SAE was sending in huge amounts of spies. parachuted SOE operatives into Latvia and Lithuania and Estonia, up here in the Baltic, in order to do sabotage. In fact, they were even saying in their reports, but anything we do to sabotage these countries here is just going to ensure that they fall into the hands of the Soviets, and the local people don't want to help us, because they say, but our only hope is that the Germans win, because otherwise we're going to be crushed by the Soviets. So why would we want to support SOE? So SOE were reporting back saying, The people on the ground are asking, and it makes a lot of sense because it seems that, well, why are we working against our own best interests and why would they want to help us? Because it's national suicide. Indeed it was. SOE was a massive state-sponsored terrorist operation. Now John Keegan, an historian who is one of the foremost authorities in warfare, many of the war books that I read as a young boy, I remember John Keegan either wrote or was doing the forward or was the editor, British military historian John Keegan wrote, we must recognise that our response to the scourge to terrorism is compromised by what we did through SOE. The justification that we had no other means of striking back at the enemy is exactly the same argument used by the Red Brigades, by the Meinhof gang, the PF, LP, the IRA and every other half-articulate terrorist organisation that SOE besmirched Britain, or disgraced Britain. And in fact, They were even called Churchill's pirates. Well, in fact, they were, because before the First World War it was considered unthinkable that you would blockade food from a country. You could blockade weapons, but you couldn't blockade food. But this hunger blockade to starve Germany and Austria, to starve civilians, which was the policy in the First and Second World War, had never been considered an acceptable warfare tactic before that, and of course was forbidden by the Geneva Convention. So the Beiler-Meinhof Red Army faction was nothing other than SOE tactics being used in Germany. And so Beiler-Meinhof gang, which was never that large a group, but they did, and the Red Army faction, they did these horror terrorist attacks, kidnappings, murders, assassinations, and this is about the full total number, it wasn't that many people, but they were using SOE tactics. And they kept the whole of Germany really on tenderhooks throughout the 70s, you may recall. Terrible, terrible attacks. And they were incompetent, befuddled by drugs and casual sex. They called them the Clowns of Terror, but that didn't stop them doing a lot of damage. And here you can see these terrorists on trial. And, I mean, you can imagine, these are just confused drug addicts, as far as one can see, but they were trained and armed. The Red Brigades in Italy did a lot of murderous attacks. And here you can get the religious mindset of modern terrorists. And of course the religion is communism. The Red Brigades. And this is Viva the Red Brigades. And Italian terrorism. Next question is how were these groups all funded? And here's James Adams' expose, The Financing of Terror, behind the PLO, the IRA, the Red Brigades. and MI9 stand the paymasters and notice it's dollars. We've got books here as well, Allies Betrayed, Nicaragua Allies Betrayed, China Allies Betrayed, speaking about all different, Persia, Iran, and also The Best Enemy's Money Can Buy by Ray Sutton, speaking about how Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution and so on. Here you've got, for example, the British with the very same criminals who are the biggest terrorist sponsors in the world today. This is the Saudi Arabian King Faisal. This is all part of Lawrence of Arabia and that sort of nonsense where they basically encouraged them to be a bunch of terrorists and mass murdering guerrillas and the way they treated the Ottoman Turks, not that the Ottoman Turks are exactly good people, but still you don't lower yourself to the tactics of the enemy. And they did brutal mass... In fact, even Lawrence of Arabia killed prisoners and was present when they were being tortured. But they promised them a whole lot of things, which Lord Balfour was also promising to the Jews. So, yeah, well, you can have a problem when you've promised the Arabs everything they want, and you've promised the Jews Palestine, and, well, yes, there's a bit of incompatibility here. And somebody's going to get angry. Now notice this is immediately following Second World War. This is the British Army dealing with riots and protests of Palestinians in what today is called Israel over Jewish immigrants coming in by the hundreds of thousands. And I'm glad this isn't a picture of a South African soldier in Soweto or something but I don't know what that looks like to you. Look at these people tied up. Look at the size of that bayonet. What were they thinking? This is not a good PR picture. And this is, in Gaza, British Army overseeing the demolition of town facilities and homes in punishment for some terrorist operations that were taking place. Mind you, they were getting terrorist attacks on both sides, because in fact even Ben-Gurion blew up the King David Hotel and things like that, killed hundreds of people in just one terrorist bombing. So you had terrorism from both the Irgun or Saqqari zealots of that time and the beginners of the PLO. This doesn't look particularly good either but here's British in Palestine wearing gas masks, they must be about to throw some tear gas canisters. This is a picture you wouldn't want published. This is the British whipping people who are protesting against their rule in India. Now, interesting because What they're doing here is they are reaping what they have sowed. They're suddenly getting terrorist attacks on them, after having told the whole people what wonderful terrorist operations they did in the Second World War, and now a whole lot of others are picking up the inspiration, saying, thank you for the ideas. I resist, therefore I exist. And these are some of the... Now these characters here, Hussein of Jordan and Yasser Arafat, All the weapons that they were using throughout the 60s and 70s were British provided. I mean they started off with Tommy guns, Sten guns, Mills grenades. It was all the things SAE had spread around there. They didn't need the Russian AKs until much later. Popular Front for Liberation of Palestine. I mean these people, this is the kind of, resistance is not terrorism. You see, well the British call them resistance fighters in Europe, so how can what they call resistance be called terrorism here? And this is one of the more famous poster people, I don't know if she ever fired a shot in anger, but she was used for the public relations image of the PLA. And here you've got more supporters and glamour and of course the Afghans as well, they've moved off the British Sten guns onto AKs now, but all what we've been seeing throughout the Muslim world, Boko Haram, Al-Shabaab, the whole lot, ISIS, they're all modelled on SAE. They're following SAE operations, including the car bombs, including assassinations, including targeting. And one third of the world's land surface fell to communist terrorists, but why? Well, their primary sponsors were actually Joseph Stalin's Soviet Union, who was about to be destroyed in 1941 and would have been, but for Bletchley Parks assisting them with information and a vast lend-lease of billions of dollars of weapons that came from America. So the Mau Mau in Kenya were absolutely hideous. I mean what they did were terrible. They were doing nothing different from what they'd learned from SAE in the British war films that came out of the Second World War. Muguti Seseku in the Congo, Idi Amin in Uganda, he loved the British Empire. I mean he in fact modelled a lot of what he did on Britain. He even had their kind of uniforms. They even awarded themselves same kind of medals. And here's Emperor Bokassa who's thought that he'd be another Napoleon and loved the French. And of course, if the French glamorized their resistance, which is nothing but terrorists, then why can't he do the same sort of thing? And if you disagree, well, the same sort of thing that befell any traitor in the Second World War, put him against a pole and shoot him. And that's why I was born into this war going on throughout, all of Southern Africa because of these terrorists. These people were just, I mean, what is different between the Swarmer group and the French resistance? planting landmines, doing ambushes, murdering people, killing civilians. How is this in any way different from Operation Anthropoid? How is this in any way different from any of the great operations of ESEA? The car bombs, exactly the same. This is now Kalahari Sands, Vintook 1987. I was there when this happened. And bombings. This is Ondangwa Post Office. And notice, by now, they're getting the weapons from China and the Soviet Union, but don't worry, those countries are getting billions and billions at the same time from the West to keep them going. Zanipir in Zimbabwe, they started off with their terror attacks using Sten guns and Lee-Enfields and Webley revolvers, which they got from the Zambian government, who had gotten them from the British. Murders, mayhem, stabbings, I mean, all this that we were getting, in Rhodesia, what we were dealing with, shooting down a aircraft. In what way was this in any way different from what SAE and OSS did to Europe in the Second World War? And this is what we've had to deal with. These are the places we've worked, Mozambique, Angola, MPLA, ANC in South Africa. The one thing Obama said that I can agree with is, anytime bombs are used to target innocent civilians, it's an act of terror. And I'd say, yes, thank you, for once we agree. He's dead right. And yet he sent 26,000 smart bombs onto targets around the world, bombed people in eight countries, killed tens of thousands of civilians, but he got a peace prize for it. So, if the Boston bombings, which killed two civilians, were cruel, savage and malevolent, then why is Nelson Mandela your role model? I mean, what is worse about the Boston bombing than the Church Street bombing in 1983? 1983 in Church Street, Pretoria, ANC sets up Carvel with the help of ANC, thank you. The PAC in Southern Africa who attacked St. James, but Mandela, the friend of the longest reigning dictator in 20th century, Fidel Castro, gave him the highest award you can get, spoke to all houses of parliament simultaneously. Mandela totally supported some of the worst dictates in the plant like Castro, Mugabe. And in Zimbabwe we've had blood diamonds, oppression, massacres such as the world has not seen in recent years. And this land claims destruction, brutal, racist, anti-white, genocidal lunacy. They can't even spell their own country's name correctly at the border post. And half the population's fled. So under Mandela's presidency, an average of 25,000 people were murdered every year in his five years of presidency. To celebrate his birthdays, Mandela would regularly open prison doors and set many convicted criminals, including armed robbers, murderers, and rapists free. But why not? I mean, he had been received by the Queen, given all kinds of ovations, received in America like he's a hero in Washington DC. I mean, was he doing anything different from what SAE and OSS did? Now, Henrik Furtwängler was dealt with lightly as a devil, but murders under his prime ministership was an average of 170 a year. Mandela had over 24,000 people being murdered a year, but he was a saint. Absolute, mindless hypocrisy. I mean, that's all you can say, hypocrisy. These are just some of the people murdered under Nelson Mandela's presidency in our country. Just some. of the terrible farmers which he never spoke out against. He never made a stand. In fact some people are calling it a genocide. In fact it certainly would be. We've marched to Parliament to protest Mandela's policies and you just look at the things that he is guilty of. But the British have got a statue to Nelson Mandela just next to the British House of Parliament and well fair enough it's next to Winston Churchill so I mean I suppose they're in company. So what is going on in British schools today? If you can look past these silly girls in the foreground. Nelson Mandela, Che Guevara, Martin Luther King Jr. He was neither a doctor nor Martin nor Luther. He was just Michael King. He wasn't a reverend. He wasn't a doctor. He was just a plagiarist, pervert, communist, revolutionary, sexual degenerate. But those are the heroes being put in a British classroom. And you say, why is there terrorism in Britain? Well, who they hear is that they're teaching the people. I mean, terrorist, terrorist, violent, Marxist, revolutionary, sexual pervert, degenerate. The most effective propaganda machine in human history has proved to be the television. Not that there's anything wrong with the technology, but it's been hijacked by people who have abused it now to just brainwash people. While I promised them liberty, they themselves are slaves of corruption. Truth is hate for those who hate the truth. Righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is a reproach to any people. When British military officials objected on both moral and military grounds to the SAE operations of fomenting terrorism and revolution, and that there was no practical use in the larger military picture, that only led to a lot of unnecessary loss of civilian lives, and provoked harsh crackdowns. Prime Minister Winston Churchill responded, that's the very intention. The whole purpose of SAE is to provoke enemy reactions on the civilian population in order to deteriorate relations in occupied countries. And that's exactly what ZANU-PF did in Rhodesia, and what ANSI did in South Africa, and what SWAPA tried to do, failed to do in South West Africa. They want to provoke crackdowns, so that the people can feel oppressed by house searches, body searches, roadblocks, things like this. They want that. And if in the midst of a riot some body can get caught up and get injured, all the better. They want collateral damage. That's necessary to foment a revolution. But that's the same logic of SOE. Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter. The SOE secret war book that I've just been going through The experts, and these are people who glamorize Britain's war effort, they say actually SAE didn't achieve anything of military significance that in any way measurably shortened the war, but all they did do is guarantee that whole countries were betrayed to communism, such as Yugoslavia. And you had the imitation game, which is nothing, I mean, first you thought that you were watching an intriguing intelligence war film, and after a while you realized you were watching nothing but a homo promo, and it's a complete bait and switch. This is in the film they're trying to suggest that this brilliant tourney was actually allowing secrets to go through a Soviet agent that Stalin could benefit from what the Enigma decrypts with the British Bletchley Park secret operations of intercepts were doing. That's a complete lie. Churchill was giving him everything that could possibly help the Soviet Union. in their war effort, so that they knew all the dispositions of German forces throughout the whole of the Eastern Front. And so, the film's a complete lie. In the film they called the big computer Colossus, actually, they said it was called Christopher. after his lover when he was at school. In fact it was called Colossus. And Alan Turney wasn't the main person. There were 6,000 people involved in Bletchley Park's decrypt operation and he wasn't the most important and he wasn't the most prominent and there was no conflict between him and the Admiral in charge. So a lot of it is just nonsense and the way they make it out in the film that In the end he committed suicide, well he was almost certainly assassinated by MI6 because he started to blab about a secret operation. Bletchley Park was secret for 60 years, you couldn't mention it, it wasn't allowed to be referred to. If you've seen any war film of any sort on the Second World War, It's really dishonest because every single major British commander was, they said, they called it their bletchley fix. They needed it twice or three times a day. They wanted to know exactly where, what, who, where. There was no unknown factors in D-Day landings of Normandy. They knew exactly where every single German platoon was, not just division. They knew the whole disposition of the whole, both from their spies on the ground, the French resistance and from their enemy decrypts, as they call them. And so in these films, they've got a lot of, well, it was part of the deception after the war, it was so secret. And they told no one, you talk about your operations, you'll be killed. Alan Turney was almost certainly killed because he started to talk about what he had been doing in order to somehow get himself out of jail when he was caught doing all kinds of pedophilia and sexual perversion. And so That was his one claim to fame was, well, you know, I helped save the world and win the war and all this, which was gross exaggeration, but it's good enough for a homo-Hollywood. The Secret War by Max Hastings, which I've been going through, quotes British high command generals as concluding that all expenses sacrificed in the Chiefs' essay did little or nothing. to alter the military situation or to secure military victory. Rather they cost an enormous amount of civilian lives by fomenting terrorism in order to provoke enemy reaction. And in fact they speak about one of the most callous operations was how they would send in thousands of operatives behind enemy lines on what were nothing more than suicide missions. They said virtually none of them. I think there's something like, they heard back from about 12 of the thousands they sent them across lines during war to get more intelligence of ground and virtually none survived. Just absolutely minus. In fact, many of these people, the handlers said, you know, we realized there was next to no chance of seeing these people alive, of them even achieving anything but disorders. The result was vast devastation of infrastructure in Europe, the loss of many innocent lives for no strategic advantage. I mean, wars are not won by blowing up a locomotive and assassinating some official. That's not how you win wars. And yet, the way they justified this in the Secret Wars, Churchill said, it's important from the moral point of view. We've lost on every front. We have to be seen doing something. And so the different raids. And so there were continually, we've got raids, assassinations, bombings, because it's the only way we can fight back. It's not making any difference, but it's something to tell the people, it's something to put in the propaganda newsreels at the beginning of the films. And they even justified at the end, it gave self-respect to countries like France, who'd been defeated in less than six weeks, meant to be a superpower, and that they felt they had a hand in the fight. although they did absolutely nothing, and it was nothing of worth. The main activities of these resistance groups, like the French resistance, was shaving off the heads of any woman who'd ever been on a date with a German soldier, and treating them like dirt, and murdering a whole lot of people who had had a friend or been considered collaborators. But they didn't actually do any fighting. They did some sabotage, they did some assassinations, murders. But you don't win wars that way. General Robert E. Lee says, any army who wars against defenseless civilians, no matter what its excuse, is no army but barbarians unworthy of the name Christian. And I'd say that's an insult to the poor barbarians, because the barbarians were not that bad. We have made a covenant with death and with Sheol. We are in agreement. When the overflowing scourge passes through, it will not come to us, for we have made lies our refuge, and under falsehoods we have hidden ourselves. It's Winston Churchill who says the truth is so precious. that in wartime it must be protected behind a bodyguard of lies. The British Empire, at the time of the Second World War, controlled one-fourth of the world's land surface. One-fourth of the world's land surface. And they'd lost it all. And they'd lost it, generally, to the same tactics they used to set Europe ablaze. Their empire was set ablaze by the same kind of people. And on that occasion they supported them. Now, we've spoken about SAE. Let me say a few words about the Office of Strategic Services. I haven't read anything there as widely on the OSS, but it was formed the 13th of June 1942. A wartime agency in the United States launched an order of President Franklin Delano Roosevelt. And he turned to one of his classmates from Columbia Law School, also a member of the Secret Orders, Wild Bill Donovan, a known communist, to establish the OSS, which became the precursor to the CIA. So the Central Intelligence Organization there was started by a hardcore communist. Wild Bill Donovan was the one person on the planet who could walk into Stalin's office or bedroom without being called, summoned, or having an appointment. I mean, he could fly to Moscow and see Stalin, which no member of the Politburo could do. Stalin's daughter couldn't do that. But Wild Bill Donovan had that much access to Joseph Stalin during the war. Franklin Delano Roosevelt appointed this Colonel William Dolevin, known as Wild Bill, who'd been appointed Coordinator of Information, meaning propaganda, in 1941 from the Office of Coordinating Information, C.R.I. later became C.I.A. OSS was established by Presidential Military Order Propaganda Espionage Subversive Activities Behind Enemy Lines. Sounds exactly the same as S.O.E. In fact, it's probably modelled on it, which is modelled on the IRA. And FDR authorised Donovan to set up the Central Intelligence Agency but FDR died before that could actually be done. This is where the new Langley headquarters is. At the height of their influence during the war, OSS employed 24,000 people. This is a big operation. And so before there was a CIA there was the OSS. The Secret War documents that William Donovan had no problem appointing known Communists, as in members of the Communist Party USA, to every level of the OSS. This included Duncan Lee. His personal assistant was an NKVD agent for the Soviet Union. Duncan Lee, as you may recall, was involved in the assassination of General George Patton. Duncan Lee was a double agent who worked for the Soviet spy agent NKVD In fact, if Wild Bill Donovan had known he was NKVD, I don't think it would have changed from having him as his personal assistant, because Wild Bill Donovan was as good as a Soviet agent anyway. And that didn't seem to bother FDR, because his wife was a communist as well. Eleanor Roosevelt was about as card-carrying, open a communist as you could be. So, you know, if FDR was not a communist, he certainly was married to one, and he certainly appointed them for every major point, including Elgar Hiss, to be the first General Secretary of the United Nations, and Dexter White in charge of the monetary fund and all the rest of it. So he was surrounded and saturated with communists all over. And even the Secret War admits that the American Senator McCarthy was not on a wild goose chase when he was speaking about there being communists in every agency in the United States, because there was in the 1950s. Of course, FDR placed them all over the place. The place was saturated with communists. Wartime America was effectively controlled by the Communist Party USA. And secret war admits us, quite openly. And this, Duncan Lee, gave the Soviets advanced knowledge of every aspect of D-Day, landing dates, landing places, where the atomic bombs were, and in fact, the Soviets got their atomic bombs through so many layers of traitors in American high command that it just boggles the brain. So while they're promised them liberty, they themselves are slaves of corruption. For by whom a person is overcome, by him also he is brought into bondage. The OSS produced silenced pistols, obviously for assassinations. Bino grenades that exploded on impact, to save the danger that a person could pick up a timed grenade and throw it back before it exploded. So these would explode in contact. They had a new kind of OSS stiletto, which is meant to be an improvement on the British SAE stilettos. And then they had a Landesteined combat knife. This looks pretty ugly and nasty. And then they had explosives disguised as lumps of coal, which are called blackjacks, tasteless poison tablets and cigarettes laced with poison. You can offer a person a cigarette and it's going to kill them. Well, immediately, as opposed to the way cigarettes kill these days, which is, you know, coffin nails. So, coal grenades. Again, you notice, you can toss the grenade into a pile of coal, and hopefully they get it into the boiler, take out the locomotive, or the home. All kinds of gadgets, including the suicide pill, which, let's say, just about every operative just flushed down the toilet. But they were all issued with suicide pills, expected to take it rather than be captured. And it was understood, according to the Secret War and by Max Hastings, that every alternative will talk. In fact, they basically just asked the people if you could just hold off on anything meaningful for 24 hours, because it'll take us at least that amount of time to change codes and get our people out of the way and so on, because they knew nobody could sustain not giving in. And they said virtually every spy, on both sides, on all sides, told everything they knew within a very short while. In fact, most never even needed to be tortured because they knew all the tortures that were possible and they just cooperated instantly. And so this business that's often depicted in the movies of, you know, them holding out, they said, actually, that's not realistic because in reality, all the spies cooperated almost entirely immediately and almost everything they knew when they were caught, which is intriguing because they're the kind of people who didn't mind assassinating somebody. but they probably realised when they're caught the only chance they've got of survival is to cooperate totally. Lockpicking tools and of course little pockets, hammerless. A hammerless so it doesn't get snagged on your pocket pulling it out. A hammerless, these are the first ones, the three twos which is, you know, quick assassination type attempt. They also used biological warfare. They sought to spread anthrax amongst German troops which of course is totally forbidden by the Geneva Convention. They also tried to hide a capsule of mustard gas in flowers to cause blindness amongst the generals in Germany and the high command headquarters. No end of attempted assassinations of Adolf Hitler. Woe to those who devise iniquity and work out evil at their beds. At morning light they practice it because it is in the power of their hand. And this must be one of the most evil men in history and I won't go back over his role in assassinating America's top war general, General George pattern but that was another presentation. Stanley Lovell of the OSS declared it is my policy to consider any method whatever that might aid the war however unorthodox or untried and in fact they betrayed their own allies such as Poland. into the hands of communist revolutionaries. And Yugoslavia, the kingdom of Yugoslavia, is meant to be their ally. And they were working relentlessly to help Tito's communist partisans as the secret war, which is pro-British, pro-SOE, but they just... Sure, you know, our people were betraying them on every level, and they admitted it. They played the decisive role in betraying Yugoslavia to the partisans. Wild Bill Donovan ensured that Tito's communist parzens, waging guerrilla warfare in Yugoslavia, received lavish quantities of American tanks, trucks, jeeps, hundreds of tons of armaments, ammunition, landmines, heavy machine guns. It was just extraordinary. People couldn't believe the budget that the OSCE has and how Wild Bill Donovan gave almost every one of it to communists, not just in Europe but also in China. And here's some of the OSS chaps posing with their characters on the other side. The Secret War claims that this undercover battle led by Donovan and the OSS ensured that Eastern Europe fell into the hands of the Soviet Union. And they claim by design, not by stupidity or accident. General Walter Beedle-Smith, a British general, wrote to Churchill that Donovan was out of control with a predilection for political intrigue and they complained Donovan doesn't report to the Chief of Staff, he reports to the President of the United States only. These are pictures they put out of their training, acting like the Lone Ranger, and these are some of the estimates of strength in Yugoslavia. Their feet are swift to shed blood. Destruction and misery are in their ways. The way of peace they have not known. There is no fear of God before their eyes. In fact, a man who could give money to one of the operatives at Jedburgh, a major bazaar to organize the assassination of General George Patton the day before he retired and resigned his commission. I mean just imagine a man who'd done more probably than any other single general for America's war effort in Europe and they murder him the day before he resigns his commission and and that is so well proven now. Donovan had no moral or ethical qualms about dealing with Communists. He channeled hundreds of millions of dollars to the Chinese Communists of Mao Zedong to fight against America's official ally, Nationalist China, under General Chiang Kai-shek. He ensured that Mao's Communist People's Liberation Army dominated post-war China. And so here are some of the operatives there. These are some OSS propaganda pictures of the Chinese guerrillas being trained by OSS operatives. Here's some of OSS missions and bases in East Asia during the Second World War. I mean these things have only been released very recently. And so the famous long walk of the People's Liberation Army of China was actually thanks to the US OSS and what they did to the people that they took over from. This, by the way, if you're wanting to understand the Nuremberg Trials, if you're wanting to understand the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, you've got to understand the way communists operate. This is part of communist doctrine. You've got to humiliate the landowners, the bourgeois, the intelligentsia. And so they would shave their heads, just like the French partisans did to women who had dated Germans in the Second World War, drag them through with insulting signs, publicly disgrace them, cut their hair, and make them stand in front of people who scream abuse at them, humiliate them and make them give confessions. You see, they're starting a new religion and so they had to dishonor and disgrace the pastors, the missionaries, the evangelists, the leaders, the businessmen, the intelligentsia, whoever they were. And so, ripping away their clothes, forcing them to their knees, shooting them in the back. This is what the commies did. They killed 68 million people in Red China under Mao Zedong. Not counting the ones killed since he died. But these are their pictures that they published. While they promised them liberty, they themselves are slaves of corruption. We've got the book in the shelves there I read many years ago, Allied Betrayed China. George Marshall, Chief of Staff of the American Army, said when the war had ended, he ordered that all the weapons that were going to Chiang Kai-shek, which was massive amounts on ships, dump them in the middle of the Pacific. They were on the way. And he said, with a stroke of a pen, I have disarmed 28 divisions of Chiang Kai-shek's army. Now just think how much sacrifice and hard work of people getting together iron, and doing the work, and working through the night, and the arsehole for democracy. And these were weapons that were actually going to go to a nationalist who was fighting communism. Dump it in the middle of the ocean. Instead they let all the weapons that they possibly could get to the hands of the communists, and Chiang Kai-shek was betrayed. So the millions, the tens of millions of people who have been murdered in China, That blood is on the hands of those communists in western governments who saved the Soviet Union when they were about to be overthrown in 1941 in Operation Barbarossa, and who betrayed China, as they betrayed Yugoslavia, Albania and many other countries, Poland and so on, in the hands of communist tyrants. But China had the biggest bloodbath of all. I don't know if you can remember, June 1989. That's not that long ago. I remember it. Tiananmen Square, students demonstrating for freedom, for democracy. They had the biggest demonstrations ever seen in China and people thought, you see the Berlin Wall was coming down, there's a new age coming in Europe, and so the people in China also thought, well we can also rise up and have these torchlight prayer vigils, but instead China first sent in the army and then they sent in the tanks. Now you might have seen this famous picture. One student standing with his books in front of the Chinese tanks. This is courage. This is resistance. And they killed over 9,000 student demonstrators in Tiananmen Square in June 1989. And our government under Nelson Mandela, after Nelson Mandela, made his speech that in future South Africa's number one foreign policy guiding principle is going to be human rights. And I spoke to someone in foreign affairs, they were rushing around thinking, oh gee, we've got to consider human rights now, well obviously we can't have our embassy in Indonesia. And the next thing he ordered was remove our embassy from Taipei, from the Republic of China, free China on Taiwan, and open an embassy in Beijing with Red China, who just massacred how many of their people? The biggest mass murdering dictatorship on the planet even beat Stalin, numbers wise, which is something to say. And so Nelson Mandela was not just a communist, he was a lying hypocrite. Donovan operated a secret slush fund provided by Congress and its war agencies a preparation bill and he spent it any way he liked without any regard to oversight or legality and there's not even any papers or financial reports on hand. They don't know how they spent their money. Money was meant to cover his far-flung spy and sabotage operations throughout Europe and Asia. Imagine a spymaster who can do whatever he wants, topple governments, change countries assassinate top war general heroes without any oversight because he's only answerable to FDR. Unbelievable. Under the authority of Franklin Delano Roosevelt Wild Bill ordered many assassinations and then they say OSS was the predecessor of the modern Central Intelligence Agency. So it makes you wonder just what else has been going on since the OSS came to an end and CIA came about. What has the CIA been after? What has it been doing? This was its first operations headquarters before they moved 1949 to Langley and this agency has toppled governments including Rhodesia, including the Shah of Iran into the hands of the Ayatollahs of Iran, including Nicaragua, They have toppled governments all over, including our own country, because they were involved heavily in making sure the ANC came to power here as well. They've armed, funded and trained Muslim and Marxist terrorists and fomented revolutions. And much of it is still classified, but now and then things come out. It's very open now, how America had as a top priority to topple Mubarak's government in Egypt, which is considered America's number one ally in the Middle East, essential to peace in the Middle East. They toppled them into the hands of the Muslim Brotherhood, founded ISIS, who have done the most hideous atrocities, which have devastated centuries-old Christian communities that have stood for thousands of years. In 19... No, in the year 2000, we had 15 million Christians in the whole of the Middle East, most of those in Egypt, Syria and Iraq. Today there's not even 11 million left. We've lost millions of Christians in the Middle East who fled. Absolutely terrible what they have done to Christians now in Egypt, Iraq, Syria. And this is the US State Department's operations. It is genocide. And they've stimulated waves of millions of Muslim refugees who have flooded out to those countries that of course are being destabilised. And where are they coming? Well, to Europe. And they're coming into Europe by the millions, and apparently there's tens of millions behind them. You see, you destabilize countries, you bomb countries, you destabilize stable governments like that of Mubarak, Saddam Hussein, Assad. Well, what's going to happen, Gaddafi? Well, millions of these people are now threatening Europe. And there is a flood. This, by the way, is taken in London. That's Trafalgar Square. and they come with their mosques, thousands of mosques already built in Europe, which the Turkish prime minister says these are barracks, the domes are helmets, the minarets are bayonets and the faithful are soldiers. And Muslims must kill unbelievers wherever they are unless they convert to Islam. Now, who in their right mind would have wanted this? Is this an accident? Is this stupidity? Or is this deliberate treachery? And what possible motive would the CIA, the OSS, the SOE have to want to bring things like Sharia laws in Britain. I mean, what does Sharia law mean? Women must walk around in tents, even the eyes must be covered in the ink to cover, the black eyes and broken noses, noses cut off by their husbands, acid thrown in their face. Every year, 5,000 women in the Middle East have acid thrown in their faces for not wearing a hijab. And how many more are captured, taken off as slaves in the markets, or stoned to death literally or hung or shot in the head in soccer practice in Kabul and honor murders every year they estimate 5,000 times a year a Muslim woman is murdered in what they call honor murder which means a husband father brother cousin uncle whatever and they call this honor murders and in London they can be this open freedom go to hell Sharia for Britain And yet you can buy on Amazon and so on, you can get on the internet your ISIS t-shirts and there are British people like this BBC character converting to Islam. These are people who used to be sane people, later became suicide bombers and so on in Europe. Like this doctor with the crazy eyes who decided to become, I mean why save lives when you can kill people? And so he became a jihadist. And these are British people overseas now murdering people. And this chap, just look at the size of the kids, getting them to participate in these things. Now that, why would you want people like this to come into your countries? Do they love Islam? No. The reason why they're supporting them, I think, is because they plan evil things in their hearts, they continually gather together for war. They want war, they need war, it's all part of their purpose. George Orwell, who used to be a communist, until he went to Russia and saw it under Soviet Union, under Stalin, he wrote in 1984, as an ex-communist, disillusioned, he says the war is not meant to be won, it's just meant to be continuous. Which is why you can just see a continuous... it doesn't matter what the reason is. Yesterday's enemy can be tomorrow's friend and tomorrow's friend can be yesterday's... I mean, it doesn't matter, you just... The war's not meant to be one, it's just meant to be continuous. And you've seen this since the Second World War has been a continuous, rolling, never-ending stream of one war after the other. And the KGB has now pioneered everything from, this man by the way is apparently, Ian Mahi Paseppa, is apparently meant to be the inspiration for Ian Fleming for his James Bond character. He is a KGB character who claims he invented plane hijackings. Just in 1969 alone, 82 aircraft were hijacked worldwide by the KGB. fund, PLO, who is based on SOE, who is based on IRA. So you see, you've got the pedigree, you've got the lineage, this is where it comes from. Democracy is the system that chooses Barabbas, who was a zealot, a Saqqari zealot terrorist, over Jesus. Today people all over the world are choosing terrorism more than Jesus. The IRA chose it, the SOE chose it, The PLO chose it. The ANC chose it. They prefer Barabbas. They like Barabbas. Barabbas is their kind of person. Jesus is not. And it's no accident that the most vicious terrorism comes from the least evangelized areas of the world. But of course that's not the end of the story. The desert tribes will bow down to Christ. All Christ's enemies will lick the dust. All kings will bow down to Him. All nations will serve Him. But that'll have to wait for next week to figure out how we're going to beat these characters. I hope I've just given some of the DNA and genealogy of where this insidious terrorism comes from. Any comments or questions? Yeah, you left a couple of them out. French Foreign Legion, the Italian Mafia, which are protected by the Roman Catholics. Yes. And the next terror attacks will be in Germany just before they start voting. It's always on the eve of voting day. It was in France, it was in Britain, now Germany is going to be next. A lot is happening already. Of course they try to under-report many of these things, especially when refugees are brought in. Yes, I realise that I did want to actually conclude with more of the hope and victories over them, but I realise I've gone way over time, so I must stop at that point. I don't know how sick it makes you feel, but as somebody who used to cheer these sort of people, and I watched some of these films glamorizing SAE as well. By sympathy I was thinking, you know, these terrorists were the good guys, I swallowed it. And I'm pretty angry and as somebody of British ancestry whose father spent six years in uniform in the Second World War, I feel disgusted that our people could have ever had anything to do with such reprehensible, disgusting tactics. It's a disgrace, it's a scandal. You know, in the South African Defence Force we can say we fought the enemy, we did not fight civilians. And we even treated the enemies we captured well. I don't know of one single atrocity committed by our people. All the infantry units are new, paratroopers, even 3-2 battalion, and I believe some of the Portuguese-speaking Angolan members of 3-2 did some atrocities in Angola. Not that I saw, not that I know any details of, but it's possible. But the South African soldiers, I don't know if our paratroopers, reccees or infantry do anything that is not honorable and that could not stand up in court of law. But I can't say that about the British Army in Second World War. The Eighth Army? For the clean war. SAE? Not at all. I mean, I think it was... As even this Secret War, which is the first comprehensive history of MI6, SAE, all that during Second World War, even they say all their sacrifice, all their expense didn't actually measurably alter or shorten the war at all. All it did was cause a massive amount of damage and a lot of civilian casualties. Which, you know, you look at that and think, how do you live with yourself with that sort of thing? But I don't think it's good for us to justify that, even if it's done in another generation by our people, because then we're hypocrites and we've got no moral ground to stand on to oppose terrorism in our day. And I think it's justifying. And to think that Hollywood has not moved an iota. They're still bringing out disgusting films glamorizing this sort of thing. And Allied and Operation Anthropoid are just two of the recent ones that have come out that glamorized SAE in some of the most reprehensible things they did. You know, assassinations. How disgusting is that? And then they try and make it look like this is really nice. brings in the money. But it's not honest. But it just shows the people of Hollywood are not interested in what is true, they're not interested in what is right, they're not interested in what's good for society, but they've got a deep hatred for Christ, which is shown in the blasphemies that comes out continually. And they just love to show Christians getting bludgeoned, like in Glorious Blasters, bludgeoning prisoners of war to death for no other reason than a German with baseball bats, even though there's no indication that even the character in this fictitious film had done anything to deserve that. But this is the hatred that you get of these atheistic, cocaine-sniffing perverts who are producers and directors of films in Hollywood. They just cannot help but bring out their hatred for anything Christian. And in this year, this Reformation year, as we're remembering our Reformation roots, which started in Wittenberg in Saxony. It just shows again why they hate Germany so much. Because the Gospel and the Reformation really came to the Western world through it. And so this is probably one reason why they hate them so much. And why they hate South African, Afrikaners, Dutch-formed Christians so much? Well, one of the most Calvinist people in the world. So the hatred of the gospel is behind a lot of what looks like racism. When you get down to it, I think a lot of this racism isn't as much racism as much as anti-Christ, anti-Christian, powers of hell, demonic hatred that just wants it. The people who brought the gospel to Africa, the people who brought the gospel to the world, I mean, they're the ones that hate the most. I mean, who started that thing with black, colored, yellow, whatever? We're all made in the image of God. There is no such thing. So where does that racism come from? One tribe is lower than the other one, they have different skin color, they have got nothing in their heads. It's man-made stuff. Well, I've got no problem recognizing that people are different and have different strengths and weaknesses and so on. But the point is, hostility for people because they're different, that doesn't make sense. But they wanted to say there's no difference between the races, but the whites are evil! If race doesn't exist, then how can you be designating a whole race guilty of something? I mean, that's just racism. But I'm beginning to think that the racism actually is hiding an underlying anti-Christian prejudice. I think that's the primary battle that we're involved in. You mentioned 68 million Chinese killed, but today there's more Christians in China than 68 million. The Middle East is being destabilized. Perhaps one of the strongest Christian movements is the Christian response to terrorism now in Egypt. It's incredible how wicked and perverse mankind can be and what they have to do to try and destroy man who is created in the image of God and destroy Christian witness. Yes. I mean, that's the other side, which we haven't even touched. But Russia today is far more Christian than Britain. And the Russian government is more pro-Christian than, well, I don't know about the present American administration, but certainly the previous American administration. So you've got an extraordinary thing that you've got more freedom of religion in Russian schools and universities today than you have in American or British schools and universities, which is bizarre. And then, what man meant for evil, God has used for good. So, yes, not to in any way minimize the suffering of the Christians in Russia or China, but the gospel is triumphant in those countries. Which goes to show that violent communist persecution has been less effective in destroying the church, or undermining it. then seductive indoctrination, Hollywood entertainment and all the different evils in the West has been more insidious. The subtle threats in the West have done more damage to the Church than violent persecution has. And never has there been such violent persecution against the Church as in Albania, Soviet Union, Red China. And yet the Church is flourishing in those countries. But it's not doing that well in a lot of Western Europe countries. which means that much as our mission is built around helping persecuted churches, but it means in a sense that the persecuted churches are doing better than the subverted, corroded, corrupted churches. Our internal threats are therefore more deadly than external threats. I mean, that's basically what it comes down to. Even though I've focused most of my life on seeking to help the Christians suffering from violent persecution by states, We're beginning to wonder, but it seems that the people in the peaceful areas are in some ways in more spiritual danger, eternal danger. I remember years ago being told the difference between a prophet and a false prophet. A false prophet points to the others. I remember seeing Alan Bursak. He'd be, the whites, the Afrikaners, the Boers. And he never had anything to say about the sins of his own heroes or himself. That's obviously a false prophet. Everyone can share and smile when you point to their sins out there. But if we want to be faithful preachers of God, we've got to deal with the sins of the people we're dealing with. You won't get many cheers and amens to that, but the fact is that we're not being faithful if we're not preaching against our own sins. And that's why, as somebody who, I mean, don't get the wrong impression, I don't hate Britain. I love what Britain has stood for at its best. I mean, you can see so much of our presentations and so much of our things we send out, like today being the 15th of June. Magna Carta, the Great Charter, 802 years ago. The grandfather of all bills of rights, the first statute. And there's so many great things like that that have come out of Britain, great missionaries. You know, our mission is named after David Livingstone, one of the great greatest friends Africa's ever had. And so there's a lot of great things that have come out of Britain that we champion and celebrate and write about and all that. But it would not be honest to them or to future generations of British people to try and cover up our own crimes. And so to me, one of the faithfulness is that we don't just want to look at how evil the communists were, but did we have any complicity? And where we did, and we plainly did, in SAE and Lend-Lease and all of that, we must be honest and say, this is unacceptable. Because if we don't, if we gloss over it, future generations could fall to the same dangers. We can never justify doing evil. no matter what our excuses. You can't do evil for a good cause or something. The end does not justify the means. No Christian can say the end justifies the means. We can't. And that was Churchill's point. Churchill reckoned the end justifies the means. And yet, even in his own book on the Second World War, he admits that we're actually in a worse place at the end of the war than we were at the beginning. And he even comments in his history of the English-speaking people saying, looking back now, It would have been better if the Kaiser was still ruling in Germany. He was the main advocate in the British war cabinet in the First World War to go to war against the Kaiser. And now he's looking back at the end of his career saying, you know, actually, we should have just left well enough alone because the Kaiser was stabilizing things. And later on, by bringing him down, we created a ripple effect. And interesting coming from you, Winston Churchill, but at least he could admit that much, that he saw that, he said, the Second World War started in the House of Mirrors, the Hall of Mirrors, the Versailles Treaty. So he admitted that they got a piece of vengeance which delivered the war. So what the parents did at Versailles, their children, died in the war that came out of the house of Moses. So even he could see a link, a connection, which he was a major player in. I think we've got to do better than that too. And that's why, I mean, I know some people say they're sometimes bewildered at my motivations, because why do I, I mean, sometimes I'm championing the great heroisms of and great achievements of British history and other times I'm exposing its atrocities like the scorched earth policies and the Anglo-Boer war and the betrayal of Rhodesia and the firebombing of Dresden but to me that's part of being a true Christian you've got to acknowledge the great and and expose the bad and it's part of our own heritage. There's sometimes the church has been absolutely tremendous and there's other times the church has been cowardly and has been in league with the devil and I don't think that it is a lack of loyalty to expose that because surely it's all part of wanting to be better. It's part of discipleship and teaching obedience to all things the Lord has commanded. You were going to add? Terrorism, if it is, whatever it is, it all falls under the umbrella of world domination. And what are they trying to do? It's not going to happen because the Lord said, in my time I will come. None before. When it was the Cold War, when everybody, oh, nuclear weapons, they're going to blow up the earth seven times over. Not a chance. The Lord will not allow it. Yes. I mean, if it had been left to people, if God didn't exist, it could have easily happened. In fact, it probably would have happened. But there is a God in heaven, and he is merciful, and he does hear the prayers of his people, and there are prophecies to be fulfilled. The earth will be as full of the knowledge of the glory of the Lord as the waters cover the sea. Every knee will bow, every tongue will confess that Jesus Christ is Lord. The kings will bow down to Christ. There's so many magnificent prophecies in the Bible that we see sometimes partial performance, but there's a lot still to come. In fact, as I was wanting to get to, but we'll get to it next week, this is not a post-Christian era. Correctly speaking, we're living in a pre-Christian era. The world has never been thoroughly evangelized, not effectively yet. We've failed in many ways. Reform missionaries made a great move in Africa in the 19th century, but in the 20th century, antinomian, dispensational characters wrecked it, and more recently we've had more extreme characters come along with the name it, claim it, and fame it, prosperity cult, and they've wrecked a lot of things. This is not a post-Christian era. It's never been truly Christianized. We're in a pre-Christian era, not a post-Christian era. Let's orient ourselves. This is probably early church history. There's a long way to go. There's a lot more ahead. And I think it's just part of our, what do you call it? It's a narcissistic, self-centered mentality. We are the terminal generation. We're the last. We're the culmination of the ages. We're the last. The Lord's coming back in our age. Why? Why would we think that? In fact, knowing that the Lord is the overseer of history, How on earth have we reached the full maturity either in the church or in civilization? We are so far from maturity. We're probably in the early foothills of church history. I think there's thousands of years ahead in church history and this mentality that we're the terminal generation I think is... Well, I would have hoped it would have died out with the hippie movement but sadly there's still some people haven't grown up for the hippie movement. They still think we're in the last generation. Late Great Plank Earth. Nope, I would say there's a lot more learning to be done and we're not going to mature at the church God wants until we learn these lessons. Such as you can't justify evil. So any other comments? Let's close and pray then. Let's, I think, switch that off and perhaps two or three would like to pray and bring our team in Nazareth and the poor people who've been suffering there. to the Lord and these countries in place that you can speak about and of course story's not over in China they're still under communism people in the Middle East are in the very throes of all that got started that we're referring to Russia might be having a lot more freedom Eastern Europe might be but not the Middle East so that's great My Lord, would you purify your church? Which is an intimidating and scary thing to ask, as many, if not all of us here, represent your church. Father, would you cleanse the ministers? Would you call those who preach to preach? I pray that you would continue to sanctify your people, bring them to yourself as a holy people, as a royal priesthood, a holy nation, set apart, useful for the Master. I pray, Lord, that your church would shine like a brilliant and bright light that is not afraid to say that something is wrong that Christ is the way of salvation and that obedience to Him and to His laws are essential. In Jesus' name, Amen. We thank you for the presentation tonight again to open our eyes to realize that there's other powers that satanic powers are in the working, which we sometimes close our eyes to. Lord, we pray as we go out and evangelize, if it is against abortion, if it is to go to the hospitals to encourage the people, if it is in our neighborhood to evangelize, to get people to come back to the Lord, to join the Church. Give us, set the Holy Spirit mighty upon us, that we are encouraged to go out and be a disciple to bring your word to the nations Lord God we are grieved at how much injustice has not only been done but has been celebrated and distorted in school textbooks, even Christian textbooks, even Christian schools and Christian homes. We pray, Lord God, that you'd give a revival of discernment to your people, that we may not glamorize or excuse or justify evil, that we may not be those who would wink at or overlook or think that you must somehow align with the propaganda of our own societies or the false patriotism that seems to want to justify the unjustifiable. We pray, Lord God, that you would help us to have the kind of holy hatred and indignation of injustice and idolatry that your people of the past had. We couldn't imagine Russian underground churches worshipping Stalin or Lenin, nor could we imagine the ancient Roman church burning incense before Nero or in any way compromising with the false religions of that time. Help us, Lord, to cleanse from our hearts and minds the distortions which Hollywood has soiled us with and planted so many false images and ahistoric events and stories into our minds and consciousness and blinded us to the great story of so for so many years, and we pray, Lord God, that you'd help us to be those who will raise the next generation to love you more earnestly, to serve you more faithfully, to be more effective in your service, to hate sin more than we have, to love you more wholeheartedly than we have. Help us, Lord God, to be more wholehearted in our love and worship of you, and more discerning and skeptical of everything that the world has to say to us. Help us, Lord God, to be real students of your word. Help us, Lord, to preach against sin and to not make excuses for it. We pray this in Jesus' name. Amen.