00:00
00:00
00:01
Transcript
1/0
I'm going to read the Reverend
William Symington, The Character and Claims of the Scottish Martyrs,
a Discourse, delivered at St. Michael's Churchyard, Dumfries,
June 16, 1831. And if you're familiar with William Symington,
his writings are just pretty amazing. His book on the atonement
is one of the best. The text, Revelation 12, 11,
they love not their lives unto the death. And of course, I want to thank
Jim Dodson who publishes all this stuff. Have him in your
prayers, he's had some health issues. We are met, my hearers,
in circumstances of very particular interest. The object of our meeting
may be presumed to be well known to you all. It is to manifest
our attachment to the Scottish Reformation by contributing to
reserve the memory of some who fell in that cause. To have our
minds instruct or at least our memories refreshed with the history
and principles of that magnanimous struggle for religion and liberty
in which they acted so noble and conspicuous apart. And to
have our hearts awaken to some proper concern in what stands
so closely connected with our dearest interest and hopes. The very spot where we meet has
its interest. The place of our father's sepulchers
never fails to call up the most tender emotions. Death, when
it breaks up living connections, cannot sever those ties of memory
which continue to twine around the heart, rendering the dead
dearer to us in some respects than the living, hallowing their
ashes and converting their graves into an inviolable sanctuary. Hence, the irresistible desire
felt to visit the melancholy spot where repose the mortal remains
of former generations, and the disposition to distinguish the
resting place of departed friends by some frail memorial. From
the touching but expressive right which obtained in past ages of
strewing the graves with flowers, to the gorgeous mausoleums of
sculpted marble which are the fashion of modern times, With
such monuments we have here, surrounded of every varied form,
according to the rank and character of the persons commemorated,
humble virtue, noble station, splendid achievement, profound
learning, and towering genius. and we should regard the man
as nothing less than a disgrace to humanity, who should walk
among these tombs with stoical indifference, or would not prefer
the cloud of sadness the scene is fitted to bring over the mind,
to the brightest gaiety which the song of pleasure or the burst
of reverie can inspire. But amid all these monuments,
vying with each other in the power of attracting a melancholy
attention, there is one particular spot, outwardly unattractive
as any, to which the heart of the Scottish patriot points today
with a feeling of overpowering intensity and the estimation
of every true friend of religion and liberty. Even the costly
mausoleum of the Bard must yield to the simple, rudely lettered
gravestone of the martyr. Grave and even solemn are the
reflections which such a meeting and such a scene are fitted to
produce. And should there be any present who have come hither
in a spirit of levity, or with a view to censure or to scoff,
may the object and circumstances of our assembly rebuke them away.
Rather, awe them into a frame of mind more befitting their
situation, as well as more honorable and profitable to themselves.
The very subject of which we must treat ought to induce the
heart to seriousness, while the feelings awakened by the contiguity
of the martyr's grave are calculated to deepen the hollowed impression. No language can be more descriptive
of the men of whom we are now to speak than of the text, they
loved not their lives unto the death. Whether the words refer
originally to all those who fell victims to the bloody persecutions
of Rome, pagan Rome, or to those of Rome anti-Christian, who has
been keenly contested by interpreters. It is no manner of consequence
for us to determine, it being our design to confine our attention
to those of our countrymen who in the struggle for reformation,
which took place in the 16th and 17th centuries, certainly
gained for themselves the character of men who love not their lives
unto the death. These men we are accustomed to
distinguish by the honorable and significant appellation of
martyr. The term signifies literally witnesses, more particularly
witnesses to the truth of the gospel, and in a more restricted
sense still, persons who have sealed their testimony to the
truth of the gospel with their blood. In the former sense, it
occurs very commonly throughout the scriptures. In the latter,
we meet with it in only three passages of the New Testament.
Acts 1220, excuse me, Acts 2220, when the blood of thy martyr
Stephen was shed, I also was standing by. Revelation 2.13,
in those days, where an Antipas was my faithful
martyr." Revelation 17.6. And I saw the woman drunken with
the blood of the saints and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus.
And when I saw her, I wondered with great admiration. The Jews were witnesses for Jehovah,
the true God against heathen idols. The primitive Christians
were witnesses for Christ against both Jews and pagans. But there
was a small band of faithful witnesses for the truth as it
is in Jesus, many of whom loved not their lives unto the death,
to whom the word has been more particularly appropriated in
modern times. Men may die for unscriptural
principles in religion, and the popular usage of language may
stall such men martyrs, but the designation properly belongs
only to such as were slain for the word of God and the testimony
which they held agreeable to that word. It is not the blood
but the cause that makes the martyr. That the appellation is to be
regarded as an honorable one will appear when you consider
that in the only three instances of which it occurs in the New
Testament, the persons to whom it is applied are represented
as standing in particular relation to Christ. Look back at these
verses cited. In the first, Paul, in relating
the words in which he addressed the Redeemer at the time of his
conversion, it says, when the blood of thy martyr Stephen was
shed, In the next, Christ himself is the speaker. Antipas was my
faithful martyr. Now are John's words, nor are
John's words less explicit, the blood of the martyr of Jesus.
This is surely not without significance. It at least imports that the
cause in which they suffered was Christ's, that their qualifications
and support proceeded from him. that the character is one to
which he is particularly attached, of which he highly approves,
and which he greatly delights to honor. The persecutors might
claim them as their victim and speak of them consequently as
theirs, but ha, there is another who claims an interest in them.
They are the martyrs of Jesus. And the relation in which They
are thus shown to stand to the exalted Redeemer, gives them
a moral elevation, throws around them a halo of real glory, which
completely neutralizes the disgrace their enemies designed to cast
upon them. The text is descriptive not merely of those who actually
suffered death, but many of whom. The head of the church preserved
alive amid the snares that were laid for them, who nevertheless
possessed as much of the spirit of the martyrs as those who fell,
are entitled to be spoken of as loving their lives, not their
lives under the death. Every hour they stood prepared
to die. And many times the crown of martyrdom
would have been preferred to the life of wretchedness and
peril. They were doomed to lead. The spirit of the reformers in
general was that of martyrs. And it burned both purely and
intensely in the bosoms of many whose blood never hallowed either
the scaffold or the heath. In what follows, we shall submit
a few considerations which seem deserving of notice relative
to those in Scotland who loved not their lives unto the death.
and then point out the treatment to which these considerations
seem to entitle them from us. In other words, we shall call
your attention to the character and claims of the Scottish reformers
and martyrs. Number one, Roman numeral one, the considerations
worthy of notice relative to the reformers and martyrs of
Scotland may be included in the following arrangement. Number
one, consider who they were. They were not, as their enemies
have represented them, visionary fanatics, but men of varied information,
sound understanding, and correct scriptural knowledge. They were
opposed both in principle and in practice to the base maxim
of the corrupt hierarchy, which teaches that ignorance is the
mother of devotion. They were well-instructed in the doctrines
of the gospel, knew perfectly the connection of their cause
with the glory of God and the best interests of men, and were,
some of them at least, persons of polite literature and elegant
accomplishments. They had zeal. but it was his
heel according to knowledge. They were not men of a doubtful
faith. They firmly believed in the principles they professed.
They would not have suffered and died for what was not an
object of belief. Faith was the very basis of their
character. Every their constant quality was connected with this.
They believed and therefore testified. They believed and therefore died.
It was given them on behalf of Christ to believe on him as well
as to suffer for his sake. They were not canting hypocrites
who professed what they did not feel and made a show of outward
devotion, which had no counterpart within. They were men of sterling
piety. Their devotion was a hallowed
fire, the flames of which were penitence, faith, gratitude,
and love. This led them to value and improve
those ordinances by which the fire was fed and kept alive.
They were accustomed to wrestle with God in secret. They retired
to their closets for closer fellowship with heaven and poured forth
their souls in strains of heartfelt, unaffected devotion. Family worship
they regularly practiced. And such was their attachment
to the public means of grace that at the risk of their lives
and immense sacrifices, they waited on the preaching of the
word and the dispensation of the sacraments. At the dead of
night or when the storm raved loud, would they steal away into
some sylvan, that means forest, retreat where they might enjoy
undisturbed the gospel of salvation. Nothing could repress their ardor
in this respect. They gathered in crowds to hear
the favorite preachers. And when the supper was dispensed, great
multitudes attended. One case of this kind, which
happened in Tevetdale, in which Black Otter and Welsh and Riddell
assisted, is spoke of as a remarkable. Another at Maybowl in Ishire
was particularly noted. In your own immediate neighborhood,
that's a Kirkpatrick iron gray, the stones are still to be ranged
on the bleak hillside where the persecuted wanderers will want
to snatch an occasional opportunity of partaking of the bread of
life and the cup of salvation. On some of these occasions, several
thousands partook of the consecrated symbols at the risk of having
their own blood mingled with the wine which represented that
of the Savior. Indeed so decided was their piety that the marks
given to the bloodhounds of persecution by which to discover them, where
they're having a Bible in their hands. They're being found at
prayer, going to a conventicle. Nor was there anything more common
than for them to be surprised when they were apprehended at
some exercise of religion, either secret or public. They were holy
as well as devout. Their conduct was no way equivocal.
Their morals were unimpeachable. They were a virtuous race to
godliness devout. The duties of religion were as
faithfully discharged as its ordinances were regularly weighted
upon. They studied to keep aloof from the corruptions of the times,
to maintain a blameless conversation, and to lead irreproachable lives.
Their principles, some may be inclined to dispute. Their prudence,
some may call in question. Their public deeds, some even
condemn, may condemn. But their private deportment,
none dare accuse. It was unsullied by the breath
of slander. The charge of preciseness in
morals, which is often brought against them by their enemies,
is the best attestation on this point that could have been desired. And having stood the scrutiny
of their link-side persecutors, they may be supposed to have
been about as free from blame as the necessary imperfection
of our present state of being will admit. The fiery ordeal
to which they were subjected would seem to have served only
to carry off the baser principles and to heighten the luster of
the more noble elements of their being. Such was the personal worth of
those men who loved not their lives unto the death. They were
worthies indeed, men of whom the world was not worthy, whose
personal excellence was such as to entitle him to the highest
respect and closest imitation of posterity. Number two, consider
what they did. They did much that ought not
to be forgotten by their descendants. To enumerate all is impossible. To select from their doings the
more prominent and important would be a difficult task. Even
to exhibit the crammed result, which is all we dare attempt,
is no easy matter. They emancipated their country
from the galling yoke of popish and episcopal dominion. Long
and hard do the friends of these systems struggle to impose them
on their own countrymen. but they nobly resisted till
potpourri was abjured by the whole nation. The representatives
of the three kingdoms were pledged to reformation by a solemn confederacy
and papists were excluded from places of power and trust both
supreme and subordinate. They delivered the church from
a tyrannical and debasing superstition. from a wicked hierarchy which
sought to enslave the minds and consciences of men, from heretical
tenants, destructive of the soul, from burdensome imposts, which
could not easily be born, and from unauthorized rites and ceremonies,
whose only tendency was to keep back the influence of pure and
undefiled religion. They rescued the Holy Scriptures
from the iron grasp of a prolificate and designing priesthood who
wished to keep the people in ignorance of what was sure to
expose their own corruptions and to lead to an overthrow of
their power. Even that word of God, which is a lamp, is to defeat
and a light to the path and made to make the simple wise into
salvation. They secured for themselves and
others freedom to think, to speak, and to act without being shackled
with the fetters of mental and corporeal slavery. In short,
They maintained a noble and successful struggle for religion and liberty
with the avowed enemies of both, with a prudence and hardiness
and valor, which can never be too much admired. In doing this,
they were exposed to wiles, threats, snares, and open violence. Their
situation resembled the lion's dens and the mountains of leopards.
Their enemies assumed the properties of beasts of prey and hunted
them down with merciless rapacity. Yet did they not shrink from
the struggle on account of the danger which preceded, which
attended it. Even when they saved their lives by retreat, it was
not from cowardly timidity, but from a dutiful respect to their
cause and to the authority of Him who has said, when they persecute
in one place, in one city flee to another. When called to it,
they waxed valiant in fight like Joshua and Barrett and Gideon
and David of old. They buckled on their armor,
slept in a tented field and met the assaults of their foes with
manful resistance. though they were sometimes overpowered
by superior numbers and greater skills and arms, they shooed
even then the true spirit of heroes. Many of them fell, but
such as survived were not backward to resume the combat, and the
issues that were was at the time such as to reflect the highest
credit on their valor, airsmoths and drum clog will long continue
to call up recollections of their fearless magnanimity, Some have manifested a disposition
to condemn this part of our forefather's conduct. I do sing in support
of their opinion in the words of Christ, all that take the
sword shall perish by the sword. But before quoting the scriptures,
people ought to be sure that they understand them. And a very
slight inspection of the circumstances in which these words were uttered
are a dissuasive from personal revenge would have shown their
unfitness for the purpose which they have brought forward. Who
does not see that, taken literally and absolutely, they go to condemn
and appeal to arms and defense, not merely of religion, but of
our civil liberties and possessions, a principle which, as tending
directly to throw open our country to the power of any ambitious
invader, will never, we trust, become a favorite sentiment with
Britons. Nor is it by any means a general truth in defense of
warfare on the account of religion, that those who have been obliged
to resort to the sword have perished by it in the end. For while the
Protestants of Germany, Switzerland, and Scotland who resisted unto
blood were not exterminated, those of Italy and Spain who
did not resist met with that fate. And as to our reforming ancestors,
They ought to be remembered that when they had recourse to arms
in defense of all that was dear to them, it was always reluctantly,
never indeed until they were driven to it. So far from seeing
anything here to blame, we are much of the opinion that the
men who would refuse in similar circumstances to fight for his
religion or liberty deserves to enjoy the benefits of neither.
However, and ungrateful posterity may frown upon those men who
love not their lives unto the death, and talk of them as having
suffered upon their own principles. One thing we know, that God smiled
upon them in his providence by granting them success, and that
they had acted on, and that had they acted on the slavish principles
of their modern revilers, the Scottish Reformation, like that
of Italy and Spain, should have been finally overthrown. Theomite
himself taught their hands to war and girded them with strength
so that bows of steel were broken by their arms. And in reckoning,
drum clogged, they by the blessing of heaven were enabled to put
to the flight the enemies of the aliens. Aliens to everything
good and great and holy. Strangers to the covenants of
promise and sworn enemies to the cause of Christ among men.
It was appointed though unintentional tribute to the principles of
the reformers in this particular. which was paid by him who presented
Cameron's head and the hands of the king's council at Edinburgh.
These, he said, are the hands and head of Anna, who lived praying and
preaching and died praying and fighting. And the nation at large added
their sanction of their memorable revolution when all rose as one
man and drove the bloody persing family of Stuart from the throne
and the kingdom. Number three, what they suffered, ought also
to be remembered. In her I must confess, myself
at a loss, how to proceed. Their sufferings were so many
as to defy enumeration. And so varied as to render classification
difficult. Without some attempts to classify
them, it would be next to impossible to go forward. They suffered
reproachful mockery. They had trial of cruel mockings,
an instrument of persecution, a very ancient and common use,
yet severe and ill to be endured by persons of generous minds.
It was employed by Ishmael against Isaac, by the children of Bethel
against Elijah, and even the children of Israel against the
messengers of God. The Savior himself and the primitive
Christians were not exempted from it. The men of whom we speak,
too, had their full share of this trial. their religion, their
language, their exercises, their conduct, their spirit, and even
their God, were made the objects of robald, scorn, and contempt.
The ignorant soldiers who were accustomed to amuse themselves
with the devotions of poor people, who fell on their knees to pray
before being shot. It will be remembered by you
of how Claverhouse, on the morning of the affair at Drumclaw, jeered
the prisoners he had taken the preceding day, and whom he was
driven before him like beast, tied two and two together, telling
them they were going to hear the sermon. and the impious and
barbarous sarcasm of Lauderdale, when consenting to the execution
of Mitchell for a supposed attack on the life of the infamous shark,
ought not here to be admitted. Then let him glorify God, he
said, in the grass market. They were subjugated to the most
ignominal bondage. The Philistines' treatment of
Samson, or that of Jeremiah, the king of Babylon, was nothing
to theirs. They were bound with cords, heavily manacled, and
thrown into dungeons. The common jails were crowded,
places of close confinement, as the rocks on the sea were
filled, and the walls of many a prison, like that of Philippi,
echoed to the midnight voice of prayer and of praise. And as if this were not enough,
they were either sent into cruel exile or compelled to banishment,
to banish themselves. Letters of intercommuning were
issued, by which the nearest relations, husband and wife,
parent and child, brother and brother, were prohibited from
assisting each other or conversing either by word or by writing.
They were thus necessitated to flee. And it was not sufficient
to have leave, the land of their birth and all the sweet endearments
of kindred and of home, numbers of respectable members of society
and even ministers were shipped off to the West Indies and sold
for slaves to work in the plantations. Do these add the wanton barbarities
to which they were exposed? Those practiced by the Highland
hosts were almost incredible. The faithful covenanters had
their ears cropped, that means they were chopped off, and their
faces branded with hot irons. Their Bibles were pulled from
their hands and they were stuck with canes on the scaffold. They
were forced for no end but to gratify a spirit of infernal
wickedness, to swear oaths at which their souls revolted. and
children under 10 years of age were collected and soldiers ordered
to fire over their heads in order to extort information from them
regarding their parents. An expedient of Graham of Claverhouse,
which in callousness of heart equals, we believe, whatever
has been thought of by the familiars of the Inquisition. Great were
their privations. They were deprived not only of
religion, liberty, and law, but of common necessities of life.
Their estates were confiscated. Heavy fines were exacted. The
most expensive plunder was commonly practiced. Prisoners were stripped
naked and thrown upon the cold ground, sometimes for asking
for a morsel of food or a cup of water. They were shot, while
their friends were strictly interdicted under the severest penalties
from carrying from supplies. As a specimen, we remind you
how 1,200 of the Bothwell prisoners were confined five months in
Greyfriars Churchyard without shelter and with only such provisions
as were barely fit to sustain the wretched existent. And how
shall we speak of their tortures? They were tormented in every
possible form, but the horrors of the thumbkin, the boot, These
things, these are devices that would crush the thumb until the
bone marrow came out, and the boot would crush the foot into
a bloody pulp. The wheel, the rack, and the
faggot are not for recital here, as they loved not their lives
unto the death. Many of them had their principles put to the
severest of trials. and not content with reviving
of their lives, the enemies put them to death in the most barbarous
forms, by shooting, hanging, quartering, beheading, burning,
were those close-blooded murders perpetrated. The common soldiers
were empowered to shoot any whom they might suspect of attachment
to the cause of the covenant. In some places, permanent gallows
were erected. The effecting case of John Brown
of Priesthill may be referred to as an example of private execution,
and that of David Haxton, of Rehit as an instance of a public
one. This gentleman who was taken prisoner at Erzmas was after
the mock form of a trial executed at Edinburgh. His hands were
first cut off by the executioner. His body was then drawn up to
the top of the gallows by a pulley. And after being let down, his
pulsating heart was torn from his bosom, exhibited on the point
of a knife as the heart of a traitor, and then thrown into the fire,
prepared for the purpose, this purpose. Wallace's head, along
with that of Cameron, were exposed on the gates of the city. Such
is but a faint recital of the wrongs done to those who love
their not their lives under the death of our land. Men who were
denied the common charities of life and driven from society
to skulk in mosses and in mountains and dens and caves of the earth,
who are oft compelled to make the heat their bed, the rock
their pillow, and to take for their curtain the canopy of the
heaven, who are pursued as beasts of prey and doomed to the worst
death and the death of traitors. But men who shall live in the
memory of good, of the good, when the names of their persecutors
are forgotten, or remembered only to receive the execration
they deserve. Number four, the spirit in which
all these things were done and suffered must not be overlooked.
It was a spirit of faith. Trust in God, in Christ, in the
promises of scripture can alone account for their activity and
their patience. With this, there was combined a patriotic attachment
to the good of their country. And then piety and patriotism
were kindred feelings. as they indeed are in the breasts
of all genuine and enlightened Christians. Theirs was not the
infidel patriotism of modern times. No man can properly love
his God without loving his country, or love his country without loving
his God. These ceilings are more closely connected than many seem
to be aware. Nehemiah, sitting down and weeping, and with sad
incontinence, praying and fasting before the God of heaven, because
of the place of his father's sepulchers, lieth in waste. The
wall of Jerusalem is broken down, and the gates there are burnt
with fire. Supplies us with a fine instance of this combination
in ancient times. The men of whom we are treating
furnish a no less striking example of modern times. God in our country
was the motto inscribed on their bloodstained banners. God in
our country was the watchword which echoed through the battlefield.
God in our country was the governing sentiment of their patriot hearts.
They have been represented as traitors. Their persecutions,
their persecutors were the traitors. At the time they leave, there
existed not a spark of true liberty in our land, but what burned
in the bosom of these traduced and persecuted wanderers. By
their patriotic exertions and sufferings and writings and prayers,
they laid their country under obligations, which the most lavish
tributes of their memory can never repay. Their spirit was
marked by an enlightened and un-extinguished zeal. They knew
it to be good, to be zealously affected in a good thing. Their
zeal was active, steadfast, devoted. The degree in which it existed
has led many to charge him with fanaticism. But there was about
them a coolness of purpose, a correctness of aim, a suitableness of selected
means, and an intrinsic excellence of cause, which in the estimation
of every one able to judge will be deemed sufficient to wipe
away the foul imputation. Their valor was truly impressive.
Strong were they and of good courage, they behaved valiantly
for their people and for the cities of their God. Then in
the proper sense of the word, they were no strangers to fortitude.
Ample proof was given in the declarations issued at Sanctuar
and at Lenarch, in the manifesto known as the Apologetical Declaration,
and in the heroic act of excommunication at Torswood, in which the highest
centers of the church were passed on the royal persecutors. The
manner in which they met their death may be further adduced
in proof of their bravery. The Lord knows, said Cargill. I go up this ladder with less
fear and perpetration of mine than ever I entered into a pulpit
to preach. Well, said Renwick, I shall soon be above these clouds.
Then I shall enjoy thee, O God, and glorify thee without interruption
or intermission forever. Nor was this the case merely
with such men as Cameron and Cargill and Renwick. Even peasants
and women manifested the same noble spirit. Andrew Hislop,
who refused to cover his eyes before being shot, is an instance
from the former class. And as instances from the latter,
you need only remember Marian Harvey and Isabel Allison, who
were on the scaffold, who on the scaffold sung the 23rd song.
And so full of tone as to show, as to drown the voice of the
wretched curate, who in derision of their scruples would compel
them to hear him pray. Incorruptible fidelity marked
the spot of those who loved not their lives unto the death. Neither
smiles nor frowns could shake their constancy or cause them
recant. No means were left untied for
this purpose, but they stood firm as a rock amid the raging
billows of the ocean. Rather than do violence to their
honest convictions, they chose to suffer and to die. Rather
than forgo the blessings of social worship, they sought the retirement
of the mountain and the cave, the warmth of their devotion
being unchilled by the damps of the night. and the melody
of their praise mingling with the sound of the tempest. Nothing
could induce them to save the body by the sacrifice of conscience.
Neither the horrors of imprisonment, nor the terrors of the branding
iron, nor the hootings of the mob, nor the ribald scorn of
perjured sycophants and lordly ecclesiastics could shake the
purpose they had formed of working out the cause of their country's
reformation. They partook largely of that intrepid spirit. which
even in women's breasts withstood the tears of fire, of the fire
and flood. They could in the face of menaces
and of tortures appropriate the words of the apostle. None of
these things move thee, neither count I life my dear unto myself,
so that I may finish my course with joy. In some instances,
they resisted attempts to force confession by means of the boot,
till their physical nature was overpowered and they fainted
away. The case of the women who were drowned at Wigtown is well
known. One of them, after the water
had flowed over her, was pulled out and offered life if she would
comply with some ensnaring requirements, when preferring to die rather
than violate her conscience, she was plunged again into the
stream. Add to all these a spirit of believing hope, which bore
them up amid their afflictions, like the ancient sufferers of
Paul, of whom Paul speaks, They expected a better resurrection,
a resurrection to eternal life and glory. Suffering not as evildoers,
they had nothing to fear with regard to the future world. Into
their cup everything bitter was mingled, which man could infuse. but there was nothing penal in
it. Their worst enemies were unable to bring upon them the
wrath of God, or even to shut out from their souls divine consolations
in the present state. Faith and hope enabled them to
make such a view of the exceeding internal weight of glory that
awaited them as to cause their present afflictions to feel light,
but for a moment. nothing, neither tribulation,
nor distress, nor persecution, nor famine, nor nakedness, nor
sword, nor peril, was able, they knew, to separate through him
from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord. If
in this life only they had had hope in Christ, They should have
been, of all men, the most miserable, but their hope extended with
the light of heaven. This scaffold was a stepping
stone to glory, and the pile by which their bodies were consumed,
they regarded as a chariot of fire to waft their souls into
the sinless and sorrowless mansions of the blessed. This is the day we shall get
the crown were the words of Cameron a short time before he fell,
so that the youthful poet was correctly pictured. has correctly
pictured it. When the righteous had fallen,
and the combat had ended, a chariot of fire through the dark cloud
descended, and the souls that came forth out of the great tribulation,
they mounted the chariots and seeds of salvation. Glide swiftly,
bright spirits. The prize is before ye, a crown
never fading, a kingdom of glory. To these considerations, the
cause in which all the spirit was shown, these sufferings born,
and these deeds performed, rouse be added. The cause on account
of which our fathers loved not their lives unto the death was
the cause of God, the cause of Christ, the cause of truth, the
cause of religion and liberty, a cause worthy of their best
intentions, exertions, and sufficient to warrant their dearest sacrifices.
But the nature of the cause will be best understood from a specification
of some of those leading principles for which they contended and
died. We say not that those we are to state were reduced to
a written, systematic form or expressed and arranged exactly
as we have done them, but we do say that they are principles
which entered essentially into their testimony for truth, principles
which they received as binding, considered as axiomatical, and
constantly acted upon. These we can do little more than
state, having left ourselves no time to discant on them, either
in the way of explanation or defense. Salvation by the free,
sovereign grace of God through faith in the Lord Jesus Christ
was the first of these principles. This was held by Luther, the
first friends of the Reformation, as an article of a standing or
falling church. It may be regarded as having produced the original
revolt from the Church of Rome. It was afterwards incorporated
in all the sentiments and discourses of the Reformers. And when once
it comes to be forgotten or denied or perverted or concealed, Whatever
external observances may remain, the spirit of the Reformation
has fled. And you may write upon it, Ichabod, the glory has departed. Another of these principles was
the sole authority of the Holy Scriptures in matters of religion
and the right of all men to pursue them. Traditions and priesthood
were discarded as grounds of faith. And the Bible alone elevated
to this rank. Wearing the seal of divine ascitation,
it was reckoned worthy of implicit and universal reverence. It was
deemed a maxim of self-evident truth, that that which all are
to believe, according to which all are to act, and by which
all are to be judged, ought to be in the full and undisputed
possession of all. Ignorant and worthless priests
might have reasons of their own for shutting out the light of
the revelation, skulking their moles and bats into hiding places,
and preferring the darkness of the twilight. But, The reformers
had no such instinctive abhorrence of light, resembling either the
bird of heaven, rather the bird of heaven, which meets the full
unblazed, full unclouded blaze with the eye that never winks
and a wing that never tires. the right of men to form their
religious opinions from the word of God, float as a relative result
from the foregoing, such a right being clearly implied in the
supreme authority of the revelation, in the impossibility of controlling
the human mind by anything but scriptural evidence or rational
argumentation, and the accountable nature of man. In opposition
to the tyrannical claims and blasphemous assumption of popes
and kings, they held the sole headship of Christ over the church,
and in consequent, independence of all political control. The
prerogatives of Zion's king they viewed as peculiar and inalienable,
nor mortal without the most daring of piety could venture to invade
them. Christ was given to be head over all things to the church,
and it was not for man to rob him of his glory or share with
him his honors. The church they regarded as a
free, independent society, having no head but one. And therefore
all who presumed in this capacity to regulate her order, interfere
with her management, prescribe reforms of worship, or lay restrictions
on her office bearers, were looked upon as wicked intruders, ungodly
and tyrannical usurpers, head of the church. Whether inscribed
in the papal crown or the regal diadem, they held to be one of
the names of blasphemy. In connection with this, they
maintained another principle, the headship of Christ over the
nations. and the consequent duty of conducting civil affairs on
religious principles and subordinating them to the interests of the
church. The restriction of the mediatorial power to the church
is comparatively a modern doctrine. The natural growth of a desire
to harmonize religious sentiments with political interest. Our
reformers knew nothing of it. They had not learned those ingenious
criticisms by which some of their descendants had been able to
explain such passages as the following in conformity with
a restricted dominion. that has put all things in subjection
under his feet. For in that he put all in subjection
under him, he left nothing that is not put under him. Esteeming
Christ as Prince of kings of the earth and governor among
the nations, they showed no wish to blot out or even to tarnish
the luster of his glorious title, King of kings and Lord of lords. Nor are they any knowledge of
the boasted discovery of modern times that things civil and religious
should be kept entirely separate. that they had nothing to do with
each other, and that church and state ought to be completely
and forever divorced. They considered that things must be connected
without being confounded. They knew that civil and religious
matters were united by many a powerful tie. They viewed them as inseparable
in point of fact. in finding them recognized in
the same scriptures, tending to produce the glory of the same
Lord, obligatory on the same persons, and connection between
them predicted as characteristic of the millennial state of the
world when kings shall be nursing fathers and queens nursing mothers
to the church, and when the kingdoms of this world shall become the
kingdoms of our Lord Jesus Christ, of our Lord and his Christ, and
when the most common affairs of life and articles of youth
shall be holiness to the Lord, finding these things to be so,
they scrupled not to recognize the connection, both in their
deeds and public standards. It is only when the church is
degraded to a mere instrument of state policy and the union
in question is objectionable, not when the civil affairs of
the world are so ordered as to advance the interest of Christ's
kingdom." And we're gonna stop there. There's quite a bit more
here. I hope you see, the importance of looking back
on our covenanted reformation. It was the best reformation in
the world, the most complete reformation in the world, the
most consistent reformation in the world. They made the best
advancements in purity of worship than any other church in the
world, except for some in the continent. And to depart from
this in the name of natural law or separation of church and state,
unbiblically defined, is nonsense. But we'll continue this next
week, Lord willing. Father, we thank you so much for these martyrs.
What would we be without them? Lord, help us to be faithful
to our covenant of reformation, to work for it, to pray for it,
to be consistent with it. And Lord, we pray that the corrupt
RPCNA will once again obey the covenants and cast off NAPARC
and cast off Christmas in their holy days and cast off their
unjust courts and once again be faithful. In Jesus' name,
amen.
Character and Claims of the Scottish Martyrs by William Symington
Pastor Schwertley reads from Symington on the covenanted reformation of Scotland.
| Sermon ID | 719201917387971 |
| Duration | 40:47 |
| Date | |
| Category | Sunday Service |
| Language | English |
© Copyright
2026 SermonAudio.