We reject the idea of theistic evolution, claiming God did it. But sometimes it's useful to engage in debate within the concepts of evolution in order to see the utter impossibility of naturalistic processes producing what is claimed by evolutionists in general. In other words, when we allow the evolutionists to make their case, they actually destroy their own case with their facts. One case in point is amino acids. I'm no expert, but you don't have to be. You just have to use your brain, look at the facts, the scientifically observed facts, and for the sake of clarity, I'll bullet point the issue. First of all, number one, it's a fact that every life form requires protein molecules in order to be alive. Second, protein molecules are made up of a complex combination of 20 different amino acids, which, number three, fall into four categories, including nonpolar, polar uncharged, acidic, negatively charged, and basic, positively charged. Please note, you don't need to understand what all that really means in depth. Just know that without 20 amino acids from all four groups of amino acid types, you can't have proteins. And if you can't have proteins, you can't have life. And that brings us to point number four and five. Number four, according to the findings of evolutionary biologists themselves, There is no evidence for basic amino acids called arginine and lysine existing at the time required for life to form. And so five, therefore, there is no evidence that life came into existence by natural means. Now, if you need to, go back and listen to those five points again. But the bottom line is that the basic amino acids that would be required for life, even if life could come from non-living matter, which there's no scientific evidence to believe is possible, these amino acids were not available to produce the proteins required for life. So what does that mean? It means that those claiming that life formed through natural means billions of years ago are ignoring the facts of science and they believe such a thing happened in spite of science, not because of it. Theistic evolutionists ignore the scientific principle of biogenesis, which says that living organisms develop from other living organisms and not from non-living matter by pretending that these theistic evolutionists just pretend to fix the issue of the origin of life by just saying, God did it. And non-theistic evolutionists ignore the scientific principle of biogenesis and say, It just happened. Again, against both of those ridiculously unscientific errors is biblical creationism. The biblical creationist points out that there's no evidence that life sprang into existence from non-living matter by natural means, and there's no evidence that life originated billions of years ago. Biogenesis requires life to come from life, and all life originated in the creator, Jesus Christ. As John 1, 3, and 4 says, all things were made by him. And without him was not anything made that was made. In him was life, and the life was the light of men. We don't reject science, but we don't accept science fiction or pseudoscience. And we certainly won't allow such silliness to replace the tried and true absolute truth of our infallible Bible, which is the Word of God. And yes, in English, it is found in the words of our King James Bible. When we look at real science, it lines up with the real Word of God. And we will not forfeit that for this sloppy, fictitious pseudoscience being taught today in the name of evolution. When we throw out the lies and the fiction of modern scientism, which we've discussed before, we come back to God's Word, and then we see all around us, there is evidence for God.