The total depravity of man, its origin. That something is radically wrong with the world of mankind requires no labored argument to demonstrate. That such has been the case in all generations is plain from the annals of history. This is only another way of saying that something is radically wrong with man himself. For the world is, but the aggregate of all the individual members of our race Since the whole of anything cannot be superior to the parts comprising it, it necessarily follows that the course of the world will be determined by the characters of those who comprise it. But when we come to inquire exactly what is wrong with man, and how it came to be in such a condition. Unless we turn to God's inspired word, no convincing answers are forthcoming. Apart from that divine revelation, no sure and satisfactory reply can be made to such questions as these. What is the source of the unmistakable imperfections of human nature? What will furnish an adequate explanation of all the evils which infest man's present state? Why is it that none is able to keep God's law perfectly? or do anything which is acceptable to him while in a state of nature. It's universal malady. To ascertain how sin, which involves all men, came into the world is a manner of no little importance. To discover why it is that all men universally and continually are unrighteous and ailing creatures supplies a key to many a problem. Look at human nature as it now is, depraved, wretched, subject to death. Ask philosophy to account for this, and it cannot do so. None can deny the fact that men are what they ought not to be. But how they, but how they became so, human wisdom is unable to tell us. To attribute our troubles to heredity and environment is an evasion. for it leaves unanswered the question, how did it come about that our original ancestors and environment were such as to produce what now exists? Look not only at our prisons, hospitals, and cemeteries, but also at the antipathy between the righteous and the wicked, between those who fear God and those who do not fear him, the antagonism between Cain and Abel, Ishmael and Isaac, Esau and Jacob is repeatedly duplicated in every age and area, but the Bible alone traces that antagonism to its fountainhead. Judicious ancients recognized and bemoaned the universal tendency of men to be lawbreakers, but were entirely unaware of its real source. They were agreed that the practice of virtue was such a thing necessary for the promotion of man's good. But they had to lament in the irregular bent and the wills and the corruption and the affections of their disciples, which rendered their precepts of little use. And they were completely at a loss to assign any reason why men who have the noblest faculties of any beings on earth should yet generally pursue their destruction with as much eagerness as the beasts do to avoid it. Plato, in the second book of his Republic, complained that men by their natures are evil. cannot be brought to good. Totally acknowledge that man is brought forth into the world in body and soul, exposed to all miseries and prone to evil, in whom that divine spark of goodness and wisdom and morality is opposed and extinguished. They realized that all men were poisoned, but how the poison came to be in the human constitution they did not know. Some ascribed it to fate, others to the hostile influences of the planets, still others to an evil angel which attends each man. Most certainly we cannot attribute man's natural inordinance and effectiveness to his creator. To do so would be the rancorous blasphemy as well as giving a lie to his word which declares God has made man upright. Ecclesiastes 7 verse 29. Even on a much lower ground such a conclusion is self-evidently false. It is impossible that darkness should issue from the father of light. or that sin should come from the ineffably holy one. It is infinitely better to confess our ignorance than to be guilty of grossest impiety, to say nothing of manifest absurdity, by placing the onus on God. But there is no excuse for anyone to be ignorant on the matter. The Holy Scriptures apply a definite solution to this mystery and show that the entire blame for his present wretchedness lies at man's own door. And therefore to say that man is a sinful creature or even to allow that he is totally depraved is to acknowledge only half of the truth and the least humbling half that. Man is a fallen creature. He has departed from his original state in primitive purity. Man, far from having ascended from something inferior to an ape, has descended from the elevated and honorable position in which God first placed him. And it is all important to contend for this, since it alone satisfactorily explains why man is now depraved. Universal Defection Man is not now, as God made him. He has lost the crown and glory of his creation and has plunged himself into an awful gulf of sin and misery. By his own perversity he has wrecked himself and placed the consequence of woe on his posterity. He is a ruined creature as a result of his apostasy from God. This requires that we consider first man in his original state, that we may perceive his folly and so lightly value in it, and that we may form a better conception of the fastness and vileness of his downward plunge, for that can only be gauged as we learn what he fell from, as well as into. By his wicked defection, man brought himself into a state as black and doleful as his original one was glorious and blessed. Second, we need to consider most attentively what it is pleased the Holy Spirit to record about Tefal itself, pondering each detail described in Genesis 3, and the amplifications of them supplied by the later scriptures, looking to God to grant us graciously an understanding of this. Third, we shall be in a better position to view the fearful consequences of Tefal, and perceive how the punishment was made to fit the crime. Original man was God's masterpiece. Instead of surveying the varied opinions and conflicting conjectures of our fallible and fallen fellow-creatures concerning the original condition and the state of our first parents, we shall confine ourselves entirely to the divinely inspired scriptures which are the only unerring rule of faith. from them, and them alone can we ascertain what man was when he first came from the hands of his creator. First, God's word makes known his intention to bring man into existence. And God said, let us make man in our image, after our likeness, Genesis 1 verse 26. There are two things exceedingly noteworthy in that brief statement, namely the repeated use of the pronoun and the plural number, and the fact that this language suggests the idea of a conference between the divine persons at this point of the six days' work. We say, at this point, for there is nothing resembling it in the record of what occurred during the previous days. Thus, the divine conference here conveys the impression that the most important stage of creation had now been reached. Demand was to be the masterpiece of the divine workmanship, the crowning glory of the mundane sphere, which is clearly borne out and is being made in the divine image. It is the usage of the plural number in Genesis 1 verse 26, which in our judgment intimates the first signification of the term image. God created man in his own image. In the image of God created he him. Male and female created he them. Genesis 1 verse 27. This announces the actual accomplishment of the divine purpose and counsel referred to in the preceding verse. The repetition of the statement, with the change of the pronoun from plural to singular number, implies a second meaning for the term, image. Viewing it more generally, it tells of the excellence of man's original nature, though it must be explained consistently with the infinite distance that exists between God and the highest creature. Whatever this glory was which God placed on Adam, it does not infer that he shared the divine perfections, nor is the nothingness of the vast of finite beings any disbargement when compared with God. For whatever likeness there is to him either is created regenerated or glorified, there is at the same time an infinite disproportion. Further, this excellence of man's original nature must be distinguished from that glory which is peculiar to Christ, who, far from being said to be made in the image of God, is the image of the invisible God. Colossians 1 verse 15. The express image of his person. Hebrews 1 verse 8. the oneness and equality between the Father and the Son in no way pertain to any likeness between God and the creature. Examining the term more closely, the image of God in which man was made refers to his moral nature. John Calvin defined it as being spiritual, and stated that it includes all the excellence in which the nature of man surpasses all the other species of animals, and denotes the integrity Adam possessed. He stated further that it may be more clearly specified in the restoration which we obtain through Christ. Without an exception, all the Puritans we have consulted say substantially the same thing regarding this image of God as moral rectitude and a turn perfect accord with the divine law. It could not be otherwise, for the holy one to make a creature after his likeness would be to endow him with holiness. The statement that the regenerate has been renewed in knowledge after the image of him that created him, Colossians 3 verse 10, clearly implies the same image in which man was originally made, in which sin is defaced. Not only did that image consist of knowledge, i.e., of God, but as Ephesians 4, verse 24 informs us, of righteousness and true holiness also. Thus man's original state was far more than one of innocence, sinlessness, harmlessness, which is mainly a negative thing. That man was created in positive holiness is also taught in Ecclesiastes 7, verse 29. God has made, not is now making, man upright, not only without any improper bias, but according to rule, straight with the law of God, conformed to his will. As Thomas Boston expressed it, quote, Original righteousness was concreted with him, end quote. The same Hebrew word occurs in good and upright as the Lord, Psalm 25, verse eight. We have dwelt long on this point because not only do Romanists and Sassanians deny that man was created as spiritual, not merely natural, and holy, not simply innocent being, but some Hyper-Calvinists who prefer their own principles to the word of God do so also. One error inevitably leads to another. To insist that the unregenerate are under no obligation to perform spiritual acts obliges them to infer the same thing of Adam. To conclude that if Adam fell from a holy and spiritual condition, then we must abandon the doctrine of final perseverance is to leave out Christ and lose sight of the superiority of the covenant of grace over the original one of works. and the Lord God for man, of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and man became a living soul. Genesis 2 verse 7. This supplies us with additional information in the making of Adam. First, the manner from which his body was formed, to demonstrate the wisdom and power of God in making out of such material, So wonderful a thing is the human body, and to teach man his humble origin and dependence upon. Second, the quickening principle bestowed on Adam, which was immediately from God, namely an intelligent spirit, of which the fall did not deprive him. Ecclesiastes 12.7 That the breadth of life included reason, where the faculty of understanding is clear from the life, was the light of man, John 1 verse 4. Third, the effect on Adam. His body was now animated and made capable of vital acts. Man's body, out of the dust, was the workmanship of God. But his soul was immediate communication from the Father of Spirits, Hebrews 12, 9. And thereby earth and heaven were united in him. And the Lord God said, It is not good that the man should be alone. I will make and help meet for him. And the Lord caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam and he slept. And he took one of his ribs and closed up the flesh thereof. and the rib which the Lord God had taken from man made he a woman and brought her to the man. Genesis 2 verses 18 to 22. It seems that God chose this mode of making the woman instead of forming her also out of the dust to express the intimate union which was to take place between the sexes, to denote their mutual relation and dependence, and to show the superiority of man. These too were so made that the whole human race, physically considered, were contained in them, and to be produced from them, making them all literally of one blood. man's endowments. And God blessed them. And God said to them, Be fruitful and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it, and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moves upon the earth. Genesis 1 verse 28. Those words intimate that there was yet another meaning to the image of God. For the position of headship and authority which you convert upon Adam show the divine sovereignty. Psalm 8 verses 5 to 6 tells us, You have made him a little lower than the angels and have crowned him with glory and honor. You made him to have dominion over the works of your hands. You have put all things under his feet. Adam was constituted God's viceroy on earth, the government of all inferior creatures being conferred upon him. That was further demonstrated when the Lord brought all before Adam for him to give names to them. Genesis 2, verses 19 to 20. which not only evidenced that he was a rational creature endowed with the power of choice, but manifested his superiority over all mundane creatures, his proprietorship in them, and his liberty to use them for God's glory and his own good. But more, God not only endowed Adam with righteousness and holiness, and by this fitting him to fulfill the end of his creation by glorifying the author of his being, He also bestowed on him the gift of reason, which distinguished him from and elevated him above all the inhabitants of the earth, conferring on him the charter of dominion over them. Further, he brought him into a pure and beautiful environment, and the Lord God planted a garden eastward in Eden. And there he put the man whom he had formed. And the Lord God took the man and put him into the Garden of Eden, which the Septuagint renders the Paradise of Joy, to dress it and to keep it. Genesis 3 verse 24 confirms the fact. that the Garden of Eden was distinct from the earth. The whole world was given Adam for a possession, but Eden was the special seat of his residence, a place of preeminent delight. It presented to his view the whole earth in miniature, so without traveling long distances he might behold the lovely landscape. which it afforded. It epitomized all the beauties of nature and was, as it were, a conservatory of its fairest vegetation and a storehouse of its choicest fruits. that the Garden of Eden was a place of surpassing beauty, excelling all other parts of the earth for fertility, is evident from other scriptures. Ezekiel, when prophesying in a day of wretchedness and barrenness, the bountiful spiritual blessings which would attend the gospel era, used as figurative but graphic language. This land that was desolate has become like the Garden of Eden." Ezekiel 36-35. Still plainer was the promise of Isaiah 51-3. For the Lord shall comfort Zion, he will comfort all her waste places, and he will make her wilderness like Eden. in her desert like the garden of the Lord. Joy and gladness shall be found therein, thanksgiving in the voice of melody. It is clear that nothing was wanting in Eden, in its pristine glory, to give the completest happiness to man. That it was a place of perfect bliss is further evident from the fact that heaven itself, The habitation of the blessed is called Paradise in Luke 23 verse 43. 2 Corinthians 12 verse 4 and Revelation 2 verse 7. Some see in that a threefold illusion. There are no others. A pledge for the complete satisfaction of the glorified man's spirit, soul, and body. Several things are imported and implied in the statement that the Lord God put a man into the Garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it. First, and most obvious, God takes no pleasure in idleness but in active industry. that such an appointment was for Adam's good cannot be doubted. Regular employment preserves us from those temptations which so often attend, indolence. Second, secular employment is by no means inconsistent with perfect holiness or with a person's enjoying intimate communion with God and the blessings resulting from it. Of course, Adam's work would be performed without any of the fatigue and disappointment which accompany ours today. The holy angels are not inert, but ministering spirits. Hebrews 1, verse 14. Of the divine persons themselves, our Lord declared, My Father works, hitherto, and I work. John 5, 17. Thus, this employment assigned to Adam was also a part of his conformity to God. Third, it implied the duty of keeping his own heart the garden of his soul with all diligence. Proverbs 4, 23. Tending his faculties and graces so that he might always be in a condition to pray, Let my beloved come into his garden and eat his pleasant fruits. Song of Solomon 4, verse 16. Further, in the words, Dress it, Hebrew, serve or till it. We are taught that God's gracious gifts are to be highly treasured and carefully cultivated by us. Neglect not the gift that is in you, 1 Timothy 4.14. Stir up the gift of God which is in you, 2 Timothy 1.6. In a Genesis phrase, and to keep it, we believe there was a tacit warning given by God to Adam. Not only does the English term convey that thought, but the Hebrew word shamar, here used, requires it. Nineteen times it is rendered preserve. Twelve times, taqid. Four times, watch. And once it is actually translated, beware. Thus the phrase signified a caution against danger, putting Adam on his guard, warning him to be on the lookout against the encroaching enemy. The Dutch Puritan Hermann Wittius pointed out that the keeping of paradise virtually engaged him, of all things, to be anxiously concerned not to do anything against God, lest, as a bad gardener, he should be thrust out of the garden, and in that discover a melancholy symbol of his own exclusion from heaven. Finally, since paradise is one of the names of heaven, we may conclude that the earthly one in which Adam was placed was a pledge of celestial blessedness. Had he survived his probation and preserved his integrity, he would have enjoyed heaven on earth. The Fall of Man Though Adam had been made in the image of God, taken into communion with Him, fitted to rejoice in all the manifestations of His wisdom and goodness which surrounded him in Eden, Nevertheless, he was capable of falling. Since it is a point which has sorely puzzled many of the Lord's people, we will endeavor to explain how it was possible for a holy person, devoid of any corruption, to sin. First, Adam's liability to falling lay in the fact that he was just a creature. As such, he was entirely dependent on Him which holds our soul in life. Psalm 66 9 As our natural life continues only so long as God sustains it, so it was with Adam's spiritual life. He stood only so long as he was divinely upheld. Moreover, as a creature he was finite, and therefore possessed no invincible power with which to repel opposition. Nor was he endowed with omniscience, which would have made him incapable of being deceived or mistaken in evil for an apparent good. Thus, O man's original condition was one of the high moral excellence, with no evil tendency in any part of his nature, with nothing in him which in the least deviated from the moral law, yet, being only a creature, he was capable of falling. Second, Adam's susceptibility to falling lay in his mutability. Changefulness is a very law or radical characteristic of the creature, to distinguish it from the creator. God alone is without fearableness or shadow of turning, James 1.17. Therefore he cannot be tempted with evil, James 1.13. That is induced to sin. This statement clearly implies that the creature as such has a capacity to be so tempted not only a depraved creature, but even an unfallen one. Immutability and impeccability, not liability to sin, are qualities which essentially distinguish the creator from the creature. The angels possess neither. Further, God alone acts from his own power, whereas the creature acts by a power given to him which is distinct from himself. Thomas Goodwin, pointing this out, God's own goodness and happiness is his ultimate end. Therefore he can never act but wholly, for he acts by himself and for himself and so cannot fail in acting, but is holy in all of his ways and works and cannot be otherwise. But man neither acts immediately by his own power nor is himself the legitimate end of his acting, but rather God is. Thus, with all faculties, man may falter when using them. Third, Adam's liability to falling lay in the freedom of his will. He was not only a rational creature, but also a moral one. Freedom of will is a property which belongs to man as a rational and responsible being, as we cannot separate understanding from the mind. Neither can we part liberty from the will, especially in connection with things within its own sphere, especially when considering that all the faculties of man's soul were in a state of perfection before the fall. With Adam and Eve, the freedom of their will consisted in the power of choosing or embracing what appeared agreeable and good to the dictates of their understandings, or in refusing and avoiding what was evil. There was no constraint or force laid upon them to act contrary to the dictates of their own wills. Such freedom also infers a power to act persuant to what the will chooses. Otherwise it could not obtain the good desired or avoid the evil detested. And in such a case as liberty would be little more than a name. Freedom of action is opposed to that which is involuntary or compelled. And the will is both self-inclining and self-determining in the acting, both internally and externally. For then only can it be said to be free. Our first parents had that freedom of will or power to retain their integrity. This is evident from the clearly revealed fact that they were under an indispensable obligation to yield perfect obedience to God. and liable to deserve punishment for the least defection. Therefore they must have been given a power to stand, a liberty of will to choose that which was conducive to their happiness. The same thing is also evident from the difference between man's primitive and present state. As fallen man, man is now by a necessity of nature inclined to sin, and accordingly he is denominated a servant of sin, a slave to it. entirely under its dominion. But it was far otherwise with Adam, whose nature was holy and provided with everything necessary to his yielding that obedience demanded of him. Nevertheless, his will being free, it was capable of complying with an external temptation to evil. Though so long as he made a right use of his faculties, he would offend himself and reject the temptation with abhorrence. It pleased God to leave her for his parents without any immediate help from without, to the freedom and mutability of their own will. But that neither made him the author of their sin, nor brought them under any natural necessity of falling.