00:00
00:00
00:01
Transcript
1/0
On January the 7th, 1855, the
minister of New Park Street Chapel in southward England, he opened
his morning sermon as follows. It has been said by someone that
the proper study of mankind is man. I will not oppose the idea,
but I believe it is equally true that the proper study of God's
elect is God. The proper study of a Christian
is the Godhead. The highest science, the loftiest
speculation, the mightiest philosophy which can ever engage the attention
of a child of God is the name, the nature, the person, the work,
the doings, and the existence of the great God whom he calls
his Father. There is something exceedingly
improving to the mind in the contemplation of the divinity.
It is a subject so vast that all of our thoughts are lost
in its immensity, so deep that our pride is drowned in its infinity. Other subjects we can compass
and grapple with, in them we feel a kind of self-content and
we go our way with the thought, behold, I am wise. But when we
come to this master science, finding that our plumb line cannot
sound its depth and that our eagle eye cannot see its height,
We turn away with the thought that vain man would be wise,
but he is like a wild ass's colt, and with solemn exclamation,
I am but of yesterday and know nothing. No subject of contemplation
will tend more to humble the mind than thoughts of God. But while the subject humbles
the mind, it also expands it. He who often thinks of God will
have a larger mind than the man who simply plods around this
narrow globe. The most excellent study for
expanding the soul is the science of Christ and Him crucified,
and the knowledge of the Godhead in the glorious Trinity. Nothing
will so enlarge the intellect. Nothing so magnified the whole
soul of man as a devout, earnest, continued investigation of the
great subject of the deity. And while it's tumbling and expanding,
this subject is eminently consolatory. Oh, there is in contemplating
Christ a balm for every womb. In musing on the Father, there
is a quietus for every grief. And in the influence of the Holy
Ghost, there is a bosom for every sore. Would you lose your sorrow? Would you drown your cares? Then
go plunge yourself into Godhead's deepest sea, be lost in his immensity,
and you shall come forth as from a couch of rest, refreshed and
invigorated. I know nothing which can so comfort
the soul, so calm the swelling billows of sorrow and grief,
so speak peace to the winds of trial as a devout musing upon
the subject of the Godhead. And it is to that subject that
I invite you, as he says, this morning. These words were spoken
over a century ago by a 20 year old preacher by the name of C.H.
Spurgeon. And those words that were true
then are true now. But the human dilemma is that
man does not want to engage in the most excellent study for
expanding the soul. Nor does he want to contemplate
Christ and Him crucified in the knowledge of the Godhead in the
glorious Trinity. See, man's desire is that he
wished that the God of the Bible did not exist at all. And he
would rather have the God of his own making. Erwin Lutzer,
in his book, Ten Lies About God, he writes this, I believe in
God is perhaps one of the most meaningless statements we can
make today. The word God has become a canvas
on which each is free to paint his own portrait of the divine.
Like the boy scribbling at his desk, we can draw God according
to whatever specifications we please. For some, He is psychic
energy. For others, He is whatever is
stronger than I am, or an inner power to lead us to deeper consciousness. To say I believe in God might
simply mean that we are seeing ourselves in a full-length mirror. Douglas McCullum, he adds, when
the story gets told, whether in the partial light of historical
perspective or in the perfect light of eternity, It may well
be revealed that the worst sin of the church at the end of the
20th century has been a trivialization of God. We prefer the illusion
of a safer deity, and so we have pared God down to more manageable
proportions. How do you see God this evening?
Do you see him as a safer deity? Or do you see Him as a God of
more manageable proportions? Well, before you answer that
question in your mind, listen to how He is viewed throughout
society. Some people see God in several
ways, and one of those ways is they see Him as an eager bellhop. He's always there when you need
Him. He carries your baggage. He never argues with you because
you're in charge. And His only responsibility is
to make you happy. And when He gets All he gets
from you is basically a smile, a thank you, and if he's lucky,
he gets a tip. Some don't see him just as an
eager bellhop. Some see him as a stern schoolteacher
whose destiny, it seems, is to ruin a year of your life. He's
the ultimate record keeper who monitors all your activities.
He gives all the hard tests just to see his students suffer. And
he wants and he demands, but he seemingly never gives or encourages. Well, maybe not a eager bellhop
or a stern schoolteacher. Some see him as an impersonal
scientist. He's intellectual, but he's not
emotional. He spends all his time locked
away in his heavenly laboratory working on unknowable wonders.
But some even see him as a clever magician. They must always work
through signs and miracles and wonders. And if there is no manifestation
of power, they conclude that God is really not involved. You
know what Jesus said about this, Matthew 16, for a wicked and
a perverse generation seeks after a sign. Well, some see him as
a heavenly grandfather. whose presence is acknowledged,
who's visited occasionally, who smiles and tells them that he
loves them when they misbehave. And then finally, there are those
that see him as a Mr. Fix-It. And to view God merely
as a Mr. Fix-It just makes him worthless
for anything else. He's great when you're in a fix,
but unnecessary when everything is going well. See, to view God
in this way is painting your own portrait of the divine, as
Erwin Lutzer says. And to do that is nothing short
of idolatry. See, to view God in any way or
any manner other than what is revealed in the Bible is idolatry.
See, contrary to popular belief, idolatry is more than bowing
down to a small figure or worshiping In a pagan temple, according
to the Bible, idolatry is thinking anything about God that isn't
true or attempting to transform him into something that he's
not. That's idolatry. So for us to understand God.
Who he is and what he is like, we have to come to the only source
that reveals that the Bible. And yet again, many people don't
want to come to the Bible. They want to try to figure that out
on their own. And you can't even entertain,
well, I think God is like and then our definition be other
than what the Bible gives. We must come to the Bible to
understand God, and I use the term understand only to mean
that such is only possible with the illumination of the Holy
Spirit. Because the natural man does not understand the things
of the Spirit of God. He can't understand them. He
can't know them. You know, we're going to spend
all eternity. Getting to know this great God that we serve.
I've been reading a book and it's been a slow read, even though
it's about 127 pages, because it's written by John Owen. If
you know anything about John Owen, You know that reading any
of his books is going to be a slow read because they're very deep.
And sometimes, you know, we come to read something very deep,
we find out just really how shallow our minds are. But as I was reading,
I came across a section where he makes a comment on the attributes
of God and he says this. He says there are some truths
of God that he has taught us to speak of. He has even guided
us in our expressions of them. But when we have done so, we
do not really fully understand these things. All we can do is
believe and admire. We profess as we are taught that
God is infinite, omnipotent, eternal, and we know the discussions
about his omnipresence, his immensity, his infinity, his eternity. We
have, I say, words and notions about these things, but as to
the things themselves, what do we really know? What do we comprehend
of them? Can the mind of man do any more
than be swallowed up in an infinite abyss and give itself up to what
it cannot conceive or express? Is not our understanding brutish
in the contemplation of such things? We are more perfect in
our understanding when we realize that we cannot understand and
we rest there. It is just the bad parts of eternity
and infinity that we see. What shall we say of the Trinity
or the existence of three persons in the same individual essence?
This is such a mystery that it is denied by many because they
cannot understand it. Is it not indeed a mystery whose
every letter is mysterious? Who could declare the generation
of the sun, the procession of the spirit or the difference
of the one from the other? Thus, the infinite and inconceivable
distance that is between him and us keeps us in the dark as
to any sight of his face or clear apprehension of his perfections. We know him rather by what he
does than by what he is. We understand his doing good,
but not truly his essential goodness. How little a portion of Him,
as Job says, is discovered in this way. Commenting on that
last paragraph, John MacArthur writes, to define the infinite
God in ways we can understand, we often have to state what He
is not for a basis of comparison. For example, when we say that
God is holy, we mean that He has no sin. We cannot conceive
of absolute holiness since we're all too familiar with sin. So all we can do is turn to the
only book that can assist our understanding of God, and that's
the Bible. And we have to turn to the author of this great book
in order to know him. Because knowing what God is like
is foundational to knowing God and knowing God is the essence
of being a Christian. The Apostle John said this in
John 17 3, and this is eternal life. that they may know you the only
true God and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent." Well, having said all of that,
I want to seek to accommodate our understanding by first examining
the existence of God. Notice with me in Genesis chapter
1 what the Bible says about the existence of God. When we look here at Genesis
as we begin, We first understand this in this statement about
the entire Bible, is that the Bible does not seek to prove
the existence of God. It merely assumes it. In Puritan
John Preston, he said this, Now concerning God, two things are
to be known. Number one, that He is. Number
two, what He is. This is like Hebrews 11.6, that
without faith, it's impossible to please Him. But him who comes
to God must believe what? That He is. That's referring
to His existence. And when we look at this, we
must understand that the existence of God is assumed in the Scriptures. The Bible just doesn't seek to
set out to prove it. It assumes it. Now, look at that
in Genesis 1-1. Look how it begins. In the beginning,
God. In the beginning, God. It's not
seeking right there in that passage to prove who this God is. Doesn't
really tell us a whole lot there until you continue to read on
about the power of this Almighty God. And you could go into the
term of Elohim, and we'll look at that in just a few moments,
and learn more about this God. But the Bible simply starts out
by saying, in the beginning, God. That's assumed. His existence is assumed in the
Scriptures. Now, over in Psalm 90, that's
written by Moses. Who wrote Genesis? Moses. And over in verse 2, he elaborates
on that phrase in Genesis 1-1 when he says this, Before the
mountains were brought forth, or ever you had formed the earth
and the world, even from everlasting to everlasting, you are God. What a beautiful verse. See, even the Apostle John makes
an attempt at this in his gospel when he's speaking of God the
Son, the Lord Jesus Christ, when he says this, In the beginning
was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with
God. And you must understand that when you hear the terms
beginning in Genesis 1.1 and John 1.1 and 2, it's not saying
that God had a beginning. See, when your children ask,
Mommy, Where did God come from? You
know, the answer is he's always been. It's not, I don't know. You have a Bible. In the beginning,
God, he's always been. He has no beginning. He has no ending. He's the Alpha
and the Omega. He is the beginning. He is the
end. Everything about him consists
in him. Everything about us consists in him. See, even in John one,
that takes us into the beginning, but it's not referring to the
beginning of the word to assume that he was created or that he
had a beginning. No, it's talking about a realm
in which we are brought into where where our understanding
ceases to exist. In other words, John is saying
in John one one in the beginning, whenever there was a beginning,
was the word. And this word was with God, and
this word was God, explain that for me. You can't. Now, when you look in Genesis
one, one, when it says in the beginning, God, that's taking
us into the beginning of the creations of the heaven and earth,
you just read the rest of the verse. See, some 90 in verse two, I
think it states it appropriately. When it says, again, before the
mountains were brought forth or ever you had formed the earth
and the world, even from everlasting to everlasting, you are God. No beginning, no ending. So we see there. That the existence
of God is assumed in the scriptures, notice, secondly, is revealed
in the creation. See, when you read verses like
Psalm 19.1, which says, the heavens declared the glory of God, and
the firmament shows His handiwork, that right there is telling that
the creation is revealing to us God. We're seeing the effects
of this God that the Bible talks about. Or, as you read in Romans
1, verses 19 and 20, when it says, Because what may be known
of God is manifest in them. For God has shown it to them.
Now, how did He show it to them? It says, For since the creation
of the world, His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood
by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead,
so that they are without excuse. The creation itself is revealing
God. How can you not look up into
the sky or just look at creation around you and say, wow, this
happened by some primeval puddle that decided to want to become
more than a one celled thing. And there we are. I mean, it
makes totally no sense. God has always existed. The Bible
does not set out to prove it. It assumes it directly and it
tells us it in the creation. William Temple, he gives us this
warning. He says it's much worse to have a false idea of God than
no idea at all. My fear is today the church has
a false idea of God. They're not contemplating God. We come in here with with thoughts
of the day, thoughts of the week. When we should be coming in here
contemplating God. Everything that we do in here
is to stimulate you to contemplate God. Expand your mind. Why do we study the word for
an hour to expand your understanding? To expand your understanding
of God in his word. We're not on an ego trip. So the existence of God is assumed
in the Scriptures is revealed In the creation, notice third
is proven theologically. I want to give you six arguments
that theologians propose. The first one is this teleological. This comes from the Greek word
teleos, which means perfection or result or end. See, when you
look at something that has been finished or perfected, you're
concluding that its resulting design must have had a designer. You can't take your watch out
and take it apart and put in all these pieces and stick it
in your pocket, shake your leg and then pull it back out. It's
going to be all put back together again. That watch had a designer. And when we look around and we
see the universe, it had a designer. Design implies a designer. That's the teleological argument. But notice another one, ontological. That comes from the word ointas.
Ointas is a Greek participle from the verb translated to be.
This argument reasons that man's ability to conceive of an absolutely
perfect being implies the reality and the existence of that being. See, that's this is what stands
out to me when you examine the Bible and you see the picture
that the Bible paints of man and puts him in such hopeless
despair that you can't say that this was postulated by man. This was someone outside of man
who put this together. And when you think about God
and you think about this perfect being that right there is proving
the ontological argument. The third one. would be aesthetical. Because there's beauty, because
there's truth in the world, it's logical to assume that somewhere
in the universe is a standard upon which beauty and truth are
based. Well, it doesn't stop there.
Next is volitional. Because man faces a myriad of
choices and exercises volition, it's logical to assume that there
must be an infinite will somewhere. The world exists as an expression
of that will. How about moral? That we know that there is a
right and wrong suggests the necessity of an absolute standard. And the last one would be cosmological. Cosmology is the argument of
cause and effect. The world and the universe exist,
and we conclude that someone made it. That makes more sense
than believing that everything came out of nothing, that at
one point nothing equaled all things. And that's essentially
what the theory of evolution is saying. See, as we carefully
examine the world, we learn more about the one who made it. Think
about it for a moment. The cause of limitless space
must be infinite. The cause of endless time must
be eternal. The cause of perpetual motion
must be powerful. The cause of complexity must
be omniscient. The cause of consciousness must
be personal. The cause of feeling must be
emotional. The cause of will must be volitional. The cause of ethical values must
be moral. The cause of religious values
must be spiritual. The cause of beauty must be aesthetic. The cause of righteousness must
be holy. The cause of justice must be
just. The cause of love must be loving. The cause of life must be living. See, our world gives evidence
that there must be a God who is the cause of all those qualities. And all of those qualities are
merely a reflection of His character in the Bible. The Bible substantiates
every one of them. That's the existence of God. That's looking at it from the
standpoint that the Bible assumes it in the Scriptures, reveals
it in the creation. And we see it proven theologically. Now, before we move on to the
next one, let me just say this. How are we to receive that? How
are we to receive it? Well, it's Hebrews 11, 6. It's
by faith. And it's not even a blind faith.
Yes, there's many things that we can't understand, but by faith
we accept those things. The Word of God will prove itself
like a lion, let it out of the cage, it'll take care of itself.
We don't have to prove it. It's got its own track record.
People have tried to destroy the word. They did try it. They tried to destroy the God
of the word by saying that he is dead. And they can't stop it. Nor can they
stop him. Notice the nature of God. This
is where we look more closely at what the Bible reveals about
the person of God. Now, there are two ways to look
at this. You can look at it according to man and you look at it according
to the Bible. Let's just examine, first of all, according to man.
And here's what you get, Voltaire. Voltaire was a French agnostic.
You know what he said? God created man in his image.
And man returned the favor. I agree. See, man sees God as. As we said, as an eager bellhop. a stern schoolteacher, an impersonal
scientist, a clever magician, a heavenly grandfather, a Mr.
Fix-It, or they see him, as Plato said, as the eternal mind, or
as Albert Einstein had stated, a cosmic force in the universe
that's unknowable. See, man does not see God as
He is revealed in the Bible because he cannot. He's dead. He is blind. And aside from that, he refuses.
He refuses to see him. That's the dilemma. Again, 1
Corinthians 2,14 says that the natural man does not receive
the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him,
nor can he know them because they are spiritually discerned. Well, that's how man looks at
the nature of God. What does the Bible say about
the nature of God? Well, let me just show you a
few things. First of all, the Bible tells us that God is a person.
And how does it tell us this? Well, it describes it in several
ways. First of all, he's described by personal titles. You remember
the disciples prayer? Matthew 6, 9. And you remember
how it begins? Our what? Father. That's a personal
title. Or how about in Psalm 23? We
know what that Psalm is talking about. It says, the Lord is my
what? Shepard, again, another personal title, even in James
two, twenty three, he's referred to as a friend. Romans 11, 34,
he's referred to as a counselor, all of those describe personhood. He is a father, he is a shepherd,
he is a friend, he is a counselor, personal titles. But it doesn't
even stop there. Think about personal pronouns.
Every time you read the Bible, you read he he he you don't read
her. We're talking about God. You don't read it when talking
about God, the Hebrew and Greek scriptures always refer to God
as he rather than by it. And you have Bibles now that
are out today, the TNIV, today's new international version, which
is total blasphemy, because what it's trying to do is give you
a gender neutral Bible. Now, God is it. Well, not only described by.
personal titles and personal pronouns, but also personal characteristics. Think about that. Isaiah fifty
five verse eight says that he thinks. When it says this, for
my thoughts are not your thoughts, nor your ways, my ways, says
the Lord, my thoughts as thinking or Genesis six, seven, when we
see him reacting. When it says that the Lord said,
I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the
earth of man and beast, creeping thing and birds of the air, for
I'm sorry that I have made them. And we see him reacting. We see
him acting. We see his volition, his will. Even in Genesis one, three, we
see those personal characteristics when we hear him speaking, when
he says, then God said, let there be light. All of these are personal
characteristics to speak of personhood. Personal titles, personal pronouns,
personal characteristics all reveal the personhood of God. Notice what else he is. Not only
is he a person, but he is a spirit. Numbers 23, verse 19 says God
is not a man. John 4.24 defines what that means
when it says God is a spirit. And Jesus goes on and further
elaborates that in Luke 24.39 by saying a spirit does not have
flesh and bones. Now, what are you if you do not
have flesh and bones? What are you, class? Nah, you all flunked that one. 1 Timothy 1.17. Turn to 1 Timothy 1.17. If you're
not a man, you are a spirit, and a spirit has not flesh and
bones, what are you? I'll read it. 1 Timothy 1.17. Now to the key, eternal, immortal,
invisible. You don't have flesh and bones. We can't see you. Now that a king eternal, immortal,
invisible to God, who alone is wise, be glory and honor forever
and ever. Amen. Charles Hodge, he said this.
It's impossible to ever estimate the importance of the truth contained
in the simple proposition. God is a spirit. It is involved
in that proposition that God is immaterial. None of the properties
of matter can be predicated to Him. He is not extended or divisible
or compounded or visible or tangible. He has neither bulk nor form.
In revealing, therefore, that God is a spirit, the Bible reveals
to us that no attribute of matter can be predicated of the divine
essence. And even though God is not material,
the Bible does describe Him in a material way. We have in Zechariah
4.10, it refers to the eyes of the Lord. Or Isaiah 50 verse
2 refers to the hand of the Lord. And what is being said by using
those human terms? That is onomatopoetic expression. Anemonic poetic expression, it
comes from a term, anthropos, which is the term where we get
man, and then you have morpheus, the term which we get form. Anthropomorphism. That is, the Bible is describing
God in human form in order to accommodate our finite understanding. When the Bible says, the wings
of the Lord, that's not saying that God has wings. And even
when it says the eyes or the hands of the Lord, it's not saying
that he has an eye or a hand. The Bible says he's a spirit.
A spirit has not flesh and bones. He's invisible. See, he's a person. He's a spirit. Let's go deeper. He's one. He's one. Although the Bible
teaches that there is only one God, Even people in ancient times
quickly developed a belief in large numbers of so-called gods
and goddesses. In fact, the Hebrews had no word
for goddesses. They just called it a god. Many nations were polytheistic. Our nation is polytheistic. At
one time, they were monotheistic belief in one God. And now today,
when you hear the phrase, God bless America, you have to say,
which one? Which God? That's why people get so bent
out of shape when we say Jesus Christ, because we are defining
which one. See, eventually, every nation
created and worshipped its own deities, usually more than one. Many of these, as 1 Samuel 7-3
calls them, foreign gods are named in the Bible, And in most
cases, we're told to what nations that each belong. You had the
list from Mesopotamia, which was a center of idol worship,
and they had the longest list. Listen to this. These were the
names of their gods. You had a drama like animal like
you had bail, which was also known as Marduk. You had Kiwin,
Nebo, Naboo, Nergal, Mishra. Riffin, Sakhoth, Shukoth-Dinoth,
Talmuz and Tartak. That was the names of the gods
from Mesopotamia. Then you had the Syrians, and
the Syrians were devoted to Hishmah and to Raimon, and they also
worshipped under the compound name Hadath-Raimon. And then
you had Israel's eastern neighbors, which was Ammon and Moab. They
worshipped Milcom and Molech and Chemish, respectively, although
the Moabites also worshipped a local manifestation of Baal. The Philistine gods were Dagon
and Beelzebub, which is the equivalent of the New Testament Beelzebul.
Then there was one Canaanite god, Baal, and two Canaanite
goddesses, Asherah and Ashtoreth. They're mentioned frequently
in the Old Testament. Ashtoreth was the same as the Mesopotamian
Ishtar, which was also known as the Queen of Heaven. The gods
of Egypt, they're represented by only two names in the Bible.
We had Ammon and Apis. Niphaz was probably an Elamite
god. You had at least three Greco-Roman
deities. They're mentioned in the New
Testament. You had the Greek goddess Artemis, known as Diana by the
Romans, and the Greek gods Zeus and Hermes, known as Jupiter
and Mercury, respectively, by the Romans. See, the Bible clearly
teaches that the gods of the nations, they have no objective
reality. Even though their worshippers
sincerely believe that they actually exist, the Lord proclaims that
they are no gods. or that the gods are not gods. See, the New Testament further
declares of idols that an idol has no real existence and that
gods made with hands are not gods. It's not surprising, then,
that when the Israelites began to encounter other nations in
significant ways, that is, as early as the time of the Exodus,
you know what they were told? They were told repeatedly that
the Lord is greater than all the gods. And that these so-called
gods were not worthy of Israel's attention or their veneration,
because there is only one God. And to believe that there were
more than one God was blasphemy and idolatry against the one
God. And that's how come when the
Israelites bow down to the gods of the other nations, God severely
chastened them. Well, listen to what the Bible
says. Deuteronomy six, four, the Lord, our God is one Lord,
one Lord. First Corinthians, eight, six,
there is only one God. First Timothy, two, five, there
is one God. Isaiah 44, six, I am the first,
I am the last, and there is no God besides me. And just where
Exodus 20 and verse 5 reveals that God is a jealous God, that
means that He alone is to be worshipped. See, there can be
but one infinite. Because Israel lived in the midst
of a polytheistic society, it was vital that they gave their
allegiance to the one God. See, beloved, that's the God
of the Bible. And when you have somebody coming
along postulating something different than this and you saying, listen,
that's not the God of the Bible. Let me take this into another
area. And that is God is three. He's a person, he's a spirit,
he's one. And he's three, he said, oh,
wait a minute, that that just makes totally no sense. You just
said he's one. You gave me a good argument. Well, he's three. God is one,
yet he exists as three distinct persons that is revealed in the
Bible from the beginning to the end. You know, the Old Testament expresses
the plurality of the Godhead in its very opening words, go
back to Genesis one one. What's it say again? In the beginning,
God. Let's look at a little bit of
Hebrew, the Hebrew word for God in that verse is Elohim. You
have a. A plural suffix at the end of
that word is I am. That plural suffix is telling
us that this word is plural, but the term itself is singular. So what that word is saying is
presenting God as a singular God who is expressed in plurality. That's what you get in the very
first verse of the Bible in the beginning, God and this God is
expressed in plurality. Now, we see elsewhere in Genesis
where we hear these terms of plural go to chapter one, verse
twenty six. And what does it say? Then God
said, let us make man in our image according to our likeness. Who said this? God did. And now
you're hearing plurality. He didn't say, then God said,
let me make man in my image according to my likeness. No, he said,
let us make man in our image according to our likeness. That's
plurality. Go to chapter three, verse twenty
two. Also uses the plural. Then the
Lord God said, behold, the man has become like one of us to
know good and evil, and now lest he put out his hand and take
also the tree of life and eat and live forever. Again, plurality. If you go into chapter 11 of
Genesis, you find in verse seven when the Lord was about to destroy
the Tower of Babel, he said this come. Let us go down in there
and confuse their language that they may not understand one another's
speech. So we see here from the very
first verse of the Bible in the beginning, God, Elohim, singular
God, singular term, but with a plural suffix at the end, the
I am ending is plural. We have a singular God existing
in a form of plurality. And then you see that following
its pattern. As you hear him say, let us are
Back and forth with those plural terms. Now, beloved, when you
begin to follow the Bible, you begin to see distinctions between
members of the Trinity, their parent in the Old Testament.
For example, in Genesis 19, verse 24, it says, Then the Lord rained
brimstone and fire on Sodom and Gomorrah from the Lord out of
the heavens. There you're seeing a distinction
in the Godhead. It starts with the Lord rain
brimstone and then it says from the Lord out of the heavens.
It's showing a distinction there again, Charles Hodge, he says
this, we find throughout the Old Testament constant mission
made of a person to him, though distinct from Jehovah as a person,
the titles, attributes, the works of Jehovah are nevertheless ascribed. This person is called the angel
of God, the angel of Jehovah, the angel of Adonai, the angel
of Elohim. And he claims divine authority,
he exercises divine prerogatives, he receives divine homage. Now, some time back, we did do
a study on the angel of the Lord. And we saw that when you get
into the New Testament, that the angel of the Lord ceases
to exist. And what does that tell us there?
Well, it tells us that the angel, the Lord. Was no other than the
Lord Jesus Christ. Because what you have in the
Old Testament, you have a theophany or Christophany, you have a pre-incarnate
appearance of Christ after the New Testament, you have no more
appearance of this angel. No more appearance, no more reference,
no more mention of him. What you have is the word becoming
flesh. Hodges goes on to say, besides this, we have the express
testimony of the inspired writers of the New Testament that the
angel, the Lord, the manifested Jehovah, who led the Israelites
through the wilderness and who dwelt in the temple was Christ.
That is, the angel was the word who became flesh and fulfilled
the work which it was predicted the Messiah should accomplish.
Again, you see. Divine characteristics subscribed
to this angel. Not just to any angel, but to
the angel of Jehovah. Now, again, in the Old Testament,
you find distinctions in the Trinity apparent all throughout
the Old Testament. For example, number six, verse
22, it says, And the Lord spoke to Moses, saying, Speak to Aaron
and his son, saying, This is the way you should bless the
children of Israel. Say this to them. The Lord bless you and
keep you. The Lord make His face shine
upon you and be gracious to you. The Lord lift up His countenance
upon you and give you peace. The Lord, the Lord, the Lord.
What do you have? You have a distinction. You have
the plurality. Plus, we also note in the Old
Testament, you have the mission of the Spirit. Go back to Genesis
1.1. What do you have there? You have in the beginning God,
Elohim, plural suffix at the end, singular term, speaking
of a senior God existing in a form of plurality. And then you see,
as you read on in verse two, that the earth was without form
and void and darkness was on the face of the deep and the
spirit of God. Now you're getting an identification
in that plurality. Again, in the Old Testament,
you have prophecy of a coming Messiah and this coming Messiah,
according to Isaiah, chapter nine, would be the mighty God. So, again, there's your distinction.
On his shoulders, he would be called wonderful counselor, the
mighty God, the everlasting father, Prince of Peace. And all throughout
the Bible, that's what you see. So, again, the Bible doesn't
even seek to prove the Trinity assumes it. Just as it assumes
the existence of God, it tells us that this God, this singular
God, this one God is three. But not three gods. One God. Existing in this form of plurality,
three distinct persons, father, son, Holy Spirit. You know, Jehovah's Witnesses
attack this doctrine, this is one of the first major doctrines
that they attack. As they're seeking to make converts. I remember
spending some time with a gentleman at a last church who was being
sucked into the Jehovah's Witnesses, and we sat down and argued over
this doctrine of the Trinity. He'd walk out of there convinced
that the Bible taught the Trinity and he'd spend some more time
around them. And then he was unconvinced. And I kept telling
you, you got to stay away from them. They're teaching heresy,
they're teaching false doctrine, they're not bringing the doctrine
of this book. If you meet someone that does not believe in the
Trinity, can they be saved? No. Then guess what, folks? T.D. Jakes is not saved. He doesn't
believe in the Trinity. Do you know that? Some of I hope
you're not buying his stuff. And so I don't watch TV and praise
the Lord, don't watch it. Best thing to do, stay away from
it. It's the most confusing channel on the air. I was given a choice
to listen to between something pagan and something like that,
I'd rather listen to the pagan stuff. At least I know exactly
where they stand. But yet, with the TVN kind of
stuff, you don't know where in the world they stand. It's confusing
every time you turn it on. So you see these distinctions.
Notice also distinctions between the members of the Trinity that
are apparent in the New Testament. Go with me to Matthew, chapter
three. Here in Matthew, chapter three,
as Jesus is being baptized by John the Baptist there in verse
16, The Holy Spirit is descended on him like a dove. And then
you have the father replying in verse 17, what's he say? This
is my beloved son. In whom I am well pleased. And you see right there, all
three members, you see the father, the son and the Holy Spirit together
in the same verse identified nothing confusing about that,
nothing veiled. where you might think it's appearing
veiled in the Old Testament. It's very clear right here. You
have the Lord Jesus Christ, you have the Holy Spirit, and you
have the Father, showing three distinctions. Go with me to John
14. And notice in John 14, verse
16, where Jesus said this, And I will pray the Father And he
will give you another helper that he may abide with you forever.
The spirit of truth in the world cannot receive because it neither
sees him nor knows him. But you know him for he dwells
with you and will be in you. There you have Jesus speaking,
he says, I'll pray to the father that he may give you the spirit
of truth. There you have the distinction.
You have them named Father, Son, Holy Spirit. You say, well, I
need it to be a little bit more clearer than that. OK, in 1 John,
chapter five. It says here, verse seven, for
there are three who bear witness in heaven, the Father, the Word
and the Holy Spirit, and these three are one. How about that? Three in one. Jesus said, John
10, 30, I and the father are one. They knew exactly what he
said when Jesus said in John 8, 58, I am who I am. What was he claiming? He was
claiming to be the I am of the Exodus there in Exodus three,
when Moses said, Who shall I say is sending me? And God said,
I am who I am. And Jesus used that very phrase
to describe himself. And they said that was blasphemy
and they sought to kill him. Remember, in first Corinthians
12, when it talks about the gifts. It says in verse four that there
are diversities of gifts, but the same spirit, there are differences
of ministries, but the same Lord, and there are diversities of
activities, but it is the same God who works all in all. And there you have the spirit,
the Lord and God distinction. Second Corinthians 1314 ends
this way benediction, the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ and
the love of God and the communion of the Holy Spirit be with you
all. Amen. Now, beloved. Can we get any clearer than that?
I mean, even take first Peter one to elect according to the
foreknowledge of God, the father in sanctification of the spirit
for obedience of the blood of Jesus Christ. Grace to you and
peace be multiplied. Three in one, the God we serve
is one God. We serve one God, we're monotheistic. If you believe in more than one
God, you're polytheistic. Jehovah's Witnesses say, no,
we believe in one God. But in John one, one, they say
in the beginning was the word and the word was a God. What
are you doing now? They throw in this indefinite
article, you know what, folks in Greek, there is no such thing
as an indefinite article, no such thing. They're making up
articles. That verse says, in the beginning
was the word and the word was with God and the word was God. The word always continually existed
as God, and it always continually existed with God. You're even
seeing that distinction right there in that verse. The word
was with God. Who is the word? John the Apostle
is the only one that uses that term to describe the Lord Jesus
Christ, because he tells us in Revelation that the word is the
Lord Jesus Christ. So again, you're seeing the distinction
in John one, one, the word is the Lord Jesus Christ and you
have God, the father, the word was with God, the father, prostrate
on face to face with God. That's what he left. He left
heaven's glory to come to earth in utter humiliation to bear
our sin. Go with me over to John 17, just
listen to his prayer. In John 17. It says in verse
one, Jesus spoke these words, lifted up his eyes to heaven
and he said, Father, the hour has come, glorify your son, that
your son also may glorify you. And as you have given him authority
over all flesh, then he should give eternal life to as many
as you have given him. And this is eternal life that
they may know you. See, eternal life is not just
the length of life, it's the quality of life. He says that they may know you
the only true God and Jesus Christ whom you have sinned. I have
glorified you on Earth. I have finished the work which
you have given me to do. And now, O Father, glorify me together
with yourself, with the glory which I had with you. When? When? Before the world was. Jesus wasn't created. Jehovah's
Witnesses want to say he was created. Mormons think he was
created. Mormons say that Jesus and Satan are brothers. Do you
know that? Mormons have a very fairy tale
belief. They believe that that they'll become gods inhabiting
their own planet and the wives will be eternally pregnant. Does
that make you feel, ladies? I'm surprised that that that
religion is popular at all among women. And if a woman is not
willing to become a Mormon, The husbands are told to divorce
him. And vice versa. That's idolatry, folks. To think
anything other than what the Bible says about our triune God
is idolatry. You know what, folks? Anytime
you're sitting there and you're seeking to worship and an improper
thought comes in your mind about God, that's idolatry. Or you're
in a situation, you go, oh, I just can't believe God would do that.
That's idolatry. May ask a simple question. Who
can comprehend the Trinity? God is three in one. And one
in three. That's an eternal mystery. I don't want to try to describe
God as an egg where you have the shell, the yoke and. In the
white there, you have three in one, God is more than an egg,
OK? or where you have the breakdowns
of water. I mean, God is more than that. I like what J.I. Packer wrote. He says, Here we
face the most dizzying and unfathomable truth of all, the truth of the
Trinity. What should we make of it? In
itself, the divine triunity is a mystery, a transcendent fact
which passes our understanding. How the one eternal God is eternally
both singular and plural, how Father, Son and Spirit are personally
distinct, yet essentially one is more than we can know. And
any attempt to explain it, to dispel the mystery by reasoning,
as distinct from confessing it from Scripture, is bound to falsify
it. Here as elsewhere, our God is
too big for His creature's little minds. See, I look at it this
way, when you try to figure this out, this is when you have a
lot of leakage. Because you cannot reduce the infinite mind of God
to finite understanding. That's why, folks, we come at
this with faith. By faith, and you read that there
in Hebrews 11. And you see people ask, how were
they saved in the Old Testament, the same way they're saved in
the New Testament? They look to a coming Messiah who would
come and take away their sin. We look back to the cross. They
look forward to the cross. They're saved by grace through
faith. Grace is evident all throughout the Old Testament. Grace was
evident the very moment that Adam and Eve sinned, that God
didn't destroy them right then. God said, in the day that you
eat of it, you shall surely die. Did they die immediately? Well,
they died spiritually immediately, and that was pictured by them
being forced out of the garden. But did they die physically 900
years later? That's grace. Without faith, it's impossible
to please him. For he who comes to God must
believe that he is. And that he is a rewarder of
those who diligently seek him. By faith. See, beloved, when I just even
go back to that sermon. Of Spurgeon, age of 20, he had
it right. To talk about the contemplation
of the Godhead that is humbling and expanding. This doctrine,
which expands the mind, also humbles the soul. He who often thinks of God will
have a larger mind than the man who simply plods around this
narrow globe. We cannot comprehend this triune
God. But we do know that he is a father who loves us. He's a
son who died for us. And he is a spirit who comforts
us. That's the triune God. And do you know him personally?
We never take for granted that everybody in here saved. Because
we know that you can be self deceived. Otherwise, you wouldn't
hear like 2nd Corinthians 13, examine yourselves to see whether
you be in the faith, prove yourselves, he says, or like what it says
in James. When it gives illustration after
illustration after illustration of what is true living faith. See, 1 John 5, 13, it says, These
things I have written to you who believe in the name of the
Son of God, that you may know that you have eternal life and
that you may continue to believe in the name of the Son of God.
See, when we're given that much and we're given what is revealed
from the Bible, the Bible is telling us we can know this God. We can't know all about this
God that. We think we can know. There are
secret things that belong to the Lord. There's things that
he reveals to us from his word. And just like as Moses said to
God, I want to see you, and so he puts him there in the cleft
of the rock and he passes by and he says, the Lord is merciful,
gracious, and he was showing him the back parts of God. And
listen, folks, that's all we get. The back parts of God. But, you know, one day. As a
child of God, the Bible says that we will see him. See, the only way that you can
come to know this triune God is to repent of your sin and
to place your trust in him. You trust him with all your life. That's an awesome God. Father,
we just come to you right now. And we ask that you would grant
us understanding tonight. of your Holy Word, Lord, that you would assist our
finite minds in what we have talked about tonight. And seeing
your personhood, seeing that you are a spirit, seeing that
you are one, seeing that you are three. Lord, that's all our mind can
handle. And Lord, we believe by faith
That you do exist. And we believe your word. And
Lord, we have tried and tested your word and your word has done
exactly what it said it would do. It has totally transformed
us. Your word says it's perfect converting
the soul. Lord, tonight, I pray that there's
a soul in here that hasn't been converted, that you would convert
it right now. Show that one their sin and show
them the Savior who came to take away their sin. We praise you for our time together
tonight, Lord. May the response be from all
your children, God, praise and worship and adoration. At what you have given to us
tonight from your word. We pray these things in Jesus
name, Amen.
Our Triune God
Series Doctrine of God
What does the Bible say about the existence and nature of God? Is it alright to speculate what God is like or is that idolatry? Listen as Pastor Steve teaches on "The Doctrine of God."
(Lecture #1 - SYS220 - Doctrine of God)
| Sermon ID | 51706205927 |
| Duration | 1:01:38 |
| Date | |
| Category | Midweek Service |
| Bible Text | Genesis 1:1 |
| Language | English |
Add a Comment
Comments
No Comments
© Copyright
2026 SermonAudio.