00:00
00:00
00:01
Transcript
1/0
And Stephen, full of grace and
of power, was doing great wonders and signs amongst the people.
And some of those who belonged to the synagogue of the freedmen,
as it was called, and of the Cyrenians, and of the Alexandrians,
and of those from Cilicia and Asia, they rose up and they disputed
with Stephen. But they could not withstand
the wisdom and the spirit with which he was speaking. Then they
secretly instigated men who said, we have heard them speak blasphemous
words against Moses and God. And they stirred up the people
and the elders and the scribes, and they came upon him and seized
him and brought him before the council. And they set up false
witnesses who said, This man never ceases to speak words against
this holy place and the law. For we have heard him say that
this Jesus of Nazareth will destroy this place and will change the
customs of Moses delivered to us. And gazing at him, all who
sat in the council saw that his face was like the face of an
angel. Let's pray. Heavenly Father,
we come before you and we ask that your grace and your mercy
would be upon us. And Father, I pray that as we
go to your word, we pray that this word would strengthen us.
We pray that this word would build us up in our faith. We
pray that this word would be such that if there are those
here who do not have faith, that you would call them to faith
as well. We pray that you would be glorified and honored and
that you would be praised and proclaimed and now all that is
said and read and done and that you would do this either through
me or in spite of me. And this I pray in Jesus's name.
Amen. I wanna talk a little bit today
because we have Stephen. And most of us who kind of grew
up around the church know a little bit about Stephen and his life.
And really the distinguishing feature of Stephen is not that
he was a deacon, though that's important. But this distinguishing
feature about Stephen is that he is the first reported martyr
after Pentecost. And so that's really kind of
what we remember and mark Stephen for. But as we talk about Stephen,
I want to just... spend a few minutes and kind
of talk to your heart a little bit about talking. And I had
a professor in seminary who used to, every once in a while, he
would kind of stop his lecturing and he'd say, man, put your pens
down and close up your notebooks and put your eyes on me because
now it's Coach Justly that's talking to you and not not your
professor. And that's what he would do every
once in a while. And those were probably, in David
Jefferson's lectures to us, probably those times that were most practical
and most meaningful. And he used that. He had been
a college football player. And actually, his first job out
of college was as one of those those radio talk show announcer
guys, you know, that do the radio versions of football games and
such. And he had just this great voice
for that before he eventually went into the ministry and served
and eventually ended up as a professor down there. I want to talk to
you in that way for just a few minutes today. Because we've
seen this kind of thing before. Stephen is speaking, the people
don't like what Stephen is saying, and they try and argue with him,
they fail in arguing with him, and so the next result is to
say, well, let's arrest him and get rid of him. You know, let's
use force and power and boot him to the street. You've heard
me say this before, and I will continue to say this more willingly
as long as I live, that the use of force, the use of bullying,
the use of intimidation to get your way is the work of people
who are weak-minded, and you cannot defend the position that
they're holding with reading and conversation. One of the
things that I am really concerned about, about our culture. You know, when you turn on the
news, you read the headlines, usually that's about as far as
I get, and I typically choose One that's known for being on
the left, and one that's known for being on the right. And I
read both of their headlines and figure out that somewhere
in between is probably what really happened. And there have not
been meetings within anybody's political preferences there.
But I fear that we have lost the ability as a culture, largely,
to have civil discourse. You know, the symbol of this
course is when two people or two groups of people, or sometimes
more than two groups of people, sit down together and they have
a sober-minded conversation. that is respectful, that is deliberate
and intentional, where you actually listen to what the other person
has to say. And when I say listen to what
the other person has to say, I don't mean I'm listening to
you long enough to figure out what I need to say next to attack
you. But to listen to what the other
person says, you kind of have to get an understanding of what
they mean. That doesn't mean don't disagree. It doesn't mean
that there's no such thing as absolute truth, and that all
truths are equal. That's what our postmodern culture
will say. Don't hear me wrong, there is
absolute truth. We don't necessarily have a monopoly
on it, but God does, and his word is the monopoly on absolute
truth. Okay, so the closer we get to
this, the closer we get to absolute truth, right? I think that's
something that most of us would agree on in principle. But sometimes
we don't agree on that in practice. Sometimes we fall into the habit. And social media is probably
about one of the worst ways that we do this. Because social media
rants tend to be just that. They tend to be rants with everybody
talking in different directions and nobody actually engaging
each other with meaningful conversation. Let me speak to your hearts for
a little bit. Don't be guilty of that. In any context, whether
it's on Facebook, and you know, Facebook's a great place to post
things, and I'd be the first to admit that I'm one of those
guys. I will post things that are sometimes Contentious isn't meant to be
the right word. Controversial. Especially in
things that I'm passionate about, like Christianity, like the pro-life
movement, and things along those lines. And sometimes those can
spark controversy. But when somebody challenges
you or says something, be intentional about listening to what they
say. And engage the ideas. Argue with the ideas that they
have, and maybe not necessarily against the person. But we tend
to don't do a good job of that as a society. Don't make that
mistake. I think one of the reasons that
Christianity, that reasoned Christianity is not growing in America today
is that we forgot how to do that. And everybody wants to talk in
sound bites. You know, and we've fallen into the trap of letting
us be pulled into the soundbite world. But conversation doesn't
happen in soundbites. Conversation needs to be held
in such a way that we listen to each other with respect, with
a degree of reverence. It's nothing new. What we're
seeing here in the Book of Acts over and over again, and as we
go through the Book of Acts, and if you continue reading past
where we're gonna take a break from the Book of Acts in a couple
weeks, you're gonna continue seeing that kind of thing take
place. So there's nothing new under
the sun. Solomon said that a long time ago, okay? But as Christians,
we have something that is absolutely true. And so we shouldn't, be
afraid of engaging people in reasoned, rational, polite conversation. Kindness. By the way, what's
interesting to me about that word, kindness, it's used in
the Bible a bunch. In fact, in Paul, when he writes,
you know, all about the things above it in 1 Corinthians 13,
kindness is one of those attributes that comes out above. Alright? But in the Christian world, kindness
is seen to be a virtue. In the Roman world, it was seen
to be a weakness. It was not something that people
looked to and aspired towards. I fear that we've run into that
same context today, where we're not intentionally kind to people
that we perhaps disagree with. And again, being kind doesn't
mean that we don't take strong stances on things. It doesn't
mean that every desire or every idea deserves respect. There's
some really stupid ideas out there, and those stupid ideas
deserve to be mocked. God mocks them. Psalm chapter
two, God mocks those who rise up against him. There's a place
for that. But if our goal is genuinely
to say, We want to engage with you so that at the end of the
day that we both agree with this, then beating each other up is
typically not going to be real successful in achieving that
goal and that end. You hear me? You hear me when
I say that? When you're on Facebook this
afternoon, or this evening, or tomorrow, or whenever, or for
maybe a generation down the Instagram world that I still haven't figured
out, or there's another thing like Instagram, Snapchat, or
those kinds of things. Us in the Generation X, we know
a little bit about Twitter that we haven't always figured out
how to use it right. You know, there's lots of those kinds of
things. Let me challenge you to be intentional about what
you say. Make sure that every word that you say is chosen deliberately,
but then also apply that not just to what you do online, but
to the conversations that you have with each other. Because
sometimes, And I think part of the other reason that the church
in America, in the West, is in decline, largely, is because
we oftentimes don't have those same kind of kindness attitudes
towards one another. Now, I heard a pastor once say,
remind us to say, look, remember when you're talking to another
Christian, part of the church, Jesus described the church as
his bride. You know, and ask yourself before
you say something to somebody who is a professing Christian,
would I want somebody saying the same thing to my bride? And
say, I'm gonna respect the bride of Christ. So there's a little
bit different standard for a believer and non-believer, but we don't
always know who all the elect are either, those whose names
are in the Lamb's Book of Life. And so we want our conversations
marked with kindness. And that also doesn't mean that we just be quiet to maintain
peace. Sometimes we interpret that.
One of the errors of my grandparent generation, especially, was that
they were quiet about things of importance, particularly their
faith. And as a result, they didn't pass those along well
to the next generation. Don't fall into their trap. And
engage bad ideas in the culture. But again, do it with a degree
of respect and dialogue with the person in kindness. There's
a phrase that I brought and was given to me by one of my professors
in seminary. It says, be hard on ideas, but
soft on people. Be gentle with people, but hard
on the ideas. And when you kind of work through
that in that way, you build relationship and you build respect. And you
don't fall into the trap of these guys. And so really what I want
you to kind of wrap your heads around as we look at Stephen's
account. Okay, we're introduced to Stephen.
We were introduced to him last week in a context. He's one of
the deacons. He's actually the first of the
deacons to be mentioned. His name is a Greek name. And
so he's one of the Hellenists. So even these first deacons weren't
all Jews. Some of these were Greeks. Stephen
is one of them. And up until this point, they've
been largely picking on the Apostles. they've gotten a little bit sidetracked,
and they go, well, we're not gonna take on the apostles. Maybe
if we can't get down, let's go after one of the underlings of
the apostles, if you will, one of the second generation, if
you will, that was converted under the ministry of the apostles.
Maybe if we can't take this group down, we'll take this group down
on their knees. That may be one of the reasons
that they're targeting Stephen. Maybe they look at how Stephen
is described. He's described as being full
of grace and truth, and he's performing wonders and signs. And we've talked about wonders
and signs, and when we talk about wonders and signs, one of the
things I told you was that you normally see that when it comes
to the work of the apostles. This is an exception to the rule.
You don't say, OK, well, we're going to throw out the rule.
We're just going to make all new rules based on the exceptions.
We don't do that. The exception doesn't define
the rule. The exception is just that. It's an exception to the
rule. Stephen is an exception to the rule. Maybe they were
just assuming he's one of the apostles because he worked miracles.
We don't know. We're not really told all of
those details in terms of why, other than the fact that he has
distinguished himself. By the way, if you remember,
just to kind of remind you of some things. When we talked about
wonders and signs, we gave a definition for that. And we said that the
definition of wonders and signs are those things which God does
through His people to demonstrate that He is God of gods. That
He is the God of the universe and those Stephen is identified in this
way by these signs, these signs and wonders that are being done
through him as an exception. By the way, the phrase full of
grace and truth, that's only used of one other person in the
Bible, and I think stuff like that is interesting when you
bump into things like that. You wanna take a guess as to
who that is? Jesus, you bet. And this is John
1, 14. Jesus is described as full of
grace and truth. Stephen is as well. He's the
only other one. That says a lot about his faith. But I think
Luke, as he's writing the book of Acts, is being intentional
too. And as he's being intentional,
he's giving us a foretaste of what's to come. Because Jesus
was who he was, working with signs and wonders, full of grace
and truth. put him to death, Stephen is
gonna follow in that same pattern of his life. And so I think it's
important that we highlight and notice that. Okay, and so he
meets opposition. There's a little bit of a different
group of opposition. Up until this point, it's always
been the priests, the Sadducees, the Pharisees, and the scribes,
and all of those guys that we're used to from the Gospels that
are coming after the apostles. Here's a layman. Here's a layman
that are coming. We're told that the opposition
is coming from the synagogue of the freemen. Now, that's actually
a reference, and interestingly enough, in the, I think it was
in the 50s or something, but in the 20th century, they actually,
it was earlier than that, it was in the early 19-teens or
20s, they actually found a synagogue dedicated to those who were free
Jewish slaves. They had been slaves to the Romans,
given their freedom, it earned that freedom, and they established
their own synagogue in Jerusalem. And we found actually a reference
to that in the archeological digs around Jerusalem. I think that's interesting when
we bump into pieces of history like that. So that's the context. These guys have been slaves.
And they're worshiping together. They don't like what Stephen
is having to say. And they're certainly not able to argue against
it. And then we're told that there's Cyrenians, or people
who were from the city or the region of Cyrene, and Alexandrians,
people from Alexandria. This is an area in North Africa. Alexandria is, of course, the
area of Egypt that we would call today. And Cyrene is closer to
the area of Libya, of what we would call it today. It wasn't
called Libya back then, obviously. And so these guys aren't real
happy. So these North African Jews are
coming in and they're trying to contend with Stephen and they're
losing over and over and over again to him. And then we're
also told that they're from Cilicia and Asia. Both of those regions
are located in modern day Turkey. So we've got people from the
southwest and from the northwest that are coming along with these
free Jews and they're bringing opposition. By the way, an interesting
piece of tidbit may be helping to connect the dots. The capital
city of the region of Cilicia was a city called Tarsus. Saul of Tarsus, Paul the Apostle
comes from that region. That's why he was given, obviously,
the title that he had. He may have been one of the guys
helping to stir things up with his own kinsmen. And that would,
again, we're inferring some things, but that would make sense given
the fact that he shows up at the end of the next chapter when
Stephen is put to death. And so any connecting dots are
important to see where some of these figures show up and where
they come from. Because I don't think anything
in history happens by accident. And if we follow our Heidelberg
Catechisms, and those of you in the Confirmation class will
see it in a couple weeks, when we talk about Providence. God
governs all things by His Providence. So here we have all of these
pieces of the puzzle coming together. And so they try and reason with
Him. And they fail. And they're unable
to do that. And there's a notation there
that they just can't contend with his wisdom and his spirits.
Spirit is capitalized in most of our Bibles, not all of the
translations. There's some of the places where
the word spirit, we don't know for sure whether it refers to
the Holy Spirit, him, the third member of the Trinity, or whether
it refers to the spirit that we're given And so context has
to help us kind of interpret that, whether it's a capital
spirit, as in terms of God himself, giving Stephen the words, which
is what Jesus promised, or whether it's a spirit of God in Stephen,
who is giving the word, giving him the boldness to speak as
he ought. Again, some of our Bibles make
that decision for us, but that's the context that we're seeing
here. And so the solution, rather than going back to the drawing
board, revaluating Stephen's arguments, saying, hmm, he's
right or he's wrong, or he's lining up with scriptures or
he's not, and if he's right, then I need to conform my ideas
to what I'm being taught now, which is what the favorite Marines
were doing, by the way, when Paul eventually gets to them.
But they don't do that. They hire some thugs. some folks that are willing to
do just about anything for a bribe in terms of money, and they come
along and say, this guy, Stephen, is speaking blasphemous words
against Moses and God. It's not right fabrication. What
were the blasphemous words? that Jesus is the very son of
the creator Moses. Well, Jews would consider that
blasphemy perhaps, but in the entirety of scripture, he's not. He's not speaking about blasphemous
words against God because he's speaking about, again, Jesus
being God in the flesh. But that's what they're accusing
him of. And so they trump up these charges and get the elders
and the scribes involved. And Stephen is now arrested,
and he's taken to trial before the council. Same council that's
been dealing with the apostles all along. This is at Sanhedrin.
You've heard plenty about Sanhedrin thus far. And they have a charge
that they officially lay out against him. based on false witnesses,
that's verse 13. And the charge is that this man
never ceases to speak words against the holy place and the law. The holy place is the temple.
In fact, it goes on to say this holy place. This is something that I want
you to catch, because there's a half-truth at work here. One
of the things that I would just simply say, wicked people do,
when they're trying to win an argument by power, force, and
intimidation. It is a kind of speak half-truths
about what you're saying. They take some of the words that
you've said, they take those words out of context, and they
twist them to mean something entirely different. Okay? Yes, Stephen is speaking against
the Temple. What is he saying about the Temple?
Then the Temple doesn't have any need anymore, because Jesus
is the greater Temple. Jesus is going to see this Temple
torn down by the way that's prophetic, that happens in the year 70 AD,
when God sends the Roman armies. to tear down the temple all the
way to the ground, not even when rock is, when stone is laid upon
another after they're done. They burned them, burned the
place to the ground, destroyed everything that is there. They
razed the city. Jesus was being prophetic. See,
he was repeating what Jesus had been saying. Not blasphemy, though,
because Jesus is the greatest Hebrews 10, verse 10, that another
sacrifice never needs to be made. And one of the wonderful things
about, again, God's providence in history is if you do some
research in history, every time somebody's tried to rebuild the
temple, tried to restart sacrifices on the Temple Mount, God sends
an army and absolutely wiped them out before they could do
so. And now an Islamic mosque sits upon the Temple Mount, preventing
that from ever happening again. Yeah, I know there's a bunch
of conspiracy theories that say, well, yeah, we've got the rock.
It's silly stuff. OK? God placed a mosque on top
of that Temple Mount so that people wouldn't try and continue
sacrificing, because his son already did that work. And so
if we were to ever sacrifice anything ever again, that would
demean the sacrifice of Jesus. Why would we ever entertain that
idea? People have, people do, and God
prevented it in His providence. So that's what they say. So yeah,
it's true. He's speaking against the temple.
The lesser temple. Glorifying the greater temple.
But speaking against the law, he's not speaking against the
law. The law is in force. The law is still in force today,
beloved. The difference is that if you
are a born-again believer in Jesus Christ, if you are saved,
and you're trusting in Jesus as your Lord and your Savior,
Jesus has fulfilled the law on your behalf. So the law is still
enforced. Jesus just fulfilled it for those
who are His own. Not for everybody, but those
who are His own. And thus, we don't need to bear
the burden of living up to the law. Praise the Lord, because
we can't. That's the problem of man. We
can't live up to the law of God. That's what Stephen is teaching. And next week, we're gonna spend
some time looking at his sermon in terms of his response to these
guys. But this is the charge that's being placed. Something
that is true, something that is false. And when false teachers
come into your midst, that's how they always work. We used
to say that if the devil wanted to infiltrate the church, he
wouldn't do so by putting on a red costume with horns and
carrying a pitchfork. That's not how he infiltrates
the church. He infiltrates the church with
little bad ideas that are mixed in with truth. And we kind of
say, OK, well, we compromise a little bit for the bad idea.
And then we kind of go a little bit further and a little bit
further. And eventually, we end up with something that doesn't
look like historic Christianity altogether. And you can look
around, and you see it all over the place in terms of the history
of the church and the way the churches have fallen. You know,
I gotta say, when I was in seminary, and when I was before seminary,
I hated church history. I hated history in general. I
was not a historian guy. I liked World War II history
because I could talk and talk about tanks and aircraft carriers,
and those things were kind of cool. But beyond that, I really
wasn't interested much in history. Maybe Roman soldiers, and that
was kind of cool, too. But as a whole, I was not a history
guy. But as I went through seminary and I got into the church for
the first time, I began realizing how important our history was.
Not just that it's rich and it's thorough and it's wonderful,
but it's important because it's what keeps us grounded. It's
what keeps us from being tempted to go astray. It's all of those
bad ideas. And when we forget our history,
we make the same mistakes that those before us have made. So
yeah, I've learned that history is very important for us as a
church. Whether that's our favorite pastime or not is irrelevant.
What's relevant is the fact that it is one of the tools that God
has given us to preserve truth and orthodoxy in the life of
God's people. Okay, we need to do that. And
one of the cool things about these sermons, and what Peter,
or what Peter has preached, and what Stephen's about to preach,
is we see them talking about it in church history, over and
over again, going through the Old Testament, reminding us of
the great things that God has done in His faithfulness. He is preaching against the temple,
but he's not preaching against the law. The law still stands. He's just saying that it's fulfilled.
They explain in verse 14 a little bit further, because he's preaching
that this Jesus of Nazareth guy, you know, the one that we killed,
will destroy this place, that's the temple, and will change the
customs of Moses delivered to us. Again, half truths. Yeah, Jesus is going to destroy
this place. He was going to see the temple
razed to the ground in judgment for what they did. In judgment
for putting the Lord of life on the cross of death. That's truth. The customs of
the Jews are going to change. One way or the other. Because
we're liberated in Christ from that. We don't need to keep track
of all 600 and some 700 laws that they have and rules that
the Pharisees made up. Praise the Lord that we don't
have to keep track of all of those things. That's good stuff
for us to be encouraged. But that's how people do it. And when people will challenge
you, they will again challenge you with half-truths. I can't
tell you how often times when I engage with atheists, they'll
say, but you believe this. Well, sort of. You know, the joke at topics
when some of those questions come up is that we say yes. You
know, it's a combination of yes and no, because what they're
charging us with is a little bit of truth and a lot of falsehood.
And so we need to clear out the falsehood to reveal the truth. That's part of what we're called
to do. And so they go on and they gaze
at him. And we'll talk about what he
talks about next week. But they gaze at him and makes
a wonderful statement. That he had the face of an angel.
Now, that's a phrase that gets used in the Bible, and you wanna
see an example of what that looks like, turn to 2 Samuel 19.27
sometime, and read through that section of scripture. I wanna just simply state what
that means. The first is this idea that he
has confidence, not just simply that he is speaking truth of
God as part of it, but he's doing it confidently. Angels don't
get afraid. They don't get scared about men. Stephen wasn't afraid to engage
with the truth. Too often times, when somebody
challenges us, we back out. We cower underneath of their
attacks. Don'ts. Stephen didn't. Of course,
that makes him a little bit more angry. But Stephen didn't as
well. He stood before them, and he
engaged them. Let me just kind of wrap this
morning up with a couple observations. First of all, opposition is part
of the Christian life. If you're not facing opposition
of one sort or another for the faith that you hold, you need
to re-examine the faith that you hold and the lifestyle that
you're living. Simple as that. There will be
seasons where we get a break. But if you look at your life
as a whole, you're going to face opposition when you hold to the
truth. because we are not of this world,
and we live in this world. That's just the reality. Jesus
told us it was gonna be the reality. The apostles told us that it
was gonna be the reality, and this is what we see demonstrated
in the book of Acts. Yes, they may not arrest you,
they may not stone you, they may not weep with you, they may
not beat you, they may not put you to death, but again, they
will seek to intimidate you into silence. or at least within the walls
of your church when you gather. One of the phrases that boggled my mind when one of these
more liberal types was thought and said that we don't have anything
against those Christians and their religion, we just want
them to keep it on the same level as their knitting clubs. And
for the ladies who are knitting, this is not meant as a dig. But
your Christianity is far more important than your knitting. I think all of you agree with
that reality. But that's the kind of attitude
that people are taking towards Christianity. They want you to
be quiet about it. They want you to do it on your
own and don't recruit. They don't want you to evangelize.
They don't want you to proselytize your faith. But if we don't evangelize
and proselytize, if we don't give a reason for the hope that
we have, we are sinning. It's our call as Christians to
do that. Opposition is going to come as
a result of doing that. It's part of the Christian life.
We see that in Stephen. We've already seen that in these
apostles. But getting back to where we
started, take care. and how you respond. You know,
it's interesting, Colossians 3.8, and when I teach on the
Ten Commandments, one of the things that sometimes people
get surprised at, because they've always heard that the Third Commandment,
you know, don't take the Lord's name in vain, is talking about
not cussing. No, it's not talking about not
cussing. Third Commandment is largely talking about not using
God's name for your own personal main purposes. That's what it's
talking about. But don't think that gives you
an excuse to go cussing. Colossians 3.8, one of the things
that Paul writes to Christians is that we are meant to have
tongues that are free from, or mouths that are free from dirty
language. a talk as people who are obscene
and things along that. We're not supposed to have filthy,
dirty talk. OK? The Bibles will translate that
in a variety of different ways. But the Greek phrase there is
we're not to have a preference for obscenities. I don't care
what the context or what that sounds like. We're not supposed
to be there. We're not supposed to, if you look at Clement of
Alexandria, who was one of the early church fathers, the way
he described his work, we as Christians are not supposed to
talk like the common laborer talks. We're supposed to talk
as somebody who is, if you will, in modern English, gentrified.
You know why that is? It's because while there's nothing
wrong with doing common labor for your vocation, if that's
what you have been called to do, it's a noble thing. But we are not common. We are
children of the king. And thus we should speak as such. Our language should reflect such. So again, be careful how you
talk. Be careful of the things that
you say. Paul and I spend some time joking every day. We got
lost a couple times trying to climb the hill where the Hollywood
sign is. And when we would get lost, Paul's
joke would rip, and rest in peace, we're done. I was kind of thinking
about that on our airplane flight home. Sometimes airplane flights
are good times to just think that we can kind of rephrase
that a little bit in terms of the concept of our passage this
morning, when we talk and engage with people in dialogue and things
like that. Call it the RIT principle, you
know. But instead of rest in peace,
let it be respect, integrity, and patience or perseverance.
I couldn't decide which. And I didn't want to go rip and
put or something along those lines. But respect. Respect the person you're talking
to. Respect yourself. Respect the God that you worship
and recognize that you represent him when you speak to anybody
that you speak to in our culture and community. Have integrity.
Integrity refers to the fact that we're consistent. OK? So
a bridge. is consistent and straight all
the way across, it's not going to fall apart. Don't fall apart.
You've got the truth on your side. Why fear? You've got the
Holy Spirit in you if you're a believer. Why fear? Fear God,
not men. Have integrity when you speak.
Integrity in terms of the consistency of the message, the consistency
of the truth, the consistency of the boldness with which you
speak. and patience or perseverance,
okay? Be patient with those with whom
you speak. Be patient with yourself, because
you're not always gonna know the answer. Don't make it up
as you go. I can't tell you how many times
it boggles my mind, for instance, when they feel like they're trapped.
They just make something up to try and get them out of the corner
that they feel trapped in. It is much better to say, I don't
know the answer to that, but I know somebody who probably
does. And that's what text messages
are for. That's what Facebook messages are for. That's what
emails are for, or phone calls. We want to do it the old school
way. And say, um, I'm stuck. Can you help me out here? OK? God surrounded you with a lot
of people. And God has placed leaders. Rely on them and learn from them
so that one day you could be the person that somebody calls
and says, uh-oh, I am in the corner. Help me out of this bind. Teach me how to engage with this
person. And part of the why I've got
us brought us together as a body so that we can rely upon each
other. And you have the strengths. But that's how we've been called
to live as a church body. That's how we've been called
to engage with those first years. And it's a demonstration that's
been modeled for us, and it's what's being modeled by Stephen.
He's going to have some pretty strong words, but everything
that he says is dealing with the ideas that he's being challenged
with. He is dealing with putting them in their place because
they've got some pretty foolish things that they're saying, but
He's standing on truth. And I would argue, willing to
be corrected if He was in error, but He wasn't in error. His Holy
Spirit was moving through Him in a powerful and profound way.
Let's pray. Heavenly Father, we come before
You. We know that we fall short. We oftentimes We lose our temper
when we engage people we don't like being opposed. We sometimes
have a desire to intimidate. We sometimes have a desire to
attack. And while ideas at times should
be attacked, we know that. We should be faithful in setting
forth your gospel and give the reason for the hope that we have
with gentleness and truth. So let us take a stance on that,
and especially as we talk to each other, let us be careful
as we do that as well. And may your glory and your mercies
cover us in all that we do, not for our praise and honor, but
for your praise and honor. In all of these things, we pray
in Jesus' name.
Steven the Deacon
Series Sermons on Acts
Opposition to faith is a normal part of the Christian life; how we respond to that opposition says a lot about the faith that we have.
| Sermon ID | 111219225326727 |
| Duration | 42:46 |
| Date | |
| Category | Sunday Service |
| Language | English |
Documents
Add a Comment
Comments
No Comments
© Copyright
2026 SermonAudio.