Sign in or signup

CODE #

3,080 active users!!Bandwidth
THURSDAY
OCT 19, 2017
Home
NewsSITE
Events & Blogs
New Audio & Video
BroadcastersNew Stuff!
Local & Church Finder
Live Webcasts
Sermons by Bible
Sermons by Topic
Sermons by Speaker
Sermons by Date
Staff Picks
CommentsALL -26 min
Top Sermons
VideosPDFs
Daily Log
PhotosNew Stuff!
StoresNew Stuff!
Online Bible
Hymnal
Daily Reading
About | 3-Mo Free!
Submit Sermon
Members Only

Mobile Apps | Info
Enjoy sermons from this broadcaster
on a variety of mobile devices.
MyChurch: clovisevfree
MyChurch Code ID: 72986
Church Apps | Info
Creating your own Church App is
as simple as turning ON the option.
 | Clovis, California
Podcast + Codes
Newest Widget | Demo
Sermons Embed | Info
Latest Blog | Info | Demo
Our Blog
Older
Newer
Blog
Post+
Search
  
Filter By

2 Book Recommendations
TUESDAY, MAY 29, 2012
Posted by: Clovis Evangelical Free Church | more..
1,000+ views | 230+ clicks
A few thoughts on a couple of books I’ve read recently.

Tell the Truth: The Whole Gospel to the Whole Person by Whole People. By Will Metzger. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press. 3rd ed. 2002.

This book really should be standard reading when it comes to the topic of evangelism. Metzger takes a rather different, yet biblically sound, approach in this work by not rooting his argument in methodology, manipulating readers by pouring on the guilt, or making his case for evangelism on social or cultural studies. As the subtitle suggests, Metzger begins with Scripture! By beginning with a serious study of the Gospel and a biblical understanding of the human condition and salvation, our motivation and our methods are biblically guided and evaluated.

The model Metzger sets forth is the “Come Home” presentation of the Gospel. It begins and ends with God, not man. It communicates man’s real need, salvation. It holds forth man’s only hope, Christ. All in all, both in terms of doctrinal study and practical application, Metzger has provided an excellent tool for evangelism.

A secondary positive result of Metzger’s work is that it demonstrates evangelism and reformed theology are not at odds. In fact, evangelism is a natural outgrowth of biblically-balanced reformed theology.

It’s not your typical work on evangelism, short and light. So when you read it, prepare to settle in for an engaging study, which I believe will prove to be rewarding as well.

Divorce & Remarriage: A Permanence View. By Wingerd, Elliff, Chrisman, and Burchett. Kansas City, Christian Communicators Worldwide, 2009.

If you adhere to the majority opinion on divorce and remarriage and do not want your position to be rattled and dismantled, don’t read this book!

Seriously. Exegesis and background study have always forced me to maintain the minority view of divorce and remarriage. However, until now, all I could find in terms of quality resources were a few sermons and articles. As you can imagine, being the minority view means not many resources are produced that affirm it. On the other hand, the majority view has more than its share of books, sermons, and articles abounding. That’s why I was so pleased to get a copy of Divorce & Remarriage. Finally, a book-length, serious, exegetical treatment arguing for the minority view.

Simply stated, the minority view is that there are no biblical grounds for divorce and that remarriage is only acceptable after the death of a spouse. The majority view believes that Matthew allows for divorce and remarriage in cases of adultery and 1 Cor 7 allows for divorce and remarriage in cases where an unbeliever has abandoned a believer.

So why does the minority view argue against what seems to be such a clear teaching in Matthew and 1 Corinthians? First, there are exegetical, hermenuetical reasons. “The NT contains 5 statements that amount to unqualified prohibitions of divorce (Matt 19:6 and Mark 10:9, 1 Cor 7:10, 1 Cor 7:11, 1 Cor 7:12, 1 Cor 7:13) and 5 statements that amount to unqualified prohibitions of remarriage after divorce if a former spouse is living (Matt 5:32b, Mark 10:11-12, Luke 16:18, Rom 7:3, 1 Cor 7:10-11a).

Second, there are the background reasons. Why does Matthew provide a “loophole” to the unqualified prohibition of Mark and Luke? And why does Matthew make sure to do this both times he addresses the issue in chs 5 and 19? The minority view answer has always made more sense to me. That is, Matthew was writing to a Jewish audience and his use of greek words demonstrates that he has Jewish engagement in mind when speaking of divorce, not divorce after consummation of marriage. The Joseph narrative in Matthew reinforces this argument, but the use of greek terms is the main point. The majority view argues that the exception was so clear for Mark and Luke’s audience that they did not have to mention it. Really? So the exception was clear but the prohibition was not!?! How could the exception be clear if the prohibition had to be stated so clear, so emphatic, and so unqualified? Makes no sense.

Third, there are the contextual reasons. Holding the majority view fails to explain the reaction of the Pharisees and the disciples when Jesus sets forth his teaching on divorce and remarriage.

A couple of other reasons I really like this book. First, I like the term “permanence view” much, much better than “minority view.” Minority doesn’t communicate the position; it just states the popularity of it! “Permanence” better communicates that we believe the Bible teaches that marriage, as a covenant representing the New Covenant relationship between Christ and the church, is “till death do us part!”

Second, this book is written by the elders of a local church who studied the relevant texts together, wrestled through the issues, arrived at this position, taught it patiently to the church, and worked on how to make good application. It’s not easy to hold the minority position (Believe me!!). That’s why I was so encouraged to discover how the Lord led these men to embrace and apply this understanding together in the context of a local church.

The only weakness I found, and this is admittedly strictly a matter of my opinion, is that I don’t see these men being charitable in their policies to those who would adamantly affirm the majority position. I agree the permanence view is the biblical view. I agree that the local church has to take a position and work out policies as such. However, it is also clear that many well-educated, faithful teachers of Scripture have affirmed and taught the majority view of divorce and remarriage. There must be a way to teach the minority view while respecting members’ decision to personally hold to the majority view as a matter of conscience, in the same way some may disagree over the matter of infant baptism or reformed theology. Every member does not have to agree to every single point of doctrine and application that the church affirms. Somewhere we need to make room for charitable disagreement for the sake of unity even within the local church context. Some points of doctrine should not result in withholding membership. Again, this is only a disagreement of methodology. In terms of biblical reasoning and faithful application, this is THE resource for the permanence view of marriage.

A great help when studying this issue, seeking to teach this issue, or seeking to make application in the local church and counseling context.

Category:  Books and Media

post new | clone this | rss feed | blog top »
Text feature this blog entry
Our Blog
Older
Newer
Top


Elder Samuel Ashwood
Reverence For Authority

Exodus 22:28
Sunday - AM
Sovereign Grace Church
Play! | MP3 | RSS


Rev. David Overway
The Value of the Law - LD 44

Heidelberg Catechism 4 - 2017
Hope Protestant Reformed
Transcript!Play! | MP3

Kevin Swanson
Hollywood's Gloss Tarnishing

Is James Bond Really Cool?
Generations Radio
Play! | MP3

Dr. Peter Masters
Transformation Process

1 Thessalonians
Metropolitan Tabernacle
Video!Play! | MP4

Event: Oct 26-28, 2017
Repentance - The Reformation Continues

NCFIC 2017 National Conference
Conference
NCFIC

Sermon: Hugh Hefner's Horrific Legacy
Kevin Swanson

SPONSOR | 6,300+

SPONSOR




                   
Christ never lost any cause He pleaded. ... Thomas Watson

Gospel of John
Cities | Local | Personal


MOBILE
iPhone + iPad
Church App
Watch
Android
Church App
Kindle + Nook
Wear
Chromecast TV
Apple TV
ROKU TV
Amazon Fire TV New!
Amazon Echo New!
Kindle Reader


HELP
Knowledgebase
Broadcasters
Listeners
Q&A
Uploading Sermons
Uploading Videos
Webcasting
Tips & Tricks
YouTube Screencasts

FOLLOW
Weekly Newsletter
Staff Picks Feed
SA Newsroom
RSS | Twitter | Facebook
SERVICES | ALL
Church Finder | Info
Sermon Player
Mobile & Apps
Podcasting | Videos
Live Webcasting
Events Support
Transcription | PowerClips
Billboards New!
Business Cards
SOLO | MINI | Domain
Favorites | QR Codes
Online Donations
24x7 Radio Stream

INTEGRATION
Embed Codes
Goodies
WordPress
Twitter
Facebook
Logos | e-Sword | BW
JSON API

BATCH
Transfer Agent
Protected Podcasts
Auto-Upload Sermons
Upload via FTP
Upload via Dropbox
Picasa
ABOUT US
The largest and most trusted library of audio sermons from conservative churches and ministries worldwide.

Our Services | Articles of Faith
Broadcast With Us
Advertising | Local Ads
CONTACT
info@sermonaudio.com
Support Us | Feedback Fridays | Stories