The massive number of lawsuits have been kicked out by judges and now the Supreme Court, I was think would be indicative of the friviology of them?
"Can Trumpâ€™s lawyers get in trouble for frivolous lawsuits?"
Apparently some Republican leaders think that the Republican apparatus is trying to steal electionsâť—đź‘Ž
From the above:
'... in the attempts by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) to have the Supreme Court overturn the results in four key states has been ridiculed even by some top Republicans.
'Texasâ€™s own senior GOP senator, John Cornyn, said, â€śI frankly struggle to understand the legal theoryâ€ť behind it. Jeb Bush responded by saying there was no theory and predicted that the court would reject it out of hand. Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.) even went so far Thursday as to suggest it was a â€śPR stunt rather than a lawsuitâ€ť and that Paxton might be merely seeking a Trump pardon for his personal legal problems.'
Mike, you know all well and good that those voting dumps which occurred in states such as Ga, Mich, Wis. In the wee hours of the morning which Senator Rand Paul spoke about are as legitimate as the $3 bill which has been in circulation since 1994.
If just those dumps were to be cast out, which they should, Trump wins.
Lurker wrote: Ha! Barr's exact words: "the U.S. Justice Department has uncovered no evidence of widespread voter fraud that could change the outcome of the 2020 election." Any idea why he said that, Jim? Because the constitution makes the fraud allegations a matter for the courts. He hasn't seen or uncovered any evidence because it's not being presented to him nor is the DOJ investigating it. But you prefer the spin of the liberal media.
On top of that, it wouldnâ€™t take widespread voter fraud anyway, but concentrated fraud in select areas, such as swing States.
Bar is a swamp creature. He wants Biden to win. But he wants to keep Trumps trust throwing him a biscuit with the Durham probe. FIRE HIM
Jim Lincoln wrote: Barr says no widespread election fraud
Then why deny Republicans from observing the count by keeping them far away, threatening them, calling the police to evict them. Why the rush to wipe the machines clean. Aren't all the eyewitness account good enough?
I know, you have a link from some CNN spin writer opposing the eyewitnesses.
â€śâ€ťAmong Democrats, 30% say it's likely that fraud affected the outcome, and 20% say it's very likely.â€śâ€ť
Even evil hearted sinners can see the obvious.
However getting them all to admit â€śTruthâ€ť is something completely different.
Democrats like communists really donâ€™t care how they get into power. They just want the power.
Sin in the mortal blinds them and reprobates do not have the moral standards to declare evil - depravity - wickedness - and duplicity exists within them as a natural reality.
Only the true saved Christian has the faith to open eyes and perceive the real truth about human existence and satanic influence.
This is a fallen world and a fallen people. Who Eph 4:17 ..... in the vanity of their mind, 18 Having the understanding darkened, being alienated from the life of God through the ignorance that is in them, because of the blindness of their heart: 19 Who being past feeling have given themselves over unto lasciviousness, to work all uncleanness with greediness.â€ś