I seem to mention I didn't agree with everything that the author, who I assume is a Millennial said. q.v.,
https://tinyurl.com/r2zyrpz (False Idol — Why the Christian Right Worships Donald Trump)
He seems to accept Petes Buttigieg a homosexual, as a Christian, that is just as much an error considering as a Catholic who says he's a Christian--both are oxymorons

But, many mainline Christians learn their lessons early in the twentieth century not to mess into politics.

John MacArthur wrote:
Also, many present-day Christian activists seem to be unaware of how much their methodology parallels that of liberal Christians at the turn of the twentieth century. Like those misguided idealists, contemporary evangelicals became enamored of temporal issues at the expense of eternal values. Evangelical activists, in essence, are simply preaching a politically conservative version of the old social gospel, emphasizing social and cultural concerns above spiritual ones...

Puts one right back to sure-pressing Truth in acts of unrighteousness Roms 1:18-32!

1 Cor 1:17-18 For Christ sent me n’t to baptize, but to preach the Gospel, & n’t with the wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of no effect. For the preaching of the cross is foolishness to those who perish; but unto us who are saved, it’s the power of God.

Your Precious Hillary; PS 130:3 If Thou, Lord, shouldest mark iniquities, O Lord , who shall stand?

Jim!; Job 9:20 If I justify myself, mine own mouth shall condemn me; if I say, ‘I am perfect,’ it shall also prove me perverse.

Barnes Commentary wrote:
John 18
​Verse 36. My kingdom, &c. The charge on which Jesus was arraigned was that of laying claim to the office of a king. He here substantially admits that he did claim to be a king, but not in the sense in which the Jews understood it. They charged him with attempting to set up an earthly kingdom, and of exciting sedition against Caesar. In reply to this, Jesus says that his kingdom is not of this world--that is, it is not of the same nature as earthly kingdoms. It was not originated for the same purpose, or conducted on the same plan. He immediately adds a circumstance in which they differ. The kingdoms of the world are defended by arms; they maintain armies and engage in wars. If the kingdom of Jesus had been of this kind, he would have excited the multitudes that followed him to prepare for battle. He would have armed the hosts that attended him to Jerusalem. He would not have been alone and unarmed in the garden of Gethsemane. But though he was a king, yet his dominion was over the heart, subduing evil passions and corrupt desires, and bringing the soul to the love of peace and unity. 

Alex Morris wrote:
....
....with thinkers like Rob Bell and Rachel Held Evans [ ] grappling with their faith with intense intellectual honesty and a deep love for the transformative message of Jesus (Held Evans famously said she was voting for Hillary Clinton because she was “pro-life,” not just “pro-birth”). These faith leaders helped me see that no one political party had a monopoly on God; that Jesus himself was revolutionary, upsetting hierarchies wherever he went; and that a form of Christianity that could be co-opted by a political agenda was suspect at its core. “I find the term ‘Christian right’ highly objectionable because I don’t think there’s anything Christian about it, frankly,” says religion historian Balmer. “What is Christian about what’s happening at the border right now? What is Christian about the economic policies since Trump took office?”...
....

Jim Lincoln wrote:
excerpts from, " Both Parties Are Addicted to Dark Money. Only One Is Trying to Quit."
https://tinyurl.com/y4s8j9rz

You don't think that Jim is on the very left of the "Independent" party do you???

Anyway here is another excerpt from the Jim-Link....
"The Democrats have often times been more creative in dodging disclosure than Republicans,” says Brendan Fischer from the Campaign Legal Center, a nonpartisan watchdog in Washington, DC. “Groups like Majority Forward, Highway 31, and others would be unlikely to push the legal envelope in this way if HR 1 were to help create a functioning FEC and laws that would prevent these disclosure dodges.”

Nihal Krishan wrote:
....
"Unfortunately, Democrats and Republicans alike have long been beholden to big money in politics, blocking meaningful reform and benefitting from weak enforcement by the FEC,” says Paul S. Ryan from Common Cause, a nonprofit government watchdog group. But he also highlighted that McConnell’s attempts to paint HR 1 as a Democratic power grab is stretching the truth. “Sen. McConnell’s not fooling anyone with his self-serving rhetoric. America knows he’s only protecting his fat-cat friends.”