Scientists endorse mass civil disobedience to force climate action
More than 300 scientists have endorsed a civil disobedience campaign aimed at forcing governments to take rapid action to tackle climate change, warning that failure could inflict ‚Äúincalculable human suffering.‚ÄĚ
Wearing white laboratory coats to symbolize their research credentials, a group of about 20 of the signatories gathered on Saturday to read out the text outside London‚Äôs century-old Science Museum in the city‚Äôs upmarket Kensington district.
‚ÄúWe believe that the continued governmental inaction over the climate and ecological crisis now justifies peaceful and non-violent protest and direct action, even if this goes beyond the bounds of the current law,‚ÄĚ said Emily Grossman, a science broadcaster with a PhD in molecular biology, who read the declaration on behalf of the group....
More accurate headline: "Approx 300 scientists endorse..." There are probably more scientists at any convention of their specialty (math, physics, computers, etc) than this group. But Reuters is showing its true colors by running a headline like this. If people who want to fight climate change really want to make a difference, they would put a big tax on all products from China, which emits more pollution than the USA and Europe combined. People who are upset about plastic straws need to look at Bengladesh that puts out more pollution in the oceans than the entire US. But you won't find this out from your local newspaper, whose editors wish they could work for Reuters and will run stories like this one as if they were the Gospel Truth.
If only the Global Warming gang would check both scientific views....!!! Eg:-
"Dr. Mototaka Nakamura received a Doctorate of Science from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), and for nearly 25 years specialized in abnormal weather and climate change at prestigious institutions that included MIT,"
In his book The Global Warming Hypothesis is an Unproven Hypothesis, Dr. Nakamura explains why the data foundation underpinning global warming science is ‚Äúuntrustworthy‚ÄĚ and cannot be relied on:
Today‚Äôs ‚Äėglobal warming science‚Äô is akin to an upside down pyramid which is built on the work of a few climate modelers. These AGW pioneers claim to have demonstrated human-derived CO2 emissions as the cause of recently rising temperatures and have then simply projected that warming forward. Every climate researcher thereafter has taken the results of these original models as a given, and we‚Äôre even at the stage now where merely testing their validity is regarded as heresy."
"Here in Nakamura, we have a highly qualified and experienced climate modeler with impeccable credentials rejecting the unscientific bases of the climate crisis claims."
So why is this religion able to legally stir up the masses to incite political change but the minute a preacher of the Gospel of Jesus Christ speaks on political matters, he is branded some sort of criminal? This rule applies except when Bible passages are twisted to further the Progressive agenda.