Why are Democrats so weird? Only a few days after his long-shot candidacy had begun to attract some interest from the mainstream press, Andrew Yang came out strongly against circumcision, surely one of the most pressing political and social issues of our time. He even doubled down on this by agreeing on Thursday to debate right-wing Wunderkind Ben Shapiro on the subject. Last month Sen. Kamala Harris (Calif.) told a painfully obvious lie about listening to Snoop Dogg and Tupac while smoking weed in college (she graduated many years before either of them released their debut albums). Even her own father told her to cut it out. Sen. Elizabeth Warren's (Mass.) insistence on releasing the results of a DNA test in the hope of vindicating her past claims of Native American heritage was one of the most bizarre events in recent political history....
Dr. Tim wrote: Ah, but which of the wayward wackos will win the Democratic nomination? Komrade Warren? Komrade O‚ÄôRourke? Komrade Harris? Komrade Sanders? Or will it be the true icon of the Soviet Socialist Republics of America: Komrade Bozo?
Socialism has taken on a deceptive metamorphosis post WWII in Europe. The young Americans are looking for government interventionist policy but with a nicer outlook and a pretty face?
Ergo Democrats and the likes of Bernie Sanders are having some success with the American youth and much of the recent modern immigrant population.
Beware the alluring and captivating socialist who can win friends and influence people whilst taking the money out of the rich folks pockets. Appealing to young and modern Liberalists.
Ah, but which of the wayward wackos will win the Democratic nomination? Komrade Warren? Komrade O‚ÄôRourke? Komrade Harris? Komrade Sanders? Or will it be the true icon of the Soviet Socialist Republics of America: Komrade Bozo?
(1) This is to be observed in God's declaration: "And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed" (Gen 3:15).
(2) This is also evident from the names which are given him in light of this, such as, the enemy Matt 13:39, the tempter Matt 4:3, the wicked one Matt 13:19, and the adversary (1 Pet 5:8).
(3) It is conveyed by the description of his work among believers: "Your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour" (1 Pet 5:8). His works are called "the wiles of the devil" Eph 6:16, buffeting 2 Cor 12:7, shooting of fiery darts Eph 6:16, and beguiling (2 Cor 11:3)."
(1) Note 'enmity' between Democrats and Christians.
(2) Democrat ideology is found as the enemy, tempter, wicked. (Devil's fiery darts?)
(3) The 'wiles of the Devil' are used to spurn the church from life in society. He displays his position as 'adversary' to all things Christian. The Devil's natural home in politics is Democrat house.
Anti-Christian politics - Communism, Socialism and Liberalism - The Democrat policies and polity of Administration.
They suffer from TDS--Trump Derangement Syndrome--and have to think up crazier and crazier alternatives to him. Think of that crazy Vermont Senator, Socialist Bernie Sanders--how long has he been there? Decades! No one took him seriously. Check his Congress record and you will find no serious bills that he created and got passed by the Democrats. He was always the Crazy Uncle in the Attic. Now, thanks to Trump, he is let out to speak in public! And young people, who can barely make decisions because their brains are not fully mature, follow him blindly, since he promises Free Goodies for Them: free college (free beer pong, free orgies, free Spring Break Trips to Acapulco, Cancun, and Miami Beach!). What is especially frustrating is that Trump is not losing in the courts, they are supporting him in every attempt that the Dems have made to block his moves. If I was an editorial cartoonist, I would show Trump as the Great Basketball Player, scoring basket after basket over the tiny players on the opposition.
The Quiet Christian wrote: Good evening, Mr. Moderator. I would like to point out Jim Lincoln's racist rant against this so-called Dominionist plot to take over ??? [....] Are there any tools you can use to address this issue?
Thank you for your concern. Here are the rules and policies established by the site founder published on the full site:
"¬Ľ No profanities including crude or rude language. ¬Ľ Personal attacks or insults directed at other users will be censored. ¬Ľ Only one post at a time per thread (allow for alternate users). ¬Ľ No cross-posting or spamming (do not copy your posts everywhere). ¬Ľ Use the "Insert Hyperlink" button to embed hyperlinks.
We reserve the right to censor other obviously inappropriate comments.
By submitting your comment for review you agree to the forum policies."
The other obvious given which should guide everyone is SermonAudio is a Protestant Christian site and everyone is expected to conduct themselves accordingly.
While I personally disagree with most of Jim's views, I can't justify censoring him for holding to views contrary to mine or the majority of regular commenters.
My advice is ignore him as it's unlikely he's going away any time soon or will change his views.
Good evening, Mr. Moderator. I would like to point out Jim Lincoln's racist rant against this so-called Dominionist plot to take over ???
I believe you have been very tolerant of Jim's intolerance and his political bent, but has he not gone too far? I'm not for theonomy, but I feel like he's gone too far again.
A number of us, as you know, have confronted Jim in his error, and NeedHim in particular, has tirelessly presented the Gospel but to no avail. There is a point at which we are casting pearls before swine. Many of us feel that he is only here to cause trouble.
Are there any tools you can use to address this issue?
A good personal morality record will throw out the whole lot in any party.
Of course our eternal heritage is much better subject on which to dwell, this world is not our home. Politics however makes a difference as to what kind of world in which we live Just ask the owner of the bed and breakfast resort. Many more examples could be given.
Synonyms for weird:- "weird, eerie, unearthly, uncanny refer to that which is mysterious and apparently outside natural law. Weird refers to that which is suggestive of the fateful intervention of supernatural influences in human affairs: the weird adventures of a group lost in the jungle. Eerie refers to that which, by suggesting the ghostly, makes one's flesh creep: an eerie moaning from a deserted house. Unearthly refers to that which seems by its nature to belong to another world: an unearthly light that preceded the storm. Uncanny refers to that which is mysterious because of its apparent defiance of the laws established by experience: an uncanny ability to recall numbers."
Look at the track record of the Democrats- sodomite marriage was legalized under Obama - broader, more lenient abortions bills with barriers removed are being introduced by the Dems in NY, for example. From NPR, "Well, mirroring what anti-abortion lawmakers are trying to do in more red states to make abortion illegal if Roe v. Wade was struck down, lawmakers in bluer states are trying to pass laws that would ensure that abortion remains legal. There are other things that states are doing. In some of the blue states, they're looking at ensuring that abortion is covered by insurance." source https://www.npr.org/2019/02/09/692955835/an-overview-of-state-abortion-laws
So Jim, tell us how supporting murder is better than those 'immoral Republicans' you keep harping about - we won't mention the Clintons sex scandals.
The Dems want us to pay for murdering a baby, and that is Jim's stance as well. God has stated no one should murder, meaning " ‚Äúthe unjust taking of innocent human life.‚ÄĚ Does being morally upright cover over the sin of murdering the innocent and the support of it? Hardly
Of course, before anything else ūüĎć any presidential candidate has to have a good personal morality record‚Ěó Now, Elizabeth Warren might fall down in that area. So far all the main Democratic candidates have a far better personal moral record than the one leading the pack for the RepublicansūüĎé
Nicole Duran wrote: ....Although there are more than 40 politicians, businessmen and celebrities weighing a bid, former Vice President Joe Biden is the only one for whom virtually all other candidates would step aside. And this far out, it‚Äôs impossible to know whether there‚Äôs another Barack Obama hiding in the mix, ready to catch fire and snatch the nomination from the heir apparent....
excerpt from, "Ranking the Top Democratic Presidential Candidates for 2020"
Two earlier posters are basically correct. It should be out of that White Islam otherwise known as Dominionism (See https://tinyurl.com/jzttasx (Notes on Reconstructionism). ) can't fix anything either.
Romans 8:7 For the mind that is set on the flesh is hostile to God, for it does not submit to God's law; indeed, it cannot. 8 Those who are in the flesh cannot please God.---ESV
Because the basis of their political policies are not biblically based...
Since God made the rules, he got to create the ones that are surrounded by logic, and reason (some other rules He created). The liberals job is to go against all of God's standards, so they are inevitably weird...