I think all of those involved probably put a lot of thought into the limitations they chose on the movie's graphic content. Reality or not, I think that putting it all out there for every eye to see would be irresponsible, so it seems they did their best to cover every aspect without actually having to use shock and horror images that could really traumatize some. I also tend to think that hardcore graphic imaging would have backfired on them as word got around. Those who planned on seeing the movie, may have decided against it, and I'd say that most parents who would have taken their kids, would have decided against it real quick as well.
I think what they did was to explain, educate, and reveal with words and softer type images, which would imply the end results without actually having to show those results and procedures, unfiltered, etc.
PG-13...Parents strongly cautioned for children under 13yrs, so the age ranges will cover all generations, even under 13yrs at times, depending upon parental approval and adult companion, and I think the graphic content needed to be considered for that reason, mostly.
1 Cor 1:17-19 For Christ didn‚Äôt send me to baptize, but to preach the gospel, n‚Äôt with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of no effect. For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it‚Äôs the power of God. For it‚Äôs written: ‚ÄúI will destroy the wisdom of the wise, & bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent.‚ÄĚ
A great reminder of a useful & helpful acronym to use, know as SLEDGE. As sadly saying & stating, in dealing with those who want to justify their acts of unrighteousness,. As the Womb, sadly for far to many babies, has become the most dangerous place to be in sadly!
Rom 1:16-17 For I amn‚Äôt ashamed of the gospel of Christ, for it‚Äôs the power of God to salvation for everyone who believes, for the Jew first & also for the Greek. For in it the righteousness of God is revealed from faith to faith; as it is written, ‚ÄúThe just shall live by faith.‚ÄĚ
Hi Frank, I keep forgetting to confirm, but I'm pretty certain that I heard on a radio program last week that a babys heartbeat is detectable 14-days following conception.
Astonishing that a baby in the womb isn't considered a baby until the moment of delivery, according to the pro-choicers. 3D imaging is pretty amazing, and they can be seen smiling, and sucking their thumbs, yet, those very same babys get eaten alive with saline solutions, vacuumed apart, alive, and when those barbaric and painful methods fail, the job is completed after delivery with a sissors, or as you've said, are taken to an empty room, placed onto a cold table, the door is closed, and they are just left there to die.
Difficult to process there being even one single human being that is okay with any of this, and that a baby can be murdered for any reason, whatsoever. Any reason.
The movie tells the story of Kermit Gosnell, an abortionist convicted on murder charges for killing babies after they were born.
The above is from the article.
I just hope that everyone can see the hypocrisy of saying a baby was illegally murdered after it left the womb versus one that was legally murdered in the womb. The rules state if the abortionist crushes the baby‚Äôs head while it is still in the womb; that is not murder. But when the body comes out totally and it is murdered, that is illegal and they can be charged with murder.
No, my dear friends, murder is murder whenever and wherever it occurs. From the moment of conception there was a human life and to intentionally end those lives is murder. Our culture generally feels that if something is legal, then is ‚Äúlikely‚ÄĚ to be okay.
But, praise our heavenly Father‚Äôs name, He is never confused and unless these people repent and come to Christ, they will be judged as murderers.
Luke 1:41 And it came to pass, that, when Elisabeth heard the salutation of Mary, the babe leaped in her womb; and Elisabeth was filled with the Holy Ghost: