NPR, ABC News, Media bias fact check, etc. are all sources that most would write off with the understanding of not being 'legit'. However, they do cater to your liberal agenda don't they? So, in your book that makes them 'legit'. As for Fox news, I could care less. You claim they are 'fake news' using one example - let's dig into ALL the examples of 'fake news' spewed out daily by many of your 'news sources' - there isn't enough hours in the day to expose your fake news sites.
I do like pointing out your hypocrisy whenever the opportunity presents itself, which is usually daily.

They did retract the story, so something was wrong with it, apparently Sean Hannity hasn't gotten that message though.

I can wait until the lawsuit and/or settlement takes place to hold my fire, but it doesn't doe much good for Fox news.

Media Bias/Fact Check wrote:
Factual Reporting: HIGH

Notes: National Public Radio usually shortened to NPR, is an American privately and publicly funded non-profit membership media organization that serves as a national syndicator to a network of 900 public radio stations in the United States of America. Very centrist in reporting. Very factual. Has a liberal editorial bias. (5/18/2016)

Mike wrote:
That would be according to your favorite Media Bias/Fact Check, right?

NPR wrote:
On May 16, the Fox News Channel broke what it called a "bombshell" story about an unsolved homicide: the July 2016 shooting of 27-year-old Democratic Party staffer Seth Rich.

Unfounded conspiracy theories involving Rich abounded in the months after his death, in part because WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange cryptically suggested that Rich's death may have been related to the leaks of tens of thousands of emails from Democratic Party officials and their allies at the peak of the presidential campaign.

Fox News' story, which took flight online and ran in segments across major shows, breathed fresh life into the rumors. Fox reported that the leaks came from inside the party and not from hackers linked to Russia — despite the conclusions of the nation's most senior intelligence officials.

Mike wrote:
That would be according to your favorite Media Bias/Fact Check, right?

Jim Lincoln wrote:
The Fox news story looks reasonably accurate, Fox doesn't have that good of reputation for being accurate. So I'd also look at the links that they provided in the article.
---

It is a sad betrayal of this elderly British couple to have put up a jihadi unawares, which is what seems to have happened.

A whole load of fully armed police in what the US call SWAT gear charging into one's home must be a horrible shock.

It should be interesting to note that Fox News has left Great Britain. So, they have to get their information second-hand?

NPR wrote:
An Ofcom report in June concluded that the transaction "raises public interest concerns as a result of the risk of increased influence by members of the Murdoch Family Trust over the UK news agenda and the political process, with its unique presence on radio, television, in print and online."

This time, there has been pressure on regulators to take into account the network's scandals in the U.S.: an array of sexual harassment lawsuits, and a now-retracted story that spread conspiracy theories about the murder of DNC staffer Seth Rich.