Fed Bulletin: Imminent Terrorist Attack on Southern Border
For those of us who’ve been raising alarms about both the jihadist threat and the national-security vulnerability created by the Obama administration’s non-enforcement of the immigration laws, this is not a surprise — particularly less than two weeks before September 11. But it is nonetheless jarring to read. Judicial Watch has just put out this statement:
Islamic terrorist groups are operating in the Mexican border city of Ciudad Juarez and planning to attack the United States with car bombs or other vehicle born improvised explosive devices (VBIED). High-level federal law enforcement, intelligence and other sources have confirmed to Judicial Watch that a warning bulletin for an imminent terrorist attack on the border has been issued. Agents across a number of Homeland Security, Justice and Defense agencies have all been placed on alert and instructed to aggressively work all possible leads and...
I take it you don't live in wrote: Wow a poster on SA has more information than the intel community, they should be consulting her before taking any action. She knows it just fake, amazing. I take it you don't live in El Paso either. And you are "named" poster????
The intel community? And one has to live in El Paso to know about what's going on around the border? Tell it to the state dept, or hs, or the white house.
Pen's right. But the timing is because an important election is nearing. Incumbents are in trouble.
pen wrote: who knows what the last unnamed poster is getting at, but I'll say this, there's a thing called a false flag. and that's when a group creates turmoil and then comes in to "save the day" afterward, creating "safety" which just happens to be a police state.
It would not be the first time in history that tactic has been used. The Nazis were skilled at creating imagined threats that they could use to grab power and further their agenda. Remember the Reichstag fire?
pen wrote: ... and that's when a group creates turmoil and then comes in to "save the day" afterward, creating "safety" which just happens to be a police state. ..
Wow a poster on SA has more information than the intel community, they should be consulting her before taking any action. She knows it just fake, amazing. I take it you don't live in El Paso either. And you are "named" poster????
who knows what the last unnamed poster is getting at, but I'll say this, there's a thing called a false flag.
and that's when a group creates turmoil and then comes in to "save the day" afterward, creating "safety" which just happens to be a police state.
if they didn't want these things to occur, they would close the border, hence logically thinking this out, the other option is that is the goal.
if it were simply "wellwishing liberals" as some around here want to say, they wouldn't be calling out that there are grave concerns, cats out of the bag at that point.
FG wrote: Now we can have a nationalized version of the police state in Boston that took place after their "terrorist attack."
You want the government to continue to do nothing so the terrorist can drive a car filled with explosives and blow up a neighborhood. Even pennnnned said take military, police action and close the border for, gasp, safety purposes. You have no concern for anybody but yourself.
Judges 18:7 Then the five men departed, and came to Laish, and saw the people that were therein, how they dwelt careless, after the manner of the Zidonians, quiet and secure; and there was no magistrate in the land, that might put them to shame in any thing; and they were far from the Zidonians, and had no business with any man.