Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi boldly defended a move to add birth control funding to the new economic "stimulus" package, claiming "contraception will reduce costs to the states and to the federal government."
Pelosi, the mother of 5 children and 6 grandchildren, who once said, "Nothing in my life will ever, ever compare to being a mom," seemed to imply babies are somehow a burden on the treasury.
The revelation came during an exchange Sunday morning on ABC's THIS WEEK.
Almost every liberal democrat stand chooses death over life in this issue:
Abortion = murder Euthanasia= murder Homosexual Unions = unborn children Homosexual Adoption = unborn children or at least a child who is more accepting of the lifestyle Contraceptives/Unmarried "safe" sex = unborn children 2-income modern household = unborn children or childcare issues at minimum Pop culture = suggests children and the old are a burden. Government mandated schools = five days a week of liberal education for the kids that survive to school age.
The only time liberals choose life is when they want to spare a death row inmate or outright do away with the death penalty. Now that the lunatics run this asylum, I can not wait to see just how far they will go.
On a side note, I know most families have to be 2-income now just to survive, that's not greed. I say keep trying your best with your kids, it's not really your fault that the country is the monstrosity that it has become. I also know many marrieds do use protection/birth control. There isn't anything outright wrong with that, but as a married couple it is something that you shouldn't HAVE to do. Children are a blessing, one day you will get old...if you live long enough and will need them to care for you!
Don't tell me; let me guess: first the unborn children (especially of "undesirables"), and then the born children who are "unwanted", then the elderly and infirm, then the mentally and physically disabled, and then, what, probably Christians and Jews who are "troublemakers," all just sucking up our resources, right? Does this sound familiar to anyone. I wonder if that was a little slip of the tongue by Nazi Pelosi; I don't think she meant to say that outloud!
I know, I know, I should be praying for her; and I will. How did we come to this? I know, we live in a fallen world.
Nancy Pelosi boldly defended a move to add birth control funding to the new economic "stimulus" package, claiming "contraception will reduce costs to the states and to the federal government." ???
If there are any of you who question whether or not Nancy Pelosi has any sense this statement should clarify for you the void that exists between her ears !!!
Pelosi and Obama are birds of a feather ------- something else that has been added to their little "Stimulus" package is over $4 BILLION DOLLARS that is being funneled to "ACORN" -------
LOOK AT IT ..... $4,000,000,000.00 ..... FOUR BILLION OF TAX PAYER DOLLARS GOING TO "ACORN" ... ... DON'T YOU LOVE IT ???
HOW MUCH WILL GOOD PEOPLE TAKE ???
Well, this and everything else shouldnâ€™t really come as a surprise, America is just reaping Her long overdue COMEUPPANCE ------- GOD IS GOING TO USE Obama AS A ROD OF PUNISHMENT ON THE BACKS OF THIS PEOPLE ------- this man is going to unleash Hell itself on America â€¦ they got their godless king.
The question is --- WILL â€śWEâ€ť REPENT ???
WHAT A PATHETICLY SELF-ABSORBED PEOPLE !!!
FROM THE WHITE HOUSE TO THE OUTHOUSE -- PATHETIC !!!
â€śWe The Peopleâ€ť have become the godly UNGODLY !!!
You can always rely on a liberal to speak nonsense. Isn't "family planning" not only buzz for contraception, but abortion? I wonder how, in Pelosi's mind, having fewer future taxpayers will help the economy? Perhaps she actually believes the government is the source of funding.
Who can possibly predict whether increasing funds for "family planning" results in a net reduction in cost of gov't? Or the converse? There are too many variables, so Pelosi's argument is unsupportable.
Unstated is her assumption that welfare programs like WIC (the costs of which she likely has in mind) ought to continue unchanged.
But I have little hope that her opponents, in Congress or out, will think of or care for such objections.
No, RTG, that won't happen, well we won't run out of people anyway, since many illegals don't pay taxes. [URL=http://www.ianpaisley.org/article.asp?ArtKey=immigration]]]Romanizing America Through Illegal Immigration[/URL]