Mike wrote:
: In the Scripture but not of it.
As is the case with any 'study bible'
be it John M's
or Ray C's
Or Henry M.M's
Or Scoff-field's[URL=http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=52314926523]]]brief Comment on Commentary Bibles[/URL]
Those who came out of RCC lies might have needed the spurious documents Romanism inserted to show their lies.
later editions had no need of such immediate access to show spurious nature of RCC accretions.
1 as long as you never make marginal notes in your own Bible you can start to criticise ANY notes.
2 if one claims only the Greek/Hebrew/arimaic is inspired ANY vulgar language book is ALL commentary. and should be titled thus.
[URL=http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=516142111530]]]commentary Bible Heresies: Scofield[/URL]
10/18/15 8:47 AM
