Hmmm! I wonder what side of the issue the Guardian is on? Where the Creation Museum is said to take 'a little license' to fill in where the bible leaves off, it seems the Guardian is clear about all of the facts of the debate! Which theory of evolution is the correct one? Oh, there's more than 1 theory out there? Dinosaurs? The word wasn't even coined until the middle 1800's, so it couldn't have been written in the bible! But descriptive language is used in the Bible to describe some living creatures that don't seem to exist today (perhaps extinct)! Extinction does still happen! When you read articles like this one in the Guardian and say to yourself, "Oh, that settles it, those Creationists are wacko!", you are failing to see the true debate and from a sadly inaccurate and biased point of view. Sure, I'm biased too, but I've done far more research on both sides of the issue than a short 3 hour tour of an unfinished museum! I used to think evolution and old earth geology were accurate, but it doesn't take long to see gigantic holes in these systems of thought...just like the holes the Guardian perceives in the Creation Museum and the lives- past and present-of its staff. Do yourself a favor- now that you’ve read the Guardians article, go to AnswersinGenesis.org |