Sign in or signup
Radio Streams
SA Radio
24/7 Radio Stream
VCY America
24/7 Radio Stream

My Favorite Things
Home
NewsSITE
Events | Local | Blogs
New Audio | Video | Clips
Broadcasters
Church Finder
Webcast LIVE NOW!
Sermons by Bible
Sermons by Category
Sermons by Topic
Sermons by Speaker
Sermons by Date
Staff Picks
CommentsALL -44 sec
Top Sermons
Daily Log
Photos
Stores
Online Bible
Hymnal
Daily Reading
Our Services
Sermon DashboardNEW
Members Only

 
USER COMMENTS BY “ PRESBYFACTS ”
RECENTLY-COMMENTED SERMONS | MoreLast PostTotal
Sermon The Witnesses (part 2) | Ben Miller
Benjamin Miller from Syosset, New York
"Please see attached diagram in PDF format."
-4 hrs 
Sermon The Corner Stones Are Set & Foundation is Finished | Dr. James M. Phillips
Donald Grewar, Wales UK from South Wales UK
-5 hrs 
Sermon The Mystery Texts P1 | Jeff Arthur
Philippus Schutte from Australia
-8 hrs 
· Page 1 ·  Found: 25 user comments posted recently.
News Item1/28/12 2:41 PM
Presby Facts  Find all comments by Presby Facts
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
500
comments
John UK wrote:
And so you have baptism succeeding circumcision, and always "effective", therefore all children of believers are saved, therefore your "church" will grow .... just like in Catholicism.
Note:
Presbyterians comprised 25% of the Colonial population. Now they are 3%.

-RTS Orlando President

This theory that paedocommunion somehow generates a growing population is not materializing.

There are now more U.S. Muslims than Presbyterians.


News Item7/14/09 5:16 PM
Presbyfacts  Find all comments by Presbyfacts
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
364
comments
Mike wrote:
Remember he limits God's sovereignty by determining what God will do with it. Thus the either-or scenario. To our friend, if God is sovereign, man must be an ox.
God made the man and the ox - different!

* God is sovereign over the entire universe: Ps 103:19; Rom 8:28; Eph 1:11

* God is sovereign over all of nature: Ps 135:6-7; Mt 5:45; 6:25-30

* God is sovereign over angels & Satan: Ps 103:20-21; Job 1:12

* God is sovereign over nations: Ps 47:7-9; Dan 2:20-21; 4:34-35

* God is sovereign over human beings: 1 Sam 2:6-7; Gal 1:15-16

* God is sovereign over animals: Ps 104:21-30; 1 Ki 17:4-6

* God is sovereign over "accidents": Pr 16:33; Jon 1:7; Mt 10:29

* God is sovereign over free acts of men: Ex 3:21; 12:25-36; Ez 7:27

* God is sovereign over sinful acts of men and Satan: 2 Sam 24:1; 1 Chr 21:1; Gen 45:5; 50:20


News Item7/14/09 3:08 PM
Presbyfacts  Find all comments by Presbyfacts
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
364
comments
Hidemi Williges wrote:
You mean these are calvinist doctrine.
= Yes.
Mike wrote:
Atonement is effectual for those who believe
= As usual mike we disagree at the edges. You seem to have given man the edge here instead of Sovereignty.
Biblicist wrote:
Is his hatred and rejection of God not a decision? Or are you saying there is nothing spiritual about this? How do you define "spiritual"
= Not a decision! Because of sin it is a state of being, requiring divine action first. 1Cor 2:14

There you are you see. As plain as the nose on your face - Arminian type defence as experienced at Dordt.

Told you there is NO third way.

Only Two ways.
God is either ALL Sovereign
OR
Man is given some kind of access by some "doctrinal" means or other.
__________________

John UK wrote:
#1 Man in his natural state prefers his sin, and does not desire to be holy. This is why he shall be damned.
John
You are far too nice to these sinners.
But You're too close for comfort.
I guess I will just have to call you Calvinist.
You only differed in your approach which was not as "harsh" as mine.

ps I did it that way for the reaction.

Thanks All.


Survey7/14/09 9:42 AM
Presbyfacts  Find all comments by Presbyfacts
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
2733
comments
WHY Baptist?

The basis behind founding a denomination upon "baptism" and seeking to identify with and in, this, is to provide a greater human participation, than paedobaptism allows or is perceived to secure.

This is why profession and immersion emerged in recent centuries, in *OPPOSITION* to covenantal infant baptism.

It is as if there was a kind of reactive resistance against the historic church sacrament. Even as we have seen down to changing the term sacrament itself. But reaction does not make for theologically or Biblically correct. It simply implies another method was brought to bear upon the ceremony, and support elicited from theology for it.
Hence the establishing of a new denomination.


News Item7/14/09 9:11 AM
Presbyfacts  Find all comments by Presbyfacts
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
364
comments
Hidemi Williges wrote:
Name calling again. I rebuke Arminianism, just as I would calvinism. Why not believe the Holy Bible (the very words of God) first, Quoting Scripture instead of spouting the fallible words of fallen men.
You are either one or the other there is no other way.
As for those who reject this and call themselves Bible only without theology - There is no such reality.

Eventually we observe sufficient proof in there posts to categorise them.

1] Total Depravity - Man in his natural estate and cannot make any spiritual decision towards God.
2] Unconditional Election - God perceives nothing in all mortals worthy of saving.
3] Limited Atonement - Jesus died only for the elect of God chosen before the world began.
4] Irresistible Grace - God alone draws people to Christ. There is nothing in the mortal to prevent this and mans decision about it, either way, is irrelevant.
5] Perseverence - God brings the elect sinner to heaven from start to finish.

These are Bible doctrines. All five are indicative of how God saves His elect in Christ. A change to any of the above brings an Arminian (free will) solution.

Thus there is no third way.


News Item7/13/09 6:00 PM
Presbyfacts  Find all comments by Presbyfacts
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
364
comments
Hidemi Williges wrote:
It seems to me that as each subject comes up that the presbyterians are looking more catholic by the minute.
Biblicist, John UK...good posts.
It is getting more and more alarming just how many Baptists are Arminian?

Was C.H.Spurgeon the last True Particular Baptist???

Sad.


News Item7/13/09 5:32 PM
Presbyfacts  Find all comments by Presbyfacts
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
364
comments
John UK wrote:
Absolutely correct!
Isn't that the Arminian method you are agreeing with John???
In the Reformed camp, the ordo salutis is 1) election, 2) predestination, 3) gospel call 4) inward call 5) regeneration, 6) conversion (faith & repentance), 7) justification, 8) sanctification, and 9) glorification. (Rom 8:29-30)

Biblicist wrote:
You notice that PF (facts indeed. cough!) does not cite his source
oops sorry!
Source. Elwell Theological Dictionary.

Biblicist wrote:
"In defining what a sacrament is...."
Try and remember that we are not Roman Catholics. (You're not one are you?)
Sacrament-baptism is a SIGN not actual grace! So don't be afraid of the word Sacrament.
Thats why we call it "sign and seal" of the Covenant.
Also try and realise that a great deal happened by grace in GOD's Reformation in the 16th century.

Edifying you guys is proving to be an uphill struggle. English comprehension as well as theology. Phew!!


News Item7/13/09 3:39 PM
Presbyfacts  Find all comments by Presbyfacts
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
364
comments
Mike wrote:
Looks a bit sideways to me. I was under the impression that first one becomes a believer indwelt by the Holy spirit, thus is ALREADY in communion with Christ, THEN comes baptism and the Lord's supper. Never heard of it the other way around before.
No! Election was first and that was back at the beginning of creation.
Faith is the gift of God which is the Holy Spirit working in the heart of those predestinated to salvation IN Christ.
Baptism is for the children of Covenanted parents, or adults who were not born to covenanted parent, but who subsequently come to Christ, by the Gift of God.

Eph 1:4 "According as he hath CHOSEN us in him BEFORE THE FOUNDATION of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love:
5 Having PREDESTINATED us unto the ADOPTION of children by Jesus Christ to himself, according to the good pleasure of HIS WILL"


News Item7/13/09 3:25 PM
Presbyfacts  Find all comments by Presbyfacts
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
364
comments
John UK wrote:
Wow!!!!
So Biblicist was right on the button, eh?
John
Can you read and use the english language?

News Item7/13/09 3:03 PM
Presbyfacts  Find all comments by Presbyfacts
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
364
comments
Biblicist wrote:
"sacrament" conveys the notion that grace is mechanically transmitted to the person taking the sacrament
You really should not LIE to achieve your ends. Satan is the father of lies. It would be a far more Christian witness if you didn't fully understand a word or concept to either leave it to others or ask! If you want to win friends and influence Christians then lying is not the way.

In point of fact it is more YOUR type of Arminian influence to believe in a "mechanical" transmission of grace.

---------

SACRAMENT;
"A religious rite or ceremony instituted or recognized by Jesus Christ. Baptism and the Lord's Supper were given a prominent place in the fellowship of the early church (Acts 2:41 - 42; 10:47; 20:7, 11), along with the proclamation (kerygma) and teaching (didache). Both rites were regarded as means appointed by Jesus Christ to bring the members of the church into communion with his death and resurrection, and thus with himself through the Holy Spirit (Matt. 28:19 - 20; Acts 2:38; Rom. 6:3 - 5; 1 Cor. 11:23 - 27; Col. 2:11 - 12)."


News Item7/13/09 9:13 AM
Presbyfacts  Find all comments by Presbyfacts
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
364
comments
Biblicist wrote:
Luther "Baptism is

Witsius: ".. the native signification of the words baptein and baptizein is to plunge, to dip."

As history states the Reformers sprinkled babies.
The only different group was Anabaptists and they were known to Reformers as heretics.

As for Witsius

"In discussing Christian baptism we begin with the mode of baptism. Some immerse and some sprinkle. Arguments for immersion are that Christ and the Apostles used this mode as seen by the example of the ancient church. "Baptize" often refers to immersion linguistically and there seems to be a more full likeness between the sign and the thing signified in immersion. In terms of those who sprinkle, the example of the three thousand (Acts 2:41) in one day and of Cornelius, Lydia, and the jailer exclude the possibility of immersion. "Baptize" can refer to sprinkling or pouring linguistically. And the thing signified by baptism is explained in the Old Testament and New Testament in terms of sprinkling and pouring (Isa. 52:15; Ez. 36:25; Heb. 12:24; 1 Pet. 1:2; Heb. 9:13-14). Immersing or sprinkling once or three times is indifferent though. It is to be done in the name of the Triune God."
(H.Witsius Economy of the Covenants)

Not as convinced as you eh?


News Item7/12/09 2:04 PM
Presbyfacts  Find all comments by Presbyfacts
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
364
comments
Question wrote:
Does your church have a website?
http://www.fpchurch.org.uk/

The site is not available on the Sabbath.


News Item7/12/09 11:21 AM
Presbyfacts  Find all comments by Presbyfacts
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
364
comments
Question wrote:
I heard that some pastors were made to leave the Free Presbyterian Church because they were paedobaptists. Is this fact or rumour? what happened?
Have not come across that one yet.
However it may depend on which countries FPC was involved.
Being from Scotland, our FPC is pure presbyterian therefore completely paedo. In point of fact the Baptist Church did not take off that big in Scotland over these centuries since God's Reformation. I think it came north from the sassenachs in the 18th century, via some soldiers. In my local town we did not have a Baptist Church until the early 1990's.

I believe the current situation is....

FPC North America - have both paedo and credo.

FPC Ulster -Ditto-
But it is said...
"On account of their additional adherence to the Articles of Faith, and because of their baptismal views, some regard the church as only nominally Presbyterian, and actually nearer to the Baptist Church"
#(NB Ian Paisley's denominational background was Baptist)

FPC Scotland - Paedo only.


News Item7/11/09 5:18 PM
Presbyfacts  Find all comments by Presbyfacts
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
364
comments
Biblicist wrote:
a] You can pride yourselves in keeping to your Roman Catholic beliefs and practices in relation to infants!!

b] And if you want to quibble, when did Preby. church government come about? Now let me think? Oh yes, it was an innovation at the time of the Reformation!! Just enough of Romanism was left in the system to suit Presby taste buds.

a] No we don't. Baptism means something quite different to them as I'm sure you know.

b] Roman church is epicopalian not presbyterian. Romanism developed over centuries until *GOD* brought His Church out from under and they protested about the non-Biblical practices setting up the Protestant Church in the process, by the grace of God. Since then we have observed that sinful man still continues to err!
Denominationalism is just as much a sin as anything else around here.
But GOD is still in charge of HIS Church!

As for Baptism? It does not contribute to salvation and the essential doctrines of Scripture, by grace and the Holy Spirit, are in a sense not up for debate.

"For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit."

God Bless.


News Item7/10/09 3:26 PM
Presbyfacts  Find all comments by Presbyfacts
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
6
comments
Roman Catholic doctrine and Liberal doctrine come from the same source.
The difference between the two is only a temporary one.
One antichrist is much the same as the next in the context of worldliness, just that each serve a different purpose for Satan. But all have a common aim. (and end)

News Item7/10/09 3:16 PM
Presbyfacts  Find all comments by Presbyfacts
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
364
comments
John UK wrote:
FR, I know I've raised this point before, but it bears repeating. The Eunuch had a very long journey back, across desert wastes, with an entourage of folks and animals. It makes complete sense that, being wealthy, he would have had a huge amount of water on board for the trip.
So if the baptism that Philip preached to him was by pouring or sprinkling, why on earth did he wait until he spotted a muddy water-hole full of 'creatures' before mentioning baptism? Why not just get out one of his bottles? And why did Philip accede to his request, when he knew the eunuch had plenty of clean water on board more suited to baptismal sprinkling? A few drops would have been sufficient and hardly would have dented his supply.
He did not need to use his drinking water supply since the Holy Spirit was in complete charge.
And provided the water by the side of the road.

= Beginning with...
Acts 8:29 Then the SPIRIT said unto Philip, Go near, and join thyself to this chariot.
= Ending at....
39 And when they were come up out of the water, the SPIRIT of the Lord caught away Philip, that the eunuch saw him no more: and he went on his way rejoicing.


News Item7/10/09 3:00 PM
Presbyfacts  Find all comments by Presbyfacts
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
29
comments
Mike wrote:
a] "A man cannot be said to have even that with which he believes in God, without having received it...not so as to take away from the free will

b] "The conclusion is that we are by no means under compulsion to abandon free choice in favor of divine knowledge,

c] "Because whoever has done anything evil by means of one unconscious or unable to resist, the latter can by no means be justly condemned"

Why Mike
a] We Calvinists are not against "Free Will" - As long as you are also FREE of the influence of SIN too!!!

b] Ditto

c] Ro 7:20 Now if I do that I would not, it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me."

Pre-Regeneration in the natural estate man has free will CONTROLLED by sin.
(Total Depravity)

Post-Regeneration the believer is no longer under the power of sin.
Because.....
Ro 6:14 For sin shall not have dominion over you: for ye are not under the law, but under grace.

1Cor 2:14 "But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned."
--------

Jim Lincoln
Re "Cult of personality" -
The ELECT are NOT influenced by this.
The NON-elect don't count.

Keep trying folks


News Item7/10/09 10:58 AM
Presbyfacts  Find all comments by Presbyfacts
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
29
comments
John Calvin. One of the greatest theological minds God has ever graced His Church and ministry with.

Calvin's genius lives on in the Church thanks be to the grace of God.
Praise the Lord!

I pray that those who have not yet perceived the Biblical Doctrines of Grace and the Truth taught therein, may be brought to know them by grace, through faith.

As Spurgeon stated in his sermon

"The old truth that Calvin preached, that Augustine preached, that Paul preached, is the truth that I must preach to-day, or else be false to my conscience and my God. I cannot shape the truth; I know of no such thing as paring off the rough edges of a doctrine. John Knox's gospel is my gospel. That which thundered through Scotland must thunder through England again."—C. H. Spurgeon

[URL=http://www.spurgeon.org/calvinis.htm]]]C.H.Spurgeon's Sermon on Calvinism IS the Gospel.[/URL]

Also on SA at
http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=126071345112


News Item7/10/09 10:38 AM
Presbyfacts  Find all comments by Presbyfacts
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
364
comments
Biblicist wrote:
The church of Donald McCleod?!
If you refer to Prof. Donald Macleod of the court case fame, (accused of putting his hands where he should not have) - he is in the Free Church of Scotland. His case led to the split in the FCOS and the forming of a new church the Free Church of Scotland (Continuing)
Macleod is a Liberal and some say that was the real reason behind the split.

My church is a different one, "Free Presbyterian Church" formed in 1893.


News Item7/9/09 4:38 PM
Presbyfacts  Find all comments by Presbyfacts
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
364
comments
Hidemi Williges wrote:
1. though, it does not absolutely state the depth of the water, it can be inferred by the wording of the text that (being the Jordan river) there was an abundant amount of water available. The words "coming up" seems to indicate that Jesus was dunked. Otherwise the the phrase would have said "stepped out of" which it doesn't.
2,3. I see many good things but having listened to Alister Begg and Ian Paisley, and am in disagreement to the following; calvinism, political activism and fellowship with catholics. I do agree with their stand on the KJV. I can say that that not every Baptist Church follows Scripture, but that each Church is independent, has the liberty to follow as led by the Holy Spirit. I, myself belong to an Independent, Fundamentalist, Separatist, Baptist Church.
4. I agree with you here.
Well we can agree in a few things. Thats good.

BTW FPC Scotland, not Ulster. Sorry I should have mentioned. We have a few differences with them too. But hey debate is good.

Jump to Page : [1] 2



Sean E. Harris
Is Satan Bound Now or Later

The Revelation of Jesus Christ
Sunday - AM
Berean Baptist Church
Play! | MP4 | RSS


Hourly: Covetousness, Sin of Our Time
Dr. Stephen Jones
Bob Jones University
Staff Picks..

Larry Wessels
Early Church History #2

Christian Answers of Austin
Teaching
Transcript!Play! | MP4

E. A. Johnston
When It Rained Hell Out Of..

Evangelistic Message
Evangelism Awakening
Transcript!Play! | MP3

Sermon:
Peaceful Living
Ken Wimer

SPONSOR | 10,100+

SPONSOR




                   
The chief work of the Holy Spirit is to make men holy. ... J. Stuart Holden


Gospel of John
Cities | Local | Personal

MOBILE
iPhone + iPad
Church App
Watch
Android
Church App
Fire Tablet
Wear
Chromecast TV
Apple TV
Android TV
ROKU TV
Amazon Fire TV
Amazon Echo
Kindle Reader


HELP
Knowledgebase
Broadcasters
Listeners
Q&A
Uploading Sermons
Uploading Videos
Webcasting
Tips & Tricks
YouTube Screencasts
2-MINUTE TIPS

FOLLOW
Weekly Newsletter
Staff Picks Feed
SA Newsroom
RSS | Twitter | Facebook
SERVICES
Sermon Dashboard | Info
Audio | Video | Podcast
Sermon Player | Video
Church Finder | Info
Mobile & Apps
Live Webcasting
Listen Line
Events Support
Transcription | PowerClips
Billboards
Business Cards
SOLO Sites New!
Favorites New! | QR Codes
Online Donations
24x7 Radio Stream
INTEGRATION
Embed Codes
Goodies
WordPress
Twitter
Facebook
Logos | e-Sword | BLB
JSON API

BATCH
Transfer Agent
Protected Podcasts
Auto-Upload Sermons
Upload via FTP
Upload via Dropbox
Picasa
ABOUT US
The largest and most trusted library of audio sermons from conservative churches and ministries worldwide.

Our Services | Articles of Faith
Broadcast With Us
Earn SA COINS! New!
Advertising | Local Ads
CONTACT
info@sermonaudio.com
Privacy Policy | Support Us | Stories