Sign in or signup
Radio Streams
SA Radio
24/7 Radio Stream
VCY America
24/7 Radio Stream

My Favorite Things
Home
NewsSITE
Events | Local | Blogs
New Audio | Video | Clips
Broadcasters
Church Finder
Live Webcasts
Sermons by Bible
Sermons by Category
Sermons by Topic
Sermons by Speaker
Sermons by Date
Staff Picks
CommentsALL -48 sec
Top Sermons
Daily Log
Photos
Stores
Online Bible
Hymnal
Daily Reading
Our Services
Sermon DashboardNEW
Members Only

 
USER COMMENTS BY “ PHILADELPHIA ”
RECENTLY-COMMENTED SERMONS | MoreLast PostTotal
Sermon Dr. Michael G. Morrow's Final Sermon (John 3:16) | Dr. Michael G. Morrow
Matt Smith from Whitley County
"Great message brother. Sharing our heartaches and valleys with our..."
-8 hrs 
Sermon Keys to Christian Living | Bill Parker
Carlos Villaverde from Los Angeles
-10 hrs 
Sermon #116 Death | Dr. James M. Phillips
nkjustice from Erie - Pa
-10 hrs 
· Page 1 ·  Found: 21 user comments posted recently.
News Item2/8/17 8:37 PM
Philadelphia  Find all comments by Philadelphia
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
35
comments
But Christian men should not wish to be turned on by ungodly women.
And married Christian men (who should have made a covenant with their eyes!) should not wish to be turned on by any godly women other than their wives.

News Item2/8/17 5:06 PM
Philadelphia  Find all comments by Philadelphia
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
35
comments
SteveR wrote:
Corvus oculum corvi non eruit
Don't be vulgate,

News Item2/8/17 4:02 PM
Philadelphia  Find all comments by Philadelphia
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
35
comments
Adriel wrote:
One of Satan's tasks during the last six thousand years has been to make Christianity look bad and thus discourage people from joining the church.
And nothing discourages people from joining the church like denying the sacrament of baptism to new converts.

Presby wrote:
I believe they use both methods Paedo and Credo. I obey only the Scriptural method of Covenant paedobaptism.

News Item2/8/17 2:58 PM
Philadelphia  Find all comments by Philadelphia
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
35
comments
Stever,

Multiple handles fool no one, except maybe Albert Kopsho and PN Mazar. Oh and secundus as well.


News Item2/8/17 2:01 PM
Philadelphia  Find all comments by Philadelphia
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
35
comments
SteveR wrote:
I have a difficult time trusting an institution that thinks the time between Sept 2001 and now is 17 years can conduct a statistically significant poll
But would a Jesuit expose Jesuit maths?

News Item1/28/17 2:43 AM
Philadelphia  Find all comments by Philadelphia
• Thread closed
• Report abuse
76
comments
Does anybody here understand the difference between a Roman Catholic (in general) and a Jesuit (in particular)?

Does anyone here understand the difference between the Pope and the Black Pope? They are not one and the same.

SteveR comes on here and states plainly RCC dogma and is accused of being a Jesuit (not sure why when he is speaking plainly and openly confessing an RCC position).

I come on here and state plainly Protestant dogma and am accused of being a Romanist in disguise (i.e. acting Jesuitically).

This appears to say more about the commenters than their subjects.

ladybug wrote:
This convo started with my asking you if you posted with other monikers. You evaded that by simply stating you have used many.
This convo did not start there, but in any event my answer was very plain and the opposite of evasive. It is my prerogative how I choose to answer you. You do not own the forum.

News Item1/28/17 2:25 AM
Philadelphia  Find all comments by Philadelphia
• Thread closed
• Report abuse
76
comments
Yet again, there is a world of difference between an assertion and a proof.

My words "you are not wrong" would not be interpreted by any sober minded reader as "Your words appear to state you are in disagreement ..."

You are being contentious without a cause.

ladybug wrote:
No 'bearing false witness', just stating what you implied....
Nonsense. If you cannot show your accusations from my words they are your false witness based upon your own private interpolations. You are not the arbiter of all things.

News Item1/28/17 2:07 AM
Philadelphia  Find all comments by Philadelphia
• Thread closed
• Report abuse
76
comments
I could not care less about SteveR's contributions to this forum and nor should you. Nor should you use him as an excuse for unrighteousness.

ladybug wrote:
To Philadelphia,
You state "How many questions do I have to answer before you answer just one?
If plain answers that agree with you make me a Romanist in disguise (aka Jesuit), what would that make you?"
You have twisted my question beyond it's intent.
Absolutely I pushed your question beyond your intent but I have not twisted it. Are you the arbiter of all things? Why should one rule apply to me and not to you? Do you own this forum?

I have given you several plain answers, but you still have not answered my first question to you.

ladybug wrote:
especially in light of the fact that you claim Rome's overriding of God's word concerning marriage isn't devilish.
I say you are now bearing false witness. If not, prove it from a direct quotation of my words.

News Item1/27/17 3:51 PM
Philadelphia  Find all comments by Philadelphia
• Thread closed
• Report abuse
76
comments
Christopher000 wrote:
...only insofar as one handle is used per topic/conversation. Otherwise, I personally view multiple handles within the same conversation to be nothing more than sneaky attempts to make it appear as though friends are popping by to strengthen a case, or to voice "their" agreement and/or disdain over whatever and whoever.
Agreed.

News Item1/27/17 3:27 PM
Philadelphia  Find all comments by Philadelphia
• Thread closed
• Report abuse
76
comments
ladybug wrote:
Perhaps before we continue our discussion Philadelphia, would you mind responding to my prior question? What are two or three of the most recent monikers you've used?
Also, you said you've used many, is 'stever of mt. zion' one of your monikers?
Sister JA, before you respond to 'Philadelphia', you might want to wait for them to answer my question concerning monikers. We don't know if we are dealing with a Romanist in disguise....
How many questions do I have to answer before you answer just one?

If plain answers that agree with you make me a Romanist in disguise (aka Jesuit), what would that make you?


News Item1/27/17 2:21 PM
Philadelphia  Find all comments by Philadelphia
• Thread closed
• Report abuse
76
comments
ladybug wrote:
Also, you said you've used many, is 'stever of mt. zion' one of your monikers?
No. Steve did not destroy his own argument earlier this week.

News Item1/27/17 2:09 PM
Philadelphia  Find all comments by Philadelphia
• Thread closed
• Report abuse
76
comments
May I ask how you get from

"You are not wrong"

to

"RC apologists" ?

Edit: JA - to answer your new question as simply as possible I believe the Pope of Rome to be the Antichrist, and the RCC to be the whore of Babylon.


News Item1/27/17 2:01 PM
Philadelphia  Find all comments by Philadelphia
• Thread closed
• Report abuse
76
comments
Oh yes, too many to recall.

As I have said on this forum before, it is the substance of what someone says that matters (and not the readers' prejudice).


News Item1/27/17 1:38 PM
Philadelphia  Find all comments by Philadelphia
• Thread closed
• Report abuse
76
comments
JuneAnnette wrote:
RC apologists are engaging in what they do best . . double talk.
Do you understand straight talk from friends?

News Item1/27/17 1:15 PM
Philadelphia  Find all comments by Philadelphia
• Thread closed
• Report abuse
76
comments
You are not wrong, but that's proof only of current doctrine and practice within the RCC.

It is not a proof of its unbiblical nature nor of their invention ("devilish origin") of the practice.


News Item1/27/17 12:49 PM
Philadelphia  Find all comments by Philadelphia
• Thread closed
• Report abuse
76
comments
ladybug wrote:
Sister JA,
Thank you for the explanation on the devilsh origin of the RCC's 'annulment'.
With respect ladies I have only seen an assertion, and not an explanation, of this.

An explanation would I believe at the very least require:
1. An explanation of the distinctions between and biblical usages of ἀθετέω and ἀπολύω.
2. An explanation of the historical inception and development the annulment practice within the RCC.


News Item1/24/17 2:46 PM
Philadelphia  Find all comments by Philadelphia
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
313
comments
SteveR - But you have no idea of the purpose to which a master would put it. Could be why you are an internet warrior.

News Item1/24/17 2:38 PM
Philadelphia  Find all comments by Philadelphia
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
313
comments
JuneAnnette wrote:
SteveR is a master at deflection . .
No he is not. He evidently fools no one.

News Item1/24/17 2:03 PM
Philadelphia  Find all comments by Philadelphia
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
313
comments
SteveR wrote:
JohnY is real, not a troll or any of your other accusations. And the fact he is real, drives you crazy
And yet he only gets banned from Catholic Forums and not from SermonAudio forums. Perhaps you should take your indignation elsewhere?

News Item1/24/17 1:52 PM
Philadelphia  Find all comments by Philadelphia
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
313
comments
I took the time to examine the quote provided by SteveR.

I would regard Lurker's original question as ill-advised but well intended. In its full context he clearly did not regard John Yurich as an "ignorant autistic person" or anything close to it but on the contrary he displayed a degree of compassion and understanding.

He explicitly states that his question is not meant as a put down or an insult. Specifically, it was so that there would be understanding in how JY's comments would be perceived/received.

SteveR, having dug out a partial old quote, is profoundly misrepresenting it. We should also note that Lurker wondered if JY was savant, which would be indicative not just of high intelligence, but genius level intelligence. Hard to interpret that as an intended insult.

http://www.sermonaudio.com/new_details.asp?ID=40662

Jump to Page : [1] 2


Don Green
Moralistic Therapeutic Deism

Moralistic Therapeutic Deism
Midweek Service
Truth Community Church
Play! | MP4 | RSS

Beware the flatterer
Shane Stegemann

Drew McKeown
Restoring the Hopeless:..

Fearless in Faith
Drew McKeown
Play! | MP3

Rev. Arnoud T. Vergunst
Marriage Enrichment (6) The..

Marriage Enrichment
Netherlands Reformed
Transcript!Play! | MP3

Kevin Swanson
Warnings About Public Schools

Finally Time to Get Them Out?
Generations Radio
Play! | MP3

Sermon:
The Suffering God
Andy White

SPONSOR | 4,700+

SPONSOR




                   
In heaven is no warfare but all well-fare. ... John Boys


Gospel of John
Cities | Local | Personal

MOBILE
iPhone + iPad
Church App
Watch
Android
Church App
Fire Tablet
Wear
Chromecast TV
Apple TV
Android TV
ROKU TV
Amazon Fire TV
Amazon Echo
Kindle Reader


HELP
Knowledgebase
Broadcasters
Listeners
Q&A
Uploading Sermons
Uploading Videos
Webcasting
Tips & Tricks
YouTube Screencasts
2-MINUTE TIPS

FOLLOW
Weekly Newsletter
Staff Picks Feed
SA Newsroom New!
RSS | Twitter | Facebook
SERVICES
Sermon Dashboard | Info
Audio | Video | Podcast
Sermon Player | Video
Church Finder | Info
Mobile & Apps
Live Webcasting
Listen Line
Events Support
Transcription | PowerClips
Billboards
Business Cards
SOLO Sites
Favorites | QR Codes
Online Donations
24x7 Radio Stream
INTEGRATION
Embed Codes
Goodies
WordPress
Twitter
Facebook
Logos | e-Sword | BLB
JSON API

BATCH
Transfer Agent
Protected Podcasts
Auto-Upload Sermons
Upload via FTP
Upload via Dropbox
Picasa
ABOUT US
The largest and most trusted library of audio sermons from conservative churches and ministries worldwide.

Our Services | Articles of Faith
Broadcast With Us
Earn SA COINS!
Advertising | Local Ads
CONTACT
info@sermonaudio.com
Privacy Policy | Support Us | Stories