Unprofitable Servant wrote: Maybe we are reading two different stories. The article DOES NOT say that it was the the republicans who held up the truth until Nov. 6th. It says Cantor called Mueller and the game was up, BUT the truth was held up until after the election. That was obviously the administration that chose to do that.
Yes, the article does silently pass by the very obvious implication. That is my point! cnsnews (and you for that matter) cannot simply give the Republicans a free pass on this. The same standard of accountability applies to ALL.
It takes the complicity of EVERYBODY who is in the know to maintain a conspiracy of silence.
The Republican leadership KNEW from late October to November 6th but maintained a public silence and did not inform the President directly despite the threat to national security.
5. Why did the Republican leadership in the House also sit on this information from late October until after Nov 6th? Should they not have informed POTUS immediately if the security breach was so grave?