SermonAudio.com

USER COMMENTS BY “ JESS HELMS ”

RECENTLY-COMMENTED SERMONS | More

Last Post

Total

Travail of the Soul \| Ken Wimer Gay Marie Allen from Wisconsin "Thank You Pastor, for another wondeful message faithfully preached! God..."	-32 hrs	1
Scripture and the Biblical Counseling Movement \| Nathaniel Pringle Christa	-33 hrs	1
What happened at Pentecost? \| Chris DeLuna	-35 hrs	1

· Page 1 · Found: 2 user comments posted recently.

2/24/12 6:57 AM

Jess Helms

| Greenville,SC

• Add new comment

• Reply to comment

• Report abuse

News Item:
Secular Music in the Church Endangers Sacredness?

68
comments

I won't get into some argument about versions, as no light, but much heat is generally created. I'll just say that my Yes is as good as a NO on the AV 1611. It'll never be "proved" what Bible is God's until He returns...no one around today was there to see the originals. As far as the apocrypha is concerned, it was a part of the initial copies, but that was shortly removed...it had no influence on the text of Scripture. As for the Identity movement or radical black movements, Satan would certainly use the Bible that God honors. I find it so interesting how the "KJV" is the one Bible that is constantly attacked in and out of the pulpit. We are free to use whatever Bible we want. I just have no confidence in a bible that calls the Lord Jesus Christ a begotten god or removes 1 John 5:7. The best friend I have in the world uses the NASV and we differ absolutely on this issue, but he's still my best friend. Let's hold each other up in prayer from our respective positions, the Lord will judge.

2/22/12 2:43 PM

Jess Helms

| Greenville,SC

• Add new comment

• Reply to comment

• Report abuse

News Item:
Secular Music in the Church Endangers Sacredness?

68
comments

The Bible teaches that God inspired the writers of Scripture. It also teaches that God will preserve His Words. I've read enough of the academic experts to know that the answer to this question isn't there. Look at the fruit of the Bibles. We had a Bible, the Authorized Version for some 300+ years in obedient churches, which enabled responsive reading, poetic language that is relatively easy to memorize, and a Bible that is outside the line of Roman Catholic manuscripts. Ruckman, Riplinger, Waite, Gipp, and all other KJV defenders have done some good work. And being men are flawed. I've used the KJV, NASV, and the NIV. I'm back to the KJV for good. They are different in less than 10% of the text, but carefully examine where they differ. I've never found a "problem" text in the KJV that can't be reconciled, including "How old was King Ahaziah." THe KJV is the only version that has it right! Anyway, if God's preservation is not infallible, then what good is a perfect Word handled by fallen men for 2,000 years?