Reconstitute&Conserve Corruption? 16) Mark 13:14. âSpoken of by Daniel the prophetâ has been deleted in the Popeâs translations. Arm in arm with the Pope here are the ESV &RSV. 17) Acts 17:26. As it stands in the AV, the word âbloodâ has been taken out of the Catholic Bibles to make humanity not âone.â In agreement with this Evilutionist private interpretation are the : the ESV & RSV. 18) John 17:12. The Catholic Douay-Rheims has omitted the words âin the world.â Following suit are, of course, the ESV & RSV.â¨19) Acts 7:30. Once more âthe Lordâ has been booted out of His own Book (see 1 Cor. 10:28, 15:47) by Jerome &the Pope. He has also been evicted by guess who. You only get one guess; not two. 20) Romans 8:1. This time the ESV &RSV have cut out more of âthe holy scripturesâ (Rom. 1:2) than the Rheims version of the Jesuits. It only removes âbut after the Spirit.â The apostates on the ESV and RSV committees got rid of âwho walk not after the esh, but after the Spirit.â As we have seen so far, the âConservativeâ revision of the RSV, the ESV, not only agrees with the Roman Catholic versions of the Bible, but often is worse than them. How âConservativeâ can one get?
So,follow apers of Rome?đđđblind lead dumb dogs deaf to truth - false memories hacked.
11) Mat27:4. Rome has always wanted to put as much emphasis on the ânon-bloodyâ Mass as they do on the actual blood of Christ. Hence, the article âtheâ (KJV) is omitted from the verse by the Catholic âBible.â Following Romeâs lead are both the ESV &RSV. 12) Mat16:3. Since Rome is Postmillennial in its theology, & since it reserves for itself alone the right to interpret the Bible accurately, it strongly resents Christâs remark in regards to being able to âtellâ the future. It changes the KJV reading âdiscernâ (âto perceive or recognizeâ) to âinterpretâ (âto explain or understand as having a particular meaningââRomeâs meaning); ditto the ESV &RSV. 13) Mat20:22. Following Jeromeâs lead, Jesuit Rheims âBibleâ of 1582 omits Christâs (&the believerâs) baptism of suffering. ESV &RSV follow suit.â¨14) Mark 6:11. The half of the verse about âSodom and Gomorrah in the day of judgmentâ was taken out by Origen &Eusebius. This corruption was preserved in Vaticanus for Jerome &the subsequent Roman âBiblesâ based on his Latin Vulgate. In agreement with the Dark Age reading of the Jesuit Rheims version are the ESV &RSV. 15). Mat6:13. The ending to the Lordâs prayer is missing from the corrupt Roman âBibleâ as well as the ESV &RSV of apostate Conservatives&Liberal Protestants.
7) Titus 2:13. Jesuit Rheims Version attempts to force the Christian to look for a thing (âthe gloryâ) instead of a person (âthe great God and our Saviour Jesus Christâ). Agreeing with this ancient corruption are the ESV &RSV. 8) Col 1:14. Neither the âConservativesâ (ESV) nor the Liberals (RSV) can stand the blood of Christ, so they both remove it from the text. This time, though, the Catholic Rheims âBibleâ isnât that apostate: it retains the KJV reading âthrough his blood.â 9) Mark 1:2. This is a famous scholarly âboo-boo,â for the quote in verse 2 is NOT from Isaiah; it is from Malachi (Mal. 3:1). Verse 3 is the quote from Isaiah. The AV text has the factually accurate reading (âthe prophetsâ). The terrible blunder of âIsaiah the prophetâ is well represented by the Catholic âBibleâ of 1582 and its âbuddiesâ from the Twentieth and Twenty1st Centuries: RSV &ESV. 10) Acts 1:3. AV has the proofs of Christâs resurrection being âinfallible.â Neither Rome (Rheims) nor the Twentieth-Century Liberals (RSV) or the Twenty1st-Century Conservatives (ESV) care much for such âabsolutismâ in the Bibleâs miracles: all three dump the word âinfallible.â
Rubbish Compactor compilation from RCC library& Monastary waste basket " conservatives" conserve old heresy.
Our enemy in fighting abortion is not the abortionist, the courts or those who are advocating for abortion rights. Our enemy is the one who was a murderer from the beginning - Satan and the spiritual forces under his command.
Throughout history, certain pagan cultures have sacrificed human infants to (Devils) as a part of a complicated ritual in return for favors asked of them.
Few of those involved in abortion today are consciously engaging in child sacrifice, although that is precisely what abortion is - the sacrifice of a human life for the convenience or needs of others. In that respect, it is no less barbaric than the human sacrifice practiced to ensure, for example, a successful harvest. But beyond this, there is a spiritual, satanically inspired dimension that gives frightening realism to abortion's identification with literal child sacrifice.
The Bible supports this idea as often we see a particular action viewed by God as something of a more overtly occultic nature. Rebellion is called witchcraft; immorality is likened to idolatry; hatred is a kin to murder - thus abortion is child sacrifice
Above History of child sacrifice focus on 1stBorn- evil irony of abortion killing 1stborn
ESV more Romanist than Old Rome 1) 1 Cor 10:28. Catholic âBibleâ from Jerome has omitted âfor the earth is the Lordâs, and the fulness thereof.â Both the ESV & the RSV are in agreement with this omission. 2) 1 Cor11:24. This time the ESV &RSV are more Liberal than the Douay-Rheims version of 1582. The ESV & RSV omit âTake, eatâ from the verse; the Jesuit Rheims retains it. 3) 1 Cor15:47. The corrupt Catholic âBibleâ doesnât like âthe Lordâ being in His own Book, so it boots Him out. Siding with Rome against the Holy Bible are the ESV &RSV. 4) Gal3:1. Here is another example where the ESV &RSV are more Liberal than the Roman âBible.â You see, the Rheims Version has adopted the correct reading of the King James 1611 AV (âthat ye should not obey the truthâ). The âConservativeâ ESV &the âLiberalâ RSV canât stand âthe truth,â so they get rid of it. 5) 1 Peter 4:14. The corrupt Catholic âBibleâ has omitted the last half of the verse (âon their part he is evil spoken of, but on your part he is glori edâ). Backing Rome up, of course, are the ESV &RSV. 6) Rev14:5. The newer corrupt Catholic âBibles,â like the Confraternity, New American, &Jerusalem, alter their own sister translation (Douay-Rheims) &kick God off His throne. Joining them are the ESV & RSV.
1Sam4:17 And the messenger answered and said, Israel is fled before the Philistines, and there hath been also a great slaughter among the people, and thy two sons also, Hophni and Phinehas, are dead, and the ark of God is taken. 18 And it came to pass, when he made mention of the ark of God, that he fell from off the seat backward by the side of the gate, and his neck brake, and he died: for he was an old man, and heavy. And he had judged Israel forty years. 19 And his daughter in law, Phinehas' wife, was with child, near to be delivered: and when she heard the tidings that the ark of God was taken, and that her father in law and her husband were dead, she bowed herself and travailed; for her pains came upon her. 20 And about the time of her death the women that stood by her said unto her, Fear not; for thou hast born a son. But she answered not, neither did she regard it. 21 And she named the child Ichabod, saying, The glory is departed from Israel: because the ark of God was taken, and because of her father in law and her husband. 22 And she said, The glory is departed from Israel: for the ark of God is taken. -- Peter S. Ruckman,decorated political scientist-nationally known authority on presidential pardons, emailed a massive data set containing his lifeâs work...
Site Officiel Francaise Â http://www.kingjamesfrancaise.net
Âżquestion of "Lord" in a language that retains seĂąor for mundane?
"To say that Jehovah is a bad translationâfor whatever reason, is to agree with modern critics. But to imply that all Bibles should conform to the KJV 1611 is unnecessary, and absurd! Does my friend imply that the French Bible (and a host of other world biblical translations) should forget âLe Eternalâ and substitute the Tetragrammaton for âSEIGNEURâ? "
David Cloud writes: â,...the Roman Catholic Church has accepted modern textual criticism and the modern Bible versions with open arms. In 1965, Pope Paul VI authorized the publication of a new Latin Vulgate, with the Latin text conformed to the United Bible Societies Greek New Testament (Michael de Semlyen, All Roads Lead to Rome, p. 201). In 1987 a formal agreement was made between the Roman Catholic Church and the United Bible Societies that the critical Greek New Testament will be used for all future translations, both Catholic and Protestant (Guidelines for International Cooperation in Translating the Bible, Rome, 1987, p. 5). Most of the translations produced by the United Bible Societies are âinterconfessional,â meaning they have Roman Catholic participation and backing.â (David Cloud) Â Guess why the UBS (United Bible Society) Greek texts are the basis for all these new versions? It's because Catholics and Evangelicals were united to produce this text. One of the 5 chief editors was the New Age Catholic Cardinal Carlos Martini, who believed god was in all men and in all religions..
* 9) Dr Scrivener & Dean Burgon both agree -during the first 100 years after the NT was written, â¨the greatest corruptions took place to the Received Text used by the early church. â¨ * 10)Peshitta Syriac Version was based on Received Txtâ¨ * 11) Papyrus #75 used the Received * 12) vast majority of extant NT manuscripts all used the Received Txt This includes about 99% =about 5,210 of 5,255 manuscripts. â¨ * 13)The Greek Orthodox Church used the Received Txtâ¨ * 14)present Greek Church still uses Received Txtâ¨ * 15) Â churches of the Reformation all used Received Textâ¨ * 16)Lutherâs German Bible 1522 used Received Text. â¨ * 17) Tyndaleâs Bible (1525) used Received Txtâ¨ * 18)Coverdale Bible (1535) used Received Txtâ¨ * 19)Matthewâs Bible 1537 used Received Txtâ¨ * 20) Â The Great Bible 1539-41 used Received Textâ¨ * 21)Geneva Bible (1557-60) used Received Text. â¨ * 22)Bishopâs Bible 1568used the Received Text. â¨ * 23) Beza Greek NT (1598) used Received Text=Greek Text that the King James â¨Bible was based on, using the 1598, 5th edition of Beza. â¨ * 24) King James Bible 1611 used Received Textâ¨ * 25) Â The Received Text =the text that has survived in continuity from the beginning of the NT itself. the only accurate representation of the originals today.
Which Translation Should You Trust? by Timothy S. Morton Â http://www.preservedwords.com/kjv1.htm Â Excellent and very well written Book online. Â Which Translation Should You Trust?Â A Defense Of The Authorized King James Version Of 1611
Or trust RCC Trash redactions?
*1) Textus Receptus is based on the vast majority (90% some say as high as 97%) of the 5000+ Greek manuscripts in existence. â¨ * 2) Textus Receptus is not mutilated with deletions, additions & amendments, as is the Minority Text. â¨ * 3) Textus Receptus agrees with the earliest versions of the Bible: Pershiita (AD 150) Old Latin Vulgate (AD 157) The Italic Bible (AD 157) etc.These Bibles were produced some 200 years before the minority text was chosen which underlines ALL modern versions since the RSV 1881. â¨ *4) Â Textus Receptus agrees with the vast majority of the 86,000+ citations from Scripture by the early church fathers. â¨ *5)Â Textus Receptus is untainted with Egyptian philosophy & unbelief.â¨ *6)Â Textus Receptus strongly upholds the fundermental Christian doctrines such as creation, the â¨virgin birth, the deity of the Lord Jesus Christ, the resurrection, the Blood etc. â¨ *7) All of the Apostolic Churches used the Received Text. â¨ *8) The churches in Palestine used the Received Text
A "Christian message" must hear Christ, And not have sodomite scribes filter His words thru a ÂżÂżÂż"Yea???, ÂżÂżÂżhath God said???
Bible believers know how downgrade spiral happens Example
"Luke 10:12 - Judgment upon Sodom
KJB - But I say unto you, that it shall be more tolerable in that day for Sodom than for that city.
NIV - I tell you, it will be more bearable on that day for Sodom than for you.
Mollenkott, ITHMN, Page 59-"Jesus refers to Sodom, not in the context of sexual acts, but in the contents of inhospitality." And on Page 71, she expands this thought with the idea of a life long homosexual orientation or 'condition' is never mentioned in the Bible."
"many believe practicing homosexuals can be Christian, there are many others who have a different conviction about what the Bible says about sodomy. For this group, it is hardly acceptable to call Sodomites temple prostitutes, or to think of same-sex relationships as natural. These same people would take a viewpoint that God hates the sin of homosexuality and will bring judgment on those who live this kind of lifestyle.
The information presented here is not all-inclusive, but is intended to sound an alarm. " NIV is pro-Sodom styled.
Dr. Tim wrote: why a catholic cemetery? 'Cause he's Catholic born And Catholic bred, And when he's gone He'll be Catholic dead.
If,BG style,"Mormon Baptized"- (OK' by Billy they're advised-)- John wakes in Kolob surprised- New Named and canonized- "St.Mormon John" chastised- Finds that Kolob is hell đĽdisguised - 'baptist' teachings new, revised- By past teachers idolized- & Following preachers unadvised- Also those who compromised- May make him wish he'd patronized- A path that was not harmonized - With fake books falsely advertised- & serpent đgaze that hypnotized.
the King James Bible exalts the Lord Jesus Christ to his highest place of honor, while the inferior versions repeatedly degrade him in various ways.
See - Many Modern Versions Degrade the Person of the Lord Jesus Christ Matt27:24; Matt28:6; Luke 23:42; John 7:8-10; Mat 5:22; Mark 9:24; Phil 2:6-8; 1 Cor10:9, 1 Cor15:47; Micah 5:2; 1 Tim 3:16 and "Worship" or "Kneel before"? Rom14:10-12
Who controls the world, God or Satan? fake bibles teach it is Satan -
1 Jn5:19 âAnd we know that we are of God, and the whole world LIETH IN WICKEDNESS.â Wycliffe, Coverdale, Bishopsâ Bible, Geneva Bible, Youngs, Third Millenium Bible
The NIV says: "The whole world is UNDER THE CONTROL OF THE EVIL ONE." NASB, ESV, ISV, Holman, Catholic St. Joseph, NET
Dr. Tim wrote: I haven't heard or read Franklin Graham's full sermon, but .. Without the burial and resurrection of Christ there is no gospel.
Franklin Did include the resurrection in his sermon
But He started with a typical Fuzzy Franklin actually quoted ÂĄBible John 3:16! "16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." -- Truth is tho- The downgrade of http://brandplucked.webs.com/absolutestandard.htm " the Bible says" https://www.crosswalk.com/faith/spiritual-life/inspiring-quotes/40-courageous-quotes-from-evangelist-billy-graham.html
Culled into modernist "For God so loved the world that he gave his
one and only http://brandplucked.webs.com/eternalonlybegottenson.htm
Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal lifeâ Jn3:16 --
References: The Billy Graham Evangelistic Association Vs
Greek text for the first part of John 3:16 "God so loved the world that he gave his ONLY BEGOTTEN Son". In Greek this looks like - Îá˝ĎĎĎ Îłá˝°Ď áź ÎłÎŹĎÎˇĎÎľÎ˝ á˝ Î¸Îľá˝¸Ď Ďá˝¸Î˝ ÎşĎĎÎźÎżÎ˝, á˝ĽĎĎÎľ Ďá˝¸Î˝ Ď áźąá˝¸Î˝ Îąá˝ĎÎżáżŚ Ďá˝¸Î˝ ÎźÎżÎ˝ÎżÎłÎľÎ˝áż áźÎ´ĎÎşÎľÎ˝. The word in question is ÎźÎżÎ˝ÎżÎłÎľÎ˝áż
Billy Graham conducted a crusade in St. Louis, Missouri, in October 1999. In an interview with the press, Graham said that baptism is not his concern and not his business. his statement: âBaptism is very important because Jesus taught that we are to believe and to be baptized. But that is up to the individual and the church that they feel led to go to. The churches have different teachings on that. I know that in the Lutheran or the Episcopal or Catholic Church it is a very strong point, and in the Baptist church. But there are some churches that would not insist on baptism. So, I GIVE THEM THE FREEDOM TO TEACH WHAT THEY WANT. I am not a professor. I am not a theologian. Iâm a simple proclaimer. ... Iâm announcing the news that God loves you and that you can be forgiven of your sins. And you can go to heaven. My job from God is not to do all these other things. ... I am not a pastor of a church. Thatâs not my responsibility. MY RESPONSIBILITY IS TO PREACH THE GOSPEL TO EVERYONE AND LET THEM CHOOSE THEIR OWN CHURCH, WHETHER IT IS CATHOLIC OR PROTESTANT OR ORTHODOX OR WHATEVER IT ISâ (Billy Graham, interview with Patricia Rice, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, October 10, 1999). strange statement in light of the explicit command by the Lord Jesus Christ:Mt 28:19 No baptism?
John Yurich USA wrote: satanic nonsense that Graham
Said Quotes of BG "1997, Graham said that nearly all of his crusades were supported by Roman Catholic churches. He said this in an interview with New Man magazine, published at that time by Promise Keepers. Following is his statement on Catholicism: âEarly on in my life, I didnât know much about Catholics. But through the years I have made many friends within the Roman Catholic Church. In fact, when we hold a crusade in a city now, nearly all the Roman Catholic churches support it. And when we went to Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minn., for the crusade [last year], we saw St. Paul, which is largely Catholic, and Minneapolis, which is largely Lutheran, both supporting the crusade. at wouldnât have happened 25 years agoâ (âBilly Graham in His Own Words: What the Evangelist Has Learned from a Lifetime of Ministry to the World,â New Man, March- April 1997, pp. 32, 33).
I agree - Satanic
Nov. 21, 1967, an honorary degree was conferred on Graham by the Catholic priests - said about being "presented with this degree. Iâm not sure but what this could start me being called âFather Graham,ââ
My Own 2 cents wrote: Jim, enjoy your lesbian edited NIV. You can have it. I prefer my two edged sword (KJV), not a pen knife. đ
Mollenkott served as an assistant editor of Seventeenth Century News from 1965â1975; as a stylistic consultant for the New International Version of the Bible for the American Bible Society from 1970â1978. Mollenkott became an associate of the Women's Institute for Freedom of the Press (WIFP) in 1977.
Democrat and trans-religious Christian, Mollenkott lives with her domestic partner Judith Suzannah Tilton at Cedar Crest Retirement Village; together they co-grandmother Virginia's three granddaughters.
Mollenkott, one of the literary consultants for the NIV translating committee, is a professed homosexual. This is verified by her own words in an interview in the Episcopal publication, Witness (June, 1991, pages 20-23). The interviewer, Sue Pierce, asked the question, "Why was it important to both of you to come out as lesbians?" Dr. Mollenkott's reply was, "My lesbianism has always been a part of me. I tried to kill myself in my teens because they told me I'd never be healed, that God had no use for people like me