Radio Streams
SA Radio
24/7 Radio Stream
VCY America
24/7 Radio Stream
66

My Favorite Things
Home
NewsroomALL
Events | Notices | Blogs
Newest Audio | Video | Clips
Broadcasters
Church Finder
Webcast LIVE NOW!
Sermons by Bible
Sermons by Category
Sermons by Topic
Sermons by Speaker
Sermons by Language
Sermons by Date
Staff Picks
CommentsALL -8 sec
Top Sermons
Online Bible
Hymnal
Daily Reading
Our Services
Broadcaster Dashboard
Members Only

 
USER COMMENTS BY “ IGNOMINIOUS EMIRAKAN ”
Page 1 | Page 6 ·  Found: 500 user comments posted recently.
News Item3/10/18 8:40 AM
Ignominious Emirakan | 4th last quarter  Find all comments by Ignominious Emirakan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
118
comments
Reconstitute&Conserve Corruption?
16) Mark 13:14. “Spoken of by Daniel the prophet” has been deleted in the Pope’s translations. Arm in arm with the Pope here are the ESV &RSV.
17) Acts 17:26. As it stands in the AV, the word “blood” has been taken out of the Catholic Bibles to make humanity not “one.” In agreement with this Evilutionist private interpretation are the : the ESV & RSV.
18) John 17:12. The Catholic Douay-Rheims has omitted the words “in the world.” Following suit are, of course, the ESV & RSV.
19) Acts 7:30. Once more “the Lord” has been booted out of His own Book
(see 1 Cor. 10:28, 15:47) by Jerome &the Pope. He has also been evicted by guess who. You only get one guess; not two.
20) Romans 8:1. This time the ESV &RSV have cut out more of “the holy scriptures” (Rom. 1:2) than the Rheims version of the Jesuits. It only removes “but after the Spirit.” The apostates on the ESV and RSV committees got rid of “who walk not after the esh, but after the Spirit.”
As we have seen so far, the “Conservative” revision of the RSV, the ESV, not only agrees with the Roman Catholic versions of the Bible, but often is worse than them. How “Conservative” can one get?

So,follow apers of Rome?🙈🙉🙊blind lead dumb dogs deaf to truth - false memories hacked.


News Item3/10/18 7:39 AM
Ignominious Emirakan | Station verification  Find all comments by Ignominious Emirakan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
118
comments
11) Mat27:4. Rome has always wanted to put as much emphasis on the “non-bloody” Mass as they do on the actual blood of Christ. Hence, the article “the” (KJV) is omitted from the verse by the Catholic “Bible.” Following Rome’s lead are both the ESV &RSV.
12) Mat16:3. Since Rome is Postmillennial in its theology, & since it reserves for itself alone the right to interpret the Bible accurately, it strongly resents Christ’s remark in regards to being able to “tell” the future. It changes the KJV reading “discern” (“to perceive or recognize”) to “interpret” (“to explain or understand as having a particular meaning”—Rome’s meaning); ditto the ESV &RSV.
13) Mat20:22. Following Jerome’s lead, Jesuit Rheims “Bible” of 1582 omits Christ’s (&the believer’s) baptism of suffering. ESV &RSV follow suit.
14) Mark 6:11. The half of the verse about “Sodom and Gomorrah in the day of judgment” was taken out by Origen &Eusebius. This corruption was preserved in Vaticanus for Jerome &the subsequent Roman “Bibles” based on his Latin Vulgate. In agreement with the Dark Age reading of the Jesuit Rheims version are the ESV &RSV.
15). Mat6:13. The ending to the Lord’s prayer is missing from the corrupt Roman “Bible” as well as the ESV &RSV of apostate Conservatives&Liberal Protestants.

News Item3/10/18 6:35 AM
Ignominious Emirakan | Backing up error items  Find all comments by Ignominious Emirakan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
118
comments
7) Titus 2:13. Jesuit Rheims Version attempts to force the Christian to look for a thing (“the glory”) instead of a person (“the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ”). Agreeing with this ancient corruption are the ESV &RSV.
8) Col 1:14. Neither the “Conservatives” (ESV) nor the Liberals (RSV) can stand the blood of Christ, so they both remove it from the text. This time, though, the Catholic Rheims “Bible” isn’t that apostate: it retains the KJV reading “through his blood.”
9) Mark 1:2. This is a famous scholarly “boo-boo,” for the quote in verse 2 is NOT from Isaiah; it is from Malachi (Mal. 3:1). Verse 3 is the quote from Isaiah. The AV text has the factually accurate reading (“the prophets”). The terrible blunder of “Isaiah the prophet” is well represented by the Catholic “Bible” of 1582 and its “buddies” from the Twentieth and Twenty1st Centuries: RSV &ESV.
10) Acts 1:3. AV has the proofs of Christ’s resurrection being “infallible.” Neither Rome (Rheims) nor the Twentieth-Century Liberals (RSV) or the Twenty1st-Century Conservatives (ESV) care much for such “absolutism” in the Bible’s miracles: all three dump the word “infallible.”

Rubbish Compactor compilation from RCC library& Monastary waste basket " conservatives" conserve old heresy.

Many fallible proofs


News Item3/10/18 5:52 AM
Ignominious Emirakan | Bloody city woe  Find all comments by Ignominious Emirakan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
5
comments
Our enemy in fighting abortion is not the abortionist, the courts or those who are advocating for abortion rights. Our enemy is the one who was a murderer from the beginning - Satan and the spiritual forces under his command.

Throughout history, certain pagan cultures have sacrificed human infants to (Devils) as a part of a complicated ritual in return for favors asked of them.

Few of those involved in abortion today are consciously engaging in child sacrifice, although that is precisely what abortion is - the sacrifice of a human life for the convenience or needs of others. In that respect, it is no less barbaric than the human sacrifice practiced to ensure, for example, a successful harvest. But beyond this, there is a spiritual, satanically inspired dimension that gives frightening realism to abortion's identification with literal child sacrifice.

The Bible supports this idea as often we see a particular action viewed by God as something of a more overtly occultic nature. Rebellion is called witchcraft; immorality is likened to idolatry; hatred is a kin to murder - thus abortion is child sacrifice

https://www.revisionisthistory.org/massacre.html

Above History of child sacrifice
focus on 1stBorn- evil irony of abortion killing 1stborn


News Item3/10/18 5:32 AM
Ignominious Emirakan | Bible student review  Find all comments by Ignominious Emirakan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
118
comments
ESV more Romanist than Old Rome
1) 1 Cor 10:28. Catholic “Bible” from Jerome has omitted “for the earth is the Lord’s, and the fulness thereof.” Both the ESV & the RSV are in agreement with this omission.
2) 1 Cor11:24. This time the ESV &RSV are more Liberal than the Douay-Rheims version of 1582. The ESV & RSV omit “Take, eat” from the verse; the Jesuit Rheims retains it.
3) 1 Cor15:47. The corrupt Catholic “Bible” doesn’t like “the Lord”
being in His own Book, so it boots Him out. Siding with Rome against the Holy Bible are the ESV &RSV.
4) Gal3:1. Here is another example where the ESV &RSV are more Liberal than the Roman “Bible.” You see, the Rheims Version has adopted the correct reading of the King James 1611 AV (“that ye should not obey the truth”). The “Conservative” ESV &the “Liberal” RSV can’t stand “the truth,” so they get rid of it.
5) 1 Peter 4:14. The corrupt Catholic “Bible” has omitted the last half of the verse (“on their part he is evil spoken of, but on your part he is glori ed”). Backing Rome up, of course, are the ESV &RSV.
6) Rev14:5. The newer corrupt Catholic “Bibles,” like the Confraternity, New American, &Jerusalem, alter their own sister translation (Douay-Rheims) &kick God off His throne. Joining them are the ESV & RSV.

News Item3/10/18 4:47 AM
Ignominious Emirakan | Better to be Bible student  Find all comments by Ignominious Emirakan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
99
comments
1Sam4:17 And the messenger answered and said, Israel is fled before the Philistines, and there hath been also a great slaughter among the people, and thy two sons also, Hophni and Phinehas, are dead, and the ark of God is taken.
18 And it came to pass, when he made mention of the ark of God, that he fell from off the seat backward by the side of the gate, and his neck brake, and he died: for he was an old man, and heavy. And he had judged Israel forty years.
19 And his daughter in law, Phinehas' wife, was with child, near to be delivered: and when she heard the tidings that the ark of God was taken, and that her father in law and her husband were dead, she bowed herself and travailed; for her pains came upon her.
20 And about the time of her death the women that stood by her said unto her, Fear not; for thou hast born a son. But she answered not, neither did she regard it.
21 And she named the child Ichabod, saying, The glory is departed from Israel: because the ark of God was taken, and because of her father in law and her husband.
22 And she said, The glory is departed from Israel: for the ark of God is taken.
--
Peter S. Ruckman,decorated political scientist-nationally known authority on presidential pardons, emailed a massive data set containing his life’s work...

News Item3/9/18 7:53 PM
Ignominious Emirakan | senior scene  Find all comments by Ignominious Emirakan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
118
comments
Carl in Greensboro wrote:
"Jehova es mi Pastor,"
Re-
Spanish Bible

http://www.reinavaleragomez.com/en/bible/10

Site Officiel Francaise
 
http://www.kingjamesfrancaise.net

¿question of "Lord" in a language that retains señor for mundane?


http://www.reinavaleragomez.com/en/node/62

"To say that Jehovah is a bad translation—for whatever reason, is to agree with modern critics. But to imply that all Bibles should conform to the KJV 1611 is unnecessary, and absurd! Does my friend imply that the French Bible (and a host of other world biblical translations) should forget “Le Eternal” and substitute the Tetragrammaton for “SEIGNEUR”? "

Good article

https://www.facebook.com/notes/craig-kusmierski/the-true-names-of-god/351679154868344?hc_location=ufi

good, short article on Jehovah or Yahweh.

http://www.learnthebible.org/jehovah-or-yahweh.html

--
geek level info-

http://brandplucked.webs.com/jehovah.htm

JEHOVAH, in King James Bible found exactly 7 times - Gen22:14; Ex6:3, 17:15; Judg6:24; Ps83:18; Is12:2 & 26:4.

&point #16 below -German Luther Bible- a T.R. Issue

http://textus-receptus.com/wiki/Article:_Acts_19:20_word_of_GOD_by_Will_Kinney

Greek Kurios= Jehovah re Dr Khoo.


News Item3/9/18 6:47 PM
Ignominious Emirakan | Most unkind cut of all  Find all comments by Ignominious Emirakan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
118
comments
David Cloud writes: “,...the Roman Catholic Church has accepted modern textual criticism and the modern Bible versions with open arms. In 1965, Pope Paul VI authorized the publication of a new Latin Vulgate, with the Latin text conformed to the United Bible Societies Greek New Testament (Michael de Semlyen, All Roads Lead to Rome, p. 201). In 1987 a formal agreement was made between the Roman Catholic Church and the United Bible Societies that the critical Greek New Testament will be used for all future translations, both Catholic and Protestant (Guidelines for International Cooperation in Translating the Bible, Rome, 1987, p. 5). Most of the translations produced by the United Bible Societies are “interconfessional,” meaning they have Roman Catholic participation and backing.” (David Cloud)
 
Guess why the UBS (United Bible Society) Greek texts are the basis for all these new versions? It's because Catholics and Evangelicals were united to produce this text. One of the 5 chief editors was the New Age Catholic Cardinal Carlos Martini, who believed god was in all men and in all religions..

https://av1611.com/kjbp/charts/various.html

-- good example-¡¡ Acts 8:37! Cut!!

http://www.avdefense.webs.com/acts8-37.html

Does the Eunuch get saved in your Bible?


News Item3/9/18 6:56 AM
Ignominious Emirakan | Received Truth  Find all comments by Ignominious Emirakan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
118
comments
* 9) Dr Scrivener & Dean Burgon both agree -during the first 100 years after the NT was written, 
the greatest corruptions took place to the Received Text used by the early church. 

* 10)Peshitta Syriac Version was based on Received Txt

* 11) Papyrus #75 used the Received
* 12) vast majority of extant NT manuscripts all used the Received Txt This includes about 99% =about 5,210 of 5,255 manuscripts. 

* 13)The Greek Orthodox Church used the Received Txt

* 14)present Greek Church still uses Received Txt

* 15)  churches of the Reformation all used Received Text

* 16)Luther’s German Bible 1522 used Received Text. 

* 17) Tyndale’s Bible (1525) used Received Txt

* 18)Coverdale Bible (1535) used Received Txt

* 19)Matthew’s Bible 1537 used Received Txt

* 20)  The Great Bible 1539-41 used Received Text

* 21)Geneva Bible (1557-60) used Received Text. 

* 22)Bishop’s Bible 1568used the Received Text. 

* 23) Beza Greek NT (1598) used Received Text=Greek Text that the King James 
Bible was based on, using the 1598, 5th edition of Beza. 

* 24) King James Bible 1611 used Received Text

* 25)  The Received Text =the text that has survived in continuity from the beginning of the NT itself. the only accurate representation of the originals today.

Vs Redacted Trash


News Item3/9/18 5:53 AM
Ignominious Emirakan | Text Received vs Redacted  Find all comments by Ignominious Emirakan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
118
comments
Which Translation Should You Trust? by Timothy S. Morton
 
http://www.preservedwords.com/kjv1.htm
 
Excellent and very well written Book online.
 
Which Translation Should You Trust?  A Defense Of The Authorized King James Version Of 1611

Or trust RCC Trash redactions?

*1) Textus Receptus is based on the vast majority (90% some say as high as 97%) of the 5000+ Greek manuscripts in existence. 

* 2) Textus Receptus is not mutilated with deletions, additions & amendments, as is the Minority Text. 

* 3) Textus Receptus agrees with the earliest versions of the Bible: Pershiita (AD 150) Old Latin Vulgate (AD 157) The Italic Bible (AD 157) etc.These Bibles were produced some 200 years before the minority text was chosen which underlines ALL modern versions since the RSV 1881. 

*4)  Textus Receptus agrees with the vast majority of the 86,000+ citations from Scripture by the early church fathers. 

*5) Textus Receptus is untainted with Egyptian philosophy & unbelief.

*6) Textus Receptus strongly upholds the fundermental Christian doctrines such as creation, the 
virgin birth, the deity of the Lord Jesus Christ, the resurrection, the Blood etc. 

*7) All of the Apostolic Churches used the Received Text. 

*8) The churches in Palestine used the Received Text


News Item3/9/18 5:47 AM
Ignominious Emirakan | Taboo into Darkness  Find all comments by Ignominious Emirakan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
6
comments
&less time posting on SA
Might be the culture even disgusts pagans
Who wants to share common culture

tinysa.com/sermon/3718124270

Hollywood Embraces Bestiality


News Item3/6/18 5:34 AM
Ignominious Emirakan | Gotta  Find all comments by Ignominious Emirakan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
21
comments
Refreshing Examples of Courage in Ignominious Times

tinysa.com/sermon/361813572

"goats going to hell say " we are glad he was arrested":Swanson


News Item3/3/18 11:12 AM
Ignominious Emirakan | Pensive communication  Find all comments by Ignominious Emirakan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
4
comments
A "Christian message" must hear Christ,
And not have sodomite scribes filter His words thru a
¿¿¿"Yea???, ¿¿¿hath God said???

https://www.biblebelievers.com/Graham1.html

Bible believers know how downgrade spiral happens
Example

"Luke 10:12 - Judgment upon Sodom

KJB - But I say unto you, that it shall be more tolerable in that day for Sodom than for that city.

NIV - I tell you, it will be more bearable on that day for Sodom than for you.

Mollenkott, ITHMN, Page 59-"Jesus refers to Sodom, not in the context of sexual acts, but in the contents of inhospitality." And on Page 71, she expands this thought with the idea of a life long homosexual orientation or 'condition' is never mentioned in the Bible."

"many believe practicing homosexuals can be Christian, there are many others who have a different conviction about what the Bible says about sodomy. For this group, it is hardly acceptable to call Sodomites temple prostitutes, or to think of same-sex relationships as natural. These same people would take a viewpoint that God hates the sin of homosexuality and will bring judgment on those who live this kind of lifestyle.

The information presented here is not all-inclusive, but is intended to sound an alarm. "
NIV is pro-Sodom styled.


News Item3/3/18 10:49 AM
Ignominious Emirakan | Roman round  Find all comments by Ignominious Emirakan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
39
comments
Dr. Tim wrote:
why a catholic cemetery?
'Cause he's Catholic born
And Catholic bred,
And when he's gone
He'll be Catholic dead.

If,BG style,"Mormon Baptized"-
(OK' by Billy they're advised-)-
John wakes in Kolob surprised-
New Named and canonized-
"St.Mormon John" chastised-
Finds that Kolob is hell 🔥disguised -
'baptist' teachings new, revised-
By past teachers idolized-
& Following preachers unadvised-
Also those who compromised-
May make him wish he'd patronized-
A path that was not harmonized -
With fake books falsely advertised-
& serpent 🐍gaze that hypnotized.

News Item3/3/18 10:09 AM
Ignominious Emirakan | Hexagonal pattern  Find all comments by Ignominious Emirakan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
73
comments
Reasons Why The King James Bible Is The Absolute Standard - God's Historic Witness to the Truth

http://brandplucked.webs.com/absolutestandard.htm

Bibles DO Teach False Doctrines

Here are well over 30 concrete examples of how the fake bibles that NOBODY seriously believes are the inerrant words of God DO corrupt and pervert sound doctrines.

http://brandplucked.webs.com/fakebiblesdoctrine.htm

the King James Bible exalts the Lord Jesus Christ to his highest place of honor, while the inferior versions repeatedly degrade him in various ways.

See - Many Modern Versions Degrade the Person of the Lord Jesus Christ
Matt27:24; Matt28:6; Luke 23:42; John 7:8-10; Mat 5:22; Mark 9:24; Phil 2:6-8; 1 Cor10:9, 1 Cor15:47; Micah 5:2; 1 Tim 3:16 and "Worship" or "Kneel before"? Rom14:10-12

Who controls the world, God or Satan?
fake bibles teach it is Satan -

1 Jn5:19 “And we know that we are of God, and the whole world LIETH IN WICKEDNESS.” Wycliffe, Coverdale, Bishops’ Bible, Geneva Bible, Youngs, Third Millenium Bible

The NIV says: "The whole world is UNDER THE CONTROL OF THE EVIL ONE." NASB, ESV, ISV, Holman, Catholic St. Joseph, NET

http://brandplucked.webs.com/satanorgodcontrols.htm

tinysa.com/sermon/3118846316

Jn 6:66


News Item3/3/18 9:47 AM
Ignominious Emirakan | Graham non Baptist  Find all comments by Ignominious Emirakan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
36
comments
Dr. Tim wrote:
I haven't heard or read Franklin Graham's full sermon, but ..
Without the burial and resurrection of Christ there is no gospel.
Franklin
Did include the resurrection in his sermon

But
He started with a typical
Fuzzy
Franklin actually quoted ¡Bible John 3:16!
"16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life."
--
Truth is tho-
The downgrade of
http://brandplucked.webs.com/absolutestandard.htm
" the Bible says"
https://www.crosswalk.com/faith/spiritual-life/inspiring-quotes/40-courageous-quotes-from-evangelist-billy-graham.html

Culled into modernist
"For God so loved the world that he gave
his

one and only
http://brandplucked.webs.com/eternalonlybegottenson.htm

Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life” Jn3:16
--

References:
The Billy Graham Evangelistic Association
Vs

Greek text for the first part of John 3:16 "God so loved the world that he gave his ONLY BEGOTTEN Son". In Greek this looks like - Οὕτως γὰρ ἠγάπησεν ὁ θεὸς τὸν κόσμον, ὥστε τὸν υἱὸν αὐτοῦ τὸν μονογενῆ ἔδωκεν. The word in question is μονογενῆ

Franklin quoted Billy's old Bible


News Item3/3/18 9:14 AM
Ignominious Emirakan | No Wynn debate moron cult  Find all comments by Ignominious Emirakan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
228
comments
Dr. Tim wrote:
John, have you ever read anything that wasn't either on this site or on a box of cereal? If ignorance is bliss, there's no need for you to go to heaven. You're in paradise right now.
JY's type of Baptist included Baptism of the dead

"Billy Graham faces backlash over Mormon’cult’ removal"

The Rev. Samuel Wynn admired Billy Graham and his evangelistic association for decades, joining its spiritual crusades and urging fellow Christians to do the same. But no more.

‘’I will never again support anything by the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association,” said Wynn, the superintendent of a United Methodist Church district in Fayetteville, N.C.

Even a UMC type has limits.

‘’My question to Billy Graham is,
What’s more important for the kingdom of God:
politics or the message of Jesus Christ?”
said Wynn.

For evangelicals, berating Billy Graham is like Catholics dissing the pope.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/on-faith/billy-graham-faces-backlash-over-mormoncult-removal/2012/10/24/2f9ca0c6-1e1b-11e2-8817-41b9a7aaabc7_story.html?utm_term=.c5ede1b4ce2c


News Item3/3/18 8:57 AM
Ignominious Emirakan | Graham non Baptist  Find all comments by Ignominious Emirakan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
228
comments
Billy Graham conducted a crusade in St. Louis, Missouri, in October 1999. In an interview with the press, Graham said that baptism is not his concern and not his business. his statement:
“Baptism is very important because Jesus taught that we are to believe and to be baptized. But that is up to the individual and the church that they feel led to go to. The churches have different teachings on that. I know that in the Lutheran or the Episcopal or Catholic Church it is a very strong point, and in the Baptist church. But there are some churches that would not insist on baptism. So, I GIVE THEM THE FREEDOM TO TEACH WHAT THEY WANT. I am not a professor. I am not a theologian. I’m a simple proclaimer. ... I’m announcing the news that God loves you and that you can be forgiven of your sins. And you can go to heaven. My job from God is not to do all these other things. ... I am not a pastor of a church. That’s not my responsibility. MY RESPONSIBILITY IS TO PREACH THE GOSPEL TO EVERYONE AND LET THEM CHOOSE THEIR OWN CHURCH, WHETHER IT IS CATHOLIC OR PROTESTANT OR ORTHODOX OR WHATEVER IT IS” (Billy Graham, interview with Patricia Rice, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, October 10, 1999).
strange statement in light of the explicit command by the Lord Jesus Christ:Mt 28:19
No baptism?

News Item3/3/18 8:37 AM
Ignominious Emirakan | Graham quoted  Find all comments by Ignominious Emirakan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
228
comments
John Yurich USA wrote:
satanic nonsense that Graham
Said
Quotes of BG
"1997, Graham said that nearly all of his crusades were supported by Roman Catholic churches. He said this in an interview with New Man magazine, published at that time by Promise Keepers. Following is his statement on Catholicism:
“Early on in my life, I didn’t know much about Catholics. But through the years I have made many friends within the Roman Catholic Church. In fact, when we hold a crusade in a city now, nearly all the Roman Catholic churches support it. And when we went to Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minn., for the crusade [last year], we saw St. Paul, which is largely Catholic, and Minneapolis, which is largely Lutheran, both supporting the crusade. at wouldn’t have happened 25 years ago” (“Billy Graham in His Own Words: What the Evangelist Has Learned from a Lifetime of Ministry to the World,” New Man, March- April 1997, pp. 32, 33).

I agree - Satanic

Nov. 21, 1967, an honorary degree was conferred on Graham by the Catholic priests - said about being
"presented with this degree. I’m not sure but what this could start me being called “Father Graham,”’

Mt23:"9 And call no man your father"??


News Item3/3/18 8:31 AM
Ignominious Emirakan | Graham condemns SodomNIV  Find all comments by Ignominious Emirakan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
73
comments
My Own 2 cents wrote:
Jim, enjoy your lesbian edited NIV. You can have it.
I prefer my two edged sword (KJV), not a pen knife. 👍
https://www.biblebelievers.com/Graham1.html

Graham

Mollenkott served as an assistant editor of Seventeenth Century News from 1965–1975; as a stylistic consultant for the New International Version of the Bible for the American Bible Society from 1970–1978. Mollenkott became an associate of the Women's Institute for Freedom of the Press (WIFP) in 1977.

Democrat and trans-religious Christian, Mollenkott lives with her domestic partner Judith Suzannah Tilton at Cedar Crest Retirement Village; together they co-grandmother Virginia's three granddaughters.

https://www.biblebelievers.com/Graham1.html

Mollenkott, one of the literary consultants for the NIV translating committee, is a professed homosexual. This is verified by her own words in an interview in the Episcopal publication, Witness (June, 1991, pages 20-23). The interviewer, Sue Pierce, asked the question, "Why was it important to both of you to come out as lesbians?" Dr. Mollenkott's reply was, "My lesbianism has always been a part of me. I tried to kill myself in my teens because they told me I'd never be healed, that God had no use for people like me

Jump to Page : 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 more


North Highlands, CA
Faith Baptist Tabernacle
Play! | More

Dr. Sacha Walicord
Election Day Sermon

Romans 13:1-7
Sunday - PM
Walker United Reformed
Play! | MP4 | RSS

Reformation Day Sermon
Dr. Sacha Walicord

Tech Talk Zoom // Episode 05

E. A. Johnston
Mistakes Of Modern Evangelism

Evangelism Awakening
Teaching
Transcript!Play! | MP3

Dr. James M. Phillips
Post America Life,..

Dr. Jim on Mission Field
Discover The Word With Dr...
Video!Play! | MP4

Kevin Swanson
Impeachment 2.0

Analysis: Is Trump Guilty?
Generations Radio
Play! | MP3

Sermon: Calvin and Dordt Bite the Dust
Kevin Swanson

SPONSOR




SA UPDATES NEWSLETTER Sign up for a weekly dose of personal thoughts along with interesting content updates. Sign Up
FOLLOW US


Gospel of John
Cities | Local | Personal

MOBILE
iPhone + iPad
ChurchOne App
Watch
Android
ChurchOne App
Fire Tablet
Wear
Chromecast TV
Apple TV
Android TV
ROKU TV
Amazon Fire TV
Amazon Echo
Kindle Reader


HELP
Knowledgebase
Broadcasters
Listeners
Q&A
Uploading Sermons
Uploading Videos
Webcasting
2-MINUTE TIPS

NEWS
Weekly Newsletter
Unsubscribe
Staff Picks | RSS
SA Newsroom
SERVICES
Dashboard | Info
Cross Publish
Audio | Video | Podcast
Sermon Player | Video
Church Finder | Info
Mobile & Apps
Live Webcasting
Solo Sites
Internationalization
Listen Line
Events | Notices
Transcription | PowerClips
Billboards | Biz Cards
Favorites | QR Codes
Online Donations
24x7 Radio Stream
INTEGRATION
Embed Codes
Twitter
Facebook
Logos | e-Sword | BLB
JSON API

BATCH
Upload via RSS
Upload via FTP
Upload via Dropbox

SUPPORT
Advertising | Local Ads
Support Us
Stories
ABOUT US
The largest and most trusted library of audio sermons from conservative churches and ministries worldwide.

Our Services | Articles of Faith
Broadcast With Us
Earn SA COINS!
Privacy Policy

TECH TALK
Tech Talk Zoom // Episode 05
Copyright © 2021 SermonAudio.