|
|
USER COMMENTS BY DANIEL LEE FORD |
|
|
Page 1 | Page 6 · Found: 232 user comments posted recently. |
| | | |
|
|
8/20/08 5:37 AM |
Daniel Lee Ford | | Spring Arbor, Mich. | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
hidemi williges wrote: scholarship and conviction in that other thread, I mentioned that the foundation of reliance on the Authorised Bible was the AV men themselves. [URL=http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=110075182]]]letter of the translators -AV bible "not justly to be accepted against"[/URL]and in reply to constant pointing to the preface, noted that the above audio and the below text show an exact 180 degree different take on what the preface implies. [URL=http://playpdf.sa-media.com/media/110075182/110075182.pdf]]]AV translators views[/URL] These responses to a link Jim's put up many times recently about the preface which tries to uphold 'scholarship only'. We're reading the preface and getting a totally different take. BTW: Here are some good books on the subject: [URL=http://bbaptist.org/which_version.pdf]]]Which Version by FLOYD NOLEN JONES,Th.D., Ph.D.[/URL] [URL=http://www.buzzardhut.net/index/htm/Forever.Settled.pdf]]]FOREVER SETTLED - JACK MOORMAN Ph.D. [PDF][/URL] |
|
|
8/19/08 11:39 PM |
Daniel Lee Ford | | Spring Arbor, Mich. | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
As bad as Obama is, this is not quite a balanced response from 'evangelicals' They might note- About Obama and sodomites,Minnery said. "You cannot square the circle as he is trying to do,” “Either you support marriage or you do not. He says one thing. By his actions, he indicates another thing." and Janet Folger, national radio host and president of Faith2Action, commented McCain “without hesitation” stated that life begins at conception, Folger pointed out. but! How does McCain justify saying he believes life begins at conception and he is pro life but said he is also FOR embryonic stem sell research in the next breath. You have to have conception to have a embryo. "You cannot square the circle as he is trying to do,” as Minnery said. (BUT only of Obama)“Either you support [life] or you do not. He says one thing. By his actions, he indicates another thing." a fair, non 'puff piece' might say. [URL=http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/2008/08/mccain_on_stemc.html]]]Others note the same conflict in McCAIN[/URL] ??obvious implications- if rights attain the moment the egg and sperm meet: all kinds of embryo research become questionable, starting with the stem-cell research McCain says he favors. |
|
|
8/19/08 11:05 PM |
Daniel Lee Ford | | Spring Arbor, Mich. | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
hidemi williges 8/19/08 4:36 PM said to a DJC49 8/19/08 3:02 PM "great attitude calling all KJVO people liars."there seem to be 2 "DJC49 Florida"s one `DJC49' a Christian, the other `DJC49' a fake. don't confuse them: analyze the below supposed"DJC49'" posts
DJC49 wrote: calling all KJVO people liarsMark 16 is the lone Biblical text about handling snakes! "" KJVO storm-trooper par excellence. ...I see his storm-trooper traits in most every KJVOer I've ever met" "You'd make a fine Jesuit ... or an Inquisitor." "what your tribe does. It's your Klan's modus operandi." 8/15/08 9:28 PM "The KJVO Klan " " You must be one of those "blind guides" " "the Über-KJVO extremists " 8/10/08 9:00 PM actually MISREPRESENTS a QUOTE Obviously, a student of scripture would know what was pointed out to the fake DJC49, the Acts incident.fake DJC49's race baiting of 'calling a spade a spade' 'your tribe'& calling brethren Nazis & Klans men, are the marks of a troll. those DJC49 posts are "questionable, confused, flawed, and uncertain :they may not be from the same author. Based on scholarly analysis of authentic DJC49 posts, showing Bible knowledge,and eschewing slander, I'd ignore the `fake DJC49' slander posts. |
|
|
8/18/08 1:11 AM |
Daniel Lee Ford | | Spring Arbor, Mich. | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Jim Lincoln wrote: John MacArthur and his staff had this to say, In their attempt to 'straighten out' the pastor MacArthur said "I noted numerous factual errors and illogical conclusions. I am taking time to write not to prove you wrong or me right, but rather to ensure that whatever conclusions we reach, they are reached with correct data and right thinking" their point 5 was "You said that Westcott & Hort worked on the Bible version of 1881. Let's be specific. Westcott & Hort worked on the English Revised Version of 1885." New Testament 1881. C.J. Ellicott, et al., The New Testament of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, Translated out of the Greek: Being the Version Set Forth A.D. 1611, Compared with the Most Ancient Authorities and Revised, A.D. 1881. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1881 [URL=http://www.wayoflife.org/fbns/revisionrevised.htm]]]Burgon's Revision Revised[/URL] When the Westcott-Hort Greek New Testament was published, together with the English Revised Version, in 1881, Burgon exposed its errors in a series of articles that appeared in the Quarterly Review. The Revision Revised, appeared in 1883. - MacArthur concludes "A believer should continue to use an accurate English translation such as " the "NIV" NIV??? |
|
|
8/17/08 8:27 PM |
Daniel Lee Ford | | Spring Arbor, Mich. | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Let there be truth wrote: McCain.. getting a free ride Don't assume!No free ride from ME: see recent posts: [URL=http://www.sermonaudio.com/new_details.asp?ID=26002]]]8/5/08 9:53 PM[/URL] 8/3/08 7:14 AM What Does Obama Believe? I said [URL=http://www.covenantnews.com/baldwin080408.htm]]]Don't make an Idol of McCAIN[/URL] Both guilty of shedding innocent blood [URL=http://thereaganwing.wordpress.com/2008/02/21/john-mccain-is-not-pro-life/]]]McCAIN not Pro-life[/URL] Obama supports abortion even MORE- [URL=http://www.sermonaudio.com/new_details3.asp?ID=16824]]] Obama&Wife for Partial Birth Infanticide [/URL] both support sodomy [URL=http://www.theamericanview.com/index.php?id=1132 ]]]McCAIN don't ask don't tell illegal view[/URL] McCain's repeated & mistaken defense of "don't-ask-don't-tell" instead of endorsing the present law which says homosexuals are not eligible to be in our military. [URL=http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=116081214400]]]Pro-Sodomy Obama - Anti-O.T. Anti-book of Romans[/URL] [URL=http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=72708132160]]]Don't Vote for McCain either [/URL] my anti-McCAIN posts 7/28/08 4:13AM 8/6/08 6:50AM 7/5/08 6:58PM 7/24/08 6:01PM 7/17/08 9:57PM etc. Baldwin/Castle! |
|
|
8/17/08 7:50 PM |
Daniel Lee Ford | | Spring Arbor, Mich. | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Jim Lincoln wrote: woman has been the main source Mollencott? You know something we I don't? [URL=http://www.wayoflife.org/fbns/oldtimefundamentalists.htm]]]DEARMORE , Aberhart[/URL] John Burgon? F.H. SCRIVENER? BISHOP WORDSWORTH? CANON COOK? DAVID OTIS FULLER? JOSEPH CHARLES PHILPOT? TERENCE H. BROWN? LOUISE GAUSSEN? PHILLIP MAUR0? WILBUR NORMAN PICKERING? ZANE C. HODGES?ROBERT DICK WILSON? EDWARD F. HILLS? GEORGE SAYLES BISHOP? SIR ROBERT ANDERSON? HERMAN C. HOSKIER? ALFRED MARTIN? BENJAMIN C. WILKINSON? HENRY M. MORRIS? ALL of these men, back in 1974 told me WHICH BIBLE to use to try to FIND correct doctrine. Pre GAR, I read from [URL=http://www.wayoflife.org/fbns/fbns-index/versfbns.htm]]] David Cloud[/URL] Dr. Waite, Sam Gipp, [URL=http://bbaptist.org/which_version.pdf]]]Which Version by FLOYD NOLEN JONES,Th.D., Ph.D.[/URL] [URL=http://www.buzzardhut.net/index/htm/Forever.Settled.pdf]]]FOREVER SETTLED - JACK MOORMAN Ph.D. [PDF][/URL] And of course, the foundation was the AV men themselves. [URL=http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=110075182]]]letter of the translators -AV bible "not justly to be accepted against"[/URL] [URL=http://playpdf.sa-media.com/media/110075182/110075182.pdf]]]AV translators views[/URL] |
|
|
8/17/08 1:00 PM |
Daniel Lee Ford | | Spring Arbor, Mich. | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Christiana wrote: he didn't even attempt Atlantic.com magazine features this interview of RW by Jeffrey Goldberg on the presidential forum at Saddleback. 1. The title, [URL=http://jeffreygoldberg.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/08/the_rick_warren_interview_no_c.php]]]No Compromise With Evil.[/URL] The article's title is ironic given that Rick Warren is co-hosting this event with a [URL=http://watcherslamp.blogspot.com/2008/07/rick-warren-partners-with-pro.html]]]pro-sodomy group[/URL] Is that a compromise of Warren's Southern Baptist roots? Is that a compromise of Biblical doctrine?...depends on your definition of "compromise or evil ". Goldberg opens the interview asking Warren what is the objective of the forum. Warren comments: "The idea is really around civility". Goldberg asks a question: "So you're against blogging?" Referencing the recent [URL=http://watcherslamp.blogspot.com/search?q=Abanes]]]Warren attacks on blogs critical of his theology[/URL] [URL=http://watcherslamp.blogspot.com/]]]Warren sells out[/URL] [URL=http://defendingcontending.com/2008/08/13/christian-extremism/#more-3300]]]it'll only get worse[/URL] This is the year where solid bible believing Christians are going to start seeing the intolerance grow ... |
|
|
8/17/08 12:27 PM |
Daniel Lee Ford | | Spring Arbor, Mich. | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Warren had an obligation to confront both candidates as a moral obligation. We knew where both of the candidates stand. What’s needed is for them both to realize is that their positions will have consequences on election day for the voters who still have a moral conscience on the issue of the killing of the pre-born. [URL=http://www.sliceoflaodicea.com/?p=1571]]]daydreaming[/URL] that Rick Warren might miraculously have had some moral courage...Warren: We’ve had 50 million dead children and counting, Senator. Obama: Did I tell you that I represent change? Lots and lots of change. Change you can believe in. Change you can count on, more change than you’ve ever seen before… Warren to audience: Can you believe that this man is trying to win over evangelical votes with a platform and voting history like this? Ladies and gentlemen, let’s call a spade a spade. Senator, you have blood on your hands. The blood of these millions of babies cries out to the heavens for justice, and you, sir, have aided and abetted these brutal butchers of mankind from your political office. (Warren to Obama.)As a pastor, I’m telling you,Senator,that you need to repent for your defense of the murder of preborn... Senator McCain, I understand you are open to a pro-choice running mate.a question... |
|
|
8/17/08 12:16 PM |
Daniel Lee Ford | | Spring Arbor, Mich. | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
[URL=http://www.sliceoflaodicea.com/?p=1571]]]Warren America's pastor[/URL] Jer.10:21 For the pastors are become brutish, and have not sought the LORD: therefore they shall not prosper, and all their flocks shall be scattered. 12:10 Many pastors have destroyed my vineyard, they have trodden my portion under foot, they have made my pleasant portion a desolate wilderness.Warren:Senator Obama,you twice voted against the Born Alive Infant Protection Act in your home state, & you even tried to cover up your vote on this.This was the bill that would have allowed tiny babies who had survived the murder attempts of the doctor a chance to survive by requiring medical care for such infants.According to testimony in your state house by a nurse who witnessed it,such babies are routinely left to die in places like dirty laundry carts shoved into closets.What would you say to those human beings who struggle hopelessly for breath on dirty sheets, denied even the comfort of human arms to hold them? Obama:I represent change. Real change you can believe in.I’m a Christian. I’m not a Muslim.If you want change, vote for me. Warren:About the dying babies,Senator? Obama:I oppose dying babies and want to make it a rare event.That’s why I want abortion kept safe & legal& subsidized.." |
|
|
8/16/08 6:28 PM |
Daniel Lee Ford | | Spring Arbor,Mich. | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
[URL=http://bbaptist.org/which_version.pdf]]]Bible ANALYSIS by FLOYD NOLEN JONES,Th.D., Ph.D.[/URL] graphic of where we got our bible print if for a quick overview [URL=http://www.born2serve.org/images/kjvchartbig.gif]]]single page chart[/URL] [URL=http://www.buzzardhut.net/index/htm/Forever.Settled.pdf]]]FOREVER SETTLED by JACK MOORMAN Ph.D. [PDF][/URL] these are pretty extensive , presentations of the case for the Authorised Bible. for Help regarding any King James Bible issue I highly recommend Dr. D.A. Waite at: http://www.biblefortoday.org/ THE BIBLE FOR TODAY E-mail: [email protected] [URL=http://www.sermonaudio.com/search.asp?speakerOnly=true&currSection=sermonsspeaker&keyword=D%2E%5EA%2E%5EWaite%2C%5ETh%2ED%2E%2C%5EPh%2ED%2E]]]Waite message[/URL] listen to this sermon on SA by Graham Chewter. It's really good: [URL=http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=89081137472]]]Providential Preservation of the Scriptures[/URL] The historic nature of the doctrine is seen:about 10 minutes into the message. 4 reasons to believe it Ad hominems about rationality can be tossed at the scholarship only position,too. The 'new priesthood' of scholars who will tell you where God's words are hidden appears quite similar to the RCC. |
|
|
8/16/08 6:06 PM |
Daniel Lee Ford | | Spring Arbor, Mich. | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
[URL=http://www.abortiontv.com/Growth/BabyBrainWaves.htm]]] a fascinating area how the baby's brain grows[/URL] Don't be misled, the fetus is not a "small blob of unrecognizable tissue," or some insignificant "birth product," (a term used by abortionists to protect themselves from the truth of what they're really doing). It's human. By the time you know you're pregnant, your baby already has a heartbeat. So this article, having to do with murder of babies outside the womb, has just as much application in the MURDER of unborn little babies, dreaming, sucking their thumbs, and listening to the sounds of their mother's voice. Just because we cannot see the baby, does not mean we can disregard what is there. [URL=http://www.abortiontv.com/Misc/BabyPartsForSale.htm]]]baby parts for sale[/URL] Now we know one of the major reasons why the abortion industry is fighting so intensely to prevent a ban on Partial-Birth abortion from being enacted. It's more than not giving any ground on abortion for any reason. It's also because selling fetal parts is a very lucrative part of the abortion business. The issue here is murder, and the false and evil definition of death of the unborn as being a different type of murder shows how callous we've become. Abortion is murder. |
|
|
8/16/08 5:43 PM |
Daniel Lee Ford | | Spring Arbor, Mich. | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
hidemi williges, good points
DJC49 wrote: [URL=http://logosresourcepages.org/Versions/johannine.htm]]]WEBPAGE[/URL] by Dr. Khoo,academic dean/lecturer at Far Eastern Bible College, Singapore rebuts the Erasmus & 1 Jn 5 myth.DJC49's rebuttal claims "The reading seems to have arisen in a fourth century Latin homily"(Wallace 2nd paragraph) But the Old Latin matches the KJV which is important because of the like wording made by Cyprian (250 AD). (The Lord says, "I and the Father are One," and again, of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost it is written: "And the three are One."). We see the reading is found not only in the Old Latin manuscripts, but was also cited by Cyprian sometime before 250 AD. Disproving Wallaces' myth that it arose in the 4th century. Clearly, Cyprian interpreted 1 Jn5:7-8 as trinity based on an Old Latin bible. [URL=http://onetruegod.wordpress.com/2008/07/02/a-case-for-the-authenticity-of-1-john-5-7-8/]]]Authenticity of 1 John 5:7-8 comprehensive![/URL] Page 291 (n2) of the (new) 3rd edition of The Text of the New Testament Bruce Metzger writes: "What is said... about Erasmus' promise " "needs to be corrected in the light of the research of H.J. de Jonge" So we can ignore outdated myths about Erasmus' `promise'. |
|
|
8/14/08 6:43 AM |
Daniel Lee Ford | | Spring Arbor, Mich. | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Both main party candidates guilty ofA. shedding innocent blood [URL=http://thereaganwing.wordpress.com/2008/02/21/john-mccain-is-not-pro-life/]]]McCAIN not Pro-life[/URL] Obama supports abortion even MORE- [URL=http://www.sermonaudio.com/new_details3.asp?ID=16824]]] Obama&Wife for Partial Birth Infanticide [/URL] B. both support sodomy [URL=http://www.theamericanview.com/index.php?id=1132 ]]]McCAIN don't ask don't tell illegal view[/URL] McCain's repeated & mistaken defense of "don't-ask-don't-tell" instead of endorsing the present law which says homosexuals are not eligible to be in our military. [URL=http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=116081214400]]]Pro-Sodomy Obama - Anti-O.T. Anti-book of Romans[/URL] Obama's pro-sodomy agenda in'Audacity of Hope.' starts with his disposal of O.T. law and the book of Romans as irrelevant. "But I also believe that the federal government should not stand in the way of... civil marriage." [URL=http://www.sbcbaptistpress.org/BPnews.asp?ID=27532]]]Obama pro sodomite marriage state-by-state[/URL] C.both unconstitutional??[URL=http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=71763]]]nObama[/URL] [URL=http://www.snopes.com/politics/mccain/citizen.asp]]]McCAINo[/URL] |
|
|
8/13/08 9:08 PM |
Daniel Lee Ford | | Spring Arbor, Mich. | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
He's just part of a LARGE number of judges who should be removed: by not making it through a re-election by an informed citizenry or: impeachment.[URL=http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=220572244]]]How to Understand Impeachment[/URL] Herb Titus says that Judges should be judges, not legislators. About 30 min in note the statement that about 90 percent of Judges should be removed because of the basic violation of law by the standard of 'good behavior'. [URL=http://www.ccomcor.org/Judges%20and%20Impeachment.pdf]]]impeachment [/URL] So, if we are true to the substantive standard of good behavior, then we would find today that most judges are misbehaving. Most judges who have been appointed to the federal bench today are violating the standard of good behavior because they're violating the substantive norm of good behavior, namely that a judge cannot make law; a judge can only discover, state it, and apply the law. They have violated that standard; they have usurped legislative power. But what's important here, I believe, is for us today to recognize that judges need to be governed by an ordinary remedy as well as an extraordinary remedy, and the extraordinary remedy - the impeachment process - is probably one that primarily should be brought.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|