jodi wrote:
why God is gonna punish those who have turned to him.

jodi wrote:
I just hope that Camping comes to a place of repentance. I am sure Mr.Camping has all the best intentions. But keep in mind the road to hell is paved with good intentions. I wonder to myself why he has such a group of followers when he has been dead wrong. All people need to do is read the bible to see what the word says about knowing when his return is. All I am gonna say is its 7 years after the rapture. Now we don't know what day we will go in the rapture but my friends its so close. Just look at the shape the world is in ! I look forward to going home. With that being said I wanna say Happy Thanksgiving to all my fellow Canadians out there on the www. Peace love joy may you all have it. God Bless

FL wrote:
I always thought the Nicene Creed contained the Gospel boundary markers. If a 5th Century man wouldn't agree to all of these he was not considered a "Christ-one." Has this changed?

complete Christian wrote:
Almost Catholic.
Almost Idolater.
Almost worshipper of graven images.
Almost complete heretic.
Almost servant of the Papal Antichrist.
Almost supporter of paedophilia priests. The very topic of this thread.
Now that is definitely "Not good news."

Almost saved.

Either you emphasize the almost part, and make your previous post moot, or you emphasize the other part, rendering catholics saved. Either way, do it with love and respect.

John UK wrote:
Yes indeed, you will find some versions have inexplicably omitted the words "without a cause" from the following verse, thus making anyone who is angry (even if it be righteous anger), in danger of the judgment.
But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire.
Matthew 5:22 KJV
Do please report back your findings when you have a moment.

But I do also find it interesting, just looking at two different verses, that since Matthew 5:22 says "but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire." The Apostle Paul himself used that exact phrase in 1 Corinthians 15:36: "Thou fool, that which thou sowest is not quickened, except it die" (KJV).

John UK wrote:
Not really, no.
No matter what Bible a person uses, it is always wise to read the notes inside the cover to ascertain the translators' reason for why they did certain things. In the KJV the name of God "Jehovah" or "YHWH" is often put in full capitals as "LORD", and that is fine by me. I don't read Hebrew anyway, and when I'm reading the old testament I can always substitute Jehovah whenever I read LORD.
What concerns me though, is when in modern Bibles there is no BLOOD redemption, when eternal punishment in HELL is not there, when the DEITY of CHRIST is cast in doubt, when Christ himself is portrayed as a sinner in danger of judgment, etc etc.

preparation wrote:
HCSB/Silofolous
Are you related to the Messianic teachers at the Refiners fire?

John UK wrote:
It is when the MV's change words that truth becomes mercurial. Some no more have "blood", and some have no more "hell", some have no more "sodomite".

KJV:

Wherefore say unto the children of Israel, I am the LORD, and I will bring you out from under the burdens of the Egyptians, and I will rid you out of their bondage, and I will redeem you with a stretched out arm, and with great judgments:

HCSB:

John UK wrote:
Odd. I don't invite anyone to a fight.
Jim of Lincoln and I have opposing views, and I trust that this event will assist him in coming to understand the agenda of Satan regarding the inerrancy of scripture. Jim's a good younger brother who can be helped.
Whose side are you on in the battle for THE BOOK?

But I can't help but notice that you did not answer my other questions. The ones forming the majority of my previous post. I'll repost so that you don't have to scroll down:

John UK wrote:
Well, Jim?
Canada says No to the KJV and look what happens.
The modern versionists take over and convince everyone that we do not have the accurate word of God any more, and this is the result.
Howbeit, there are still some believers who are true believers, and such will use the KJV or its contemporaries, until the second coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.
Maybe you should start promoting the Geneva if your antagonism to the best Bible ever translated cannot be assuaged.

Not too cool wrote:
If a baptized Christian engages in any of the following he "will not inherit the kingdom of God" (Gal 5:19-20):

Street-Preacher wrote:
"IF ANY MAN SHALL TAKE AWAY FROM THE WORDS OF THE BOOK (THE+AUTHORIZED+HOLY+BIBLE) OF THIS PROPHESY, GOD SHALL TAKE AWAY HIS PART OUT OF THE BOOK OF LIFE," REVELATION 22:19a !

And "the Human One"? Wow. There are plenty of good translations, but this is not one of them.

Ghj wrote:
But one of the ways which Satan always has worked with sin is, "Did God really say that." (Gen 3:1 para).
The answer is - NIV (any) NO! God did not say that.
The answer is KJV YES! God did say that.
is NOT "word for word."

John UK wrote:
Not so much through fear, but a simple desire to worship the one true God and Jesus Christ whom he has sent, and to hear more about Jesus by the preaching of the Holy Bible, the inerrant and inspired word of the living God, as relevant today as it was when written, and as accurate today as it was when written, praise be to God (to God alone be the glory) for preserving his word through the ministry of fallen men (redeemed and reworked and remade), that his word may not be doubted but believed, and that believing, men may have eternal life by faith alone in Christ alone, this only being possible through the scripture alone, and this only possible if we have the scripture accurately translated into our own language, this being realised in our own beloved Authorized Version, which version we hold aloft as the word of God, inerrant as regards doctrinal content, and inerrant in its exhortatons.

Amanda (joppy) wrote:
The rooms shouldn't have been denied. NO ONE was right in this situaton. Humanity in itself is going to need to repent.

Also, and I realize I may be taking this somewhat out of context, but I think the main principle still applies, but 2 John 10-11 seems to discourage the practice of welcoming those who do not acknowledge Christ into the home:

2 John 7-11

I say this because many deceivers, who do not acknowledge Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh, have gone out into the world. Any such person is the deceiver and the antichrist. 8 Watch out that you do not lose what we[a] have worked for, but that you may be rewarded fully. 9 Anyone who runs ahead and does not continue in the teaching of Christ does not have God; whoever continues in the teaching has both the Father and the Son. 10 If anyone comes to you and does not bring this teaching, do not take them into your house or welcome them. 11 Anyone who welcomes them shares in their wicked work.