http://www.kjvtextualtechnology.com/essay-14--kjv-older-english-is-rightly-retained.php

There are good reasons why we should never bring Bible language down to the level of man, but should bring man up to the level of Bible language. Like other languages, the English keeps degenerating, and eventually reaches the point where it's unfit for the sacred text since the manner of expression becomes unfitting to display God's Word.

Dr. Tim wrote:
..,Despite his many flaws, Dr. Ruckman had more Christianity in his little finger than you have in your whole body, Jim...

"Junior hit the meter man; junior hit the cook.
Junior’s antisocial, according to the book.
Junior smashed the clock and lamp; junior hacked a tree.
Destructive trends are treated in chapters two and three.
Junior threw his milk at mom; junior screamed for more.
Notes on self-assertiveness are found in chapter four.
Junior tossed his shoes and socks out into the rain.
Negotiation, that is normal; disregard the strain.
Junior set dad’s shirt on fire and upset grandpa’s plate.
That’s to get attention; see page thirty-eight.
Grandpa seized a slipper and turned junior ‘cross his knee.
Because Grandpa hasn’t read a book since 1933.”

Papa Ruckman on bein' Papa
"Now I know you can do the best you can do sometimes, and the kid still won’t listen to you. You can raise him right, punish him right, give him the right atmosphere and surrounding; and he still disappoints you and breaks your heart. Those things will happen sometimes in spite of the best you can do. But make sure you fulfill your responsibility as a father."

https://www.tilledsoil.org/integrity-christian-apologetics-ergun-caner-case-study/

Fakers like Ergun Caner touted by Ankerberg put him in
"ignore" category

No integrity??
No time to spend.

When u doubt the Bible from the very 1st verse
U fall for Caner lies that are worse
As much as u polish your lies & rehearse
Truth died in the street & U ran down with your hearse.
💀

And, reading the statements by all the prominent people coming to Ergan’s defense at the beginning of the article just makes me sick. The evidence is so clear, yet they make statements like:

“Ankerberg said he believes Caner’s testimony is ‘completely true.’” – Christianity Today

“Having examined all these charges against Dr. Caner carefully and having looked at the related evidence, I can say without hesitation that all of the moral charges against Dr. Caner are unsubstantiated. … Dr. Caner is a man of honesty, integrity, and loyalty to Christ.” – Dr. Norman Geisler

Ankerberg ignores lies exposed long ago.

"Cease, my son, to hear the instruction that causeth to err from the words of knowledge."
Pr19:27

U gonna judge God the Father by ALL his sons?

"And he stretched forth his hand toward his disciples, and said, Behold my mother and my brethren!"Mt12:49

http://www.icr.org/article/science-vs-scripture-open-response-dr-john-ankerbe/

Adds a 67th book to the Bible..."nature" with Ross as guru

http://creation.mobi/rosshovind-debate-john-ankerberg-show-october-2000-analysis-by-jonathan-sarfati

In any case, it is clear from Ankerberg’s comments when moderating the Hovind-Ross debate (with an unfair old-earth bias) that he picked up many compromise views at his seminary. And as shown by Dr. David Menton’s letter to Ankerberg in June 1992, Ankerberg was clearly an old-earther at about the time of the booklet. This letter shows the disrespectful way Ankerberg treated high-profile young-earth creationist Ph.D. scientists, who had given up much time to record programs for him, and instead he substituted the gross errors of old-earther Hugh Ross.

But Jesus didn’t say Adam and Eve were created at the beginning of the “creation period”
But once you start, rephrasing the Bible continues

https://answersingenesis.org/family/marriage/but-from-the-beginning-of-the-institution-of-marriage/

Mk10:6 But from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female.

https://jesus-is-lord.com/nivdelet.htm
--

We stand on infinitely firmer ground when we insist that the whole of Mark’s Gospel—from the 1st verse of the 1st chapter to the end of verse 20 of the
16th chapter—was given by inspiration of God and is to be respected as an integral part of the divine revelation.

See John W. Burgon, The Last Twelve Verses of the Gospel According to S. Mark (Oxford, England: James Parker and Co., 1871), p. 98.

https://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.tbsbibles.org/resource/collection/156A9AA2-2086-4C4E-BE0A-08A4508415DA/The-Last-Twelve-Verses-of-Mark-16.pdf
--
Waaayyyy back
3/27/17 7:15 PM

Billy Graham Portland OR 1992
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ESDRzVwPdSM

TBN played this last Saturday.

He begins by quoting
"“For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.” Mtt12:40
Then ...
In three minutes time he tells you
" the Bible doesn't say Jonas was swallowed by a whale..."2min& 48 seconds into video

How do u do a stage trick like this?
Be Authoritative
Speak Forcefully
Look the part, ( tall, handsome, clean shaved , suit & tie)
Rely on ¡short! Attention span of your Audience.

Mt12:37
"For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned. "

http://brandplucked.webs.com/matthew1240whale.htm

The Greek word correctly translated in the King James Bible as "Whale" is ketos. I have a modern Greek dictionary called Diury's Modern English-Greek and Greek-English Dictionary 1974. It has nothing whatsoever to do with the Bible. It's just a Greek/English dictionary. If you look up the Greek word ketos it simply says WHALE. If you look up whale, it says ketos.

We're in the position of
" u do know that
1-
IF THERE WERE NEVER any Hebrew& Aramaic
2-IF THERE WERE NEVER any Koiné Greek
-/
For ever, O LORD, Thy Word is settled in heaven" (Ps. 119:89).
So Hebrew & Greek have
"nothing to do with the preservation of God’s Word. His Word would still be preserved even if no one ever spoke Hebrew,Aramaic or Greek"

Either/Or Fallacy (also called "the Black-and-White Fallacy," "Excluded Middle," "False Dilemma," or "False Dichotomy"): This fallacy occurs when a writer builds an argument upon the assumption that there are only two choices or possible outcomes when actually there are several.

English-established By God's Providence
Acts 2:5

Fools (¡in English!)make ¿flights of fancy 🚀&postulate Klingon texts👽?
😜
Is 28:9Whom shall he teach knowledge? and whom shall he make to understand doctrine? them that are weaned from the milk, and drawn from the breasts. 10For precept must be upon precept, precept upon precept; line upon line, line upon line; here a little, and there a little: 11For with stammering lips and another tongue will he speak to this people. 12To whom he said, This is the rest wherewith ye may cause the weary to rest; and this is the refreshing: yet they would not hear. 13But the word of the LORD was unto them precept upon precept, precept upon precept; line upon line, line upon line; here a little, and there a little; that they might go, and fall backward, and be broken, and snared, and taken. 14bWherefore hear the word of the LORD, ye scornful men"

In regard to the nature of the Received Text I have the benefit of looking back over 100 years of history since Burgon‘s day. I can see the confusion that has come from the multiplicity of Greek texts and English versions.
The One Standard was divided into two, then into three, then into four,
and there has been no end of further division.
Today there are hundreds of texts and versions, each with its own peculiar witness as to what God supposedly said. The ―Thus saith the Lord‖ of the nineteenth century has become ―the Better Manuscripts Omit This Verse‖ of the twentieth.
The Received Text was blessed and exalted by God in a way that no text of Scripture has ever been."

You find there
1- the Bible translating What Jesus said into another language.
E.G.Mk5:41 "Talitha cumi"

2-supplying alternate readings.
1Sam9:9 " what's a seer?"
marginal insertions show that the AV1611 translators were honest researchers. Of their efforts, the Trinitarian Bible Society stated in Fruit Among The Leaves, Quarterly Record, July-September 1980, No. 472 that “In most cases the reading in the text of the Authorised Version is superior to the alternative given in the margin.”

¿seer vs prophet?

https://dorightchristians.wordpress.com/2016/05/20/james-white-lies-about-peter-ruckman-and-sam-gipp/amp/

Above we have White lying about Ruckman’s &Gipp’s position on the KJV, lying about Baptists with PhDs, lying about KJVOs debating Catholics, ad nauseum… paid consultant for ver$ion$ have ve$ted intere$t ..
Love of money.
-
https://www.timefortruth.co.uk/content/pages/documents/1462113322.pdf
--
Translation or a Catholic edition 89% of the time (pp. 747-769). Are we to believe that God gave the cults the correct text and not Christians?
For the entire 818 pages proving White wrong see:
Earlier link-

For summary-

https://www.timefortruth.co.uk/content/pages/documents/1396705848.pdf

• Peter Ruckman (Scholarship Only Controversy, 472 pages). After the publication of the book, White challenged Ruckman to a debate, and Ruckman agreed, setting a time and place. White put on his break light and took flight. His stage fright regarding the upcoming dog fight, made him an outright ‘no-show’.

-- worried about Pinto type bad DBate?--

http://www.noiseofthunderradio.com/articles/2013/12/12/my-debate-with-james-white-121213.html

"After debate" summary by Pinto / of White debate"

The entire "debate " duck out by White feather is seen here

https://www.timefortruth.co.uk/content/pages/documents/1482770320.pdf

White leans heavily towards Rome&Watchtower. In spite of what James White would undoubtedly profess to the contrary, the departures from the AV1611 that White favours and which occur mostly in the NASV, NIV, also occur to a considerable extent in Catholic & Jehovah’s Witnesses’ bibles.

White levels criticisms at 241 passages of scripture as they stand in the AV1611, 252 verses in total, of which 24 verses are from the Old Testament. Of that selection, the NIV stands with the AV1611 in only 9 of the 241 passages, or in 4% of the total. However, it lines up against the AV1611 with the JR, DR, JB and NWT* in 28% of the passages, with the JB and NWT in 70% of the passages and with one or more of the JR, DR, JB, NWT in 89% of the passages that White mentions.
*DR - Douay-Rheims, Challoner’s 1749 Revision, JR - Jesuit Rheims 1582 New Testament, from the web, www.studylight.org/desk/ and probably a reproduction of the DR - it doesn’t differ, JB - Jerusalem Bible, NWT - New World Translation

https://av1611.com/kjbp/charts/themagicmarker.html

Bruce w Lantto wrote:
To all the nay sayers that say I do not have the KJV 1611 Authorized Version in my hand because I can't read it are wrong. I have a copy of the KJV 1611, with the Apocrypha is in it, Yes, that is true.But any well read Christian will know that t. he Apocrypha is in the middle between the Old and New Testaments because the translators did not accept the Apocrypha, because they didn't accept it as the Word of God. I STILL STAND BY DEUTERONOMY 30:10-14. In Jesus name. Bruce w Lantto

tinysa.com/sermon/38182338191

Qui Bono?

Jesuit Elephant in the Room

Paul told Timothy that the ‘Love of Money’ was the root of all evil, he was making an important point.
Bible$ $ell doubt$

http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/news/superstar-billy-graham-made-it-big-in-wrestling-now-the-steroids-that-got-him-there-may-be-killing-him-6448014

--
Poly-Sci teacher Ruckman had recently changed his Facebook profile photo to an image of the sheet music from “Götterdämmerung” — Richard Wagner’s opera about the destruction of the Norse gods.

Bad influence in music/culture.

His dad left behind 10 children, one of whom is this Peter Ruckman, of Chicago, in his obituary.