While it is true that ID is not always Biblical Creationism, it still can be if that is what the person believes is behind the ID.
The article doesn't state whivh version of ID this man believes, but regardless of that he should not have been denied a fair oppertunity to defend himself. This was nothing but a witch hunt from Day 1.
Mat 24:26 Wherefore if they shall say unto you, Behold, he is in the desert; go not forth: behold, he is in the secret chambers; believe it not. For as the lightning cometh out of the east, and shineth even unto the west; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.
Anyone reading the book of Hebrews can easily grasp the fact that we have only one Priest to make intercession for our sins. And it even says where to find him. Sitting at the right hand of God in heaven.
All these other people trying to do his job have no authority whatsoever from God to do so.
Heb 8 We have such a high priest, who is set on the right hand of the throne of the Majesty in the heavens
Anyone claiming to do the job of Jesus Christ makes himself out to be a replacement for Him, which we all know is blasphemous and completely ungodly.
Gen 5 And Adam lived a hundred and thirty years, and begot a son in his own likeness, after his image; and called his name Seth: And the days of Adam after he had begotten Seth were eight hundred years: and he begot sons and daughters: And all the days that Adam lived were nine hundred and thirty years: and he died. And all the days of Seth were nine hundred and twelve years: and he died. And all the days of Enos were nine hundred and five years: and he died. etc
It's entirely possible, however bear in mind that God lowered the average lifespan since then. 2 score years and 10 we are told in psalms.
Can someone clarify for me exactly what he claims to believe? I know he denys being muslim, but I also heard somewhere he was mormon? I'm not in america and can't make any sense out of the online data as it's all over the place.
Rom 1:29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, without understanding, covenant breakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful: who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.
These are having that pleasure that this verse speaks of.
This is the issue that cost us a million $. My church walked out of the national church because they demanded we accept sodomite ministers. The million was the price of the buildings now inhabited by so few members that they worship easily in the enterance way instead of the main building.
A church that promotes deliberate sin, should fall.
Again? Tell me when they actually have real proof. All they ever have are conclusions based on unprovable presuppositions that are directly influenced by their bias towards evolution and long ages. Their beliefs make their science. Just like mine does.
I however like to base my presuppositions on the documented record of the one who did it and who gives details about how and when he did it. I like to start with answers from the one who does know everything and who was there. Rather than the opinions of men who don't know everything and who weren't there.
Start with answers, get right questions. Start with questions, get right and wrong answers - and no way to tell them apart.
If the Romans and the Pharisees of the day who would have given the world and possibly lives for it as evidence could not demonstrate that the body was still in the tomb, then these scoffers today are just telling fairy tales.
The article claims it's 40,000 years old, and if the museum agrees then it isn't Biblical based anyway.
Inserting long ages is an evolutionists way to make the Bible look like it isn't historical. A creation organisation should be demonstrating how those long ages were not required and in fact never happened at all.
The link to the full story is for the wrong article.
There will be times when the liberal secular rulers decide that the Bible is wrong and that we can't talk against their beliefs. But that is no reason not to do so. The Bible is the authority here, not the opinions of secular men.
"His 'group selection' terminology is misleading, and his distinction between 'kin selection' and 'individual direct selection' is empty."
Dawkins always seems to have that kind of tone when dealing with anyone who has any opinion different than his own. The attitude of "How silly they can't possibly be right because I am"
Of course, he believes he's at the top of the evolutionary tree that's mutated by chance for millions of years.
Me - I'm descended from an original designed human. It's true I have mutations over several hundred generations. But I'm more like a piece of designed machinery than an explosion in a factory causing a mechanical mess. I even have a kind of instruction manual for appropriate use.
So maybe I might have an opinion worthy of contradicting Dawkins'. That would be "My designer disagrees with your conclusion".