|
|
USER COMMENTS BY NOT YOU, POPE |
|
|
Page 1 | Page 3 · Found: 79 user comments posted recently. |
| | | |
|
|
1/12/12 3:28 PM |
Not you, pope | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
SteveR wrote: Let us move on from the vain babblings of earlier posts and consider the 4th Commandment received by Moses given by our God on the Holy Mount. Whether you consider the Sabbath on Saturday or Sunday, How do you and your local Church honour God in this Holy Commandment? We glorify God and enjoy Him forever by attending Holy Mass every Lord's Day (Sunday). Sola Gratia! Solus Christus! Soli Deo Gloria! ____________ Sola fide? Nullum. |
|
|
1/12/12 3:18 PM |
Not you, pope | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Jim Lincoln wrote: This is why you also fine for you to eat meat during Lent, John. If John Y. would like to fast meat while praying during the 40 days before [URL=http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Acts+12%3A4&version=KJV]]]Easter[/URL] he may certainly do so. We cannot bind his conscience in these matters. |
|
|
1/12/12 3:04 PM |
Not you, pope | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Jim Lincoln wrote: From the article, but then Protestants know... Where in this [Protestant] article is a direct quote from a pope supporting the theory that molecules ever have (or ever could), somehow, collocated themselves into a life form? |
|
|
1/12/12 2:47 PM |
Not you, pope | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Jim Lincoln wrote: Gasp! Just from the SA title I thought the article was about the Catholic Church [URL=http://www.johnankerberg.org/Articles/_PDFArchives/roman-catholicism/RC1W0902.pdf]]]Is the One True Church Roman Catholic?[/URL]. Per Dr. "billions and billions of Earth years," John Ankerberg, states this about the "True [Evangelical] Church":"True Church ♦ There is no salvation outside this [Evangelical] church" _______________________________________ “Meanwhile, intelligent conservative, orthodox Protestants continue to convert to Rome, and there are few if any resources to offer any response. "Evangelicalism cannot mount such because it is not a church. "That is a very serious problem, given that Rome thinks ecclesiastically.” -WTS Professor of Historical Theology, Dr. Carl Trueman, “[URL=http://www.reformation21.org/blog/2011/04/another-thing-needful.php]]]Another Thing Needful[/URL]” |
|
|
1/12/12 2:38 PM |
Not you, pope | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Observer wrote: Yet another a grand display of his ignorance! If Jesus were born 30 years ago and just now started His public ministry, would there be no "graven-image" of Him? |
|
|
1/12/12 12:33 PM |
Not you, pope | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
"You could quiz the average Evangelical about specific sexual issues and they'd have answers for you. But if you gave a test to the typical Evangelical church-goer about the doctrine of justification by faith, the essence of the Gospel or the atoning work of Christ -- they'd fail. "And, in fact, those kinds of quizzes have been given to demonstrate the gross ignorance of Evangelicals when it comes to fundamental Bible doctrines [including] the Gospel. They don't understand it. And yet, we're being told again and again and again that we need more instruction on sex. And it needs to be more and more explicit all the time. "That is worse, I think, than anything you could cite from the Middle Ages that shows the apostasy of the Roman Catholic Church. "[Evangelicalism is] in a serious, serious state of spiritual decline. And this sort of hyper-interest in sex is about as carnal as it could be and it's pretty much the worst trend the church could foster." -Reformed Pastor Kevin Boling interview with Pastor Phil Johnson (Dr. John MacArthur's protégé), " [URL=http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=11012142350]]]Evangelical Exhibitionists[/URL]," January 10, 2012. |
|
|
1/12/12 10:41 AM |
Not you, pope | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
John Yurich USA wrote: It sure does not refer to the Catholic Church. The Whore of Babylon is not one specific church but is all False churches that deny the Deity of Jesus and the Holy Trinity. Amen Brother! |
|
|
1/11/12 10:23 PM |
Not you, pope | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
If an orthodox old-Earth preacher is exegeting Genesis 1, how does he describe our human progression?"First there were Adam and Eve who fruitfully multiplied and filled the Earth mightily until Noah. "This full Earth was subsequently wiped out because of sin and through the Great Flood and there were only 8 survivors. "We conclude the first million years here. Then this pattern was roughly followed another 5,000 times until our current epoch. "Now anywhere there's soil, we find human remains because there were literally trillions and trillions of people before you and me." Isn't this a suspect story? But now 1/2 of preachers think this way? Hmmm. |
|
|
1/11/12 3:43 PM |
Not you, pope | | | |
|
Add new comment Reply to comment Report abuse
|
Jim Lincoln wrote: Or, to put it more simply Should Roman Catholicism really be classified as a Christian religion? -- No. This, coming from a "billions and billions of years old" Earther? Dr. Ankerberg is to be avoided. for not your pope wrote: NOTICE NYP, all these dates PRECEDE the birth of your apostate RCC! The (Universal or "one") Catholic (Christian) Church started circa A.D. 33 from Jesus (Cornerstone) to Peter (the 1st chief bishop) and so on until Pope Benedict XVI (the current chief bishop). It naturally adopted the adjective "Roman" since Popes (chief bishops) have (mostly) found their chair located in Rome at the Vatican.for not you pope wrote: You said "The Catholic Church started circa A.D. 33 from Jesus to Peter and so on until Pope Benedict XVI." Please verify this. If Peter's not the singular "rock," what is it that makes Protestantism "one"?With 100s of denominations, 1,000s of independent churches and "millions and millions of Bible interpretations," how can Protestantism, in any sense, be "one" except in its 500 year disagreement with Rome? |
|
|
|
Jump to Page : 1 2 [3] 4 |
| | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|