Radio Streams
SA Radio
24/7 Radio Stream
VCY America
24/7 Radio Stream
70

My Favorite Things
Home
NewsroomALL
Events | Notices | Blogs
Newest Audio | Video | Clips
Broadcasters
Church Finder
Webcast LIVE NOW!
Sermons by Bible
Sermons by Category
Sermons by Topic
Sermons by Speaker
Sermons by Language
Sermons by Date
Staff Picks
CommentsALL -27 sec
Top Sermons
Online Bible
Hymnal
Daily Reading
Our Services
Broadcaster Dashboard
Members Only

 
USER COMMENTS BY “ IGNOMINIOUS EMIRAKAN ”
Page 1 | Page 2 ·  Found: 500 user comments posted recently.
News Item3/18/18 11:30 AM
Ignominious Emirakan | Stream of unconsciousness  Find all comments by Ignominious Emirakan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
64
comments
I only scan the headline
"Science Shows Men Like Women With Less Makeup"
Is it oscitancy or obstinacy?
Anyhoo-

I don't see any surprise in thinking
a man with less makeup would like women.

The Metrosexual makeup "sissy men" don't seem to like women any more than I like to read EMIT articles... Maybe my lisDexia explains it?

Men with less makeup might also like women since they supply the lack in the makeup

Women make up for what men lack.

Eph 5:28 So ought men to love their wives as their own bodies. He that loveth his wife loveth himself."

Or did I just make up the implications of the headline?
"Claire's pulls 17 makeup products that tested positive for asbestos"
Eyeliner headliner

https://www.foxnews.com/lifestyle/2017/12/27/claires-pulls-17-makeup-products-that-tested-positive-for-asbestos.amp.html

Might keep u from becoming a hothead...


News Item3/18/18 11:07 AM
Ignominious Emirakan | part and parcel post  Find all comments by Ignominious Emirakan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
11
comments
Mr b wrote:
An atheist chaplain. These liberal lunatics are so insane it’s laughable.
Well, Sodomite Pastors & Satanic Pastors have been there a while

They use Sodomite " bibles"
http://www.scionofzion.com/sodomyniv.htm
"
Dr. Mollenkott, one of the literary consultants for the NIV translating committee, is a professed homosexual. This is verified by her own words in an interview in the Episcopal publication, "Witness" (June 1991, Pages 20-23). The interviewer, Sue Pierce, asked the question, "Why was it important to both of you to come out as lesbians?" Dr. Mollenkott's reply was, "My lesbianism has always been a part of me"
& U can tell from NIv product

& same company making NIV
http://www.scionofzion.com/niv2.htm
prints the
Satanic Bible

https://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Bible/NIV/niv-gay-satan.htm

Did you know that Zondervan publishers (who publish the New international Version of the Bible) is owned by Harper Collins? Harper Collins also publishes The Joy of Gay Sex and The Satanic Bible. Tragically, many professed Christians know this yet continue to use their corrupted NIV bible. Oh how apostate America has become when even it's professed Christians are using corrupted Bibles that blasphemy and dishonor the Lord..


News Item3/18/18 10:57 AM
Ignominious Emirakan | Comission mission ommission  Find all comments by Ignominious Emirakan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
5
comments
Holy Bible, New International Version®, NIV® Copyright ©1973, 1978, 1984, 2011 by Biblica, Inc.® Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide.
--
RCC Gk.
"The text shared by these two editions was adopted internationally by Bible Societies, and following an agreement between the Vatican and the United Bible Societies it has served as the basis for new translations and for revisions made under their supervision.

This marks a significant step with regard to interconfessional relationships. It should naturally be understood that this text is a working text (in the sense of the century long Nestle Tradition): it is not to be considered as definitive, but as a stimulus to further efforts toward defining and verifying the text of the New Testament. For many reasons, however, the present edition has not been deemed an appropriate occasion for introducing textual changes.”

..you will plainly see that they hide nothing. The Greek text behind the modern versions are under the supervision of the Vatican. All modern versions use these Greek texts which means that what you have in your Bible and what is omitted is decided by the Roman Catholic Church."

http://www.scionofzion.com/rcv.htm

$ale$ job$
"Remember"
ÂżDon't forget to remember? Next salable change?


News Item3/18/18 10:22 AM
Ignominious Emirakan | Two Cor two seventeen  Find all comments by Ignominious Emirakan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
61
comments
Dr. Tim wrote:
Exceptionally Stupid Version.
As Edward Hills said
"In regard to Bible versions many contemporary Christians are behaving like spoiled and rebellious children. They want a Bible version that pleases them no matter whether it pleases God or not. "We want a Bible version in our own idiom," they clamor. "We want a Bible that talks to us in the same way in which we talk to our friends over the telephone. We want an informal God, no better educated than ourselves, with a limited vocabulary and a taste for modern slang." And having thus registered their preference, they go their several ways. Some of them unite with the modernists in using the R.S.V. or the N.E.B. Others deem the N.A.S.V. or the N.I.V. more "evangelical". Still others opt for the T.E.V. or the Living Bible.
But God is bigger than you are, dear friend, and the Bible version which you must use is not a matter for you to decide according to your whims and prejudices. It has already been decided for you by the workings of God's special providence. If you ignore this providence and choose to adopt one of the modern versions, you will be taking the first step in the logic of unbelief."
&
http://www.scionofzion.com/rcv.htm

Your Modern Version is Roman Catholic- Dr Matto


News Item3/18/18 8:13 AM
Ignominious Emirakan | Bad fruity  Find all comments by Ignominious Emirakan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
23
comments
But perhaps Feldblum is most remembered for pulling back the curtain on the same-sex marriage agenda. Asked what would happen if religious liberty clashed with the "rights" of people who identify as LGBT, she brazenly stated that she'd have "a hard time coming up with any case in which religious liberty should win." That's chilling, FRC warned at the time, since as head of the EEOC, she would act as the head referee on disputes over workplace discrimination. If Americans were hoping for neutrality, they certainly didn't get it under Chai's leadership.
enemy of Trump's supposed agenda on religious liberty pushed by Trump?
¿¿¿?$R u being played????
"Even if the commission is required to have a certain number of Democrats, the White House doesn't have to take just anyone (or, in this case, the worst possible option)."
"she openly vowed to implement ENDA by regulations if Congress didn't pass it. At one point, Chai even signed on to an online petition "'Beyond Same-Sex Marriage: A New Strategic Vision for All Our Families and Relationships,' which advocates for
polygamy
and government recognition... for... diverse kinds of partnerships" -- a view she later disavowed."
Will she now return to Moslem Polygamy support???
Is that " religious liberty"??

News Item3/18/18 8:00 AM
Ignominious Emirakan | Faith fruit  Find all comments by Ignominious Emirakan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
99
comments
John UK wrote:
...doctrines of devils.
Scholars may be helpful, especially biblical scholars, but come the end of the day, it is faith that wins through. And what has the Lord himself taught you regarding the word of God? Quoting scripture will only help if you know for sure that the scripture is inerrant and inspired of God.
Edward Hills
http://standardbearers.net/uploads/The_King_James_Version_Defended_Dr_Edward_F_Hills.pdf

Start with faith faith in the Bible, & u end with faith

But Gnostic
" science falsely so called"
Ends with no sure wordsS

"founds his criticism of the New Testament text squarely and solidly on the historic doctrines of the divine inspiration and providential preservation of Holy Scripture, and it is his firm conviction that this is the only proper approach. Hence, he not only differs radically with those critics who have a lower evaluation of the Bible, but is also sharply critical of those scholars whose evaluation of the Bible is similar to his but who have, in his estimation, been persuaded .."
By doctrines of devils
"that they ought not to stress the orthodox view of Scripture in their study of the New Testament text"


News Item3/18/18 7:52 AM
Ignominious Emirakan | Bad soil bad fruit  Find all comments by Ignominious Emirakan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
61
comments
Lk13 the "Lord"
judges by fruit
"8 a"And he answering said unto him, Lord, let it alone this year also.."

Cultic ESV downgrades--Luke 13:8a(ESV) And he answered him,
'Sir, let it alone this year also,"

Lk2:33aKJB: And Joseph and his mother marvelled.."

ESV:"And his father and his mother.."AsJW's NWT&Rome's NAB:

Lk4:4KJB: And Jesus answered him, saying, It is written, That man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word of God.

ESV: And Jesus answered him, "It is written, 'Man shall not live by bread alone.'"JW's NWT: Cult cut&Rome's NAB

Lk 9:55KJB: But he turned, and rebuked them, and said, Ye know not what manner of spirit ye are of.
ESV: But he turned and rebuked them. JW spirit of NWT& NAB

Lk9:56
KJB: For the Son of man is not come to destroy men's lives, but to save them. And they went to another village.

ESV: And they went on to another village.
JW's NWT: ditto& RCC's NAB

Lk17:36
KJB: Two men shall be in the field; the one shall be taken, and the other left.
ESV: cut&NWT&NAB

Lk23:17
KJB: (For of necessity he must release one unto them at the feast.)
ESV: cut&NWT&NAB

Lk 23:38
KJB: And a superscription also was written over him in letters of Greek, and Latin, and Hebrew, THIS IS THE KING OF THE JEWS.
ESVcut


News Item3/18/18 7:09 AM
Ignominious Emirakan | current  Find all comments by Ignominious Emirakan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
23
comments
Trump Renominated A LESBIAN ACTIVIST for A TOP ANTI-DISCRIMINATION JOB & CONSERVATIVES aren't HAPPY

http://www.newsweek.com/trump-renominates-lesbian-activist-conservatives-unhappy-748640

Updated | Conservatives are upset that a top federal watchdog who is known as an outspoken advocate for the LGBT community may get to keep her job until 2023—thanks to President Donald Trump.

The White House this week sent to the Senate for confirmation the renomination of Chai Feldblum, whose federal biography identifies her as “the first openly lesbian commissioner” of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). She also identifies as "the fourth person with a disability to serve on the commission," having been diagnosed with anxiety disorder

Feldblum joined the EEOC, which enforces federal laws prohibiting workplace discrimination, in April 2010 during the Obama administration."
--
No shock to me but"the Trump administration wants to give one of the most liberal LGBT activists of the Obama years another term.”

http://www.frc.org/updatearticle/20171213/chai-tees

Perkins "shocked" why?
"Trump himself promised in his RNC address to “protect our LGBTQ citizens from the violence and oppression of a hateful foreign ideology.”
Pray For Your Leaders.


News Item3/17/18 7:23 PM
Ignominious Emirakan | Squirrel  Find all comments by Ignominious Emirakan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
99
comments
Jon wrote:
.. issue has always driven me nuts!
#1. The Letter of Aristeas – Many Bible defenders have written articles refuting the fallacious idea that the apostles and our Lord Jesus Christ quoted from a Greek translation called the Greek Septuagint, or simply referred to as the LXX.

Here are a couple of good articles that give you a good overview of why the claims of those who promote the LXX are false.

David Daniels has a very informative vlog dealing with the evidence and history of the alleged pre-Christian Greek translation of the Old Testament.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBFXozZ_Zhc

5 parts. ( less reading)

http://www.scionofzion.com/septuagint1.htm

2Greek Old Testament translation into a pagan tongue and produced by the other eleven tribes in addition to the Levites is UNSCRIPTURAL &unacceptable.
2A. Levites,guardians of the O.T. Scriptures

Mal2:7-8 “For the priest’s lips should keep knowledge, and they should seek the law at his mouth: for he is the messenger of the LORD of hosts. But ye are departed out of the way; ye have caused many to stumble at the law; ye have corrupted the covenant of Levi, saith the LORD of hosts.”
Dt 31:24-26 - Levi Alone

3- Lk24:44&Mt5:18=Hebrew


News Item3/17/18 1:18 PM
Ignominious Emirakan | Old game  Find all comments by Ignominious Emirakan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
99
comments
Dr. Tim wrote:
Some of those Chinese bronzes are pretty old, too. Come to think of it, I ain't no spring chicken myself. If older is better, I must be getting pretty close to perfection.
Kinda like losing 2 teeth. closer to perfection! no tooth ache potential there

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=lTDJgtxiA3w
--
in
"Why Not Preach Mark?"
Daniels points out the Greek prof admitting " little changes can make big doctrinal differences "
God's Son missing from Mk 1:1??
The prof steps thru Adoptionism implications from this.

"Would it make a difference to you if you knew that the New Testament of your modern Bible did not have First and Second Peter? Yet if the total number of missing words were added up, this is how much shorter the modern translations are than the King James Version. Is it cause for concern that the names of Christ are missing 175 times, or if the word "hell" is not found in the Old Testament, or if key doctrinal passages have been diminished? That these things are so, with the reasons why, are set forth in the Dark Secret"

As Old Bodies losing teeth,bone mass, wasting muscle mass... senescence of the Body creepeth in.

http://kjv.landmarkbiblebaptist.net/JackMoorman-Missing.html

Missing the mark.


News Item3/17/18 11:49 AM
Ignominious Emirakan | Blank verse video  Find all comments by Ignominious Emirakan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
99
comments
No Mark resurrection?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=lTDJgtxiA3w
--
http://www.scionofzion.com/sinaiticus_fake.html

Why Not Preach Mark 16?

It is necessary that every Christian who uses a modern version that they watch these videos, especially since the Sinaiticus is used by every modern translation as one of their "oldest and best" manuscripts. Now it is no longer old and best but a forgery from the nineteenth century. The evidence is irrefutable. If you use a modern version, then you are relying on this nineteenth century counterfeit as your Bible.
_
You Tube Videos offering Evidence of the Counterfeit Nature of Codex Sinaiticus

These Youtube videos are concerned with the Sinaiticus Manuscript being a 19th century forgery for the intentional purpose of destroying the King James Bible by replacing it. The videos were done by David Daniels of Chick Publications. Steven Avery contributed research that was used in the Videos. This material is very important because Sinaiticus is one of the two main manuscripts which forms the basis of all modern versions of the Bible, the other main manuscript being Vaticanus.
modern versions are satanically inspired

https://www.timefortruth.co.uk/content/pages/documents/1384636132.pdf

Short reply to White type


News Item3/17/18 11:33 AM
Ignominious Emirakan | Blank verse  Find all comments by Ignominious Emirakan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
99
comments
Connor7 wrote:
"intentionally omitted"
U obviously never bought Burgon's Last 12 verses

http://www.kjvtoday.com/home/should-the-longer-ending-of-mark-mark-169-20-be-in-the-bible

See the blank in B

Notice the entire blank column after Mark 16:8. Luke begins on the new page.

Same as empty argument

Vaticanus is technically, at best, a half-hearted witness to the omission of the verses. Though he considered the verses as spurious, Alford nevertheless offered an observation that ought to give one pause: “After the subscription in B [Vaticanus—DM] the remaining greater portion of the column and the whole of the next to the end of the page are left vacant. There is no other instance of this in the whole N.T. portion of the MS [manuscript—DM], the next book in every other instance beginning on the next column” (p. 484, emp. added). This unusual divergence from the scribe’s usual practice suggests that he knew that additional verses were missing. The blank space he left provides ample room for the additional twelve verses.
-

https://apologeticspress.org/apcontent.aspx?category=13&article=704

Apocrypha+spurious. Label a book or arguement that way & u don't give it credence
e.g.
Apocryphal recession account of W&H


News Item3/17/18 11:11 AM
Ignominious Emirakan | Reformed informed  Find all comments by Ignominious Emirakan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
99
comments
"a spiritual issue, here - the issue raised in Isaiah 66:2: "... but to this man will I look, even to him that is poor and of a contrite spirit, and trembleth at my word"; in John 10:35: "... and the scripture cannot be broken"; and in Revelation 22:19: "And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book."

In light of this consideration of a reliable translation alone, how excellent is the KJV. It is a perfectly faithful&reliable translation into English of the Hebrew and Greek original. Men translated it who believed the Bible to be a divine,¬ a human, book, &who believed that God would be able to "communicate" with His people by the words which He inspired, faithfully rendered in English.

Such men are required for the translating of the Bible. It is not enough that they be scholars of the Hebrew, Aramaic&Greek and adepts in the language into which the Bible is translated; but they must also be godly, orthodox saints who reverence Scripture as the holy Word, wholly God-breathed.

translating is not every man's skill as the mad saints imagine. It requires a right, devout, honest, sincere, God-fearing man.."


News Item3/17/18 10:55 AM
Ignominious Emirakan | ban walking too  Find all comments by Ignominious Emirakan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
8
comments
Diane wrote:
This is a terrible tragedy. When will the outcry begin to ban bridges?

News Item3/17/18 10:52 AM
Ignominious Emirakan | From prev Reformed Link  Find all comments by Ignominious Emirakan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
99
comments
"Heretical views of Holy Scripture prevail in the churches today, especially among the scholars and theologians. There is the view that the Bible is only the fallible testimony of Israel and of the church to Jehovah and to Jesus of Nazareth. But there is also the view that Scripture as given by God cannot effectively communicate to modern men, or to certain groups of modern men, e.g., the youth. It must be adapted by the church, in order to be able to speak to men today. These low views of the Word of God influence the translation of the Bible. They give the translators license to render Scripture almost as they please. This is seen today in the version being prepared by the National Council of Churches which will filter the Bible through the mind of the women's liberation movement, even though we lose our Heavenly Father and our Elder Brother in the process. I suppose that these translators are sincere and that their work on this version is consistent with their view of Scripture: it must be made to speak to twentieth century "liberated" women, if not to a unisex society. It is not at all inconceivable that future versions will be made to "communicate" with Marxists; proponents of liberation theology; homosexuals; &those who take salvation as a purely this-worldly event."

News Item3/17/18 10:39 AM
Ignominious Emirakan | law prophets Psalms  Find all comments by Ignominious Emirakan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
99
comments
Dr. Tim wrote:
Facts,facts,facts...
thx!
controversy concerns 5,000 Greek MSS of the New Testament
90%of these MSS are in basic agreement among themselves. The Greek text contained in this majority of MSS is known as the Majority Text, the Byzantine Text, or the Traditional Text (TT). The text of the KJV, which belongs to this majority of MSS, but is not perfectly identical with the TT, is known as the Textus Receptus (TR)—the "Received Text." This text was accepted as the authentic text of the New Testament by the Protestant Church from the Reformation to the nineteenth century&by the Greek Church for more than a thousand years before the Reformation. Westcott& Hort baselessly asserted the superiority of a type of text represented by a small minority of Greek MSS, particularly Codex Vaticanus (B) &forgered Sinaiticus(Aleph)

Many Reformed&Presbyterian preachers have accepted the theory of W-H.
Those Reformers went back to Rome. UnReformed&uninformed use "False facts" of a mythical "Recension"(&Lxx)the way Darwin used Evilution
Both are
"science falsely so called"

But so have many "Fundamentalists"- cf BJU
Tho u noted yer brand of Fundy knows the Authorized is God's wordS

I agree with Bible over various corrupted "camps"


News Item3/17/18 10:10 AM
Ignominious Emirakan | law prophets Psalms  Find all comments by Ignominious Emirakan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
99
comments
Aleph Penned by Constantine Simonides. Sinaiticus is a total fake! ..sorry situation is that this is one the main 45 manuscripts which underlies all the modern versions, which means that the modern versions are all based upon a counterfeit manuscript making them all null&void. There are over 6000 manuscripts but the modern versions are based on only 45 &some of them are very corrupt in nature such as Sinaiticus, Vaticanus, Alexandrinus (A 02), Bezae Canatbrigiensis (D 05). Sinaiticus is one of the two manuscripts, Vaticanus being the other, where Mark 16:9-20 is omitted intentionally while it appears in 618 other manuscripts. It also contains the "Shepherd of Hermes" and "The Epistle of Barnabas."

www.scionofzion.com/sinaiticus_fake.html

entire series of videos giving the details of this counterfeit manuscript &
its Catholic connection.

3036 textual differences in the Gospels alone. 656 in Matthew - 567 in Mark - 791 in Luke - 1022 in John. With these amounts of disagreements in the Gospels alone, how can these manuscripts ever be trusted for accuracy, yet all your modern versions rely heavily on these two manuscripts?

"Jot&Tittle" preclude "septTedNugent" as OT of Jesus
Ref is to Heb.
&Lk24:44 shows Heb, not Gk Bible layout.
LawProphetsPsalms


News Item3/17/18 9:59 AM
Ignominious Emirakan | Hill of divination nation  Find all comments by Ignominious Emirakan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
8
comments
"Vaticanus Manuscript (B)
The word “Vatican” in Latin means “Hill of Divination.” (Deu 18:10 KJV) There shall not be found among you any one that maketh his son or his daughter to pass through the fire, or that useth divination, or an observer of times, or an enchanter, or a witch, The Vaticanus manuscript was found in the Vatican library in 1481. It was rejected by the King James Translators because it was very corrupt and unreliable. The following portions of Scripture are missing from the Vaticanus: Genesis 1:1-46; 28; Psalms 106-138; Matthew 16:2-3; Mark 16:9-20; The Pastoral Epistles (1 & 2 Timothy and Titus) and everything after Hebrews 9:14. These were intentional omissions because the manuscript was found in excellent condition with no pieces missing. In the Gospels it leaves out 237 words, 452 clauses, and 748 whole sentences. These omissions were intentional since there was room left on pages to write these in. The Vaticanus manuscript was written on expensive Vellum and was in good condition when found which means that the missing areas were not due to missing sections but intentional omission."

http://www.scionofzion.com/vaticanus_sinaiticus.htm

Where Vatican gets their snippy clippy cut & paste devil doctrines.
Good study at Link.
Origen(sic) of problems.


News Item3/17/18 8:52 AM
Ignominious Emirakan | Fish market  Find all comments by Ignominious Emirakan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
13
comments
Kieron wrote:
Mr. Lincoln if you don't mind me asking are you Liberal or Conservative?
U could ask -
"are you Liar or Candid?
--
as in
--
"Mr Lucifer, are you Liar or Candid?"

Some questions are humorous.
--


News Item3/17/18 8:41 AM
Ignominious Emirakan | Woe to bloody cities  Find all comments by Ignominious Emirakan
• Add new comment
• Reply to comment
• Report abuse
3
comments
Dr. Tim wrote:
Meanwhile about 15 or 16 thousand people are murdered every year in the United States. Where are all the advocates for murderers' rights? Who are we to pick and choose which crimes against God and nature are acceptable and which ones are not? Where is the spirit of equal opportunity in this regard?
700,000 medically murdered by docs
Another 400,000 by moms poisoning their babies

http://www.worldometers.info/abortions/

¡About 9 million so far this year!

"This year" refers to the period from Jan 1 at 00:00 up to now.

The data on abortions displayed on the Worldometers' counter is based on the latest statistics on worldwide abortions published by the World Health Organization (WHO).

According to WHO, every year in the world there are an estimated 40-50 million abortions. This corresponds to approximately 125,000 abortions per day.

In the USA, where nearly half of pregnancies are unintended and four in 10 of these are terminated by abortion , there are over 3,000 abortions per day. Twenty-two percent of all pregnancies in the USA (excluding miscarriages) end in abortion.

far worse than we like to think on.

Jump to Page : 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 more



Rev. Nathan Langerak
Bold Access

The Body of Christ
Sunday Service
Crete Protestant Reformed
Play! | MP4 | RSS


Tech Talk Zoom // Episode 05

Robert Gianserra
The Reign of the Son of Man..

The Prophecy of Daniel
Grace and Truth Church
Play! | MP3

Dr. Andrew Woods
James 012-Faith Without Works?

James
Sugar Land Bible Church
Video!Play! | MP4

Sponsor:
Learn How to Be a Church Consultant

Free Web­inar Replay with Thom Rain­er. 7 Habits of Succ­essful Church Cons­ult­ants.
https://event.webinarjam.co..

Sermon: #50 Your Last Chance to..
Dr. James M. Phillips

SPONSOR




SA UPDATES NEWSLETTER Sign up for a weekly dose of personal thoughts along with interesting content updates. Sign Up
FOLLOW US


Gospel of John
Cities | Local | Personal

MOBILE
iPhone + iPad
ChurchOne App
Watch
Android
ChurchOne App
Fire Tablet
Wear
Chromecast TV
Apple TV
Android TV
ROKU TV
Amazon Fire TV
Amazon Echo
Kindle Reader


HELP
Knowledgebase
Broadcasters
Listeners
Q&A
Uploading Sermons
Uploading Videos
Webcasting
2-MINUTE TIPS

NEWS
Weekly Newsletter
Unsubscribe
Staff Picks | RSS
SA Newsroom
SERVICES
Dashboard | Info
Cross Publish
Audio | Video | Podcast
Sermon Player | Video
Church Finder | Info
Mobile & Apps
Live Webcasting
Solo Sites
Internationalization
Listen Line
Events | Notices
Transcription | PowerClips
Billboards | Biz Cards
Favorites | QR Codes
Online Donations
24x7 Radio Stream
INTEGRATION
Embed Codes
Twitter
Facebook
Logos | e-Sword | BLB
JSON API

BATCH
Upload via RSS
Upload via FTP
Upload via Dropbox

SUPPORT
Advertising | Local Ads
Support Us
Stories
ABOUT US
The largest and most trusted library of audio sermons from conservative churches and ministries worldwide.

Our Services | Articles of Faith
Broadcast With Us
Earn SA COINS!
Privacy Policy

TECH TALK
Tech Talk Zoom // Episode 05
Copyright © 2021 SermonAudio.