JuneAnnette wrote:
Quit making excuses and show us what you got . .
Again, I hate to repeat myself but in your case I will make an exception . .
SteveR . . get outta here . . the onus is on YOU to prove that which you have alleged is true!
You brought the charges and you sir must provide the proof.
Your words:
"Don't worry, I will get to that soon.
Again SteveR . . it is your obligation to prove the allegations you have made against others posting here
whom you have accused of referring to John Yurich as an "ignorant autistic person"
This is a very serious charge you have made.
In the absence of verifiable proof, you need to submit a public apology to these posters for your false allegation
against them.
And since Philadelphia totally
dismantled your charge against Lurker in
this matter,
you owe him an apology.

Nik wrote:
The street preacher in the main photo is Adam from teamjesuspreachers, if you are offended by him then you are offended by truth, Adam and his brothers are one of the best street preachers today,he and his brotherIsrael are diligent Holy Ghost filled labourers for the Lord,
I can also recommend Kevin from crytoGod and Buddy Fisher ,Gabethestreetpreacher and there are many others who do not preach to offend but rather preach truth in love, for they love truth, they preach against sin and the need for repentance.
All through history people have been offended by preaching but if the truth offends or makes us enemies that is not the fault of the preacher.
These faithful brothers do not go out to offend but to warn and to save souls.
Praise the Lord

JuneAnnette wrote:
SteveR . . get outta here . . the onus is on YOU to prove that which you have alleged is true!
You brought the charges and you sir must provide the proof.
Your words:
"Don't worry, I will get to that soon.
Again SteveR . . it is your obligation to prove the allegations you have made against others posting here
whom you have accused of referring to John Yurich as an "ignorant autistic person"
This is a very serious charge you have made.
In the absence of verifiable proof, you need to submit a public apology to these posters for your false allegation
against them.
And since Philadelphia totally
dismantled your charge against Lurker in
this matter,
you owe him an apology.

JuneAnnette wrote:
SteveR . . get outta here . . the onus is on YOU to prove that which you have alleged is true!
Your words:
"Don't worry, I will get to that soon.
Again SteveR . . it is your obligation to prove the allegations you have made against others posting here
whom you have accused of referring to John Yurich as an "ignorant autistic person"
This is a very serious charge you have made.
In the absence of verifiable proof, you need to submit a public apology to these posters for your false allegation
against them.
And since Philadelphia totally
dismantled your charge against Lurker in
this matter,
you owe him an apology.

JuneAnnette wrote:
SteveR . .
Why are you wasting time?
We're waiting on specific proof of the allegation you made against other posters here,
whom you have accused of
referring to John Yurich as an
"ignorant autistic person."
And since Philadelphia totally
dismantled your charge against Lurker in
this matter,
you owe him an apology.

JuneAnnette wrote:
Re: specific proof of the allegations made by SteveR against others posting here
whom he has accused of referring to John Yurich as an "ignorant autistic person"
SteveR wrote:
JA
Don't worry, I will get to that soon.
And since Philadelphia totally
dismantled your charge against Lurker in
this matter,
you owe him an apology.

Philadelphia wrote:
No he is not. He evidently fools no one.

JuneAnnette wrote:
SteveR is a master at deflection . .
Again . . SteveR . . you need to man up and provide specific proof of the allegations you have made against others posting here
whom you have accused of referring to John Yurich as an "ignorant autistic person" to wit . .
This is a very serious charge you have made.
In the absence of verifiable proof, you need to submit a public apology to these other posters for your false allegation
against them.

Philadelphia wrote:
And yet he only gets banned from Catholic Forums and not from SermonAudio forums. Perhaps you should take your indignation elsewhere?

ladybug wrote:
In Internet slang, a troll (/ˈtroʊl/, /ˈtrɒl/) is a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people, by posting inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the intent of provoking readers into an emotional an emotional response[2] or of otherwise disrupting normal, on-topic discussion,[3] often for the troll's amusement.
This defines both JohnY and SteveR. They purposely come here to stir strife and division, it is their 'amusement'.
Steve R. seeks to defend John Y because, like the jesuit troll, JY holds fast to the RCC. Birds of a feather....
As for the claim that JY is autistic, how cruel is that? I have a niece who is autistic, it is no light matter. The Jesuit troll seeks only to stir more strife with his accusation. Ignore this minion of Satan, the accuser of the brethren.

In reaction to my telling JohnY how Blessed he was that his CATHOLIC parents encouraged him to read the Bible, ladybug responded

ladybug wrote:
Rambling on like a two year old is hardly being blessed, being a deliberate troll is not a blessing either.

MS wrote:
Encyclopedia Britannica, Google, and Wikipedia...where pests and trolls get their 'theological' sound bites.

(I replied)
1 Corinthians 1:19 For it is written, I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and will bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent.
1 Corinthians 1:20 Where is the wise? where is the scribe? where is the disputer of this world? hath not God made foolish the wisdom of this world?
1 Corinthians 1:21 For after that in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe.
--------------------

MS wrote:
As one has rightly said:
"What do you get when you mix politics and religion"?
FRANKLIN GRAHAM

ladybug wrote:
Penned,
I do not agree with your brand of dominionism-type religion. With that said, 'penned' will suffice.
Are you in agreement with F.G. and the sign of rain as a blessing? Do you think his ecumenism and his accursed gospel should be overlooked for the sake of the event?
Do you agree with the word of God which states "No man that warreth entangleth himself with the affairs of this life; that he may please him who hath chosen him to be a soldier."
Are you okay with Paula White as Trump's spiritual advisor?

Did you know that the lady bug is named for the virgin Mary? The original name of the ladybug is “Our Lady’s Bug.” It seems that during the Middle Ages, a plague of small insects (probably aphids) attacked the crops, threatening Europe with starvation. The people had recourse to Our Lady, and petitioned her to save them from this plague. In answer to their prayer, a cloud of small, black-spotted, orange-red insects arrived and promptly ate all the offending pests. The grateful population gave to them the name, “Our Lady’s Bugs.”

Carl in Greensboro wrote:
Question to you true believers: If you received an invitation to go and opportunity to speak and invoke a prayer or give a message of blessing and encouragement to this president to do good things for the nation and to steer the country to do good and not evil in the world (i.e. the Mexico City Policy) at the inaugural weekend would you have RSVP'd and gone; or would refuse the invitation because "so-and-so" was there?

Dave wrote:
I not scared of you,

John Yurich USA wrote:
I want to put it to rest right now the insane notion that some might have on here that I am autistic. I am not autistic but am a highly intelligent college graduate.