fake news wrote: two different events. I see. You proved your point, sorry I falsely accused you of putting forth fake news. One more question, would you name the Trump policies that have been impacted by that picture?
Was he single then? If yes, Doesn't the cover reinforce dating policies at Liberty U? Its not like The Donald was pictured with someone outside his race
Jim Lincoln wrote: IE, everything that happens in a President's term of office is his fault! Northern and Southern California have a lot of differences, so they might want to split sometime in the future. So while states can't secede from the Union they can split up etc., so who knows what might happen. An interesting history lesson about Texas, [URL=/czybnk]]]http://tinyurl.com/czybnk (The Great Divide---Was Texas authorized to divide into five states?)[/URL]
I see this more as a move against the DNC, than Trump. If CA leaves the Union, Trump has a lock on reelection. I think its a divide and conquer move by Trump forces, and liberal States will be forced to offer CA carrots to stay
ladybug wrote: Christopher You are being baited. Please do not give opportunity for the RCC to be presented in any other light than what it truly is - a Satanic religion that damns all who are deceived by it. Don't be fooled by the newfound 'hospitality' of the Jesuit troll.
Feel free to share your views on Marriages done within the RCC. How can an evil satanic religion perform a Mass that you wouldn't attend result in a Sacred Holy Biblical Marriage?
Chris, (to answer your question) I'm here for he same reason many others are. I'm interested in news articles that deal with my faith.
Thank you for answering my question about confirmation in the RCC. I'm trying to understand the position many put forward on this board. The position that the RCC is a satanic institution unable to merit any good. An institution so satanic that they wont attend any Mass, even a baptism, wedding or funeral. Therein lies my first issue. Do you view your sacred and holy marriage as something unholy done at the feet of Satan? There are Anabaptists, but there aren't Anamarriagists. Even after you leave the RCC, you are still married, a marriage officiated by minion of Satan. Can a True Biblical union take place at the RCC? If yes, then shouldn't antiRCC people be willing to attend a holy sacred event like a RCC wedding? If no, why do even antiRCC Churches view them as valid. I know Paul doesn't say one remarries, but then again Paul didn't say to rebaptize people that were initially too young to understand their commitment or as you say the Gospel Message
I'm running out of room, but I do want to relate this views with views of Baptism, primarily rebaptisms of ex Catholics
You were baptized and married in the RCC, were you confirmed?
I gave you a hard time earlier for not knowing the orders and institutions of the RCC, but I thought if you got married in the RCC you would know. I'm not trying to trap you, just making a point about sacraments. If you at twenty something couldn't discern your marriage taking place at a satanic temple, how can Baptists expect teens to be qualified to be baptized at their age? Yea, you had social pressure, but don't Baptist teens have pressure too?
let me help your discussion wrote: ‚ÄúUnder federal law, the executive branch [of the United States of America] is expressly required to take religion into account in determining who is granted asylum. Under the provision governing asylum (section 1158 of Title 8, US Code), an alien applying for admission must establish that √ā‚Ä¶ religion [among other things] ‚Ä¶ was or will be at least one central reason for persecuting the applicant.‚ÄĚ And it is in the federal statutes! ‚ÄúMoreover, to qualify for asylum in the United States, the applicant must be a ‚Äėrefugee‚Äô as defined by federal law. That definition (set forth in Section 1101(a)(42)(A) of Title , US Code) also requires the executive branch to take account of the alien√ā‚Äôs religion: The term ‚Äėrefugee‚Äô means (A) any person who is outside any country of such person√ā‚Äôs nationality ‚Ä¶ and who is unable or unwilling to return to ‚Ä¶ that country because of persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution on account of ‚Ä¶ religion [among other things] ‚Ä¶[.]‚ÄĚ http://tinyurl.com/pfee4nq
If you play the Executive Order game, you don't have to follow law. You just need to say its in the vital interest of the Country. Cute Trick
The wicked stay up all night, and never receive rest. The righteous are rewarded with rest and contentment
Psalms 127:2 ¬† It is vain for you to rise up early, to sit up late, to eat the bread of sorrows: for so he giveth his beloved sleep.
Revelation 14:10 ¬† The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb:
¬†¬†Revelation 14:11 ¬† And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever: and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name.
Christopher000 wrote: do that all by themselves. No knowledgeable Christian can, in good conscious, defend a religious system which, so arrogantly and defiantly, works against God Himself. We pray for the people, but hate the system which deceives them...
I would argue...No knowledgeable Christian can, in good conscious, attack a religious system which, so arrogantly and defiantly, when they don't understand the system which 1.2 billion Christians belong to
2 Peter 2:10 ¬† But chiefly them that walk after the flesh in the lust of uncleanness, and despise government. Presumptuous are they, selfwilled, they are not afraid to speak evil of dignities.
Christopher000 wrote: Not looking to continue a thread that was shut down, but wanted to respond do to your comment, Ladybug. Thanks for the advice, and I do remember. Honestly, I'm unclear on what a Jesuit even is. I've heard it enough as an insult, so it's time I take a look, I guess. I had assumed it was synonymous with Roman Catholic, basically.
All those years in the RCC, and they never told what a religious order was? What a Jesuit, orders of Dominican, Franciscan? Carmelite? etc was? and what was unique to each institute, society or order?
Its no wonder you fear them, you don't understand them. And now the fake oath is trotted out. You guys have been so beguiled, its pitiful
2 Thessalonians 2:10 ¬† And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.
¬†2 Thessalonians 2:10 ¬† And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.
¬†¬†2 Thessalonians 2:11 ¬† And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:
¬†¬†2 Thessalonians 2:12 ¬† That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unr
Ignominious Emirakan wrote: People who say that Hitler wasn't really elected are usually germanophiles who search for excuses for crimes of NAZI Germans The idea that Hitler wasn‚Äôt elected democratically is an allusion to the fact that he never got more than 50% of the votes (the best result was some 44%).
Or people that understand political systems........
Hitler was more like a Paul Ryan, Nancy Pelosi or Mitch McConnell, than a Donald Trump. He was a party leader. Using party leadership, and a few tricks the entire KPD were arrested, Social Democrats threatened and NAZIs (not Hitler)still only received 44% of the vote in the unfair election of 1933