Michael Hranek wrote:
Elmer
Do you mind telling me what you mean in this "Romans 13 Cult" you are talking about?
Thanks

Mike wrote:
So Graham shouldn't say what he said, though true, because he has planks in his eye, which Biblically speaking must mean America has only splinters in hers. Interesting. Gives a whole new perspective on the nation.
No new perspectives here Mike. But just for giggles, if you had planks in your eye and I had planks in mine, would I be able to see clearly to pull the planks out of your eye without pulling the planks out of mine first? Wouldn't I have responsibility for mine first, removing them thereby giving me clear vision to see yours so I can warn you of them. That's my point Mike, OK? Nothing unbiblical here. No new perspectives, on Paul or anything else.

FG wrote:
Yet Franklin Graham wants these Chinese house churches to forget about obeying God rather than men, and make sure that they obey their government and register their churches with the state approved apostate three self patriotic national church.....right into serfdom.

Do the research wrote:
S.M.A.R.T. (Self-Monitoring, Analysis and Reporting Technology; often written as SMART) is a monitoring system for computer hard disk drives (HDDs) and solid-state drives (SSDs)[1] to detect and report on various indicators of reliability, in the hope of anticipating failures.

Bill Grimes wrote:
Dr. Paisley was a man of whom the world was not worthy!

s c wrote:
I can't help but wonder how the Grahams can speak out of both sides of their mouths. Isn't their sidekick, the "pope", an ardent believer that "The Church regards with esteem also the Muslims. They adore the one God, living and subsisting in himself; merciful and all-powerful, the Creator of heaven and earth, who has spoken to men;" as quoted on the catholic website?
The Grahams have some planks to pull from their own eyes before they try to call the nation(s) to repentance or warn people that the end is near. they need to settle it that either the Gospel of Rome is the Gospel, or the Gospel of Liberalism is the Gospel or the Biblical Gospel is the Gospel, because they don't even try to differentiate between the three. If one believes that a man is saved by the atoning works of Christ on the cross and his righteousness imputed, obtained by the instrument of faith alone, then one should not, implicitly or explicitly, promote the Pope of Rome or the Bishop of Canterbury as somehow being the spiritual friends of Christians.

Christopher000 wrote:
SteveR Write:
"Im glad that the RCC still reads the Lords Prayer, too many independent baptist churches wont. They say it the 'apostles' prayer and that the kingdom was declined.
So sad that the RCC is MORE Biblical in this way than many Protestant Churches today."
Steve, I think it's wrong to continue giving John little nuggets of affirmation by defending the system he holds so dearly because he's shy. Every time you defend the church of Rome, you're condoning and strengthing his position, in his mind, because it makes him think you agree that there's no reason for him to come out as a born again Christian. No matter how much you hate everyone, you know that the mass itself and aligning oneself with the false doctrines of Rome while claiming to be a born again Christian is to defy the very God you claim to embrace.